English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 20 |  Items with full text/Total items : 90029/119959 (75%)
Visitors : 24026754      Online Users : 302
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/127689
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/127689


    Title: 刑法上著手標準的續造-以德國學說和實務反思我國法應有之詮釋
    Reflections on the Standard of “Initiate a Crime” in Criminal Law: Exploring the Interpretation of Our Criminal Law with German Opinion
    Authors: 黃奕文
    Huang, Yi -Wen
    Contributors: 法律碩二
    Keywords: 未遂;著手;中間行為理論;個別的實質化理論;行為規範
    Attempted;Initiate a Crime;Intermediate Behavior Theory;Individual Substantive Theory;Code of Conduct
    Date: 2017-12
    Issue Date: 2019-12-04 14:47:47 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文探討刑法上著手理論的難題。關於未遂犯的著手,學說上素有主觀理論與客觀理論二大陣營之爭,此一難解的問題根源於德國於19世紀以降的立法發展史。本文爬梳德國刑法典對於未遂的法制史源流,藉由歷史的脈絡可以得出著手標準的發展其實和未遂犯的處罰依據息息相關,二者可謂具有高度的相生關係。接著,本文將分析於德國1975年新頒布刑法典後,學者對於該條文所作之詮釋,藉以瞭解彼邦學說與實務上,對於著手時點的高度分歧,恐怕並非吾人所樂見的。接著,本文將視角回到我國刑法第25條未遂規定之上,學者對該條文究竟是採取客觀未遂理論或主觀未遂理論素來有所爭執,本文將指出,雖然由立法沿革來看,我國是承繼德國舊刑法第43條而來,但由文義以及客觀目的論解釋來看,似乎並不排除以主觀理論為核心的解釋可能性。據此出發,本文將提出對於著手時點的看法,藉此反省我國實務上的一些案例類型(以殺人未遂罪和竊盜未遂罪作為示範)。
    This paper explores the difficult problems of the “initiate a crime theory” of criminal law. On the attempt to proceed, the theory is subject to the theory of subjective theory and objective theory of the two camps dispute, this difficult problem is rooted in Germany in the 19th century legislation history. In this paper, the German criminal code for the attempt of the history of the legal system, through the historical context can be drawn to the development of standards in fact and attempted to commit penalties based on the relevant, both can be described as a high degree of mutual relationship. Then, this article will be analyzed in Germany after the promulgation of the new criminal code in 1975, scholars for the interpretation of the provisions of the article, in order to understand the other doctrine and practice, for the start of the high degree of divergence, I am afraid we are not happy to see. Then, this article will return to Taiwan’s criminal law Article 25 of he provisions of the above, the scholars of the article is to take the objective theory of attempted or subjective attempt to have some dispute, this article will point out that although the legislative evolution, Taiwan is inherited Article 43 of the old German criminal law, but by the meaning of justice and objective teleological interpretation of view, does not seem to exclude the subjective theory as the core of the interpretation of the possibility. Based on this, this paper will put forward the views on the point of view, to reflect on the practice of some of the types of cases (to commit crimes and attempted theft as a demonstration).
    Relation: 世新法學, 第11卷第1期, 頁1-40
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.3966/199815542017121101001
    DOI: 10.3966/199815542017121101001
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML16View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback