English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 88295/117812 (75%)
Visitors : 23401737      Online Users : 91
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/121264


    Title: 康德論政治自由:對政治式詮釋的修正
    Kant on Political Freedom: A Commentary on Political Reading of Kant
    Authors: 周家瑜
    Chou, Chia-Yu
    Contributors: 政治系
    Keywords:  The Metaphysics of Morals ; Immanuel Kant ; political freedom ; property right ; external freedom
    《道德形上學》 ; 康德 ; 政治自由 ; 財產權 ; 外在自由
    Date: 2012-12
    Issue Date: 2018-12-07 17:12:12 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: This article aims to answer a fundamental question about Kant's political philosophy: what is political freedom in Kant's political writings (especially in his mysterious The Metaphysics of Morals)? I argue in this article that what Kant intended to stress is the conception of external freedom as property right. To argue this, I first analyze two main contemporary interpretations of Kant's political philosophy, namely ethical reading and political reading of Kant. While the latter has resolved some of the interpretive difficulties that the former encounters, the political reading has its own internal difficulties. By drawing attention to Kant's oft-ignored conception of external freedom, I argue that these internal difficulties can be resolved.
    本文主旨在於闡明康德的政治自由,在康德政治哲學中,康德所討論的是什麼樣的自由概念?本文分析當代對康德《道德形上學》(The Metaphysics of Morals)之兩種不同取向的詮釋:其一為倫理式詮釋,主張這種取向的詮釋者傾向透過康德道德哲學的理論框架來理解其後期的政治著作;另一則為政治式詮釋,主要是因應倫理式詮釋所遇到的詮釋困難而興起,傾向給予康德後期政治著作較多獨立性。本文除了闡明當代對康德政治哲學的現狀外,亦探討當前討論最多的政治式詮釋-以Arthur Ripstein之共和式詮釋為代表-本文指出儘管此一詮釋成功因應了倫理式詮釋所遇到的困難,其本身仍有所疏漏,藉著指出「外在自由」在康德政治論述中的關鍵地位,本文期望對政治式詮釋提出修正。
    Relation: 政治與社會哲學評論, No.43, pp.81-116
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6523/168451532012120043003
    DOI: 10.6523/168451532012120043003
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    81-116.pdf3833KbAdobe PDF30View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback