政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/127692
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109948/140897 (78%)
Visitors : 46092067      Online Users : 1264
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/127692


    Title: 重新檢視過失共同正犯之難題-以德國學說為討論中心
    Re-examine the Problem of Negligent Accomplice—The Theories in Germany
    Authors: 黃奕文
    Huang, Yi -Wen
    Contributors: 法律碩二
    Keywords: 不法集體決議;因果關係;最低限度充分條件理論
    Illegal Cooperative Decisions;Causation
    Date: 2016-11
    Issue Date: 2019-12-04 14:48:10 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 刑法釋義學中，過失共同正犯（fahrlässige Mittäterschaft）的討論，無疑是最撲朔迷離的一塊領域，它不但牽涉到我們對於刑法基本理論的前理解，更重要的是，承認該犯罪類型與否將嚴重攸關加害者之刑事責任。在二十一世紀的今天，複數行為人因過失導致的法益侵害，頻率遠較以往傳統社會來得高，如何妥適地處理該行為人的責任，便成了刑法釋義學的一大難題。本文將由德國真實發生的【皮革噴霧劑案】作為切入點，進一步地說明因果關係理論運用在集體決議時的難題，導致我們勢必得將思考重心移往共同正犯領域。本文擬重新省視共同正犯的成立要件的合理性，進一步地對既有的觀點提出批判，並於文末提出有限度地承認過失共同正犯之見解，期能為集體犯罪找到合適的處理模式。
    In the Hermeneutics of criminal law, the discussion of fahrlässige Mittäterschaft (negligent accomplice), is undoubtedly a most confusing areas. It is not only related to our understanding of the basis for criminal law but also the recognition of the type of crime or not will seriously affecting his/her criminal responsibility. In the twenty-first century, resulting from negligence against several people has already become much more frequently than traditional society. How to properly deal with the perpetrators responsibility, has become a major problem of criminal law. This article will take place in the Germany’s case【Ledersprayfall 】as a starting point to further illustrate the causation problem of cooperative decisions ; therefore, we will inevitably have to move the center of gravity to the (accomplice) fields. The article intends to reinspect the elements of (accomplice), and further put criticism on existing views. At the end of this article, the author will point out that (negligent accomplice)’s recognition is a solution to deal with some difficult cases. 
    Relation: 興大法學, 第20期, 頁193-280
    Data Type: article
    DOI link: https://doi.org/10.3966/199516202016110020004
    DOI: 10.3966/199516202016110020004
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Law] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2163View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback