English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 83053/111947 (74%)
造訪人次 : 21726885      線上人數 : 686
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/120093

    題名: Number of Meanings and Number of Senses: An ERP Study of Sublexical Ambiguities in Reading Chinese Disyllabic Compounds
    作者: Huang, Hsu-Wen
    Lee, Chia-Ying
    貢獻者: 心腦中心
    關鍵詞: Chinese compounds;ERPs;N400;homonymy;polysemy;sublexical semantic ambiguity
    日期: 2018-03
    上傳時間: 2018-09-14 16:06:17 (UTC+8)
    摘要: In English, an extensive body of work in both behavioral and neuropsychological domains has produced strong evidence that homonymy (words with many distinct meanings) and polysemy (many related senses) are represented, retrieved, and processed differently in the human brain. In Chinese, most words are compounds, and the constituent characters within a compound word can have different meanings and/or related senses on their own. Thus, in order to resolve lexical ambiguity in Chinese, one has to consider the composition of constituent characters, as well as how they contribute to whole word reading, known as "sublexical ambiguity." This study investigates how two types of sublexical ambiguity affect Chinese word processing. The number of meanings (NOM) and the number of senses (NOS) corresponding to the first character of Chinese compounds were manipulated in a lexical decision task. The interactions between NOM and NOS were observed in both behavioral results and N400s, in which NOM disadvantage effect was found for words with few-senses only. On the other hand, the NOS facilitation effect was significant for words with multiple-meanings (NOM > 1) only. The sublexical ambiguity disadvantage suggested that semantically unrelated morphemes are represented as separate entries. For characters with multiple meanings, one orthographic form is associated with more than one morphemic representation. In contrast, the sublexical sense advantage supported the idea that semantically related senses that shared a morphological root are represented within a single entry. The more senses listed in a morphological root, the stronger representation will be formed. These results suggest that two types of sublexical ambiguities are represented and processed differently in Chinese word recognition models and also demonstrate that how they interact with each other in the mental lexicon.
    關聯: Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 324
    PMID: 29651260
    資料類型: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00324
    DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00324
    顯示於類別:[心智‧大腦與學習研究中心 ] 期刊論文


    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    fpsyg-09-00324.pdf1464KbAdobe PDF41檢視/開啟


    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋