English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109951/140892 (78%)
Visitors : 46210679      Online Users : 1078
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/127711


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/127711


    Title: 論商業判斷法則於我國刑事案件之運用
    Study on the Applications of Business Judgment Rule in Criminal Procedure
    Authors: 周振鋒
    Chou, Cheng-Fong
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 商業判斷法則（經營判斷原則）;背信罪;非常規交易罪;受任人義務;刑事程序
    Business Judgment Rule;Offenses of Breach of Trust;Offenses of Non-arm’s Length Transaction;Fiduciary Duty;Criminal Procedure
    Date: 2017-12
    Issue Date: 2019-12-04 14:50:46 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 商業判斷法則（Business Judgment Rule）係美國法下保護董事及其經營決定之制度，該法則假定經營決定符合以下條件：一、經營決定（business decision）；二、無利益關係與獨立性（disinterestedness and independence）；三、正當注意（due care）；四、善意（good faith）；五、無濫用裁量（no abuse of discretion），除非訴訟上原告能舉證推翻前揭任一個條件，否則法院將拒絕事後審查經營決定。商業判斷法則原為民事程序之被告抗辯事由，但於我國司法實務不少見解認為商業判斷法則可作為刑事案件之抗辯理由，學說上亦持有正反不同見解，爭議程度相當高。本文即擬以商業判斷法則是否適用於刑事程序此一問題為出發，整理與分析近期司法實務觀點與趨勢，並對國內學說意見加以梳理，綜合觀察後提出本文對此問題之解答，希能整合目前紛亂之實務與學說意見，於兼顧正反意見下提供一個新的思考方向，作為本文結論。
    Under the U.S. legal regime, Business Judgment Rule (BJR) is developed to protect directors and their business decisions by presuming the decisions in question are (1) business decisions and made by persons with (2) disinterestedness and independence, (3) due care, (4) good faith, and (5) no abuse of discretion. Unless the plaintiff rebuts one of such presumptions, the court would not second-guess the decisions the defendant made. While BJR is originally used in civil procedure, Taiwan courts also apply such rule in criminal procedure as defense for defendants. This article is about to analyze recent judicial opinions and academic theories and to offer some suggestions as conclusion.
    Relation: 法令月刊, Vol.68, No.12, pp.84-105
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2467View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback