English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 86151/114824 (75%)
Visitors : 23072943      Online Users : 173
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/122691


    Title: 綠建築標章之溢價率分析— 以新北市住宅大樓為例
    The Price Premium of Green Building Certification - A Case Study of New Taipei City Residential Building
    Authors: 陳奉瑤
    Chen, Fong-Yao
    梁仁旭
    Liang, Jen-Hsu
    Contributors: 臺灣土地研究
    Keywords: 特徵價格模型;新北市;綠建築溢價;臺灣綠建築標章
    Green building premium;Hedonic model;New Taipei City;The EEWH green building labeling system
    Date: 2018-05
    Issue Date: 2019-03-28 09:17:07 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 綠建築之推動為各國政策發展方向,無論透過市場機制或政策推廣綠建築,綠 建築價格及綠效能將是重要關鍵,多數研究也證實綠建築溢價的存在。我國自2000 年開始推動綠建築標章制度迄今,為何民間興建綠建築佔同期間取得使用執照的比 例不及0.1%?難道綠建築相對於非綠建築在市場上沒有溢價?本文運用2012年至 2014年新北市實價登錄資料,以特徵價格迴歸模型進行分析。實證結果顯示,新 北市擁有綠建築標章之電梯大樓,平均溢價率約7.5%;合格級、銅級、銀級與黃 金級的溢價率分別為13.3%、1.3%、1.9%及4.5%,與依序遞增的假說不符;就價格 分布而言,高價住宅與低價住宅之溢價率分別為3.1%與14.6%,以低價住宅的綠建 築溢價較明顯;就空間地域而言,市中心區之綠建築溢價率較低,郊區之溢價率相 對較高且以合格級居多。綜言之,三高住宅(位於高房價區、高價住宅、高標章等 級)的溢價率有相對偏低的現象。
    Governments around the world have focused promotion for green buildings either through market mechanism or governmental policies. Many researches have proven a price premium for buildings with green features and pointed out price and efficiency is the key. Why the construction of green buildings accounted for the same period to obtain the building use permit less than 0.1% since 2000? Is the green building relative to the non- green building in the market there is no premium? This study examines the price premium of the green label in New Taipei City with hedonic regression model by actual selling price data from 2012 to 2014. The result shows that buildings certified have an average price premium of 7.5%; whereas Certified, Bronze, Silver and Gold level each has average price premium of 13.3%, 1.3%, 1.9% and 4.5%. Hypothesis of increasing premium with higher level has been overturned. As for the property type, lower-end condominiums have higher price premium of 14.6% comparing to those of higher-end of 3.1%, and are more statistically significant. Location-wise, price premium is higher in the suburb, with more Certified-level buildings, comparing to those in CBD. Reasoning behind lower price premium in higher-priced districts, higher-end condominium and higher certification level might be worth discussing further when promoting green building labeling system.
    Relation: 臺灣土地研究, 21(1), pp.61-85
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.6677/JTLR.2018.21.01.061-085
    DOI: 10.6677/JTLR.2018.21.01.061-085
    Appears in Collections:[臺灣土地研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    87.pdf1025KbAdobe PDF10View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback