English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 83053/111947 (74%)
造訪人次 : 21700806      線上人數 : 745
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/119878
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119878


    題名: 共同基金資金流向與指數報酬關係研究-以法人及散戶角度分析
    The relationship between Aggregate Fund Flow and Index Returns-an institutional-retail investor perspective
    作者: 王子維
    Wang, Tzu-Wei
    貢獻者: 岳夢蘭
    Yueh, Meng-Lan
    王子維
    Wang, Tzu-Wei
    關鍵詞: 共同基金資金流
    機構投資人
    散戶投資人
    投資人風險情緒
    Mutual fund flow
    Institutional investors
    Retail investors
    Investor sentiment
    日期: 2018
    上傳時間: 2018-09-03 15:47:18 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究運用週資料針對美國股票型、新興市場股票型、北美高收益債券型以及北美投資等級債券型之整體、散戶以及法人共同基金資金流向與指數報酬間關係做探討。結果發現兩者在當期存在高度的正向關係。而針對兩者之因果關係之分析則發現,遞延一或兩期之指數報酬對於當期共同基金資金流有相當顯著之正向影響,也就是投資人具有正向回饋交易之行為,而散戶及機構法人皆有同樣的情況。反向關係的探討上,資金流對於指數報酬之價格衝擊的效果則不明顯,此與過去研究的結果一致。

    另外,對於機構法人及散戶資金流間關係的分析中發現,散戶有跟隨法人資金流之傾向。雖然研究觀察到法人在新興市場股票共同基金有跟隨散戶資金流的情形,但這可能仍是理性之投資行為,這也隱含了機構法人相對散戶投資人確實具有較充分之資訊。而針對共同基金資金流是否為良好之風險情緒指標之分析顯示,法人資金流是反映投資人風險情緒較好之指標。散戶投資人之資金流則是會在情緒好轉或惡化後,才會在下一週有實際資金流入或流出的反應。
    In this paper, we study the relation between weekly market index returns and aggregate fund flow into U.S. equity, emerging market equity, North America high yield bond and North America investment grade bond. Aggregate fund flow data of each asset class are divided into retail and institutional flow as well. The concurrent relation between flow and return is positive and highly correlated. Our tests also indicate that aggregate flow generally follows index returns with one or two-week lag, which suggests positive feedback-trading of both retail and institutional investors. Nonetheless, we have not found evidence to support the price impact of fund flow on market returns.

    Further, when it comes to the relation between retail and institutional fund flow, tests show that retail investors would follow institutional investors on the weekly basis. Institutional investors, however, only follows retail investors in emerging market equity with rational reasons. This might imply that institutional investors are more informed and sophisticated than retail investors. As for the analysis of fund flow and investor sentiments, the result shows retail investor flow follows sentiment indicator with a one-week lag, while concurrent institutional flow and investor sentiments are positively correlated.
    參考文獻: Avramov, D., Chordia, T., and Goyal, A. (2006). Liquidity and autocorrelations in individual stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(5), 2365-2394.

    Barclay, M. J., and Warner, J. B. (1993). Stealth trading and volatility: Which trades move prices?. Journal of Financial Economics, 34(3), 281-305.

    Chakravarty, S. (2001). Stealth-trading: Which traders’ trades move stock prices?. Journal of Financial Economics, 61(2), 289-307.

    De Long, J. B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L. H., and Waldmann, R. J. (1990). Noise trader risk in financial markets. Journal of Political Economy, 98(4), 703-738.

    Edelen, R. M., and Warner, J. B. (2001). Aggregate price effects of institutional trading: a study of mutual fund flow and market returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 59(2), 195-220.

    Edwards, F. R., and Zhang, X. (1998). Mutual funds and stock and bond market stability. Journal of Financial Services Research, 13(3), 257-282.

    Fisher, K. L., and Statman, M. (2000). Investor sentiment and stock returns. Financial Analysts Journal, 56(2), 16-23.

    Gervais, S., Kaniel, R., and Mingelgrin, D. H. (2001). The high‐volume return premium. The Journal of Finance, 56(3), 877-919.

    Greenwood, R. (2007). Excess comovement of stock returns: Evidence from cross-sectional variation in Nikkei 225 weights. The Review of Financial Studies, 21(3), 1153-1186.

    Harris, L., and Gurel, E. (1986). Price and volume effects associated with changes in the S&P 500 list: New evidence for the existence of price pressures. the Journal of Finance, 41(4), 815-829.

    Humphrey, J. E., Benson, K. L., and Brailsford, T. J. (2013). Do Fund Flow‐Return Relations Depend on the Type of Investor? A Research Note. Abacus, 49(1), 34-45.
    James, C., and Karceski, J. (2006). Investor monitoring and differences in mutual fund performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(10), 2787-2808.

    Jegadeesh, N., and Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65-91.

    Kaniel, R., Saar, G., and Titman, S. (2008). Individual investor trading and stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 63(1), 273-310.

    Keswani, A., and Stolin, D. (2006). Mutual Fund Performance Perspective and Competition: A Cross‐Sector Analysis. Journal of Financial Research, 29(3), 349-366.

    Lee, C., Shleifer, A., and Thaler, R. H. (1991). Investor sentiment and the closed‐end fund puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 46(1), 75-109.

    Lee, Y. T., Liu, Y. J., Roll, R., and Subrahmanyam, A. (2004). Order imbalances and market efficiency: Evidence from the Taiwan Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 39(2), 327-341.

    Llorente, G., Michaely, R., Saar, G., and Wang, J. (2002). Dynamic volume-return relation of individual stocks. The Review of Financial Studies, 15(4), 1005-1047.

    McCullough, B. D. (1997). An analysis of stock market transactions data. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 37(4), 887-903.

    Shleifer, A., and Summers, L. H. (1990). The noise trader approach to finance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(2), 19-33.

    Warther, V. A. (1995). Aggregate mutual fund flows and security returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 39(2-3), 209-235.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理學系
    105357014
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105357014
    資料類型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.Finance.023.2018.F07
    顯示於類別:[財務管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML9檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋