English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 92624/122950 (75%)
Visitors : 26913976      Online Users : 467
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/127740


    Title: 后蘇聯地區事實上國家的可持續性與未來(以阿布哈兹和德涅斯特河沿岸爲例)
    The sustainability and future of de facto states of post-sovie area (on the example of Transnistria and Abkhazia)
    Authors: 瑪麗亞
    Bazhkova, Maryia
    Contributors: 連弘宜
    Lian, Hong-Yi
    瑪麗亞
    Bazhkova, Maryia
    Keywords: 事實上國家
    冻结的冲突
    de facto state
    frozen conflict
    parent state
    patron state
    possible scenario
    Date: 2019
    Issue Date: 2019-12-06 09:24:34 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 苏联解体和南斯拉夫导致
    建立大量主权国家和分裂国家
    集中在大黑海地区和巴尔干地区。后者,所谓的
    事实国家成为冰冻冲突的结果,这是俄罗斯对其执政能力的控制
    在苏联的最后几年,领土被削弱,民族宗教处于休眠状态
    紧张局势演变成内部冲突。分离主义者,最终得到了
    俄罗斯通过停火达成了战场上的胜利
    举行了二十多年的母国。但是,围绕的问题
    这些事实上的国家仍未解决,并试图解决冲突和
    和解因许多因素而变得复杂,包括俄罗斯的利益和
    参与该地区,国家历史记忆和人口统计资料,非能力
    弱势的母国加强和国际规范和法律,主要是
    现状。本论文旨在研究阿布哈兹和阿布哈兹的事实状态。
    德涅斯特河沿岸,面临的挑战,并探讨可能的情况
    通过调查和分析共同点以及差异。
    The dissolution of the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia resulted in the
    establishment of a great number of sovereign nations and separatist states
    concentrated in the greater Black Sea region and Balkans. The latter, so-called de
    facto states became the result of frozen conflicts that emerged as Russia’s grip over its
    territory weakened during the last years of the USSR and dormant ethno-religious
    tensions erupted into internecine conflict. Separatists, ultimately with help from
    Russia, were able to enshrine victories on the battlefield through ceasefires with
    parent states that have held for over two decades. However, the issues surrounding
    these de facto states remain unsettled, and attempts at conflict resolution and
    reconciliation have been complicated by many factors, including Russian interests and
    involvement in the region, national historical memory and demographics, non-ability
    of weak parent states to step up and international norms and laws that mostly favor
    the status quo. This thesis seeks to examine the de facto states of Abkhazia and
    Transnistria, the challenges in front of them and explore possible scenarios for the
    future of these entities through investigating and analyzing the common points and
    differences.
    Reference: BIBLIOGRAPHY
    I. BOOKS
    Bahcheli, Tozun, Barry Bartmann, and Henry Srebrnik, De Facto States: The Quest for Sovereignty (New York: Routledge, 2004), pp.105-111.
    Beissinger, Mark R., and Crawford Young. Beyond State Crisis? : Postcolonial Africa and PostSoviet Eurasia in Comparative Perspective. Washington D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press,2002, pp.53-57.
    Bencic, Aurora, and Teodor I. Hodor, Transdniestria: Ethnic Conflict or Geopolitical Interests?
    London: Editura Universitatii din Oradea, 2011, pp.403-417.
    Buchanan, A. Justice, legitimacy, and self-determination. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004,pp.26-37.
    Buzard, Kristina, Benjamin A.T. Graham and Ben Horne. Unrecognized States: A Theory of
    Self-Determination and Foreign Influence. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, 2012.
    Byman, Daniel L. Keeping the peace: lasting solutions to ethnic conflict. Baltimore and London:
    JHU Press, 2002, p.280.
    Caspersen, Nina, and Gareth Stansfield. Unrecognized States in the International System.
    London: Routledge, 2011, pp.24-33.
    Caspersen, Nina. Making Peace with De Facto States, Unrecognized States and Secession in the
    21th Century. New York: Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp.38-55.
    Caspersen, Nina. Unrecognized States: The Struggle for Sovereignty in the Modern International
    System . Cambridge: Polity Press, 2012, pp.64-66.

    Chinn, Jeff, and Robert Kaiser. Russians as the New Minority: Ethnicity and Nationalism in the
    Soviet Successor States. New York: Westview Press, 1996, pp.200-213.
    De Waal, Thomas, Maria Lipman, Lev Gudkov and Lasha Bakradze. The Stalin Puzzle:
    Deciphering Post-Soviet Public Opinion. Washington, DC: Carnegie Foundation of International
    Peace, 2013, pp.44-68.
    Donald L. Horowitz, Irredentism and International Politics. Sydney: Lynne Rienner Publishers
    1991, pp.112-119.
    Gary King, Robert Keohane and Sidney Verba, “Designing Social Inquiry” in Scientific
    Inference in Qualitative Research, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994), pp.35-37.
    Geldenhuys, Deon, Contested States in World Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009,
    pp.85-89.
    Horowitz, Donald L. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985,
    pp. 24-28.
    Jessup, Philip C. A modern law of nations: an introduction. New York: Archon Books, 1986,
    p.236.
    Lynch, Dov. Engaging Eurasia's Separatist States: Unresolved Conflicts and De Facto States
    New York: United States Institute of Peace, 2004, pp.16-22.
    Macedo, Stephen, and Allan Buchanan. Secession and self-determination. New York: New York
    University Press, 2003, pp.247-255.
    Moore, Margaret. National Self-determination and Secession, Oxford: Oxford University Press,
    1998, pp.76-88.

    Oskanian, Kevork. Fear, Weakness and Power in the Post-Soviet South Caucasus. London:
    Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2011, pp.67-69.
    Pavković, Alexandr, and Peter Radan. Secession and Territorial Borders: The Role of Law.
    Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2011, pp.20-25.
    Peterson, M-J. Recognition of Governments: Legal Doctrine and State Practice, 1815- 1995.
    New York: St. Martin's Press, 1997, pp.23-55.
    Radan, Peter, and Aleksandar Pavkovic. On the Way To Statehood: Secession And Globalisation.
    Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, 2008, pp.44-45.
    Radan, Peter. International Law and the Right of Unilateral Secession. Surrey: Ashgate
    Publishing, 2011, pp.321-331.
    Riegl, Martin, and Bohumil Dobos. Unrecognized States and Secession in the 21th Century.
    New York: Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp.25-44.
    Sterio, Milena. The right to self-determination under international law. London: Routledge, 2013,
    pp.97-114.
    Tekushev, Islam. Abkhazia: Between the Past and the Future. Prague: Medium Orient, 2013,
    pp.75-79.
    Young, Robert A. The Secession of Quebec and the Future of Canada. Montreal: McGillQueen’s Press, 1998, pp.46-48.
    II. JOURNAL ARTICLES
    Bakke, Kristin M., John O’Loughlin and Michael J. Ward. “The Viability of De Facto States:
    Post-War Developments and Internal Legitimacy in Abkhazia”, for the annual meeting of the
    American Political Science Association, Seattle, September 2011.

    Berg, Eiki, “How can a de facto state be distinguished from a puppet state? An analysis of
    Transnistrian-Russian relations and dependences”, in Estonian Foreign Policy Yearbook 2011.
    Tallinn: Estonian Foreign Policy Institute, 2012, pp.12-18.
    Berg, Eiki, and Raul Toomla. “Forms of Normalisation in the Quest for De Facto Statehood”, in
    “The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs”, Vol. 44, No. 4, 2009,
    pp.27-45.
    Caspersen, Nina. “Playing the Recognition Game: External Actors and De Facto States”, in ‘The
    International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs”. Vol 44, Issue: 4, 2009, pp.12-37.
    Coggins, Bridget L. “Secession, Recognition & The International Politics of Statehood”. PhD.
    Diss., Ohio State University, 2006, pp.28-30.
    Cojocaru, Natalia. “Nationalism and Identity in Transnistria, Innovaton” in “The European
    Journal of Social science research”, Volume 19, 2006, issue 3-4, pp.261-272.
    Coppieters, Bruno, and Richard Sakwa. “Contextualizing Secession” in “Normative Studies in
    Comparative Perspective”. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003, pp.10-14.
    Cornell, Svante E. “Autonomy as a Source of Conflict: Caucasian Conflicts in Theoretical
    Perspective” in “World Politics”. Vol. 54, No. 2, 2002, pp.245-276.
    Dębski, Sławomir, Bartosz Wiśniewski and Wojciech Lorenz, “EU Policy Options towards PostSoviet De Facto States” in “The Polish Institute of International Affairs”. No. 6, 2017, pp.12-18.
    Dersso, Solomon. “International Law and the Self-Determination of South Sudan”. Addis Abeba:
    Institute for Security Studies, 2012.
    Dion, Stephane. “Why is Secession Difficult in Well-Established Democracies? Lessons from
    Quebec” in “British Journal of Political Science”. Vol. 26, No. 02, 1996, pp.269-283.

    Gauthier, David. “Breaking Up: An Essay on Secession” in “Canadian Journal of Philosophy”,
    Vol. 24, 1994, pp.357-371.
    Gezerdava, Said. “Abkhaz sovereignty and relations with Russia” in “The Politics of Nonrecognition in the Context of the Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict”. London: International Alert, 2011,
    pp.16-18.
    Hill, William. “Reflections on Negotiation and Mediation: The Frozen Conflicts and European
    Security” in “Demokratizatsiya”. July 2010, pp.219-227.
    Johnstone, Ian. “Consolidating Peace: Priorities and Deliberative Processes” in “Annual Review
    of Global Peace Operations”. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2019, pp.13-29.
    Kaufman, Stuart J., and Stephen R. Bowers. “Transnational dimensions of the Transnistrian
    conflict” in “Nationalities Papers: The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity. 26 (1), 1998,
    pp.129-146.
    Kaufmann, Chaim. “Possible and Impossible Solutions to Ethnic Civil Wars” in “International
    Security”. Vol. 20, No. 4, 1996, pp.3-20.
    Keating, Michael. “Rethinking Sovereignty: Independence-lite, Devolutionmax and National
    Accommodation” in “Revista d'estudis autonòmics i federals”. No 16, 2012, p.290.
    Kemp, Walter. “Selfish Determination: The Questionable Ownership of Autonomy Movements”
    in “Ethnopolitics”. Vol. 4, 2005, pp.85-104.
    King, Charles. “The Benefits of Ethnic War: Understanding Eurasia’s Unrecognized States”, in
    “World Politics”. Vol. 53, No. 4, July 2001, pp.524-552.
    Kolossov, Vladimir, and John O’Loughlin. “After the Wars in the South Caucasus State of
    Georgia: Economic Insecurities and Migration in the De Facto States of Abkhazia and South
    Ossetia” in “Eurasian Geography and Economics”. Vol.52, 2011, pp.631-654.

    Kolossov, Vladimir. “The Transdniestrian Moldovan Republic: An Unrecognized State in the
    Geopolitical World Order” in “Eurasian Geography and Economics”. Vol. 55(5), 2010, pp.1-34.
    Kolstø, Pal, and Andrei Malgin. “The Transnistrian Republic: A Case of Politicized Regionalism”
    in “The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity”. 26 (1), 1998, pp.103-127.
    Kolstø, Pal, and Helge Blakkisrud. “Living with Non-recognition: State- and Nationbuilding in
    South Caucasian Quasi-states” in “Europe-Asia Studies”. Vol. 60, No. 3, 2008, pp.483-509.
    Kolstø, Pal. “The Sustainability and Future of Unrecognized Quasi-States” in “Journal of Peace
    and Research”. Vol 43, No. 6, 2006, pp.1-7.
    Margalit, Avishai, and Joseph Raz. “National self-determination” in “The Journal of Philosophy”,
    Vol. 87, no. 9, 1990, pp.439-461.
    Munteanu, Angela, and Igor Munteanu. “Transnistria: a paradise for vested interests” in “SouthEast Europe Review”, Issue (4), 2007, pp.51-66.
    Österud, Öyvind. “The Narrow Gate: Entry to the Club of Sovereign States” in “Review of
    International Studies”. 23(2), 1997, pp.167-184.
    Pegg, Scott. “De Facto States in the International System” for Institute of International Relations
    at the University of British Columbia, 1998, pp.1-29.
    Pegg, Scott. “International Society and The De Facto States” in “The international journal of
    Middle East studies”. Vol.33, Issue 3, 2001, pp.469-470.
    Popescu, Anna. “European Neighborhood Policy and the Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict: European
    Union’s Approach” in “Europeanization and Conflict Resolution: Case Studies from the
    European Periphery”, Chapter 5, July 2004.
    Popescu, Nicu. “Democracy in Secessionism: Transnistria and Abkhazia’s Domestic Policies”.
    2006, pp.1-27.

    Radan, Peter. “Secessionist Referenda in International and Domestic Law” in “Nationalism and
    Ethnic politics”. Vol.18, 2012, pp.8-21.
    Radoman, Jelena. “Future Kosovo Status-Precedent or Universal Solution” in “Western Balkans
    Security Observer”. Issue no. 3, 2006, pp.14-22.
    Rywkin, Michael. “The Phenomenon of Quasi-states” in “Diogenes”. Vol. 53, No. 2, 2006,
    pp.28-57.
    Sanchez, Alejandro W. “The Frozen Southeast: How the Moldova-Transnistria Question has
    Become a European Geo-Security Issue” in “The Journal of Slavic Military Studies”, 22 (2),
    2009, pp.152-176.
    Zartman, William. “Putting Things Back Together” in “Collapsed States: The Disintegration and
    Restoration of Legitimate Authority”. London: Lyenne Rienner Publishers, 1995, pp.19-31.
    III. INTERNET SOURCES
    Basescu, John. “Moldova may reunite with Romania in next 25 years”, RIANovosti, November
    30, 2010, <http://en.rian.ru/world/20101130/161565516.html>, (August 28, 2019).
    BBC News. Regions and territories: Abkhazia, 12 March 2012,
    <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3261059.stm>, (August 7, 2019).
    Belister, Natalya. “Transnistrian Conflict: State of Affairs and Prospects of Settlement,” Black
    See News, 27 January 2013, < https://www.blackseanews.net/en/read/55025> (August 12,
    2019).
    Cherilla, Victor. “APE voices regret on Transnistria article”, EUobserver, 3 February, 2011,
    < http://euobserver.com/24/31684> (August 21, 2019)
    Freedom in the World, 12 November 2012, from Freedom House Web site:
    http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2012 (August 12 2019).

    Ministry of Foreign Affairs, September 4, 2019, <http://mfaapsny.org/ru/foreign-policy/> ,
    (September 4, 2019).
    Shields, Samantha. “Russian presence grows in Abkhazia”, Wall street journal. December 14,
    2009, < https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB126070743647789499>( August 24, 2019).
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    外交學系
    106253030
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106253030
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU201901252
    Appears in Collections:[外交學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    303001.pdf2412KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback