Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/128907
|
| Title: | 區段徵收土地整合與交易價格變動之研究–以新店中央新村北側附近地區為例
The Study of Zone Expropriation, Land Assembly and Tranding Price Adjustment |
| Authors: | 莊博閔
Chuang, Po-Min |
| Contributors: | 邊泰明
莊博閔
Chuang, Po-Min |
| Keywords: | 區段徵收
土地整合
交易成本
交易價格
競價強度
Zone expropriation
Land assembly
Transaction costs
Trading price
Bidding strength |
| Date: | 2020 |
| Issue Date: | 2020-03-02 11:22:45 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 區段徵收在土地開發事業上，有相當的重要性，其以公權力徵收私人土地所有權之強制力，透過先公有再分配移轉予私人，以取得公共設施用地之公平性及土地開發財務之自償性等特質，形成政府部門無償取得公共設施用地的主要途徑。
土地整合為區段徵收過程當中對於土地產權結構改變的重要活動，這種活動有賴於開發者與不同地主及權利關係人進行協商，並且土地整合的進度、效率與成本會高度受到土的本身的產權結構特性所影響，這也是制度經濟學所關注的交易成本。而土地產權所形成不同的交易成本對於交易地價所產生的影響仍缺乏足夠研究，此外，市場面訊息及開發者數量亦是影響交易地價的重要因素，但以上因素在現有區段收與土地整合相關文獻中也缺乏統合性研究。因此本研究以「新店中央新村北側區段徵收開發案」為個案，採用個體交易資料並訪談利害關係人對在區段徵收後的利益的看法加以分析。本研究的研究成果如下：
一、共有人數愈多，使交易成本提高，促使建商收購價格較低
二、基於風險因素，建商傾向在愈接近公告期間以較高價格購入
三、建商數量反映對於土地競價的強度，建商數量越多使交易地價提升
Zone expropriation has considerable importance on land development, with the
power authorized by the government, it can publicize private land property rights and then transfer to individuals, the institution has the characteristics including the
fairness of acquisition of public facilities and the financial self-pay of land development. This constitutes the major method that the government acquires public facilities without cost. Land assembly is an important activity for the change of land property rights structure during the process of land expropriation. This activity
depends on the developer to negotiate with different landowners and stakeholders, and the progress, efficiency and, cost of the land assembly will be highly affected by the land’s property structure itself, this is also the transaction cost concerned by
institution economics.
The impact of different transaction costs formed by land property rights on trading land prices is still insufficiently studied. In addition, market information and the number of developers are also important factors affecting trading land prices, but
the above factors are also lacking in land assembly and zone expropriation studies.
Therefore, in this study, we use "the zone expropriation development of the Northern Side of Xindian Central Village " as our research case, and analyzing with individual trading data and interviewing stakeholders` views on the benefits after the
expropriation. The research results of this study are as follows:
1. The larger the total number of co-owner, the higher the transaction cost, and the lower the purchase price of the developers.
2. Due to risk factors, developers tend to buy at higher prices as they approach the announcement period.
3. The number of builders reflects the intensity of land bidding. The greater the number of developers, the higher the trading land price. |
| Reference: | 一、中文文獻
內政部，2005，『麻雀地變鳳凰城—台灣區段徵收案例實錄』，台北：內政部。
王文宇，1996，「財產法的經濟分析與寇斯定理」，『月旦法學雜誌』，15：6-15。
王文科，1994，『質的教育研究法』，台北：師大書苑。
古永嘉，1996，『企業研究方法』，台北：華泰書局。
李宗信，1999，「台灣地區都市計畫整體開發之演進歷程及改進方向」，國立成功大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文：台南。
李鴻毅，2001，『不動產經營與管理』，台北：中國地政研究所。
沈靜悅，2006，「民間建築合建行為之研究-以賽局理論分析」，朝陽科技大學建築及都市設計研究所：彰化。
林怡妏，2006，「應用交易成本理論檢討台灣現行土地開發機制—舊市區與新開發區之比較」，國立成功大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文：台南。
林建伸，2004，「區段徵收開發新社區之效益評估—以太平新光區段徵收為例」，逢甲大學土地管理研究所碩士論文：台中。
林森田，2001，『土地經濟理論與分析』，台北：三民書局
金家禾，1998，「不動產開發過程中估價功能之研究」，『中興法商學報』，34 ：235-271。
胡振揚，2003，「區段徵收與財務平衡」，國立成功大學都市計畫學系碩士論文：台南。
陳向明，2002，『社會科學質的研究』，台北：五南圖書出版公司。
黃俊英，1996，『行銷研究，管理與技術』，台北：華泰書局。
楊松齡，1994，「區段徵收制度之公平性與分配內涵之分析」，『台灣地政』，101：10∼16。
楊棻糸，2000，「都市更新單元規模之研究」，國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文：台北。
楊與齡，1981，『房屋之買賣委建合建或承攬』，台北：中正書局
劉文中，1994，「住宅社區整體開發之研究」，國立中興大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文：台中。
蔡伯俊，2006，「以賽局理論探討都市發展過程中地方政府與開發商互動行為」，國立台北大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文：台北。
謝靜琪，2001，『區段徵收發還土地所有權人抵價地比例準則之硏究』，台中：內政部中部辦公室。
邊泰明，2003，『土地使用規劃與財產權－理論與實務』，台北：詹氏書局。
邊泰明，2010，「都市更新-困境與信任」，『經濟前瞻』，131：97-102。
二、英文文獻
Ball, M., 1994, “The 1980s Property Boom”, Environment and Planning A, 26: 671-695.
Coase, R. H., 1937, “The nature of the firm”, economica, 4(16): 386-405.
Coase, R. H., 1960, “The problem of social cost”, Journal of law and economics, 1-44.
Cohen, L., 1991, “Holdouts and Free Riders”, Journal of Legal Studies, 20: 351-362.
Colwell, P. and H. Munneke, 1999, “Land Prices and Assembly in the CBD,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 18: 163–180.
Colwell, P. F. and Sirmans, C.F., 1978, “Area, Time, Centrality and the Value of
Urban”, Land Economics, 54(4): 514-519.
Eckart, W., 1985, “On the Land Assembly Problem”, Journal of Urban Economics,18: 363-378.
Gillen, M. and Fisher, P., 2002, “Residential developer behaviour in land price
determination”, Journal of Property Research, 19(1): 39–59.
Healey, P., 1994, “Urban policy and property development: the institutional relations of real-estate development in an old industrial region”, Environment and Planning, 26(2): 177-198.
Hillebrandt, P., Cannon, J. and Lansey, P., 1995, The Construction Company in and out of Recession, London: Macmillan.
Lin, T. and Evans, A., 2000, “The relationship between the price of land and size of plot when plots are small”, Land Economics, 76(3): 386-394.
Miceli, T. and Sirmans, C. F., 2007, “The holdout problem, urban sprawl, and eminent domain”, Housing Economics, 16 (3/4):309-19.
Shoup, D., 2008, “Graduated Density Zoning”, Journal of planning education and research, 28: 161-178.
Smyth, H., 1985, Property Companies and the Construction Industry in Britain,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wimmer, R. and Dominick, J., 1995, Mass Media Research: An Introduction, 5th ed.,
Belmont, CA.: Wadsworth Publishing Company |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
地政學系碩士在職專班
104923027 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104923027 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202000200 |
| Appears in Collections: | [地政學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 302701.pdf | 2372Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 207 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
