政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/119966
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 109952/140887 (78%)
造访人次 : 46346102      在线人数 : 1432
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119966


    题名: 從基頻晶片產業探討於標準必要專利FRAND授權制度中之應對之道—以Qualcomm受裁罰案為中心
    A Study of the Way to Deal with the FRAND Licensing Terms of Standard Essential Patents from the Baseband Chips Industry—Focusing on Case of Qualcomm
    作者: 李雅婷
    Lee, Ya-Ting
    贡献者: 陳桂恒
    Chan, Kwei-Hang
    李雅婷
    Lee, Ya-Ting
    关键词: 標準必要專利
    公平合理無歧視
    拒絕授權
    關鍵設施理論
    誠信協商
    合理權利金
    SEP
    FRAND
    Refusal of license
    Essential facilities doctrine
    Good-faith negotiation
    Reasonable loyalty
    日期: 2018
    上传时间: 2018-09-03 16:01:57 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 　　隨著行動通訊技術革新，人類的生活方式產生前所未有的巨大變化，而行動通訊因具備兼容性之特質，為求相關技術之效率與普及，目前主流作法係藉由國際標準制定組織依據一定的組織規章制定行動通訊標準，並且為了防免標準必要專利權人濫用其市場支配地位而有害於創新與市場競爭，標準制定組織規定其應遵孚智慧財產政策以及FRAND授權承諾，惟FRAND授權制度因其定義未明等原因，在國際授權實務上產生諸多競爭法爭議。
    　　故本研究係自專利與標準必要專利FRAND授權制度出發，研究美國、日本、歐盟、我國以及中國大陸相關之競爭法規範，再核心討論目前國際主流國家對高通案之處置情形，接著由標準必要專利授權所產生之競爭法重要爭議中選取標準必要專利權人拒絕授權、專利箝制以及合理授權金此三大議題，分析近年來國際主流見解，最終基於前述研究內容進行綜合討論，並對於台灣在基頻晶片產業現況與FRAND授權制度之中，提出可能的應對方案，期許能夠對於未來日趨多變之基頻晶片領域提供一些討論方向。
    　　With the innovation of mobile communication technology, it has brought unprecedented changes to the lifestyle of human beings. Because of the compatibility of mobile communication, to the efficiency and popularity of related technologies, the mains tream is setting Standard of Essential Patents (SEPs) by Standard-setting Organization (SSO). And in order to prevent the SEP holders abuse of market dominance and being harmful to the innovation incentive and competition, the SEP holder must abide by the intellectual property policy and FRAND license terms of SSO. However, because of the ambiguous definition of FRAND, there are many disputes in competition law when licensing.
    　　This research will starts from the patent and SEPs, FRAND terms, the relevant competition regulations of the United States, Japan, the European Union, Taiwan and China, and then focus on the current situation of the international mainstream countries in the Qualcomm case, then discuss three vital disputes of the competition law cause by SEP licensing—refusal of license, patent hold-up and good-faith negotiation, reasonable loyalty, and analyze the mainstream opinions internationally in the recent years. In the conclusion, there will be comprehensive discussions based on the contents mentioned above for Taiwan. In the current situation of the baseband chip industry and the FRAND licensing terms, a possible solution will be proposed to provide insights for the fast-changing future of baseband chips industry.
    參考文獻: 一、中文文獻
    （一）書籍
    1.陳敏，(2007)。行政法總論。台北：新學林。
    2.王居尉，(2009)。行動通訊導論。台北：學貫。
    3.黃銘傑，(2009)。競爭法與智慧財產權法之交會－相生與相剋之間。台北：元照。
    4.楊智傑，(2014)。專利法。台北：新學林。
    5.曾勝珍，(2015)。圖解智慧財產權。台北：五南圖書。
    6.劉孔中，(2015)。解構智財法及其與競爭法的衝突與調和。台北：新學林。
    7.洪德欽等，(2015)。歐盟法之基礎原則與實務發展(上)。台北：臺大出版中心。
    8.周延鵬、張淑真、曾志偉、汪忠輝，(2015)。致富密碼：智慧財產運營及貨幣化。台北：天下雜誌。
    9.曾恕銘，(2016)。無線通訊系統概論：行動通訊與網路。台北：台灣東華。
    10.劉尚志、陳在方，(2017)。台灣科技產業美國專利訴訟30年之回顧。台北：元照。
    11.劉尚志、李偉綺、呂柔慧，(2018)。專利評價與損害賠償。台北：元照。
    （二）期刊論文
    1.劉孔中、簡維克，(2009)。CD-R案之解析與評釋－以公平法與專利強制授權為重心。公平交易季刊，第17卷第1期。頁1-38。
    2.林平，(2015)。標準必要專利FRAND許可的經濟分析與反壟斷啟示。財經問題研究，6，3-12。
    3.楊宏暉，(2015)。標準關鍵專利之濫用與限制競爭。公平交易季刊，第23卷第4期，頁35-86。
    4.陳皓芸，(2015)。標準必要專利權之行使、權利濫用與獨占地位濫用。公平交易季刊，第25卷第1期，頁81-130。
    5.沈宗倫，(2017)。標準必要專利之法定授權與專利權濫用──以誠實信用原則為中心。政大法學評論，第149期，頁1-83。
    6.楊智傑，(2018)。高通行動通訊標準必要專利授權與競爭法:大陸、南韓、歐盟、美國、臺灣裁罰案之比較。公平交易季刊，第26卷第2期，頁1-54。
    7.盧憶，(2018)。通信技術標準下的專利許可爭議－以美國法為例。法治現代化研究，2018年第2期，頁159-172。
    （三）碩博士學位論文
    1.邱筱婷 (2011)。行動通訊產業軟硬體整合策略分析。國立政治大學商管專業學院碩士學位學程碩士學位論文。
    2.李兆國 (2003)。標準制定組織及標準專利權之爭議。國立交通大學科技法律研究所碩士論文。
    （四）行政處分與法院判決
    1.公平交易委員會公處字第095156號處分書。
    2.公平交易委員會處分書公處字第106094號。
    3.中華人民共和國國家發展和改革委員會行政處罰決定書發改辦價監處罰〔2015〕1號。
    4.智慧財產法院106年度民暫字第10號裁定。
    （五）網際網路
    1.中華人民共和國國家工商行政管理總局令，關於禁止濫用智慧財產權排除、限制競爭行為的規定，上網日期2018年5月21日。檢自：http://home.saic.gov.cn/fgs/zcfg/201507/t20150721_192800.html
    2.中國國務院反壟斷委員會，關於濫用智慧財產權的反壟斷指南（徵求意見稿），上網日期2018年5月21日，檢自：http://images.mofcom.gov.cn/fldj/201703/20170323141351774.doc
    3.中央銀行經濟研究處 (2018年2月)，中華民國國際收支平衡表季報，上網日期2018年5月21日，檢自：https://www.cbc.gov.tw/public/Attachment/822316242771.pdf
    4.中華人民共和國國家發展和改革委員會，國務院關於印發《中國製造 2025》的通知，上網日期2018年3月15日，檢自：http://iknow.stpi.narl.org.tw/Post/Files/%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B%E5%A4%A7%E9%99%B8%E5%9C%8B%E5%8B%99%E9%99%A2%E9%97%9C%E6%96%BC%E5%8D%B0%E7%99%BC%E3%80%8A%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B%E8%A3%BD%E9%80%A02025%E3%80%8B%E7%9A%84%E9%80%9A%E7%9F%A5.pdf
    5.中華人民共和國國家發展和改革委員會，國家發展改革委對高通公司壟斷行為責令整改並罰款60億元，上網日期2018年1月3日，檢自：http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xwzx/xwfb/201502/t20150210_663822.html
    6.邱金蘭，高通裁罰案 經濟部槓公平會，聯合新聞網，上網日期2018年4月11日，檢自：https://udn.com/news/story/7240/2763275?from=crm4-referralnews_ch2artbottom
    7.張建中，工研院證實高通暫停5G合作 影響評估中。中央通訊社，上網日期2018年4月11日，檢自：http://www.cna.com.tw/news/ait/201710250150-1.aspx
    8.賴佩璇，經濟部批評公平會裁罰高通 科法學者：逾越行政權限，聯合新聞網，上網日期2018年4月11日，檢自：https://udn.com/news/story/7321/2782767
    9.林菁樺 (20118/4/11)，經長︰與高通5G合作案 已恢復，自由時報，上網日期2018年4月11日，檢自：http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/business/paper/1171676
    10.黃珮君。林百里批高通案對產業不利 經長：將再約高通談，自由時報，上網日期2018年3月19日，檢自：http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/business/breakingnews/2253972
    11.潘姿羽，金價罰鍰近在眼前，公平會：高通已陸續匯入台灣，經濟日報，上網日期2018年3月14日，檢自：https://udn.com/news/story/7240/2909829
    12.公平交易委員會新聞資料　(2017/10/11)。公平交易委員會，上網日期2018年月日，檢自：https://www.ftc.gov.tw/internet/main/doc/docDetail.aspx?uid=126&docid=15235.
    13.張煌仁 (2015/9/22)，WiMAX業者：政府騙了我們，ETToday新聞雲，上網日期2018年5月14日，檢自：httｐs://www.ettoday.net/news/20150922/568432.htm
    14.曲建仲 (2014/9/29)。你真的都搞懂了嗎？數位通訊新世代，科學月刊，上網日期2018年5月14日，檢自：http://scimonth.blogspot.tw/2014/09/blog-post_3.html
    二、英文文獻
    （一）專書
    Steven Anderman and Ariel Ezrachi, (2011). Intellectual Property and Competition Law: New Frontiers. New York: Oxford University Press.
    （二）期刊
    1.Mark A. Lemley and David McGowan, (1998). Legal Implications of Network Economic Effects, 86 Cal. L. Rev. 479.
    2.Mark A. Lemley, (2002). Intellectual Property Rights and Standard-Setting Organizations, 90 Cal. L. Rev. 1889..
    3.John C. Jarosz & Michael J. Chapman, (2013). The hypothetical negotiation and reasonable royalty damages: the tail wagging the dog. Stanford Technology Law Review Volume 16, Number 3 Spring 2013. Retrieved from: http://www.analysisgroup.com/uploadedfiles/content/insights/publishing/stlr_hypothetical_negotiation_royalty_damages_jarosz_chapman.pdf
    4.Mark A. Lemley and Carl Shapiro, (2013). A Simple Approach to Setting Reasonable Royalties for Standard-Essential Patents, 28 Berkeley Tech. L.J. Available at: http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/btlj/vol28/iss2/2.
    5.Jorge L. Contreras, (2018). The Global Standards Wars: Patent and Competition Disputes in North America, Europe and Asia.
    （三）判決
    1.Georgia-Pac. Corp. v. U.S. Plywood Corp., 318 F. Supp. 1116 (S.D.N.Y. 1970), modified sub nom. Georgia-Pac. Corp. v. U.S. Plywood-Champion Papers, Inc., 446 F.2d 295 (2d Cir. 1971)
    2.MCI Commc`ns Corp. v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 708 F.2d 1081 (7th Cir. 1983).
    3.Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp., 472 U.S. 585, 105 S. Ct. 2847, 86 L. Ed. 2d 467 (1985).
    4.MetroNet Servs. Corp. v. Qwest Corp., 383 F.3d 1124, 1131 (9th Cir. 2004).
    5.Verizon Commc`ns Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP, 540 U.S. 398, 411, 124 S. Ct. 872, 881, 157 L. Ed. 2d 823 (2004).
    6.Broadcom Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc., 501 F.3d 297, 313 (3d Cir 2007).
    7.Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 127 S. Ct. 1955, 167 L. Ed. 2d 929 (2007).
    8.Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Elecs., Inc., 553 U.S. 617, 629, 128 S. Ct. 2109, 2117, 170 L. Ed. 2d 996 (2008).
    9.Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 173 L. Ed. 2d 868 (2009).
    10.Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc., 696 F.3d 872, 878 (9th Cir. 2012).
    11.Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc., No. C10-1823JLR, 2013 WL 2111217 (W.D. Wash. Apr. 25, 2013).
    12.Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc., 795 F.3d 1024 (9th Cir. 2015).
    13.Federal Trade Commission v. Qualcomm Incorporated,No. 17-CV-00220-LHK, at 5 (N.D. Cal, 2017).
    14.In re Qualcomm Antitrust Litig., 292 F. Supp. 3d 948 (N.D. Cal. 2017).
    15.Federal Trade Commission v. Qualcomm Incorporated, No. 17-CV-00220-LHK, (N.D. Cal, 2017).
    16.Impression Prod., Inc. v. Lexmark Int`l, Inc., 137 S. Ct. 1523, 1531, 198 L. Ed. 2d 1 (2017).
    17.Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v ZTE Corp. and ZTE Deutschland GmbH., Case C-170/13, European Court of Justice.
    18.Orange-Book-Standard, available at: http://www.ie-forum.nl/backoffice/uploads/file/IEForum/IEForum%20Uitspraken/Octrooirecht/EN%20Translation%20BGH%20Orange%20Book%20Standard%20-%20eng.pdf (last visited:2018/4/10).
    19.Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc., 795 F.3d 1024 (9th Cir. 2015).
    （四）報告或官方文件
    1.European Commission, 19th IBA Competition Conference, Florence 11 September 2015 – version 01, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2014-2019/vestager/announcements/intellectual-property-and-competition_en
    2.Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation No 1/2003 . https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A52006XC0901%2801%29.
    3.Statement of Enforcement Principles Regarding “Unfair Methods of Competition” Under Section 5 of the FTC Act. Federal Trade Commission. https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public_statements/735201/150813section5enforcement.pdf.
    4.Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Maureen K. Ohlhausen In the Matter of Qualcomm Inc. File No. 141-0199 (2017). https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/170117qualcomm_mko_dissenting_statement_17-1-17a.pdf
    5.Strict Sanctions on Qualcomm`s Abuse of Cellular SEPs, Imposed the largest surcharge in the KFTC`s history - KRW 1 trillion 30 billion and the orders to rectify the unfair business model (2016/12/28). http://essentialpatentblog.lexblogplatform.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/64/2017/01/2016.12.28-KFTC-Press-Release-unofficial-Englsih-translation.pdf.
    6.Antitrust: Commission opens two formal investigations against chipset supplier Qualcomm(2015/7/16), European Commission Press Release Database. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-5383_en.htm
    7.Antitrust: Commission fines Qualcomm €997 million for abuse of dominant market position (2018/1/24), European Commission Press Release Database http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-421_en.htm
    8.IEEE 802 network enhancements for the next decade Industry Connections Activity Initiation Document (ICAID) Version: 1.3, 2017-03-16. IEEE Standards Association. http://standards.ieee.org/about/sasb/iccom/IC17-001-01_IE.pdf.
    9.IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws. http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/bylaws/sb_bylaws.pdf
    10.Ex ante disclosure of licensing terms, ETSI. http://www.etsi.org/about/how-we-work/intellectual-property-rights-iprs/ex-ante-disclosures
    11.ETSI Intellectual Property Rights Policy (2017)
    12.Antitrust: Commission opens two formal investigations against chipset supplier Qualcomm (2015/7/16), European Commission Press Release Database, available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-5383_en.htm
    13.Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property. U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. https://www.justice.gov/atr/IPguidelines/download
    14.Factsheet - Standard Essential Patents. European Commission. Retrieved from: http://europa.eu/rapid/attachment/IP-17-4942/en/Factsheet%20-%20Standard%20Essential%20Patents.pdf.
    15.Setting out the EU approach to Standard Essential Patents (2017/11/29). European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/26583/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native.
    16.Global cellular baseband processor revenue share by vendor from 2014 to 2016, Statistics. https://www.statista.com/statistics/427073/cellular-baseband-processor-supplier-share/
    17.Sravan Kundojjala, Stuart Robinson, & Christopher Taylor (2018/1/8). Baseband Market Share Tracker Q3 2017: Qualcomm Gains Share. Strategy Analystics. https://www.strategyanalytics.com/access-services/components/rf-and-wireless/reports/report-detail/baseband-market-share-tracker-q3-2017-qualcomm-gains-share#.WulgSohuY2x
    18.Communication from the Commission to the Institutions on Setting out the EU approach to Standard Essential Patents. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/26583
    19.Antitrust: Commission opens proceedings against Samsung, European Commission. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-12-89_en.htm
    20.Report by the EAGCP, An economic approach to Article 82, p8 http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/competition/economist/eagcp_july_21_05.pdf
    21.Karen Campbell, Jim Diffley, Bob Flanagan, Bill Morelli, Brendan O’Neil, Francis Sideco (2017.Jan.). The 5G Economy: How 5G technology will contribute to the global economy. IHS Economics & IHS Techonology Economic Impact Analysis. https://cdn.ihs.com/www/pdf/IHS-Technology-5G-Economic-Impact-Study.pdf.
    （五）網際網路
    1.About 3GPP, Retrieved Apri. 11 2018, from http://www.3gpp.org/about-3gpp
    2.What are standards?, IEEE, Retrieved May 22, from: http://standards.ieee.org/develop/overview.html
    3.About WSC, World Standards Cooperation, Retrieved May 22, from: https://www.worldstandardscooperation.org/about/
    4.What are standards? ETSI, Retrieved May 22, from: http://www.etsi.org/standards/what-are-standards.
    5.How are standards made? IEEE, Retrieved May 22, from: http://standards.ieee.org/develop/process.html.
    6.How we develop standards, Retrieved May 22, from: https://www.iso.org/developing-standards.html
    7.Qualcomm Report Segment, , Retrieved Apri 7 2018, from: http://investor.qualcomm.com/reportingsegments.cfm
    8.Global cellular baseband processor revenue share by vendor from 2014 to 2016, , Retrieved Mar. 26 2018, from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/427073/cellular-baseband-processor-supplier-share/, statista
    9.Qualcomm 2016 Annual Report of Form 10-K For the Fiscal Year Ended September 25, 2016, p10-13, Retrieved May 13 2018, from: http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/QCOM/6180434255x0x915400/CD71F5A8-BEAA-4EEE-B385-2CD75B48B9D3/2016_Annual_Report_Form_10-K.pdf
    10.Qualcomm Announces First Quarter Fiscal 2018 Results, Qualcomm, , Retrieved May 13 2018, from: http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/QCOM/6180434255x0x970100/92139AD2-4BBB-4F30-8D4B-F5C867BFEA87/FY_2018_1st_Quarter_Earnings_Release.pdf
    11.Mike Freeman (2018/4/27). Qualcomm tweaks patent licensing scheme; Will it help end legal war with Apple?, The San Diego Union Tribune, Retrieved May 23 2018, from:: http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/business/technology/sd-fi-qualcomm-framework-20180427-story.html
    12.Qualcomm Comments on Apple Complaint (2017/1/20), Qualcomm Press Release, Retrieved June 23 2018, from: https://www.qualcomm.com/news/releases/2017/01/20/qualcomm-comments-apple-complaint
    13.Qualcomm Confirms Receipt of Korea Fair Trade Commission`s Case Examiner’s Report (2015/11/17). Qualcomm Press Announcements, , Retrieved May 13 2018, from: https://www.qualcomm.com/news/releases/2015/11/17/qualcomm-confirms-receipt-korea-fair-trade-commissions-case-examiners
    14.Qualcomm Responds to Announcement by Korea Fair Trade Commission (2016/12/27), Qualcomm Press Announcement, , Retrieved May 2 2018, from: https://www.qualcomm.com/news/releases/2016/12/27/qualcomm-responds-announcement-korea-fair-trade-commission
    15.Qualcomm Stay Appeal Denied by Seoul High Court on Absence of Irreparable Harm; Appeal to Seoul High Court on Merits of the Case to Proceed (2017/9/4), Qualcomm Press Announcement, Retrieved May 13 2018, from: https://www.qualcomm.com/news/releases/2017/09/04/qualcomm-stay-appeal-denied-seoul-high-court-absence-irreparable-har
    16.Qualcomm Disagrees with Decision by Taiwan Fair Trade Commission and Intends to Seek a Stay and Appeal the Decision (2017/10/11), Qualcomm Press Announcements, Retrieved May 13 2018, from: https://www.qualcomm.com/news/releases/2017/10/11/qualcomm-disagrees-decision-taiwan-fair-trade-commission-and-intends-seek
    17.NVIDIA to Wind Down Icera Modem Operations (2015/5/5), NVIDIA, Retrieved May 5 2018, from: https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-to-wind-down-icera-modem-operations
    18.Roumeliotis, Liana B. Baker (2018/3/13). Broadcom to end bid for Qualcomm, keeps plan to move to U.S.: sources, Reuter, from : https://www.reuters.com/article/us-qualcomm-m-a-broadcom/broadcom-to-end-bid-for-qualcomm-keeps-plan-to-move-to-u-s-sources-idUSKCN1GP1ND.
    19.Antitrust: Commission sends two Statements of Objections on exclusivity payments and predatory pricing to Qualcomm(2015/12/8), European Commission Press Release Database, Retrieved Apri. 30, from: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-6271_en.htm
    20.Case AT.40220 – Qualcomm (exclusivity payments) Commission Decision of 24/01/2018, from: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/cases/dec_docs/40220/40220_2395_3.pdf.
    21.Qualcomm to Appeal European Commission Decision Regarding Modem Chip Agreement (2018/1/24), Qualcomm Press Announcement, Retrieved May 5 2018, from: https://www.qualcomm.com/news/releases/2018/01/24/qualcomm-appeal-european-commission-decision-regarding-modem-chip-agreement
    22.Qualcomm to Enhance Development of Taiwan’s Wireless Ecosystem Through the Qualcomm Innovation Lab – Taiwan (2017/8/10), Qualcomm Press Announcements. Retrieved May 13 2018, from: https://www.qualcomm.com/news/releases/2017/08/10/qualcomm-enhance-development-taiwans-wireless-ecosystem-through-qualcomm
    23.Taiwan’s 5G Value Chain Expected to Output $134 billion and Support 510K jobs in 2035 (2017/8/10), Qualcomm Press Announcements, Retrieved May 13 2018, from: https://www.qualcomm.com/news/releases/2017/08/10/taiwans-5g-value-chain-expected-output-134-billion-and-support-510k-jobs
    24.Gottfried Schüll, International report - The Dusseldorf World Patent Court?(2012/4/18), Retrieved Apri. 9 2018, from: 　 http://www.iam-media.com/reports/Detail.aspx?g=adfe3855-9a8f-4dd8-97a4-974716411f01
    25.Dr. Stefan M. Zech, Jochen Kilchert, Dr. Stephan Held, Christian Hess, Tilman Pfrang and Dr. Tobias Wuttke, Patent enforcement through the courts in Germany(2018/2/19), Retrieved Apr. 9 2018, from: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=b12d6f05-d05a-47fc-b7b0-e6c3dcfd1aaa
    26.Aaron Tilley (2017/1/20). Apple Sues Qualcomm For $1 Billion, Alleging Extortion, Forbes, Retrieved Jun 7 2018, from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/aarontilley/2017/01/20/apple-sues-qualcomm-for-1-billion-over-royalties/#1819729d41f5

    三、日文文獻
    （一）書籍
    丸島儀一(2011)。知的財産戦略―技術で事業を強くするために。東京：ダイヤモンド社。
    （二）報告與官方文件
    1.不公正な取引方法に関する基本的考え力(昭和57年)，獨占禁止法研究會，6-7。
    2.ICT 国際標準化推進ガイドライン(2008)。研究開発・標準化戦略委員会，日本総務省， http://www.soumu.go.jp/main_sosiki/joho_tsusin/policyreports/joho_tsusin/kenkyu_kaihatsu/pdf/080606_1_sa7.pdf，14-16。
    3.知的財産の利用に関する独占禁止法上の指針，(平成28年1月21日)。公正取引委員會。參見: http://www.jftc.go.jp/dk/guideline/unyoukijun/chitekizaisan.html。
    （三）期刊
    平山賢太郎 (2014)。独禁法から考える 知的財産権ライセンス拒絶．差止請求，13-14，パテント Vol.67 No.12。
    （四）判決與行政處分
    1.知財高裁平成25年（ネ）第10043号。
    2.公正取引委員会平成21年排除措置命令書（措）第22号。
    （五）網際網路
    独占禁止法研究会の開催について(平成28年2月10日)，公正取引委員会，參見：https://www.jftc.go.jp/houdou/pressrelease/h28/feb/160210_3.html (最終瀏覽日：2018/8/19)。
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理與智慧財產研究所
    104364217
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104364217
    数据类型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.TIIPM.025.2018.F08
    显示于类别:[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    421701.pdf2397KbAdobe PDF2490检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈