English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 94188/124659 (76%)
Visitors : 29624058      Online Users : 316
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/127716
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/127716


    Title: 公務人員退休制度之年金保險化 - 公務人員退休制度之改革評析
    Commentary on the Reform of the Public Servants Retirement and Pension System—Trend towards Insurance Annuity Systems
    Authors: 張桐銳
    Tsang, Cheng-Yun
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 公務人員退休制度;年金改革;社會保險;保險原則;重分配;服公職權利;照顧原則
    public servants retirement system;pension reform;social insurance;insurance principle;redistribution;right to hold public office;principles of alimentation
    Date: 2018-07
    Issue Date: 2019-12-04 14:51:10 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 年金改革為我國近年來社會政策之重大課題。2017年8月9日制定公布之公務人員退休資遣撫卹法(以下簡稱退撫法)乃是年金改革之初步成果。然而伴隨而生的是其合憲性之爭議。本文從憲法第18條服公職權利,尤其是所謂國家對於公務人員之照顧義務(照顧原則),檢討退撫法之合憲性。本文認為,公務人員退休制度的改革顯現出退休制度年金保險化之趨勢,而此將衝擊公務人員制度,此一衝擊應具備足以正當化之理由,且減縮後之退休金應仍足以提供對於公務人員最低限度之照顧。基於對於公務人員之最低限度照顧,公務人員之退休所得不應低於相同薪資之勞工。退撫法所規定之退休所得上限,以及以最後15年平均俸額取代最後職務之俸給計算月退休金,違反照顧原則,應屬違憲。 
    The pension reforms in recent social policy changes in Taiwan has garnered widespread attention. The Public Servant Retirement and Pension Act promulgated on August 9, 2017 was the first of the reforms. However, the Act has been debated for its constitutionality, which this study examined according to the principle that the government must safeguard the rights of its citizens to hold public offices, as stated in Article 18 of the Constitution of the Republic of China. This study believes that the reform of the public servant retirement system corresponds to the trend of transforming pension systems according to insurance annuity systems. The consequent changes in the public servant system require justification. After reduction, the pension payments should remain sufficient for retired public servant to maintain a minimal standard of living. Therefore, the retirement income of public servant should not be lower than that of workers with equivalent income. The Act's specification of the upper limit of the public servant' retirement income and the replacement of the original monthly retirement compensation standards with the amount equivalent to each servant' average pay for the final 15 years of servant conflicts with the principles of alimentation, rendering the Act unconstitutional.
    Relation: 東吳法律學報, Vol.第三十卷, No.第一期, pp.33-87
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    42.pdf1125KbAdobe PDF42View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback