English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 89683/119504 (75%)
Visitors : 23940212      Online Users : 120
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/122684


    Title: 基地所有人於地上權人或典權人將房屋權源出賣時之先買權-以該先買權之有無及客體為中心
    The Right of First Refusal of the Owner of the Building Site When the Superficiary or the Dian-Holder of the Site Sells His House and His Right Together: Focus on the Acknowledgement and the Object of the Right of First Refusal
    Authors: 黃健彰
    Huang, Chien-Chang
    Contributors: 臺灣土地研究
    Keywords: 一體處分;地上權;先買權;典權;優先承買權;優先購買權
    Dian;Dispose Together;Option of First Refusal;Preemption;Right of First Refusal;Superficies
    Date: 2016-11
    Issue Date: 2019-03-28 09:15:24 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 不動產先買權涉及不動產的有效利用,向來是實務上重要問題,但相關學說研究仍有不足。例如依土地法第一0四條規定,基地之地上權人或典權人出賣房屋時,基地所有人有先買權;不過,參酌民法第八三八條第三項及第九一七條第二項規定,基地的地上權人或典權人出賣房屋時,應一併出賣其地上權或典權(即權源),而不得僅出賣房屋。此際,基地所有人是否仍有先買權?如有,先買權的客體為何?就此二問題均有不同見解。本文先析究上開規定的規範意旨與適用上應注意之處,作為全文探討的基礎,再探討前開二問題。本文著重於相關當事人的利益衡量分析,並希冀促進不動產的有效利用;本文就既有的學說、實務見解予以回應,並提出解釋論上的建議。本文以為,基地的地上權人或典權人將其房屋連同權源一併出賣時,基地所有人仍有先買權,其行使先買權時應一併購買權源。
    The right of first refusal refers to effective utilization of the real estate and is an important issue in practice. However, the existing studies are insufficient. For example, according to Article 104 of the Land Act, the owner of the building site has a right of first refusal when the superficiary or the dian-holder of the site sells his house. However, according to the third paragraph of Article 838 and the second paragraph of Article 917 of the Civil Code, the superficiary or the dian-holder of the building site shall sell the superficies or dian at the same time when he sells his house. He cannot only sell his house. In this situation, does the owner of the site still have the right of first refusal? If so, what is the object of the right of first refusal? There are controversies over the two questions. First of all, this study analyzes the purposes and the issues we shall notice when the above provisions are applied as the foundation of this whole article. This study then explores the said questions. This study emphasizes the interests of the concerned parties and promotes effective utilization of the real estate. This study discusses the existing doctrine and practice and makes some propositions in explanation. This study holds that when the superficiary or the dian-holder of the building site sells his house and his right together, the owner of the site still have the right of first refusal. When he exercises his right of first refusal, he shall buy the superficies or dian together.
    Relation: 臺灣土地研究, 19(2), pp.79-100
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[臺灣土地研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    80.pdf699KbAdobe PDF43View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback