English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109950/140901 (78%)
Visitors : 46022290      Online Users : 910
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125973


    Title: 從圖像到影像:肖像照在華語電影的時空再現
    From Icon to Image:The Time and Space Reproduction of Photo-portraits in Chinese-Language Cinema
    Authors: 肖瑞昀
    Xiao, Rui-Yun
    Contributors: 陳儒修
    Chen, Ru-Shou
    肖瑞昀
    Xiao, Rui-Yun
    Keywords: 肖像
    再現
    恐怖份子
    牯嶺街少年殺人事件
    陽光燦爛的日子
    師父
    Portrait
    Reproduction
    The Terrorist
    A Brighter Summer Day
    In the Heat of the Sun
    The Final Master
    Date: 2019
    Issue Date: 2019-09-05 17:39:31 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 自1839年及1895年攝影與電影誕生以來,不乏對這兩種媒介的對比和討論。持不同觀點的學者透過媒介間相斥的特徵分析,分別建立起攝影與電影在藝術或文化上的主體性。進入當代,攝影從「圖像」(icon)過度到「影像」(image),攝影過去以紙本照片的方式寄居在靜止的圖像空間中,如今衍生出複雜的時間與空間形式。
    本文在攝影與電影兩者各異的媒介特徵基礎上,討論肖像照片內嵌於電影影像中的現象。巴特「此曾在」、德勒茲「影像-時間」、巴赫汀「時空匯流」等論述是本文重要的理論基礎。本文以《恐怖份子》、《牯嶺街少年殺人事件》、《陽光燦爛的日子》和《師父》四部華語電影為樣本,透過電影中肖像照的文本分析,探求其時空意義,對當代華語文化的視覺經驗問題進行詮釋與反思。
    Since the birth of photography in 1839 and film in 1895, there has been a lot of comparison between them. Scholars with different viewpoints established the subjectivity of photography and film in fine art or culture. In the modern era, there has been a shift away from "icon" to "image". In the past, photography used to set in a still image with the form of photo on paper, and nowadays it has a complicated form of time and space.
    Based on the different media characteristics of photography and film, the study discusses the phenomenon that portrait photos are embedded in film images. Barthes”That has been", Deleuze "Image-Time", and Bakhtin "Chronotope" are the important theoretical foundations of this study. It takes four Chinese’s cinema, The Terrorizers(恐怖份子), A Brighter Summer Day(牯嶺街少年殺人事件), In the Heat of the Sun(陽光燦爛的日子)and The Final Master(師父)as samples. Through the analysis of photo-portraits in movies, it explores the meaning of time and space , reflecting on the visual experience of contemporary Chinese culture.
    Reference: 中文文獻:
    Aumont,J. & Marie,M. , 吳珮慈(1996)。《當代電影分析方法論》。臺北: 遠流(原書:Aumont,J.,& Marie,M.(1988). L`analyse des Films.)
    Barthes,R., 許綺玲(1997)。《明室攝影札記》。臺北:台灣攝影工作室(原書:Barthes,R.(1980). La chambre claire (p. 29). Paris: Gallimard.)
    Barthes,R., 許薔薔,& 許綺玲(1997)。《神話學》。臺北:桂冠(原書:Barthes,R.(1957). Mythologies.)
    Barthes, R., 李洋, & 孙啟栋(2012)。〈第三意义——关于爱森斯坦几格电影截图的研究笔记〉,《电影艺术》,2:102-108.(原文:Barthes, R. (1970). The third meaning. Teoksessa: Manghani, Sunil, 109-114.)
    Batchen,G., 周仰(2015)。《每一個瘋狂的念頭》。北京:中國民族攝影出版社(原書:Batchen,G.(1999). Burning with desire: The conception of photography. Mit Press.)
    Deleuze,G., 黃建宏(2003)。《電影 II: 時間-影像》。臺北: 遠流(原書: Deleuze,G.(1985). L`ima Stam ge-temps. Les Ed. de minuit.)
    Jameson, F. 馮淑貞(1995)。〈重繪台北新圖象〉,鄭樹森編,《文化批評與華語電影》,233-275。台北市︰麥田。(原書:Jameson, F.(1992) Remapping Taipei. The Geographical Aesthetic: Cinema and Space in the World System (pp. 114-157). London: BFI Publishing.)
    Stam,R., 陳儒修,& 郭幼龍(2002)。《電影理論解讀》。臺北: 遠流(原書:Stam,R.(2017). Film theory: an introduction. John Wiley & Sons.)
    Van Gelder,H.,& Westgeest,H.(2014)。《攝影理論.歷史脈絡與案例分析》。北京:中國民族攝影藝術出版社(原書:Van Gelder,H.,& Westgeest,H. (2011). Photography theory in historical perspective. John Wiley & Sons.)
    王詩婷(1991)。〈電影的創作一直在發生:楊德昌談牯嶺街的拍片經驗〉,《影響電影雜誌》,16:129-131
    史書美(2013)。《視覺與認同: 跨太平洋華語語系表述呈現》。臺北:聯經
    巫鴻(2017)。《聚焦——攝影在中國》。北京:中國民族攝影藝術出版社
    周蕾(2001)。《原初的激情: 視覺,性慾,民族志與中國當代電影》。
    臺北:遠流
    林年同(1985)。《鏡遊》。香港:素葉出版社
    林年同(1991)。〈中國電影的藝術形式與美學思想〉,〈中國電影的空間意識〉,《中國電影美學》。香港:允晨文化
    林志明(2013)。《複多與張力:論攝影史與攝影肖像》。臺北:田園
    塗紀亮(2006)。《皮爾斯文選》。北京:社會科學文獻出版社, 256
    孫鵬程(2012)。《形式與歷史視野中的詩學方案:比較視域下的時空體理論研究》。杭州:浙江大學出版社
    張小虹(2005)。〈電影的臉〉,《中外文學》, 34.1: 139-175
    張小虹(2010)。〈快照吳爾芙·驚嚇現代性〉,《英美文學評論》, 16:1-22
    張英進(2012)。《多元中國 : 電影與文化論集》。南京:南京大學出版社
    張英進(2016)。〈學術的主體性與話語權:「華語電影」爭論的觀察〉,《二十一世紀》,154:47-60
    許維賢(2011)。〈新馬華人與華語(語系)電影〉,《電影欣賞學》,
    8.2:3-9
    許綺玲(2009)。〈尋找《明室》中的<未來的文盲>〉,《藝術學研究》,4:53-85
    陳申(1987)。《中國攝影史 1840-1937》。北京:中國攝影出版社
    陳傳興(2015)。〈明室鏡語——由羅蘭巴特的明室談攝影美學的幾種問題〉,《銀鹽熱 : 21世紀影像啓示錄》,41-75
    陳傳興&阮義忠(1999)。《攝影美學七問 : 與陳傳興.漢寶德.黃春明的對話錄》。北京:中國攝影出版社
    張英進(2006)。《審視中國: 從學科史的角度觀察中國電影與文學研究》。南京:南京大學出版社
    陳儒修a(1994)。〈女兒的儀式——愛恨交加的母女關係〉,《女性與影像: 女性電影的多角度閱讀》,237-246
    陳儒修b(1994)。《台灣新電影的歷史文化經驗》。臺北:萬象
    黃建宏(2003)。〈譯者序〉。Deleuze, G《電影 II: 時間-影像》。臺北: 遠流
    黃毓秀(1993)。〈賴皮的國族神話(學): 牯嶺街少年殺人事件〉。台灣社會研究季刊,14:1-38
    劉瑞琪(主編)(2012)。《近代肖像意義的論辯》。臺北: 遠流
    閻鴻亞(鴻鴻)、楊順清、賴銘堂編劇(1991),《牯嶺街少年殺人事件分 鏡劇本》。台北:時報
    應愛萍(2013)。〈皮爾斯符號學與攝影理論研究〉,《美育學刊》, 2:48-55
    戴錦華(2007)。《電影理論與批評》。北京:北京大學
    顧錚 (2007)。 《西方攝影文論選》。杭州: 浙江攝影出版社
    顧錚 (2007)。《現代性的第六張面孔》。上海: 上海人民出版社

    博碩士論文:
    林士民(2003)。攝影行為現象之研究─邁向攝影現象學研究的美學思考。南華大學美學與藝術管理研究所碩士論文,嘉義縣。
    邱啟霖(1998)。攝影與電影:「真實」概念的論述演變。輔仁大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文,新北市。
    劉錫明(2005)。攝影觀念與印象形成之關聯—以人物肖像作為影像符號為例。世新大學圖文傳播暨數位出版學研究所(含碩專班)碩士論文,臺北市。

    外文文獻:
    Bakhtin, M.( 1981).The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Ed. Michael Holquist. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press
    Batchen, G. (2011). Photography degree zero: reflections on Roland Barthes`s Camera lucida.
    Baudrillard, J. (1987). The evil demon of images.
    Bazin, A., & Gray, H. (1960). The ontology of the photographic image. Film Quarterly, 13(4), 4-9.
    Benjamin, W. (1972). A short history of photography. Screen, 13(1), 5-26.
    Berger, J. (2008). Ways of seeing. Penguin UK.
    Berger, J. (2013). Understanding a photograph. Penguin UK.
    Campany, D. (2008). Photography and cinema. Reaktion Press.
    Cowie, E. (1997). Fantasia. In Representing The Woman (pp. 123-165). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
    De Saussure, F. (2011). Course in general linguistics. Columbia University Press.
    Dennis, K. (2009). Benjamin, Atget and the ‘readymade’politics of postmodern photography studies. In Photography: Theoretical Snapshots (pp. 124-136). Routledge.
    Doane, M. A. (1982). Film and the masquerade: Theorising the female spectator. Screen, 23(3-4), 74-88.
    Dyer, R. (2013). Heavenly bodies: Film stars and society. Routledge.
    Foucault, M. (2005). The order of things. Routledge.
    Giannetti, L. D., & Leach, J. (1999). Understanding movies (Vol. 1, No. 1, p. 999). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    Hansen, M. (1986). Pleasure, ambivalence, identification: Valentino and female spectatorship. Cinema Journal, 6-32.
    Kear, J. (2003). The Spiral of Time: Memory, Temporality and Subjectivity in Chris Marker’s La Jetée’. Phototextualities: Intersections of Photography and Narrative.
    Krauss, R. E. (1986). The originality of the avant-garde and other modernist myths. MIT press.
    Lu, Sheldon H. (魯曉鵬), and Emilie Yueh-yu Yeh (葉月瑜), eds. 2005. Chinese-Language Film: Historiography, Poetics, Politics. Honolulu: U of Hawai’i P.
    Marien, M. W. (2006). Photography: A cultural history. Laurence king publishing.
    Metz, C. (1985). Photography and fetish. October, 34, 81-90.
    Mirzoeff, N. (Ed.). (2002). The visual culture reader. Psychology Press.
    Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6-18.
    Mulvey, L. (1996). Fetishism and Curiosity. Bloomington: Indiana UP
    Mulvey, L. (2006). Death 24x a second: Stillness and the moving image. Reaktion Books.
    Orlow, U. (2007). Photography as cinema: La Jetée and the redemptive powers of the image.
    Peirce, C. S. (1934). Collected papers of charles sanders peirce(Vol. 5). Harvard University Press.
    Pollock, G. (2015). Vision and difference: Feminism, femininity and histories of art. Routledge.
    Riviere, J. (1929). Womanliness as a Masquerade. Published in, 35-44.
    Rose, G. (2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials. sage.
    Sharrett, C. (1986). Intertextuality and the Breakup of Codes: Coppola`s Apocalypse Now. Sacred Heart University Review, 6(1), 3.
    Sontag, S. (2001). On photography. Macmillan.
    Stewart, G. (1999). Between Film and Screen: Modernism`s Photo Synthesis. University of Chicago Press.
    Studlar, G. (1992). In the realm of pleasure: Von Sternberg, Dietrich, and the masochistic aesthetic. Columbia University Press.
    Sturken, M., & Cartwright, L. (2001). Practices of looking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Szarkowski, J. (1966). The photographer`s eye. Little Brown & Co.
    Tagg, J. (1993). The burden of representation: Essays on photographies and histories (Vol. 80). U of Minnesota Press.
    Thornham, S. (1997). Passionate Detachments an Introduction to Feminist Film Theory.
    Van Lier, H., & Rommens, A. (2007). Philosophy of photography. Leuven University Press.
    Wang, Caroline C. and Burris M.Ann(1994). Empowerment through Photo Novella: Portraits of Participatio. Health Education Quarterly 21(2): 171- 186
    Wollen,P(2003) Fire and ice. Wells, l. The Photography Reader. Routledge,London,pp 76-80
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
    106464062
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106464062
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU201900872
    Appears in Collections:[傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    406201.pdf4876KbAdobe PDF2511View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback