English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46339811      Online Users : 376
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119804


    Title: 企業環境管理與經濟績效關聯之實證研究 -以A公司為例
    An Empirical Exploration of the Relationship Between Corporate Environmental Management (CEM) and Corporation Financial Performance (CFP): A Case Study
    Authors: 李可點
    Lee, Ko-Tien
    Contributors: 羅明琇
    劉世慶

    Lo, Ming-Shio
    Liu, Shih-Ching

    李可點
    Lee, Ko-Tien
    Keywords: 企業環境管理
    經濟績效
    水資源管理
    高階經營團隊
    Environmental management
    Financial performance
    Water management
    Top management team
    Date: 2018
    Issue Date: 2018-08-29 16:04:48 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 企業環境管理(corporate environmental management CEM)與企業經濟績效(corporate financial performance CFP)間的正向/負向關係在過去已有許多研究與討論,本研究深入探討調節變數如高階經理團隊、供應商及客戶對於企業環境管理與企業經濟績效關係的影響程度。在探討企業環境管理與企業經濟績效關係時,過往研究使用不同的變數來衡量。企業環境管理可分成三種措施:污染控制、污染預防、產品責任。衡量企業環境管理績效可使用三種指標:環境管理指標(EMV)、環境績效指標(EPV)、環境資訊指標(EDV)。企業經濟績效亦可使用三種指標衡量:會計指標、市場指標(投資人導向與顧客導向)及組織指標。本研究針對台灣薄膜電晶體液晶顯示器製造廠商,探討其水資源管理與經濟績效之關聯。本論文使用環境管理指標作為企業環境管理績效指標,並使用顧客導向市場指標及組織指標探討企業經濟績效。藉由半結構式訪談,本研究歸納出環境管理指標與顧客導向市場指標及組織指標間存在無關聯、正向及負向關係。在大部分水資源政策下,環境管理指標及顧客導向市場指標間無關聯。企業環境管理導致成本增加,亦會對利害關係人溝通造成負面影響。本研究亦發現環境管理指標和顧客導向市場指標及組織指標存有正向關係,企業環境管理減少成本、改善公司名譽及利害關係人溝通,並降低營運風險。本研究亦提出高階經營團隊,相較供應商及客戶,其調節角色較為明顯。高階經營團隊的支持有助於將企業環境管理正向地連結至企業經濟績效。
    The direction of relationship between corporate environmental management (CEM) and corporate financial performance (CFP) has long been debated. The moderating roles of top management team (TMT), suppliers and customers have received much attention as well. Different research uses various variables in determining the relationship. CEM practices are classified into three categories: pollution control, pollution prevention and product stewardship. To determine CEM performance, three indicators are identified: environmental management variable (EMVs), environmental performance variables (EPV) and environmental disclosure variables (EDV). CFP is categorized into three variables as well: accounting-based (accounting returns), market-based (investor-oriented and customer-oriented) and organizational measures. This research focuses on a Taiwanese TFT-LCD manufacturer and studies its CEM and CFP relationship in terms of water management. The thesis uses EMV as CEM indicator, and customer-oriented market indicator and organizational measures as CFP indicators. Through semi-structure interview, the research concludes undetermined, negative and positive relationship. Most water management approaches demonstrate no clear relationship with customer-oriented indicator. CEM leads to negative CFP in terms of increasing cost, and surprisingly, stakeholder communication. Positive relationship between CEM and CFP is found in terms of cost advantage, brand reputation, stakeholder communication and risk prevention. The research also proposes the moderating role of TMT, suppliers and customers. TMT’s support is of great importance in the linkage of positive CEM with CFP.
    Reference: 中華民國台灣薄膜電晶體液晶顯示器產業協會. (2011). 產業聚落. Retrieved from http://www.ttla.org.tw/cluster/
    行政院環境保護署. (2018). 行政院環境保護署水質保護網. Retrieved from https://water.epa.gov.tw
    蔡人傑. (2017). 年度節水推動成果說明. Retrieved from http://www.edf.org.tw/Documents/1-節水推動成果說明.pdf
    Albertini, E. (2013). Does environmental management improve financial performance? A meta-analytical review. Organization & Environment, 26(4), 431-457.
    Anyan, F. (2013). The influence of power shifts in data collection and analysis stages: A focus on qualitative research interview. The Qualitative Report, 18(18), 1.
    Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of management review, 28(1), 71-88.
    Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative research, 1(3), 385-405.
    Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of management Journal, 43(4), 717-736.
    Blacconiere, W. G., & Northcut, W. D. (1997). Environmental information and market reactions to environmental legislation. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 12(2), 149-178.
    Blacconiere, W. G., & Patten, D. M. (1994). Environmental disclosures, regulatory costs, and changes in firm value. Journal of accounting and economics, 18(3), 357-377.
    Bowen, F. E., Cousins, P. D., Lamming, R. C., & Farukt, A. C. (2001). The role of supply management capabilities in green supply. Production and operations management, 10(2), 174-189.
    Bowling, A. (2014). Research methods in health: investigating health and health services: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
    Brinkmann, S. (2014). Interview Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp. 1008-1010): Springer.
    Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2008). Ethics in qualitative psychological research. The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology, 24(2), 263-279.
    Bryman, A. (2001). The nature of qualitative research. Social research methods, 264-288.
    Campos, L. M., & Vazquez-Brust, D. A. (2016). Lean and green synergies in supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 21(5), 627-641.
    Cassells, S., & Lewis, K. (2011). SMEs and environmental responsibility: do actions reflect attitudes? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(3), 186-199.
    Chen, Y.-T., & Chen, C.-C. (2014). An analysis of domestic water management performance across regions in Taiwan. Water Policy, 16(4), 704-719.
    Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of management Journal, 43(4), 663-680.
    Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (2000). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation Strategic Learning in a Knowledge economy (pp. 39-67): Elsevier.
    Delmas, M., Hoffmann, V. H., & Kuss, M. (2011). Under the tip of the iceberg: Absorptive capacity, environmental strategy, and competitive advantage. Business & Society, 50(1), 116-154.
    Delmas, M. A., & Pekovic, S. (2015). Resource efficiency strategies and market conditions. Long Range Planning, 48(2), 80-94.
    Denzin, N. (1970). Strategies of multiple triangulation. The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological method, 297, 313.
    Edwards, R., & Holland, J. (2013). What is qualitative interviewing? : A&C Black.
    Elsayed, K., & Paton, D. (2005). The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: static and dynamic panel data evidence. Structural change and economic dynamics, 16(3), 395-412.
    Florida, R. (1996). Lean and green: the move to environmentally conscious manufacturing. California management review, 39(1), 80-105.
    Gascoigne, J. (2002). Supply chain management—project acorn. Corporate Environmental Strategy, 9(1), 62-68.
    Geffen Charlette A., R. S. (2000). Suppliers and environmental innovation: The automotive paint process. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(2), 166-186. doi:doi:10.1108/01443570010304242
    Gilley, K. M., Worrell, D. L., Davidson III, W. N., & El–Jelly, A. (2000). Corporate environmental initiatives and anticipated firm performance: the differential effects of process-driven versus product-driven greening initiatives. Journal of management, 26(6), 1199-1216.
    Given, L. M. (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods: Sage Publications.
    Green Jr, K. W., Zelbst, P. J., Bhadauria, V. S., & Meacham, J. (2012). Do environmental collaboration and monitoring enhance organizational performance? Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(2), 186-205.
    Green Jr, K. W., Zelbst, P. J., Meacham, J., & Bhadauria, V. S. (2012). Green supply chain management practices: impact on performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(3), 290-305.
    Green, K., Morton, B., & New, S. (1996). Purchasing and environmental management: interactions, policies and opportunities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(3), 188-197.
    Grossman, W., & Hoskisson, R. E. (1998). CEO pay at the crossroads of Wall Street and Main: Toward the strategic design of executive compensation. The Academy of Management Executive, 12(1), 43-57.
    Hall, J. (2000). Environmental supply chain dynamics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 8, 455-471.
    Hallam, C., & Contreras, C. (2016). Integrating lean and green management. Management Decision, 54(9), 2157-2187.
    Hamilton, J. T. (1995). Pollution as news: media and stock market reactions to the toxics release inventory data. Journal of environmental economics and management, 28(1), 98-113.
    Handfield, R., Krause, D., Scannell, T. and Monczka, R. (2000). Avoid the pitfalls in supplier development. Sloan Management Review, 41(2), 37-49.
    Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of management review, 20(4), 986-1014.
    Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30-37.
    Iwata, H., & Okada, K. (2011). How does environmental performance affect financial performance? Evidence from Japanese manufacturing firms. Ecological Economics, 70(9), 1691-1700.
    Jabbour, C. J. C., Da Silva, E. M., Paiva, E. L., & Santos, F. C. A. (2012). Environmental management in Brazil: is it a completely competitive priority? Journal of Cleaner Production, 21(1), 11-22.
    Judge, W. Q., & Douglas, T. J. (1998). Performance implications of incorporating natural environmental issues into the strategic planning process: an empirical assessment. Journal of management Studies, 35(2), 241-262.
    Kagan, R. A., Gunningham, N., & Thornton, D. (2003). Explaining corporate environmental performance: how does regulation matter? Law & Society Review, 37(1), 51-90.
    Kaldor, N. (1966). Marginal productivity and the macro-economic theories of distribution: comment on Samuelson and Modigliani. The Review of Economic Studies, 33(4), 309-319.
    Kimchi, J., Polivka, B., & Stevenson, J. S. (1991). Triangulation: operational definitions. Nursing research, 40(6), 364-366.
    King, A., & Lenox, M. (2001). Does It Really Pay to Be Green? An Empirical Study of Firm Environmental and Financial Performance. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5, 105-116.
    King, A., & Lenox, M. (2002). Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Science, 48(2), 289-299.
    Klassen, R. D., & McLaughlin, C. P. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42(8), 1199-1214.
    Klassen, R. D., & Whybark, D. C. (1999). The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Academy of management Journal, 42(6), 599-615.
    Konar, S., & Cohen, M. A. (1997). Information as regulation: The effect of community right to know laws on toxic emissions. Journal of environmental Economics and Management, 32(1), 109-124.
    Krasnikov, A., Mishra, S., & Orozco, D. (2009). Evaluating the financial impact of branding using trademarks: a framework and empirical evidence. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 154-166.
    Krut, R., & Karasin, L. (1999). Supply chain environmental management: lessons from leaders in the electronics industry. United States-Asia Environmental Management.
    Kurapatskie, B., & Darnall, N. (2013). Which corporate sustainability activities are associated with greater financial payoffs? Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(1), 49-61.
    Lamming, R., & Hampson, J. (1996). The Environment as a Supply Chain Management Issue. British Journal of Management, 7(s1), S45-S62. doi:doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.1996.tb00147.x
    Lewis, H. (2017). Product Stewardship in Action: The Business Case for Life-cycle Thinking: Routledge.
    Lorraine, N. H. J., Collison, D. J., & Power, D. M. (2004). An analysis of the stock market impact of environmental performance information. Accounting Forum, 28(1), 7-26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2004.04.002
    Lozano, R. (2015). A holistic perspective on corporate sustainability drivers. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(1), 32-44.
    Lu, K.-c., & Liu, K. (2018). Taiwan: The Water-starved Island. Retrieved from https://english.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=1876
    Matos, S., & Hall, J. (2007). Integrating sustainable development in the supply chain: The case of life cycle assessment in oil and gas and agricultural biotechnology. Journal of operations management, 25(6), 1083-1102.
    Melnyk, S. A., Sroufe, R. P., & Calantone, R. (2003). Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance. Journal of operations management, 21(3), 329-351.
    Menguc, B., Auh, S., & Ozanne, L. (2010). The interactive effect of internal and external factors on a proactive environmental strategy and its influence on a firm`s performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(2), 279-298.
    Molina-Azorín, J. F., Claver-Cortés, E., López-Gamero, M. D., & Tarí, J. J. (2009). Green management and financial performance: a literature review. Management Decision, 47(7), 1080-1100.
    Montabon, F., Sroufe, R., & Narasimhan, R. (2007). An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and firm performance. Journal of operations management, 25(5), 998-1014.
    Murray, A., Sinclair, D., Power, D., & Gray, R. (2006). Do financial markets care about social and environmental disclosure? Further evidence and exploration from the UK. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(2), 228-255.
    O`Reilly, M., Wathey, D., & Gelber, M. (2000). ISO 14031: Effective mechanism to environmental performance evaluation. Corporate Environmental Strategy, 7(3), 267-275.
    Papadakis, V. M., & Barwise, P. (2002). How much do CEOs and top managers matter in strategic decision‐making? British Journal of Management, 13(1), 83-95.
    Papagiannakis, G., & Lioukas, S. (2012). Values, attitudes and perceptions of managers as predictors of corporate environmental responsiveness. Journal of Environmental Management, 100, 41-51.
    Parikka-Alhola, K. (2008). Promoting environmentally sound furniture by green public procurement. Ecological Economics, 68(1-2), 472-485.
    Passetti, E., Cinquini, L., Marelli, A., & Tenucci, A. (2014). Sustainability accounting in action: Lights and shadows in the Italian context. The British Accounting Review, 46(3), 295-308.
    Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods: SAGE Publications, inc.
    Porter, M., & Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. The Dynamics of the eco-efficient economy: environmental regulation and competitive advantage, 33.
    Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of economic perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.
    Power, D. F. S. a. D. J. (2005). Use the supply relationship to develop lean and green suppliers. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 10(1), 60-76.
    Przychodzen, J., & Przychodzen, W. (2015). Relationships between eco-innovation and financial performance–evidence from publicly traded companies in Poland and Hungary. Journal of Cleaner Production, 90, 253-263.
    Rao, P. (2002). Greening the supply chain: a new initiative in South East Asia. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(6), 632-655.
    Rozar, N. M., Mahmood, W. H. W., Ibrahim, A., & Razik, M. A. (2015). A study of success factors in green supply chain management in manufacturing industries in Malaysia. J Econ Bus Manag, 3(2), 287-291.
    Rubin, H., & Rubin, I. (1995). Foundations of qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data, 17-41.
    Rusinko, C. (2007). Green manufacturing: an evaluation of environmentally sustainable manufacturing practices and their impact on competitive outcomes. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(3), 445-454.
    Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of management Journal, 40(3), 534-559.
    Saeidi, S. P., Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S. P., & Saaeidi, S. A. (2015). How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 341-350.
    Sarkis, J., & Cordeiro, J. J. (2001). An empirical evaluation of environmental efficiencies and firm performance: pollution prevention versus end-of-pipe practice. European Journal of Operational Research, 135(1), 102-113.
    Scannell, T., Vickery, S. and Droge, C. (2000). Upstream supply chain management and competitive performance in the automotive supply industry. Journal of Business Logistics, 21(1), 23-48.
    Schmidheiny, S. (1992). Changing course: A global business perspective on development and the environment (Vol. 1): MIT press.
    Schultze, W., & Trommer, R. (2012). The concept of environmental performance and its measurement in empirical studies. Journal of Management Control, 22(4), 375-412.
    Sharma, S. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of management Journal, 43(4), 681-697.
    Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic management journal, 729-753.
    Simpson, D. F., & Power, D. J. (2005). Use the supply relationship to develop lean and green suppliers. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 10(1), 60-68.
    Singleton, R. A., & Straits, B. C. (2002). Survey interviewing. Handbook of interview research: Context and method, 59-82.
    Smith, D. (2014). Environmental performance evaluation helping business deliver more than just savings. Retrieved from https://www.bsigroup.com/PageFiles/323397/ISO-14031-article.docx
    Srivastava, S. K. (2007). Green supply‐chain management: a state‐of‐the‐art literature review. International journal of management reviews, 9(1), 53-80.
    Sroufe, R. (2003). Effects of environmental management systems on environmental management practices and operations. Production and operations management, 12(3), 416-431.
    Stefan, A., & Paul, L. (2008). Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(4), 45-62.
    Stephan Vachon, R. D. K. (2006). Extending green practices across the supply chain The impact of upstream and downstream integration. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(7), 795-821.
    Stephan Vachona, R. D. K. (2008). Environmental management and manufacturing performance: The role of collaboration in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 111, 299–315.
    Theyel, G. (2000). Management practices for environmental innovation and performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(2), 249-266.
    Thurmond, V. A. (2001). The point of triangulation. Journal of nursing scholarship, 33(3), 253-258.
    Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2006a). Extending green practices across the supply chain: the impact of upstream and downstream integration. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(7), 795-821.
    Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2006b). Green project partnership in the supply chain: the case of the package printing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(6-7), 661-671.
    Vasileiou, K., & Morris, J. (2006). The sustainability of the supply chain for fresh potatoes in Britain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(4), 317-327.
    Wagner, M., Van Phu, N., Azomahou, T., & Wehrmeyer, W. (2002). The relationship between the environmental and economic performance of firms: an empirical analysis of the European paper industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9(3), 133-146.
    Walls, J. L., Phan, P. H., & Berrone, P. (2011). Measuring environmental strategy: Construct development, reliability, and validity. Business & Society, 50(1), 71-115.
    Warren, C. A. (2002). Qualitative interviewing. Handbook of interview research: Context and method, 839101.
    Williams, S., & Schaefer, A. (2013). Small and medium‐sized enterprises and sustainability: Managers` values and engagement with environmental and climate change issues. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(3), 173-186.
    Wilmshurst, T. D., & Frost, G. R. (2000). Corporate environmental reporting: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(1), 10-26.
    Wood, D. J., & Jones, R. E. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(3), 229-267.
    Yang, M. G. M., Hong, P., & Modi, S. B. (2011). Impact of lean manufacturing and environmental management on business performance: An empirical study of manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 129(2), 251-261.
    Yu, V., Ting, H.-I., & Jim Wu, Y.-C. (2009). Assessing the greenness effort for European firms: A resource efficiency perspective. Management Decision, 47(7), 1065-1079.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)
    105363034
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105363034
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.MBA.071.2018.F08
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    303401.pdf2173KbAdobe PDF29View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback