English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 89672/119493 (75%)
Visitors : 23945131      Online Users : 146
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124428


    Title: 區分所有權人會議決議程序瑕疵之效力
    The Effect of the Procedurally Defective Decision Made by the Unit Owner Assembly
    Authors: 黃健彰
    Huang, Chien-Chang
    Contributors: 法學評論
    Keywords: 區分所有權人會議決議;程序瑕疵;違反之事實非屬重大;於決議無影響;當場表示異議;誠信原則
    Decision Made by the Unit Owner Assembly;Procedural Defect;The Fact of Violation is Insignificant;Do Nothing to the Prejudice of the Resolution;Make Objection at the Meeting;Principle of Good Faith
    Date: 2017-09
    Issue Date: 2019-07-24 16:00:30 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 有程序瑕疵的區分所有權人會議決議效力,涉及每一區分所有權人的權益與決議的穩定性,是理論與實務上的重要問題。本文先總說其效力,再分別針對「區分所有權人會議決議程序瑕疵違反之事實非屬重大且於決議無影響」、「對區分所有權人會議決議程序瑕疵未當場表示異議」與「區分所有權人訴請撤銷決議有其他違反誠信原則的情形」,分析有程序瑕疵的區分所有權人會議決議效力。本文著重於成本效益分析與相關當事人的利益衡量,就既有的學說、實務見解及修正草案予以回應,並提出解釋論與立法論上的建議。本文以為,區分所有權人會議決議召集程序或決議方法,違反法令或規約時,區分所有權人得於決議後三個月內訴請法院撤銷其決議;區分所有權人對召集程序或決議方法,未當場表示異議者,不得訴請撤銷。如程序瑕疵的情形非屬重大且於決議無影響,則法院得駁回撤銷決議之訴。
    The effect of the procedurally defective decision made by the unit owner assembly is an important issue in theory and practice due to its great influence on the interests of every unit owner and the stability of the decision. This study first explores the aforementioned effect in general before analyzing it under the following circumstances: "the fact of violation is insignificant and will do nothing to the prejudice of the decision", "the unit owner did not make objection to the procedure at the meeting", and "the unit owner who applied to the court to revoke the decision violates other good faith requirements." The cost-benefit analysis is then stressed and the interests of the concerned parties are emphasized. This study further discusses the existing doctrine, practice, and the draft amendment and makes some propositions in explanation and legislation. In this study, it is suggested that if the calling procedure or the method of a decision made by the unit owner assembly violates the act or regulation of the condominium, a unit owner may apply to the court to revoke the decision within three months after the decision, except the unit owner who did not make objection against the calling procedure or the method of the decision at the meeting. Upon receipt of the petition for annulment of a decision, should the court considers that the fact of violation described in the said petition is insignificant and will do nothing to the prejudice of the decision, the court may dismiss such petition.
    Relation: 法學評論, 150, 1-47
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/ 10.3966/102398202017090150001
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202017090150001
    Appears in Collections:[法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    52.pdf862KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback