政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/125570

政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Executive Master of Business Administration > Theses > Item 140.119/125570

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125570

Title:	大台北地區公立醫院附設護理養護機構營運策略之研究—以A機構為例 Research on the Operation Strategy of Nursing home Organizations in Public Hospitals in Greater Taipei Area —— Taking Organization A as an Example
Authors:	蕭奕宗 Shiau, Yih-Tsong
Contributors:	詹文男 Tsan, Wen-Nan 蕭奕宗 Shiau, Yih-Tsong
Keywords:	護理養護機構護理之家高齡社會長照2.0 營運策略 Nursing Home Organization Nursing Home Senior Society Long-term care 2.0 Operation Strategy
Date:	2019
Issue Date:	2019-09-05 15:53:31 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	由於經濟的成長、教育知識的普及、社會文化與生活水準發展較高，讓我國由開發中國家漸漸邁入已開發國家行列，進而促成國民平均壽命的延長和近年來生育率下降，台灣社會已出現人口老化的現象。65歲以上老年人口占總人口比率在2018年3月底也到達14.05％，所以臺灣已於2018年邁入「高齡社會」。因此為維護社會老年人口的生活尊嚴與質量，以及因應老人社會日後將帶給年輕壯年們的照顧負擔以及扶養壓力的加重，再者還有生育減少導致少子化的現象，因此扭轉目前老年化的社會，增進生活品質，不僅是政府施政努力的目標，也需我國國民們一起參與與關注。高齡社會的形成造成人口結構的明顯改變，為因應老年社會所帶來的老人陪伴與安養、勞動力減低與生育減少等問題，也為回應失能、失智人口增加所需照護勞力的要求，從家庭生活安養、居家照顧、社區照護到住宿式安養照顧之多元化的服務，得以建立以社區為基本的長照服務系統，刻不容緩。而長照服務機構中的一般長期照護安養機構中為「住宿式」的機構類別，有照顧難易程度來分，計有老人福利機構、榮譽國民之家、身心障礙福利機構及護理之家（護理養護機構）等。由於台北市立聯合醫院附設護理養護機構(護理之家)已營運有多年之久，其入住住民之組成、住民家屬選擇之喜好、住民家屬的地緣性與家庭所得、醫護人員與照服員的異同、還有與鄰近私人獨立護理養護機構之競合關係等，皆因不同因素而有所差別與差異，值得我們進一步加以研究、探討、比較與分析。本研究主要透過文獻的探討、人員議題問卷的訪問結合並目前的政經情況，藉以瞭解目前我國公、私立護理養護機構的經營現況、兩種機構入住住民的異同與醫護人員的現況異同、照服員的人力之調配與本國與外勞組成比例等，進一步探討公立醫院附設護理養護機構與私人獨立護理養護機構服務現況的異同點與經營模式競爭策略差異之研究。 Due to economic growth and the popularization of education and knowledge, our country has gradually entered the ranks of developed countries from developing countries. Because of the extension of the average life expectancy of the national population and the decline in fertility in recent years, the population has become aging. This has become more apparent in developed countries, but similar phenomena have recently occurred in developing countries. For example, the proportion of the elderly population over the age of 65 in the country has reached 14.05% at the end of March 2018. Therefore, Taiwan has entered the "age society" in 2018. In order to maintain the dignity and quality of life of the elderly in the society, and to cope with the burden of care and support pressures that the elderly society will bring to the young and old, and nowadays, the phenomenon of declining birth due to reduced fertility, thus reversing the current ageing Society and the promotion of quality of life are not only the goals of the government`s administrative efforts, but also the participation and attention of the people. The formation of an old society has caused a significant change in the demographic structure. In response to the problems of elderly people’s companionship and maintenance, labor reduction and fertility reduction in response to the elderly society, it also responds to the need to care for labor caused by the increase in disability and dementia. It is imperative to establish a community-based long-serving service system by providing a variety of services from family, home care, community care to residential care. Among the long-term care and maintenance institutions in the long-serving service organizations, there are "stay-type" institutions, including elderly welfare institutions, honorary national homes, mentally handicapped welfare institutions, and nursing homes. Since the attached nursing care institution of the Taipei City United Hospital has been in operation for many years, the composition of its residents, the preference of family members, and the competitive relationship with neighboring private independent care and nursing home are worthy of further discussion and comparison. This study, through the discussion of the literature, the interview of the personnel questionnaire, combined with the current political and economic situation, to understand the current situation of the operation of public and private nursing home institutions in Taiwan, the similarities and differences between the two institutions in the residents and the current situation of the medical staff, the counselor The allocation of manpower and the proportion of domestic and foreign workers, etc. Further explore the research on the status quo of the service and nursing strategy of the attached care and institutions and private independent care and nursing home institutions in public hospitals.
Reference:	中文文獻書籍內政部(2008)。人口政策白皮書。2013 年 6 月 27 日，取自 http://www.ris.gov.tw/ch9/0970314.pdf 內政部(2011) 司徒達賢，(2016)。策略管理新論：觀念架構與分析方法。台北：智勝。阮玉梅等著（2002）。長期照護概論。台北：華杏出版。中華民國長期照護專業協會（1999）.台閩地區長期照護名冊。中華民國長期照護專業協會（2003）.台閩地區長期照護名冊。中華民國長期照護專業協會（2005）.台閩地區長期照護名冊。行政院衛生署（1995）.建立醫療網第二期計畫。行政院衛生署（1999）.醫療發展基金作業要點。行政院衛生署（1996）.建立醫療網第三期計畫。行政院衛生署（1998）.老人長期照護三年計畫。行政院衛生署（2000）.新世紀健康照護計畫。行政院衛生福利部統計處(2017)，護理之家機構數。行政院衛生福利部(2018)，平面文宣類，衛生福利部_長照2.0懶人包李采娟、賴玫君、楊文惠等（2001）。護理之家成本分析研究，中台灣醫學科學雜誌，6(4)，223-232。林政賢（2002）。高齡者進住長期照護機構意願之探討—以台北市為例，未出版之長庚大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，桃園縣。吳淑瓊、江東亮（1995）。台灣地區長期照護的問題與對策，中華衛誌，14(3)，246-254。吳淑瓊（1999）。我國老人長期照護政策措施的檢討與建議，長期照護雜誌，3(2)，9-13。吳淑瓊、陳正芬（2000）。長期照護資源的過去、現在、與未來，社區發展季刊，29，19-31。吳淑瓊（2001）。建構長期照護體系先導計劃第一年計劃，台北市內政部。吳淑瓊（2004）。從建構長期照護體系先導計劃之執行─看我國社區長期照護體系之建構，社區發展季刊，106，88-96。邱美琪（2004）。台灣一般民眾選擇長期照護態度之探討，未出版之國立台北大學社會學系碩士論文，台北市。范淑玲（2004）。護理之家住民長期照護服務使用情形及其相關因素探討，未出版之國立陽明大學社區護理研究所碩士論文，台北市。許世凱（2004）。台北市私立小型老人養護機構競爭優勢及策略聯盟之運用─資源基礎理論的觀點，未出版之國立台灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文，台北市。陳秀卿(1999)，長期照護，台北：藝軒。陳筱如（2005）。台灣老年人口的基本生活與照顧費用，2005 年臺灣人口學會學術研討會─21 世紀的臺灣人口發展:趨勢與挑戰。陳惠姿、李孟芬、蔡誾誾、毛慧芬、李世代、林麗嬋等人(2004)。長期照護實務。台北:永大書局。黃松林(1994)。老人養護機構服務提供與被養護者滿意度之究。東海大學社會工作研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中。電子化策略與經營模式，Allan Afuah、Christopher L.Tucci 著，呂執中編譯，麥格羅.希爾出版，2001 年 9 月出版楊克平、尹祚芊（1999）。台灣地區長期照護病患之身心社會功能與其影響因素之探討，護理研究，7(1)，65-76。楊漢湶、孫碧雲（1999）。公立醫院附設護理之家之探討，醫院雜誌，32(2)，57-65。期刊論文台灣地區總人口及人口推估(2018)。台北：國家發展委員會。王國羽(2004)‧老年、障礙：研究概念取向與我國資料討 ‧論身心障礙研究，2(3)，134-159。王增勇(1997)‧殘補式或普及是福利—台北是居家照顧政策的決擇‧社區發展季刊，80，213-232。林昭宏；柴惠敏；廖龍仁；黃昭郎; 陳美汀；廖小瑤, 社區居民腦中風患者日常生活活動和生活品質的調查研究; A Follow-up Study of Activity of Daily Living and Quality of Life for Stroke Patients in the Community物理治療; 28卷5期 (2003/10/01)， P243 - 250 林慈恩、李鴻文(2007)。從資源基礎理論探討長期照護機構之競爭優勢; 運動休閒餐旅研究 (2007.03)。2(1)，120-147。林維言(2001)‧從加強老人安養服務方案的執行談長期照護制度之建構‧社區發展季刊，92，6-9。柯瓊芳(2004)。由歐洲失能老人之理想居住安排論家庭在當代社會的功能‧台灣人口學會2004年年會暨：「人口、家庭與國民健康政策回顧與展望」研討會。彭朱如（2000）。醫院策略管理─價值鏈與策略形態分析，醫院雜誌，33(2)，45-55。張家銘，蔡智能 - 台灣醫學, 2003; 老年人之周全性評估國立成功大學醫學院附設醫院內科部老年科徐慧娟(1999)。長期照護結果品質評值一以護理之家院民評估量表(MDS) 為例。護理雜誌，46(1)，57-64。徐珊(2001)。長期照護機構特質與照護人關係之研究。國立中山人力資源管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄。張席熒；謝妤葳；薛漪平；謝清麟;日常生活活動功能評量之四十年回顧; A Forty-year Retrospective of Assessment of Activities of Daily Living; 台灣復健醫學雜誌； 34卷2期 (2006 / 06 / 01) ， P63-71 陳金貴(2002)。非營利組織社會企業化經營探討。發表於新世紀智庫論壇第19期，非政府組織夏季論壇。羅春月、汪美伶、謝組邦 (2009)。服務品質與顧客反應關係之研究：以護理之家為例，真理大學管理科學研究所碩士班，未出版，台北蘇淑貞、盧美秀、張文英(2001)。台灣地區護理之家服務現況之探討。台北醫學院護理學研究所醫藥衛生學門。未出版，台北網際網路政院拍板長照扣除定額12萬，經濟日報記者鄭鴻達、曹逸雯／台北報導上網日期：2019 年4 月17 日，檢自 https://udn.com/news/story/7238/3760024?from=udn-hotnews_ch2 智慧化與資通科技(ICT)導入長照產業之趨勢與必要性，牟台珠中國生產力中心產學創新經營組副管理師，上網日期：2017 年01 月24 日，檢自 https://mymkc.com/article/content/22598 銀髮族智慧化醫療未來走向，林佳玲，中國生產力中心 SBIR專案三組副管理師上網日期：2015 年10 月02 日，檢自 http://mymkc.com/article/content/22217 英文文獻書籍: American Hospital Association，“Introduction to discharge planning for hospital”，IL American Hospital Association，(1983). Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2006). Qualitative Research in Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods: United States Edition. Bhote, K. R. (1996). Beyond Customer Satisfaction to Customer Loyalty. New York: American Management Association. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Myers, M. D. (2013). Qualitative research in business and management, Sage. Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching(2nd ed.) London: Sage.Poter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: The Free Press. Kane, R. A. & Kane, R. L. (1987). Long-term care: Principles, programs, and policies. New York: Springer Publishing Co. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods, 3rd edn. Applied Social Research Methods Series, vol. 5: Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods(4th ed.) Thousand Oaks: SAGE. 專書與期刊 Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. Anderson, E., Fornell, C., & Rust, R. T., (1997). Customer Satisfaction Productivity and Profitability: Differences between Goods and Services. Marketing Science, 16(2), 129-145. Brody S. J, Masciocchi C., (1980). Data for Long-Term Care Planning by Health-Systems Agencies, American Journal of Public Health, 70, 1194-1198. Berglund, A. L. (2007). Satisfaction with Caring and Living Conditions in Nursing Homes: Views of Elderly Persons, Next of Kin and Staff Members. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 13, 46-51. Grant, R. M. (1991). The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation, California Management Review, 33, 114-135. Kane, R. L. (1995). Improving the quality of long-term care. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 274(16), 1268-9. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1994). Reassessment of Expectations as a Comparison Standard in Measuring Service Quality: Implications for Further Research. Journal of Marketing,58(1),111-124. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L.(1988). Communication and Control Process in the Delivery of Service Quality. Journal of Marketing, 52(2), 35-48. Smith, J. K. (1983). Quantitative versus Qualitative Research: An Attempt to Clarify the Issue. Educational Researcher, 12(3), 6-13. Sixma H.J., Van Campen C., Kerssens J.J.,& Peters L.(2000). Quality of Care from the Perspective of Elderly Person: The Quote Elderly Person Instrument. Age and Ageing, 29, 173–178. Steiber, S. R. (1988). How Consumers Perceive Health Care Quality. Hospitals, 62(7), 84. Van Maanen, J. (1979). Reclaiming Qualitative Methods for Organizational Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 520-526.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程(EMBA) 105932189
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105932189
Data Type:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU201900940
Appears in Collections:	[Executive Master of Business Administration] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
218901.pdf	4805Kb	Adobe PDF2	0	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...