English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 91913/122132 (75%)
Visitors : 25777871      Online Users : 174
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124933

    Title: 臺灣東南亞移工的藝術主體與展演空間之形塑
    The creating of artistic subjects and performance spaces of Southeast Asian migrant workers in Taiwan
    Authors: 潘仲雯
    Pan, Chung-Wen
    Contributors: 邱炫元

    Chiou, Syuan-yuan
    Hong, Yi-Chen

    Pan, Chung-Wen
    Keywords: 東南亞移工
    Southeast Asian migrant workers
    Artistic practices
    Transnational labor
    Construction of subjectivity
    Performance spaces
    Date: 2019
    Issue Date: 2019-08-07 16:47:33 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究以「東南亞移工藝術實踐」作為基本命題,使用「主體建構」的社會學觀點,綜觀性的從「制度結構」、「行動者」與「勞動/藝術場域」三個層次進行分析,藉以闡釋「東南亞移工如何在參與全球跨國勞動遷移的進程下,逐漸由一名底層勞動者,成為獨當一面的移工藝術家」。首先,回顧台灣東南亞藝文自1990年代末至2018年的發展軌跡,共經歷了「工運時期」、「移民平權時期」與「文化交流時期」三個階段的轉折,移工藝術實踐慣以被臺灣政府、社運人士與地方非營利組織看作是共同推動社會發展的良藥。除此之外,移工作為履行「勞動責任」和「藝術理想」的行動者,勞動處境與社會待遇成為了他們能否打造出多元主體的先決條件,他們會主動將自身暴露於台灣的公共場合中,策略性地轉換勞動者與藝術家的身分類別以求達成某些特殊目的。最後,無論在哪一種類型的展演活動,東南亞移工的藝術場域並不是一個獨立運作的美學實踐空間,它是經常依附在層層權力關係之下,講求利益互惠的生產邏輯,並且融合移工勞動與藝術實踐的社會場域。本研究主張,東南亞移工之所以可以自由行走在臺灣的公共領域,運用「移工藝術家」的頭銜建立起自我主體性,事實上是經由臺灣社會共同建構與醞釀而成的結果。
    Bearing in mind the perspective of “the construction of subjectivity”, this research focuses on the artistic practices of Southeast Asian migrant workers in Taiwan. The analytical framework includes three aspects: institutional structure, social actors, and the field of labor/art, aiming to address the problematic: how have underclass proletariat Southeast Asian laborers succeeded in turning themselves into what is referred to as “migrant artists” in Taiwan? The following dimensions are to be examined: firstly, the historical development of Southeast Asian migrant art in Taiwan, which has experienced three important stages since the late 1990s to 2008, including “the labor rights period”, “the immigrant equality period”, and “the multicultural period”. The Taiwanese government, advocators, and non-profit organizations tended to claim that the artistic practices of these migrant laborers can effectively improve social development as well as resolve certain social problems in our multicultural era. Secondly, the opportunities of foreign laborers to create multiple subjectivities depend primarily on their working conditions and favorable social reception. Moreover, they expose themselves in public willfully, strategically switching between their roles of laborer and artist as occasion demands. Finally, the function of exhibition spaces where the Southeast Asian laborer-artists display their artwork are not just aesthetic; these public spaces also integrate the power relations between transnational laborers and other social actors, and the reciprocity of interests is particularly emphasized in such artistic productions. This research suggests that due to the social construction of a collectivity, Southeast Asian workers in Taiwan are able to become independent migrant artists in public and successfully re-construct their subjectivity in the age of transnational mobility.
    Reference: 英文參考書目
    Arnold, B. R., Matus, Y. E., 2000, ”Test Translation and Cultural Equivalence  Methodologies for Use with Diverse Populations.” Pp. 121-136 in Handbook of Multicultural Mental Health, edited by Freddy A. Paniagua and Ann-Marie Yamada. UK: Academic Press.
    Bass, M., 2018, “Temporary Labour Migration.” Pp. 51-63 in Diaspora Engagement and State Policies of Return Migration in Asia. in Routledge Handbook of Asian Migrationss,edited by Gracia Liu-Farrer and Brenda S.A. Yeoh. New York: Routledge.
    Bourdieu, P., 1989, “Social Space and Symbolic Power.” Sociological theory. 7(1): 14-25.
    Bourdieu, P., 2013, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. New York: Routledge.
    Clifford, J., 1997, Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Conger, J. A., Kanungo, R. N., 1988, “The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice.” Academy of Management Review 13(3): 471-482.
    Durrant, S., Lord, C. M. (Eds.), 2007, Essays in Migratory Aesthetics: Cultural Practices between Migration and Art-making. New York: Rodopi.
    Foucault, M., 1982, “The Subject and Power.” Critical Inquiry. 8(4): 777-795.
    George, K. M., 2007, “ Art and Identity Politics: Nation, Religion, Ethnicity, Elsewhere.”Pp.37-59 in Asian and Pacific Cosmopolitans, edited by Kathryn Robinson. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Goffman, E., 1956, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
    Griswold, W., 2012, Cultures and Societies in a Changing World. London and Los Angeles: Sage.
    Hall, S. ,1990, “ Cultural Identity and Diaspora.” The Journal Framework 36: 222-237.   
    Werbner, P., Fumanti, M, 2013, ”The Aesthetics of Diaspora: Ownership and Appropriation.”Ethnos 78(2): 149-174.
    Herzfeld, M., 2014, Cultural Intimacy: Social Poetics in the Nation-State. New York: Routledge.
    Hintjens, H. M., 1992, “Immigration and Citizenship Debates: Rreflections of Ten Common Themes.” International Migration (Geneva, Switzerland). 30(1): 5-17.
    Holt, C., 1967, Art in Indonesia: continuities and change. New York: Cornell University Press.  
    Kelly, P., Lusis, T, 2006, “Migration and the Transnational Habitus: Evidence from Canada and the Philippines.” Environment and Planning A 38: 831-847.
    Krahula, B., 2012, One Zentangle a Day: A 6-week Course in Creative Drawing for Relaxation, Inspiration, and Fun. Indiana: Quarry Books.
    Liang, P., 2016, “Interweaving Ethics and Aesthetics: Marriage Migrants and Theatre Making in the Asian Transnational Space.” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 17(3): 334-356.
    Lutz, H., 2018, “Care Migration: The Connectivity between Care Chains, Care Circulation and Transnational Social Inequality.” Current Sociology 66(4):577-589.
    Wei, M. L. P., Ho, E. L. E., 2018, “Diaspora Engagement and State Policies of Return Migration in Asia” Pp.92-102 in Routledge Handbook of Asian Migrationss, edited by Gracia Liu-Farrer and Brenda S.A. Yeoh. New York: Routledge.

    Nakamura, F., Perkins, M., and Krischer, O. (Eds.), 2013, Asia through Art and Anthropology: Cultural Translation across Borders. London: Bloomsbury.
    Papastergiadis, N., 2000, The Turbulence of Migration: Globalization, Deterritorialization and Hybridity. USA: Blackwell Ltd.
    Scott, P., 2013, “Imagining Asian Aesthetics in Colonial Hanoi: The École Des Beaux Arts De L'Indochine (1925–1945).” Pp.42-61 in Asia through Art and Anthropology: Cultural Translation across Borders, edited by Olivier Krischer. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
    Scott, J. C.,2008, Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    Seiz, N., 2013, “Coming Home: How “Re-Entry” Shaped the Work of A Contemporary Woman Artist in Taiwan.” Pp. 62-76 in Asia through Art and Anthropology: Cultural Translation across Borders edited by Olivier Krischer. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
    Spiro, P. J., 2019, “The Equality Paradox of Dual Citizenship.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 45(6): 879-896.
    Vongpoothorn, S., “Lifting Words, Floating Words.” Pp.103-110 in Asia through Art and Anthropology: Cultural Translation across Borders, edited by Olivier Krischer. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
    Wang, L. J., 2016,” Multicultural Taiwan: Policy Development and Challeges.” Pp.37-54 in Multiculturalism in East Asia: A Transnational Exploration of Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, edited by Iwabuchi, K., Kim, H. M., and Hsia, H. C. (Eds.) England: Pickering & Chatto Publishers.
    Zolberg, A. R., 2009, A Nation by Design: Immigration Policy in the Fashioning of America. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.

    皮耶.布赫迪厄著,石武耕、李沅洳、陳羚芝譯,2016,《藝術的法則──文學場域的生成與結構》。臺北:典藏。(Bourdieu, P.,1993, The Field of Cultural
    Production: Essays on Art and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.)
    成露茜,2004,〈移民/工發聲與媒體〉。頁 129-158,收錄於夏曉鵑、陳信行、黃德北等編,《跨界流離:全球化下的移民與移工(上冊)》。臺北:臺灣社會研究雜誌。
    吳東牧、林玲瑩,2014,〈移工淘金夢醒 畫盡臺灣美麗哀愁〉。《中華民國博物館學會》67:32-35。
    阿諾德.豪澤爾著、陳超南等譯,1992,《藝術史的哲學》。四川:中國社會科學版。(Hauser, A., 1959, The Philosophy of Art History. New York: Knopf)
    侯作珍,2007,〈臺灣海外小說的離散書寫與身分認同的追尋 以六0到八0年代為探討中心〉。《文學新論》6:27-42。
    高夫曼著、曾凡慈譯,2010,《汙名-管理受損身分的筆記》。臺北:群學。(Goffman, E., 2009, Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. London: Simon and Schuster Inc.)
    畢恆達,2015,〈社會研究的研究者與倫理〉。頁 29-84,收錄於嚴祥鸞編,《危險與秘密-研究倫理》。臺北:三民。
    楊明,2010,《鄉愁美學: 1949 年大陸遷臺作家的懷鄉文學》。臺北:秀威。
    鄭欣昀,2015,《Pierre Bourdieu「藝術場域自主化」的理論:以庫爾貝與馬內為例》。臺北:臺灣師範大學美術學系研究所碩士論文。
    霍華德.S.貝克爾著、盧文超譯,2014,《藝術界》。中國:譯林出版社。(Becker, H. S., 2008, Art Worlds: Updated and Expanded. Berkeley: University of California Press.)

    丁勻婷、王平宇,2005,〈越傭 今起暫停引進〉。自由時報,臺北報導,1月 20 日。
    文化部,2018,〈文化部辦理「多元新南向,文化心視野」成果分享會-展現國際與臺灣深度文化共鳴〉。文化新聞,12 月14日。
    張正,2014,〈不只為了十萬塊──記第一屆移民工文學獎〉。獨立評論,10 月 24日。
    張雅婷,2018,〈上百名菲國移工佔領新竹巨城 用藝術溫暖家鄉〉。聯合報,即時網路新聞,3月18日。
    郭芷瑄,2009,〈泰億祥號喋血1 印尼漁工判死刑 2人無期徒刑〉。大紀元,網路新聞,4 月7日。
    潘仲雯、李岳軒,2018,〈移工團隊齊心打造,《模特與彩繪:公益願景計劃》3/18 新竹巨城登場〉。移人,即時網路新聞,3月10日。

    中華民國行政院主計總處,2018,107 年度總預算案總說明。 http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/data/dgbas01/107/107Btab/107B%E7%B8%BD%E8%AA%AA%E6%98%8E%E5%8F%8A%E4%B8%BB%E8%A6%81%E9%99%84%E8%A1%A8.PDF,取用日期:2018年10月9日。
    中華民國勞動部,2017,勞動統計年報—外籍工作者。 https://www.mol.gov.tw/statistics/2452/2455/,取用日期:2018年2月10日。
    中華民國勞動部勞動部,2018,《就業服務法》第 52 條修正條文。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawSingle.aspx?pcode=N0090001&flno=52,取用日期:2018年1月5日。
    菲律賓國家統計局,2017, 2017海外菲律賓籍工作調查(2017 Survey on Overseas Filipinos)。https://psa.gov.ph/content/2017-survey-overseas-filipinos-results-2017-survey-overseas-filipinos,取用日期:2018年3月4日。
    國際勞工組織,2016, Indonesia :Decent Work for Indonesian Migrant Workers報告書。https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/---ilo-jakarta/documents/publication/wcms_366945.pdf,取用日期:2018年3月16日。
    Description: 碩士
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105254004
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU201900239
    Appears in Collections:[社會學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    400401.pdf11257KbAdobe PDF0View/Open

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback