English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88987/118693 (75%)
Visitors : 23569787      Online Users : 175
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125033


    Title: 平台企業成長策略之個案研究
    A case study on the growth strategies of the platform business
    Authors: 何奕均
    He, Yi-Chun
    Contributors: 邱奕嘉
    Chiu, Yi-Chia
    何奕均
    He, Yi-Chun
    Keywords: 平台商業模式
    覆蓋競爭
    細分市場
    騰訊
    Platform business model
    Platform envelopment
    Market segment
    Tencent
    Date: 2019
    Issue Date: 2019-08-07 17:05:29 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 平台企業已成為全球商業領域中不可忽視的一股力量,平台商業模式也不斷 在各行各業中顛覆既有商業模式,平台企業已逐漸成為學術界與實務界積極研究 的對象。諸多研究聚焦在平台企業如何顛覆既有商業模式、平台企業商業模式的 設計、平台企業如何透過補貼達成成長、平台生態系各階段理論等,但鮮有回應 平台企業從第一個細分市場成功後,該如何切入下一個細分市場。本文旨在呼應 覆蓋競爭,並提出一套有理論支持且得以落實至實務的方法,彌補現行研究的缺 口。
    本研究以騰訊作為個案,並採用騰訊在完成通訊工具市場壟斷後相繼聚焦的 四個新細分市場,分別是門戶網、網路遊戲、C2C 電商及電腦安全市場。並透過 這四個事件驗證本研究提出的 MUS 架構與 3P 架構1。
    本研究最終結論為 MUS 架構確實能協助平台企業選擇合適的新細分市場, 透過市場特性、用戶特性及服務特性三個構面解析挑戰者與既存者所屬之市場, 再搭配本研究提出的灘頭堡選擇策略與階梯策略,將能協助挑戰者找到最為合適 的新市場。而 4P 架構也著實能夠協助挑戰者與既存者競爭,透過定位、利潤池、 定價策略與寄生策略,將能幫助挑戰者找到合適的競爭手段。
    最後本研究嘗試連結舊經濟的競爭策略,透過 MUS 架構及 4P 架構的詮釋, 搭建舊經濟與新經濟思維的落差,選擇舊經濟競爭策略中的資源基礎論與動態能 力理論,連結 MUS 架構及 4P 架構的各項度,協助無論是舊經濟或新經濟的學 者都能透過此架構更好理解平台企業的覆蓋競爭。也解除長期有不少新經濟學者 對於舊經濟完全不適用於新經濟領域的謬誤,也為舊經濟因為多年研究積累而設 置出不少不必要的限制解套。
    Platform companies have been a strong trend in the current global business domain. The platform business model has changed the normal business among many industries. Due to this reason, the platform business model has been studied by both academic and practical. There are so many researches about how platform enterprise disrupted traditional business model, how to design the platform business model, how to use subsidy strategy to grow the platform company or stages theory of ecosystem. However, there is barely research about how to get into a new market with the success of its own market. This thesis is trying to offset this gap.
    This thesis uses Tencent as the case study, focusing on the four following markets: Portal website, Internet games, C2C e-commerce, and computer safety. In these four events, the thesis is going to use MUS model and 3P (after case analysis, then adjust to 4P) model which are proposed by the author.
    In conclusion, MUS indeed can help platform enterprises to find out the suitable new market by using three aspects: market feature, user feature, and service feature. Also, collocating with stairs strategy and beachhead selecting strategy, platform companies can find out the suitable new markets. Moreover, 4P model can help challenger platform enterprises find out the suitable competition strategy through position, profit pool, price strategy, and parasite strategy.
    Last, this research helps to connect with traditional economic thinking and new economic thinking. By connecting RBV, DCT and MUS model, 4P model. This can help to solve the bias that traditional economic theories cannot fit in new economic domain.
    Reference: 中文文獻
    Yin, R. K., 周海濤, 李永賢, & 張蘅. (2009). 個案研究設計與方法. 五南圖書出版股份有限公司, 台中.
    于卓民、李吉仁. (2013). 策略管理精論: 前程文化.
    中國電子商務研究中心. (2011). 2010年度中國電子商務市場數據監測報告. Retrieved from 杭州:
    中國電子商務研究中心. (2012). 2011年度中國電子商務市場數據監測報告. Retrieved from 杭州:
    中國電子商務研究中心. (2013). 2013年度中國電子商務市場數據監測報告. Retrieved from 杭州:
    中國電子商務研究中心. (2014). 2013年度中國電子商務市場數據監測報告. Retrieved from 杭州:
    中國電子商務研究中心. (2015). 2014年度中國電子商務研究中心. Retrieved from 杭州:
    中國電子商務研究中心. (2016). 2015年度中國電子商務市場數據監測報告. Retrieved from 杭州:
    中國電子商務研究中心. (2017). 2016年度中國電子商務市場數據監測報告. Retrieved from 杭州:
    中國電子商務研究中心. (2018). 2017年度中國電子商務市場數據監測報告. Retrieved from 杭州:
    中國電子商務研究中心. (2019). 2018年度中國電子商務市場數據監測數據. Retrieved from 杭州:
    王珊珊. (2014). 騰訊入股京東背後的盤算. Retrieved from https://cn.nytimes.com/technology/20140311/tc11tencent/zh-hant/
    王源. (2016). 网络新闻特色研究-以腾讯, 新浪, 网易三大网站为例 [J]. 新闻世界(03), 6-9.
    吳俞旻. (2015). 騰訊帝國之平台策略. 臺灣大學商學研究所學位論文, 1-158.
    吳思華. (1998). 策略九說, 臉譜文化出版社, 台北.
    吳瑞達. (2019). 騰訊投資11年 63家公司上市. Retrieved from https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20190221000333-260203?chdtv
    吴晓波. (2017). 腾讯传. In: 杭州: 浙江大学出版社.
    呂本富. (2018). 呂本富:從平台經濟到平台經濟學. 阿里商業評論.
    李宏. (2018). 平台經濟新戰略: 中國經濟出版社.
    罗仲伟, 任国良, 焦豪, 蔡宏波, & 许扬帆. (2014). 动态能力, 技术范式转变与创新战略——基于腾讯微信 “整合” 与 “迭代” 微创新的纵向案例分析. 管理世界, 8, 152-168.
    陳威如, & 余卓軒. (2013). 平台革命: 席捲全球社交, 購物, 遊戲, 媒體的商業模式創新: 商周出版.
    龚丽敏, & 江诗松. (2016). 平台型商业生态系统战略管理研究前沿: 视角和对象. 外国经济与管理, 38(6), 38-50.
    黎小林. (2010). 4C 理论视角下腾讯网盈利模式及成功因素分析. 新闻世界(12), 158-160.
    騰訊控股有限公司. (2005). 騰訊2004年報. Retrieved from
    騰訊控股有限公司. (2006). 騰訊2005年報. Retrieved from
    騰訊控股有限公司. (2007). 騰訊2006年報. Retrieved from
    騰訊控股有限公司. (2008). 騰訊2007年報. Retrieved from
    騰訊控股有限公司. (2009). 騰訊2008年報. Retrieved from
    騰訊控股有限公司. (2010). 騰訊2009年報. Retrieved from
    騰訊控股有限公司. (2011). 騰訊2010年報. Retrieved from
    騰訊控股有限公司. (2012). 騰訊2011年報. Retrieved from
    騰訊控股有限公司. (2013). 騰訊2012年報. Retrieved from
    騰訊控股有限公司. (2014). 騰訊2013年報. Retrieved from
    騰訊控股有限公司. (2015). 騰訊2014年報. Retrieved from
    騰訊控股有限公司. (2016). 騰訊2015年報. Retrieved from
    騰訊控股有限公司. (2017). 騰訊2016年報. Retrieved from
    騰訊控股有限公司. (2018). 騰訊2017年報. Retrieved from
    騰訊控股有限公司. (2019). 騰訊 2018 年報. Retrieved from
    Bakos, Y., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1999). Bundling information goods: Pricing, profits, and efficiency. Management science, 45(12), 1613-1630.
    Bakos, Y., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2000). Bundling and Competition on the Internet. Marketing science, 19(1), 63-82.
    Burnham, T. A., Frels, J. K., & Mahajan, V. (2003). Consumer switching costs: a typology, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 31(2), 109-126.
    Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2011). Platform envelopment. Strategic Management Journal, 32(12), 1270-1285.
    Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2006). Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 92.
    Eppen, G. D., Hanson, W. A., & Martin, R. K. (1991). Bundling-new products, new markets, low risk: Purdue University, Krannert Graduate School of Management.
    Farrell, J., & Klemperer, P. (2007). Coordination and lock-in: Competition with switching costs and network effects. Handbook of industrial organization, 3, 1967-2072.
    Gadiesh, O., & Gilbert, J. L. (1998a). How to map your industry's profit pool. Harvard Business Review, 76(3), 149-159.
    Gadiesh, O., & Gilbert, J. L. (1998b). Profit pools: a fresh look at strategy. Harvard Business Review, 76(3), 139-148.
    Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2008). Platform Leaders. MIT Sloan management review.
    Gawer, A., & Henderson, R. (2007). Platform owner entry and innovation in complementary markets: Evidence from Intel. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(1), 1-34.
    Helfat, C. E., & Raubitschek, R. S. (2018). Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems. Research policy, 47(8), 1391-1399.
    Hidding, G. J., Williams, J., & Sviokla, J. J. (2011). How platform leaders win. Journal of Business Strategy, 32(2), 29-37.
    Hill, C. W., Jones, G. R., & Schilling, M. A. (2014). Strategic management: Theory & cases: An integrated approach: Cengage Learning.
    Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as Ecology: Harvard Business Review, March 2004. Harvard Business Review.
    Interbrand. (2018). Best Global Brands 2018 Rankings. Retrieved from
    Kazan, E., & Damsgaard, J. (2013). A framework for analyzing digital payment as a multi-sided platform: A study of three european NFC solutions.
    Nalebuff, B. (2004). Bundling as an entry barrier. The quarterly journal of economics, 119(1), 159-187.
    Nalebuff, B. J. (1999). Bundling.
    Nalebuff, B. J. (2000). Competing against bundles. Yale School of Management Working Paper No. ES-02.
    Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economyand how to make them work for you: WW Norton & Company.
    Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2004). Defining two-sided markets. Toulouse, France: IDEI, mimeo, January.
    Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
    West, J. (2003). How open is open enough?: Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Research policy, 32(7), 1259-1285.
    Williams, J. (1998). Renewable advantage: Crafting strategy through economic time: Simon and Schuster.
    Zhou, J. (2017). Competitive bundling. Econometrica, 85(1), 145-172.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理與智慧財產研究所
    1063641161
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1063641161
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU201900385
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    何奕均-平台企業成長策略之個案研究.pdf10438KbAdobe PDF30View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback