English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 92429/122733 (75%)
Visitors : 26449431      Online Users : 119
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/128886


    Title: 日本對越南之貿易援助有效性分析 -以峴港港口改善計畫為例
    The Effectiveness of Japan’s AfT policy towards Vietnam: A Case Study of Da Nang Port Improvement Project
    Authors: 葉姵君
    Yeh, Pei-Chun
    Contributors: 劉曉鵬
    葉姵君
    Yeh, Pei-Chun
    Keywords: 貿易援助
    輔助論
    轉移論
    援助有效性
    AfT
    Supplemental theory
    Displacement theory
    Effectiveness of aid
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2020-03-02 11:18:50 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 越南為日本貿易援助的最大受援國之一。本文為了更好的研究貿易援助之效益,以峴港港口改善計畫為主要研究案例,分別從日本視角以及在地視角,並透過輔助論及轉移論深入探討日本對越南提供的貿易援助計畫之實質效益。
    透過研究可以發現,峴港港口改善計畫不僅補充峴港港口能力之不足,更進一步加強峴港市及其周邊地區之經濟發展,符合輔助論認為援助有效提供受援國資源不足並帶動其經濟成長之論點。
    而透過觀察日本提供官方發展援助的綁訂條件、日越間匯率差距加大等日本不利因素以及政府支持、峴港港口股份有限公司積極發展港口等越南積極因素,發現轉移論論述中認為受援國在接受援助後將會過分依賴援助國之協助並放棄發展之現象並未在本案例出現。
    簡而言之,本文試圖在量化分析法的分析基礎之上,透過田野調查法以及訪談法為主要的研究方法針對峴港港口改善計畫進行分析。而根據結果顯示,不論是透過輔助論或是轉移論為主要途徑進行分析,皆可佐證日本對越南所提供的貿易援助項目—峴港港口改善計畫之有效性。
    Since Aid for Trade (AfT) initiative first advocated by WTO in 2005, it has turned more and more important. Japan has been the main donor of Aft so far. After the full resumption of its aid to Vietnam in 1992, Japan has made significant contributions to the economic development of Vietnam. Therefore, this study intends to analyze the effectiveness of Japan's AfT to Vietnam. The author takes Da Nang Port Improvement Project as a case study and tries to verify the effectiveness of this project.
    The results of this study find that Da Nang Port Improvement Project posivitvely strengthened the economic development of Da Nang and the surrounding areas. Camparing the negative factors of aid from Japan with the positive efforts of Vietnam, this study finds that the recipient country, i.e. Vietnam, continues its self-sustaining development. The finding further indicates that the displacement theory is not applicable to the subject of this study. In conclusion, the study confirms that Japan's Da Nang Port Improvement Project, after being examined by both supplemental theory and displacement theory, has effectively contributed to the development of Da Nang.
    Reference: 一、 中文部分
    上海外國語學院日語專業譯,吉澤清次郎著,1976,《戰後日本同亞洲各國的關係》。上海:人民出版社。

    王孔祥,2004,〈西方國家的對外援助:理論與實踐的分析〉,《教學與研究》,11:45-51。

    林沁雄,2008,〈對邦交國的最適援助—兼論歐盟國家在援外之經驗與借鏡〉,《台灣國際研究季刊》,4 (2):1-23。

    林秀雲譯,Earl Babbie著,2013,《社會科學研究方法》(The Practice of Social Research)。臺北:雙葉書廊。

    胡龍騰、黃瑋瑩、潘中道譯,Ranjit Kumar著,2000,《研究方法:步驟化學習指南》(Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners)。臺北:學富文化。

    席艷樂、曹亮、陳勇兵,2010,〈對外援助有效性問題研究評述〉,《經計學動態》,2:125-130。

    歐信宏、胡祖慶譯,Joshua S. Goldstein著,2003,《國際關係》(International Relations)。台北:雙葉書廊。

    謝宗林、吳惠林,1998,〈國際金融危機與國家貨幣主義〉,《經濟前瞻》,55:112-117。

    環球時報,2018,〈日企在越為何如此受歡迎?專家:官方援助,主打“高質量基建牌”〉, http://www.xinhuanet.com/world/2018-03/28/c_1122600170.htm,檢閱日期:2019年10月10日。

    羅傑,2016,〈台商在越南投資可能遭遇之法律問題簡析〉,《東協瞭望》,14:1-32。

    二、 英文部分
    Alesina, A. & Dollar, D. 2000. “Who gives aid to whom and why?” Journal of Economic Growth, 5 (1): 33-63.

    Ascher, W. & Mirovitskaya, N. 2013. Development Strategies, Identities, and Conflict in Asia. Durham: Duke Center for International Development.

    Barder, Owen. 2006. “Are the planned increases in aid too much of a good thing?” Working Papers 90. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.

    Bauer, P. T. 1981. Equality, the Third World, and economic delusion. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Bearce, D. & Tirone, D. C. 2010. “Foreign Aid Effectiveness and the Strategic State Standards Gaining Momentum of 10 Donor Governments.” Journal of Politics, 72 (3): 837-851.

    Berthélemy, J. C. 2006. “Aid allocation: Comparing donors’ behavior.” Swedish Economic Policy Review, 13: 75-109.

    Boone, P. 1996. “Politics and the effectiveness of foreign aid.” European Economic Review, 40 (2): 289-329.

    Brazys, Samuel Rueckert. 2013. “Explaining Donor Heterogeneity in Aid for Trade.” Review of International Political Economy, 20 (4): 947-978

    Burnside, C. & Dollar, D. 2000. “Aid, policies, and growth.” American Economic Review, 90 (4): 847-868.

    Busse, M., Hoekstra, R. & Königer, J. 2012. “The impact of Aid for Trade facilitation on the costs of trading.” KYKLOS, 65 (2): 143-163.

    Calì, M. and Te Velde, D. 2011. “Does Aid for Trade really improve trade performance?” World Development, 39 (5): 725-740.

    CEIC. 2019. “Vietnam Spot FX: Transfer: Japanese Yen.” Retrieved from https://www.ceicdata.com/en/vietnam/foreign-exchange-rates/spot-fx-buy-japanese-yen. (Accessed on October 17, 2019).

    Chenery, H. B. & Strout, A. M. 1966. “Foreign Assistance and Economic Development.” The American Economic Review, 56 (4): 679-733.

    Chong, A. & Gradstein, M. (2008). “What determines Foreign Aid? The Donors’ Perspective.” Journal of Development Economics, 87 (1): 1-13.

    Clemens, M., Radelet, S. & Bhavani, R. 2004. “Counting chickens when they hatch; The short-term effect of aid on growth.” Working Paper 44. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.

    Collier, P. & Dehn, J. 2001. “Aid, shocks, and growth.” Working Paper No. 2688. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Collier, P. & Dollar, D. 2002. “Aid allocation and poverty reduction.” European Economic Review, 46 (8): 1475-1500.

    Collier, P. & Hoeffler, A. 2004. “Aid, policy and growth in post-conflict societies.” European Economic Review, 48 (5): 1125-1145.

    Commission on Growth and Development. 2008. The Growth Report: Strategies for Sustained Growth and Inclusive Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Crawford, G. 1997. “Foreign aid and political conditionality: Issues of effectiveness and consistency.” Democratization, 4 (3): 69-108.

    Dalgaard, C-J. & Hansen, H. 2001. “On aid, growth and good policies.” Journal of Development Studies, 37 (6): 17-41.

    Dalgaard, C-J. & Hansen, H. & Tarp, F. 2004. “On the empirics of foreign aid and growth.” The Economic Journal, 114 (496): 191-216.

    Danang Port Co Ltd. 2008. Danang Port Joint Stock Company Annual Report 2008. Da Nang: Danang Port Co Ltd. Retrieved from https://danangport.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/DNP-FS-2008-Audited-En.pdf. (Accessed on June 14, 2019).

    Easterly, W. 2003. “Can foreign aid buy growth?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17 (3): 23-48.

    Easterly, W., Levine, R., & Roodman, D. 2003. “New Data, New Doubts: Revisiting ‘Aid, Policies, and Growth’.” Working Paper No. 26. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.

    Easterly, W., Levine, R., & Roodman, D. 2004. “Aid, policies, and growth: Comment.” American Economic Review, 94 (3): 774-780.

    Elayah, M. 2016. “Lack of foreign aid effectiveness in developing countries between a hammer and an anvil.” Contemporary Arab Affairs, 9 (1): 82-99.

    Feyrer, J. 2009. “Trade and income—exploiting time series in geography.” Working Paper 14910. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Finkel, S. E., Rodriquez-Zepeda, J., Surzhko-Harned, L., Pérez Liñán, A. & Bearce, D. H. 2010. “Has Aid for Trade increased recipient exports? The impact of US AfT allocations 1999-2008.” Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1663325.

    Gachet, A. N. 2016. “What is the relation between foreign aid and trade?” MPRA Paper 70861. München: University Library of Munich.

    Gnangnon, K. S. 2019. “Aid for Trade export diversificstion in recipient-countries.” The World Economy, 42 (2): 396-418.

    GRIPS. 2002. Japan’s Development Cooperation in Vietnam: Supporting Broad-based Growth with Poverty Reduction. Tokyo: National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies

    Hausmann, R., Pritchett, L. & Rodrik, D. 2005. “Growth accelerations.” Journal of Economic Growth, 10 (4): 303-329.

    Hansen, H. & Tarp, F. 2001. “Aid and growth regressions.” Journal of Development Economics, 64 (2): 547-570.

    Helble, M., Mann, C. & Wilson, J. S. 2012. “Aid-for-Trade Facilitation.” Review of World Economics, 148 (2): 357-376.

    Hirata, K. 1998. “Japan as a Reactive State? Analyzing the Case of Japan-Vietnam Relations.” Japanese Studies, 18 (2): 1-31.

    Hjertholm, P., Laursen, J. & White H. 2000. “Macroeconomic Issues in Foreign Aid.” Discussion Paper No.00-05. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.

    Hoekman, B. & Nicita, A. 2010. “Assessing The Doha Round: Market Access, Transactions Costs and Aid for Trade Facilitation.” Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 19 (1): 65-79.

    Hoekman, B. & Wilson, J. S. 2010. “Aid for Trade: Building on Progress Today for Tomorrow’s Future”. Policy Research Working Paper Series No,5361. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Hong Hiep, L. 2017. “The Strategic Significance of Vietnam-Japan Ties.” ISSUE 2017 No,23, Singapore: ISEAS.

    Hühne, P., Meyer, B. & Nunnenkamp, P. 2014. “Who benefits from aid for trade? Comparing the effects on recipient versus donor exports.” The Journal of Development Studies, 50 (9): 1275-1288.

    IMF. 2019. “World Economic Outlook Database.” Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2019/02/weodata/index.aspx. (Accessed on October 18, 2019).

    IPA. 2016. Danang: Worth living, Worth investing. Danang: IPA

    Japan Forward. 2019. “China Conflict Increases Opportunities for Japan-Vietnam Trade and Investment.” Retrieved from https://japan-forward.com/china-conflict-increases-opportunities-for-japan-vietnam-trade-and-investment/. (Accessed on June 20, 2019).

    JICA. 2000. Country Assistance Program for Vietnam. Tokyo: JICA. Retrieved from http://www.grips.ac.jp/forum/module/prsp/countryassist.html. (Accessed on June 17, 2019).

    JICA. 2010. Ex-Post Evaluation Report of Japanese ODA Loan Projects 2009(Vietnam). Tokyo: JICA. Retrieved from http://open_jicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/12033940.pdf. (Accessed on June 17, 2019).

    JICA. 2014. The Study for Tien Sa - Da Nang Port Improvement Project (Phase 2). Tokyo: JICA. Retrieved from http://open_jicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/12250627.pdf. (Accessed on June 17, 2019).

    JICA. 2019a. Japanese Enterprises Proposing Program in Vietnam Ongoing Projects. Tokyo: JICA. Retrieved from https://www.jica.go.jp/vietnam/english/activities/c8h0vm0000anjq56-att/proposing.pdf. (Accessed on June 20, 2019).

    JICA. 2019b. JICA’S On-Going Projects Map in Vietnam. Tokyo: JICA. Retrieved from https://www.jica.go.jp/vietnam/english/activities/c8h0vm0000anjq56-att/ongoing_en.pdf. (Accessed on August 20, 2019).

    Kim, R. Y. 2017. “Does aid for trade diversify the export structure of recipient countries?” WINPEC Working Paper Series No. E1710. Tokyo: Waseda Institute of Political Economy Waseda University.

    Kiute, L.S., Nasiri, A., Alleyne, A. & Wenxue, J. 2015. “Aid for Trade and Export Performance of Developing Countries.” Developing Country Studies, 5 (14): 5-14.

    Kovsted, J. 2000. “Financial Sector Aid.” In Tarp, F., ed., Foreign Aid and Development: Lessons Learnt and Directions on the Future, pp. 197-202. London: Routledge.

    Krugman, P. 1987. “The Narrow Moving Band, the Dutch Disease, and the Competitive Consequences of Mrs. Thatcher: notes on trade in the presence of dynamic scale economies.” Journal of Development Economics, 27: 41-55.

    Martínez-Zarzoso, I., Nowak-Lehmann, F. & Rehwald, K. 2017. “Is aid for trade effective? A panel guantile regression approach.” Review of Development Economics, 21 (4): 175-203.

    MOFA. 1981. Japan's Blue Book of Foreign Affairs. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/bluebook/1981/s56-contents.htm#index. (Accessed on June 10, 2019).

    MOFA. 1992a. Japan's ODA Annual Report 1992. Tokyo: MOFA.

    MOFA. 1992b. Japan's Official Development Assistance Charter.Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/summary/1999/ref1.html. (Accessed on June 10, 2019).

    MOFA. 1993. Japan's ODA Annual Report 1993. Tokyo: MOFA.

    MOFA. 1994. Japan's ODA Annual Report 1994. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/summary/1994/index.html. (Accessed on June 2, 2019).

    MOFA. 1995. Japan's ODA Annual Report 1995. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/summary/1995/index.html. (Accessed on June 10, 2019).

    MOFA. 1996. Japan's ODA Annual Report 1996. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/summary/1996/index.html. (Accessed on June 10, 2019).

    MOFA. 1997. Japan's ODA Annual Report 1997. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/summary/1997/index.html. (Accessed on June 10, 2019).

    MOFA. 1998. Japan's ODA Annual Report 1998. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/summary/1998/index.html. (Accessed on June 17, 2019).

    MOFA. 1999. Japan's ODA Annual Report 1999. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/summary/1999/index.html. (Accessed on June 17, 2019).

    MOFA. 2000. Japan's ODA Annual Report 2000. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/summary/2000/index.html. (Accessed on June 17, 2019).

    MOFA. 2001. Japan's Official Development Assistance White Paper 2001. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/white/2001/index02.html. (Accessed on June 17, 2019).

    MOFA. 2002a. Evaluation Study of Japanese ODA for Vietnam. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/evaluation/FY2001/text-pdf/vietna
    m.pdf. (Accessed on June 17, 2019).

    MOFA. 2002b. Japan's Official Development Assistance White Paper 2002. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/white/2002/index02.html. (Accessed on June 17, 2019).

    MOFA. 2003a. Japan’s Official Development Assistance Charter. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/reform/revision0308.pdf. (Accessed on June 12, 2019).

    MOFA. 2003b. Japan's Official Development Assistance White Paper 2003. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/white/2003/index03.html. (Accessed on June 17, 2019).

    MOFA. 2004a. Japan's Official Development Assistance White Paper 2004. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/white/2004/index.html. (Accessed on June 20, 2019).

    MOFA. 2004b. Japan’s Country Assistance Program for Viet Nam. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/region/e_asia/vietnam.pdf. (Accessed on June 20, 2019).

    MOFA. 2005. Japan's Official Development Assistance White Paper 2005. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/white/2005/index.htm. (Accessed on June 20, 2019).

    MOFA. 2006. Japan's Official Development Assistance White Paper 2006. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/white/2006/index.htm. (Accessed on June 21, 2019).

    MOFA. 2007. Japan's Official Development Assistance White Paper 2007. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/white/2007/index.htm. (Accessed on June 21, 2019).

    MOFA. 2008. Japan's Official Development Assistance White Paper 2008. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/white/2008/html/index.htm. (Accessed on June 21, 2019).

    MOFA. 2009a. Japan's Official Development Assistance White Paper 2009. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/white/2009/html/index.html. (Accessed on June 21, 2019).

    MOFA. 2009b. Japan’s Country Assistance Program for Viet Nam. Tokyo: MOFA.

    MOFA. 2010. Japan's Official Development Assistance White Paper 2010. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/white/2010/html/index.html. (Accessed on June 21, 2019).

    MOFA. 2011. Japan's Official Development Assistance White Paper 2011. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/white/2011/html/index.html. (Accessed on June 23, 2019).

    MOFA. 2012a. Aid for Trade. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/oda/shiryo/hyouka/kunibetu/gai/aft/jk11_01_index.html. (Accessed on June 26, 2019).

    MOFA. 2012b. Country assistance policy for the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved fromhttps://www.vn.emb-japan.go.jp/document/pdf/Vietnam-1%EF%BC%88En%EF%BC%89.pdf. (Accessed on June 26, 2019).

    MOFA. 2012c. Japan's Official Development Assistance White Paper 2012. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/white/2012/html/index.html. (Accessed on June 23, 2019).

    MOFA. 2013. Japan's Official Development Assistance White Paper 2013. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/white/2013/html/index.html. (Accessed on June 26, 2019).

    MOFA. 2014. Japan's Official Development Assistance White Paper 2014. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/white/2014/html/index.html. (Accessed on June 26, 2019).

    MOFA. 2015a. Japan's Official Development Assistance White Paper 2015. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/white/2015/html/index.html. (Accessed on June 26, 2019).

    MOFA. 2015b. Development Cooperation Charter. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/page_000138.html. (Accessed on June 26, 2019).

    MOFA. 2016a. Country Assistance Evaluation of Vietnam. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/evaluation/FY2015/pdfs/vietnam.pdf. (Accessed on June 26, 2019).

    MOFA. 2016b. Japan's Official Development Assistance White Paper 2016. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/white/2016/html/index.html. (Accessed on June 30, 2019).

    MOFA. 2017. Japan's Official Development Assistance White Paper 2017. Tokyo: MOFA. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/white/2017/html/index.html. (Accessed on June 30, 2019).

    MOFA. 2019. ODA budget [Data File]. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/oda/shiryo/yosan.html. (Accessed on June 30, 2019).

    MPI. 2008. Statistical Yearbook of Vietnam 2008. Honai: MPI.

    Nilsson, L. 1997. “Aid and donor exports: the case of EU countries.” Lund Economic Studies, 70: 47–77.

    Nkusu, M. 2004. “Aid and the Dutch Disease in Low-Income Countries: Informed Diagnoses for Prudent Prognoses.” Working Papers 04/49. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

    Nowak-Lehmann D., F., Martínez-Zarzoso, I., Klasen, S. & Herzer, D. 2009. “Aid and trade – A donor's perspective.” The Journal of Development Studies, 45(7): 1184-1202.

    Osei, R., Morrissey, O. & Lloyd, T. 2004. “The nature of aid and trade relationships.” The European Journal of Development Research, 16(2): 354-374.

    OECD. 2019a. “Aid for Trade data (constant 2015 US$).” Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dac/aft/aid-for-tradestatisticalqueries.htm. (Accessed on May 07, 2019).

    OECD. 2019b. “ODA data (constant 2015 US$).” Retrieved from https://stats.oecd.org/qwids/. (Accessed on May 07, 2019).

    OECD/WTO. 2008. Aid for Trade at a Glance 2007: 1st Global Review. Paris: Geneva/OECD Publishing.

    OECD/WTO. 2017. Aid for Trade at a Glance 2017: Promoting Trade, Inclusivenes s and Connectivity for Sustainable Development. Paris: Geneva/OECD Publishing.

    Pettersson, J. & Johansson, L. 2013. “Aid, Aid for Trade, and bilateral trade: An empirical study.” The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 22 (6): 866-894.

    Rajan, R. & Subramanian, A. 2005. “What undermines aid’s impact on growth.” NBER Working Paper No. 11657.

    Rajan, R. G. & Subramanian, A. 2008. “Aid and growth: What does the cross-country evidence really show?” Review of Economics and Statistics, 90 (4): 643-665.

    Riddell, R. C. 1987. “Justifying the Official Aid Programme: Challenging Its Critics.” Research Article, 9 (2): 140-152.

    Roodman, D. 2007. “The anarchy of numbers: Aid, development, and cross-country empirics.” World Bank economic review, 21 (2): 255-277.

    Shiraishi, M. 1990. Japanese Relations with Vietnam, 1951–1987. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Sothan, S. 2018. “Foreign aid and economic growth: evidence from Cambodia.” The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 27 (2): 168-183.

    Stiglitz, J. E. & Charlton, Andrew. 2006. “Aid for trade.” International Journal of Development Issues, 5 (2): 1-41.

    Thow, A.M. & Priyadarshi, S. 2013. “Aid for trade: an opportunity to increase fruit and vegetable supply.” Bull World Health Organ, 91 (1): 57-63.

    Veiderpass, A. & Andersson, P. A. 2007. Foreign aid, economic growth and efficiency development: A data envelopment analysis approach. Swedish: SADEV report.

    Vogler-Ludwig, K., Schönherr, S., Taube, M. & Blau, H. (1999). Die auswirkungen der entwicklungszusammenarbeit auf den wirtschaftsstandort deutschland. In Forschungsberichte des Bundesministeriums für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung, BMZ – Band 124. München: Weltforum Verlag.

    VPA. 2019. “Statistics of port.” Retrieved from http://www.vpa.org.vn/. (Accessed on October 07, 2019).

    Wagner, D. 2003. “Aid and trade – an empirical study.” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 17 (2): 153-173.

    White, J. 1974. The Politics of Foreign Aid. NY: St. Martins Press.

    World Bank. 1998. Assessing aid: What works and what doesn't and why. New York: Oxford University Press.

    World Bank. 2001. World Development Report 2000/2001: Attacking Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.

    World Bank. 2019. “Net official development assistance and official aid received (constant 2015 US$).” Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/DT.ODA.ALLD.KD. (Accessed on May 07, 2019).

    Suwa-Eisenmann, A. & Verdier, T. 2007. “Aid and Trade.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(3): 481-507

    Vijil, M. & Wagner, L. 2010. “Does Aid for Trade enhance export performance? Investigating on the infrastructure channel.” Paper presented at European Trade Study Group International Conference.


    三、 越文部分
    Báo điện tử Pháp Luật thành phố Hồ Chí Minh. 2019. “Đà Nẵng đầu tư gần 200 tỉ đồng cải tạo đường ra cảng Tiên Sa.” Retrieved from https://plo.vn/do-thi/giao-thong/da-nang-dau-tu-gan-200-ti-dong-cai-tao-duong-ra-cang-tien-sa-817434.html. (Accessed on Auguest 20, 2019).

    BÁO ĐIỆN TỬ VOV. 2018. “Dự án mở rộng cảng Tiên Sa Đà Nẵng: Làm xong mới xin hợp thức hóa?” Retrieved from https://vov.vn/kinh-te/du-an-mo-rong-cang-tien-sa-da-nang-lam-xong-moi-xin-hop-thuc-hoa-789978.vov. (Accessed on Auguest 10, 2019).

    Danang Port Co Ltd. 2019. “THỐNG KÊ SẢN LƯỢNG THÔNG QUA NĂM.” Retrieved from https://danangport.com/thong-ke/. (Accessed on July 25, 2019).

    Haiguan Online. 2019. “Thủ tướng chỉ thị nâng cao hiệu quả sử dụng vốn vay ODA.” Retrieved from https://haiquanonline.com.vn/thu-tuong-chi-thi-nang-cao-hieu-qua-su-dung-von-vay-oda-107231.html. (Accessed on July 30, 2019).

    Nhan Dan Online. 2018. “Việt Nam cần chiến lược tổng thể để thu hút, quản lý và sử dụng ODA.” Retrieved from https://en.nhandan.org.vn/business/item/6605202-vietnam-needs-overall-strategy-to-attract-manage-and-use-oda.html. (Accessed on July 03, 2019).

    PCI. 2019. “PCI Data.” Retrieved from http://eng.pcivietnam.org/data-catalog/pci-data/. (Accessed on July 02, 2019).

    Saigon Online. 2018. “Phát triển nguồn nhân lực tránh tụt hậu.” Retrieved from https://saigondautu.com.vn/goc-chuyen-gia/phat-trien-nguon-nhan-luc-tranh-tut-hau-63465.html. (Accessed on July 08, 2019).

    Tạp chí điện tử Tài chính. 2019. “Các nhân tố tác động đến hiệu quả sử dụng ODA trong giao thông đường bộ ở Việt Nam.” Retrieved from http://tapchitaichinh.vn/nghien-cuu-trao-doi/cac-nhan-to-tac-dong-den-hieu-qua-su-dung-oda-trong-giao-thong-duong-bo-o-viet-nam-311995.html. (Accessed on July11, 2019).

    Vietnam News. 2019. “Cảng Liên Chiêu đóng vai trò then chốt cho Đà Nẵng bền vững.” Retrieved from http://bizhub.vn/news/lien-chieu-port-to-play-key-role-for-a-sustainable-da-nang_310856.html. (Accessed on July 10, 2019).

    Vietnam Net. 2018. “Vay vốn ODA Nhật Bản: Nhiều điều kiện đòi hỏi cao hơn.” Retrieved from https://vietnamnet.vn/vn/kinh-doanh/dau-tu/bo-tai-chinh-von-vay-nhat-ban-dang-dat-hon-471751.html. (Accessed on Auguest 07, 2019).

    VietNamNet Online Newspaper. 2015. “Nhà phát triển Cảng Tiên Sa từ chối Hỗ trợ Phát triển Chính thức.” Retrieved from https://english.vietnamnet.vn/fms/business/126882/tien-sa-port-developer-turns-down-official-development-assistance.html. (Accessed on Auguest 08, 2019).

    VnEconomy. 2018. “Quan ngại về vốn vay Nhật Bản và phản hồi từ phía JICA.” Retrieved from http://vneconomy.vn/quan-ngai-ve-von-vay-nhat-ban-va-phan-hoi-tu-phia-jica-20180831162818303.htm. (Accessed on July 05, 2019).
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國家發展研究所
    106261007
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106261007
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202000189
    Appears in Collections:[國家發展研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    100701.pdf2131KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback