English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 91913/122132 (75%)
Visitors : 25724170      Online Users : 302
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/130609


    Title: 臺北市租屋類型與租金之分析 ―雅房、分租套房、獨立套房及整層住家之差異比較
    Analysis of Types of Rental Housing and Rents in Taipei :The Difference Between “Room to share”, “Subdivided Studio”, “Studio”, and “Apartment”.
    Authors: 吳彥葶
    Wu, Yen-Ting
    Contributors: 張金鶚
    Chang, Chin-Oh
    吳彥葶
    Wu, Yen-Ting
    Keywords: 租屋品質
    租金
    特徵價格理論
    空間迴歸模型
    Rental quality
    Rent
    Hedonic price theory
    Spatial lag regression model
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2020-07-01 13:54:12 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 臺灣租屋市場存在居住品質與租金不對稱的問題。本文利用591租屋網租金成交資料,以特徵價格理論及空間迴歸模型分析市場分割房間、獨立套房、整層住家居住品質與租金關係,並進一步比較各租屋類型隱私價值差異。
    實證結果顯示分割房間及獨立套房每坪單價分別高於整層住家7.5%及2.2%,市場有居住品質越低、租金單價越高的現象。再者,房屋分割隱含隱私程度的切割,雅房和分租套房、分租和獨立套房月租金分別相差30.9%及13.8%,歸因於獨立衛浴、門牌、出入口等。本文建議政府應加強稽查違規使用並制定房屋分割標準,並可透過租金模型估算租金水準,避免房東規避課稅,以健全租屋市場。
    Taiwan's rental market has problems with asymmetric living quality and rent. The paper uses the data obtained from 591, applying Hedonic price theory and the spatial regression model to analyze the relationship between the residential quality and rent among three different types, “subdivided room”, “studio”, and “apartment”. The paper then compares the differences in the privacy value of each rental type.
    The empirical results show that the unit price per floor of the “subdivided room” and “studio”, both representing lower living quality is 7.5% and 2.2% higher than the “apartment” respectively. It implies that the rental market shows a phenomenon: the lower the quality of living, the higher the unit price of rent. Furthermore, the housing subdivision implies the residential privacy segmentation. The empirical also finds that the difference between the amount of monthly rent of “room to share” and “subdivided studio”, and the amount of monthly rent of “subdivided studio”, and “studio” are 30.9% and 13.8% respectively due to the independent bathroom, doorplate, mailbox, entrance and exit. It is suggested that the government should strengthen the inspection of illegal use and formulate housing separation standards to improve the rental market. Moreover, by using the rent model to estimate the rent level, tax evasion can be avoided leading to a sound rental market.
    Reference: 一、中文參考文獻
    1.呂秉怡、花敬群,2012,不動產租賃服務產業經營與管理制度規畫專業服務案總結報告書,內政部委託之研究成果。
    2.沈體雁、馮等田與孫鐵山,2010,『空間計量經濟學』,北京:北京大學書出版社。
    3.李如君,1997,「臺北地區住宅租金水準之研究」,國立政治大學地政系碩士論文。
    4.李春長、游淑滿、張維倫,2012,「公共設施、環境品質與不動產景氣對住宅價格影響之研究─兼論不動產景氣之調節效果」,『住宅學報』,21(1): 67-87。
    5.李馨蘋、劉代洋,1999,「租賃住宅市場租金之影響因素」,『中華管理評論』,2(1)
    6.李泓見、張金鶚、花敬群,2006,「台北都會區不同住宅類型價差之研究」,『台灣土地研究』,9(1): 63-87。
    7.花敬群,2000,發展出租住宅市場機制之研究,內政部建築研究所委託之專題研究專案成果。
    8.林祖嘉、林素菁,1993,「台灣地區環境品質與公共設施對房價與房租影響之分析」,『住宅學報』,(1): 21-45。
    9.林祖嘉,1992,「臺灣地區房租與房價關係之研究」,『 臺灣銀行季刊』,43(1): 279-312。
    10.林祖嘉、陳建良,2005,「租買選擇、貸款選擇、與世代組成:巢式LOGIT模型之應用」,『住宅學報』,14(1): 1-20。
    11.林祖嘉、馬毓駿,2007,「特徵方程式大量估價法在台灣不動產市場之應用」,『住宅學報』,16(2): 1-22。
    12.林秋瑾、楊宗憲、張金鶚,1996,「住宅價格指數之研究-以台北市為例」,『住宅學報』,4: 1-30。
    13.紀凱婷,2009,「台北市新推個案定價之時間與空間相依性分析」,國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文:臺北。
    14.韋瑋,2017,『精通Python網絡爬蟲:核心技術、框架與項目實戰』,中國: 機械工業出版社。
    15.陳彥仲、薛立敏,2000,台灣都市出租住宅市場之研究期末報告書,內政部建築研究所委託之專題研究成果報告(編號:MOIS891009),台北市:內政部建築研究所。
    16.崔媽媽基金會,2017,『第一次租屋就上手』,新北:大喜文化有限公司。
    17.張金鶚、曾善霞,1991,「台北市住宅品質指標之研究」,『都市與計劃』,18(1): 83-106。
    18.張金鶚,2003,『房地產投資與市場分析-理論與實務』,臺北市: 華泰文化。
    19.彭建文、楊宗憲、楊詩韻,2009,「捷運系統對不同區位房價影響分析-以營運階段為例」,『運輸計劃季刊』,38(3): 275-296。
    20.曾建穎、張金鶚、花敬群,2005,「不同空間、時間住宅租金與其房價關聯性之研究—台北地區之實證現象分析」,『住宅學報』,14(2): 27-49。
    21.曾菁敏,2008,「空間外部性、交易成本與市地重劃對住宅土地價格影響之研究-台南市的實證分析」,『住宅學報』,17(1):23-50。
    22.華昌宜、賴碧瑩,2001,「我國租賃住宅市場之發展與推動」,『住宅學報』10(1): 67-76。
    23.黃怡潔、江穎慧、張金鶚,2017,臺北市公共住宅對周圍住宅價格之影響,『都市與計劃』,44(3): 277-302。
    24.溫在弘,2015,『空間分析』,臺北:雙葉書廊。
    25.鄒克萬、鄭皓騰、郭幸福與楊宗名,2013,「應用空間特徵價格模型評估高速鐵路對土地價格影響之時空特性-以臺灣高鐵為例」,『建築與規劃學報』,14(1): 47-66。
    26.廖國偉、林沛靜、江穎慧、楊宗憲,2017,利用巨量資料於住宅租金價格趨勢之研究,科技部補助專題研究計畫成果報告。
    27.鄧志松,2006,「選舉的空間因素:以三次總統選舉為例」,『國家發展研究』,6(1): 89-144。
    28.楊宗憲與蘇倖慧,2011,「迎毗設施與鄰避設施對住宅價格影響之研究」,『住宅學報』,20(2): 61-80。
    29.楊曉冬、李忠富,2012,「住宅租賃特徵價格研究─以哈爾濱市為例」,『系統管理學報』,4: 486-493。
    30.蔡菊花、賈士軍,2010,「基於Hedonic模型的住宅租賃價格影響因素分析」,『經濟研究導刊』,(30): 150-152。
    31.賴美蓉,2003,「臺灣三大都市住宅品質之分析」,『臺灣土地金融季刊』,40(1): 23-45。
    32.謝博明,2015,住宅次市場界定及住宅價格空間分析:以新升格之台南市為例,『住宅學報』,24(1): 29-54。
    33.戴國正、張金鶚、江穎慧,2012,「大眾捷運系統對房價影響效果之再檢視」,論文發表於〈世界華人不動產學會年會〉,澳門大學工商管理學院:澳門,2012年7月3–5日。
    34.簡嘉嫺、江穎慧,2018,「影響住宅租金指數總體性變數之研究」,『土地問題研究季刊』,17(1) : 99-110。 

    二、英文參考文獻
    1.Alonso, W, 1964, Location and Land Use, Cambridge: Mass., Harvard University Press.
    2.Allen, M.T., T.M. Springer and N.G. Waller, 1995, “Implicit pricing across residential rental submarkets”, The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 11(2), 137-151.
    3.Altman, I.,1975, The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, crowding., Brooks/Cole: Monterey.
    4.Anselin, L. and Rey, S., 1991, “Properties of tests for spatial dependence in linear regression models.”, Geographical analysis, 23(2):112-131.
    5.Anselin, L., 1988, Spatial Econometrics:Methods and Models, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
    6.Anselin, L.,1999, “Interactive techniques and exploratory spatial data analysis.”, Geographical Information Systems: principles, techniques, management and applications 1, 251 264.
    7.Arimash, B. C.,1992, “An empirical analysis of demand for housing attributes in third world city”, Land Economic, 68: 366-378.
    8.Asabere, P. K. and Colwell, P.F., 1985, “The Relative Lot Size Hypothesis: An Empirical Note.”, Urban Studies, 22 (4): 355-357.
    9.Basu, S. and Thibodeau, T. G., 1998, “Analysis of spatial autocorrelation in house prices.”, The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 17(1):61-85.
    10.Boyle, P. J. and Lathrop, E.S.,2009, “Are consumers' perceptions of price–quality relationships well calibrated? ",International Journal of Consumer Studies,33(1):58-63.
    11.Colwell, P. F. and Sirmans, C. F., 1978, “Area, Time, Centrality and the Value of Urban Land.”, Land Economics, 54(4): 514-519.
    12.Colwell, P. F. and Dillmore, G., 1999, “Who Was First? An Examination of an Early Hedonic Study”, Land Economics, 75(4): 620-626
    13.Court, A. T, 1939, Hedonic Price Indexes with Automotive Examples, In The Dynamics of Automobile Demand, New York: General Motors.
    14.Cliff, A., and Ord, J. K., 1973, Spatial Autocorrelation, London: Pion.
    15.Evans, G.W., 2003, “ The built environment and mental health", Journal of Urban Health , 80(4): 536-555.
    16.Follain, J. R. and S. Malpezzi, 1980, Dissecting Housing Value and Rent, Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
    17.Jaffe A. J., and Bussa R.G., 1977, “Using a simple model to estimate market rents: a case study”, Appraisal journal, 45(1): 7-13.
    18.Gavett, T. W., 1967, “Quality and a Pure Price Index”, Monthly Labor Review , 90(3), 16-20.
    19.Griliches, Z., 1971, “In Price Indexes and Quality Change”, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    20.Haggett, P., Cliff, A. D. and Frey, A., 1977, Locational Analysis in Human Geography: Locational Methods v.2, London: Edward Arnold.
    21.Halvorsen, R. and Palmquist, R., 1980, “The Interpretation of Dummy Variables in Semilogarithmic Equations”, The American Economic Review, 70(3): 474-475.
    22.Haas, G. C, 1922, “A Statistical Analysis of Farm Sales in Blue Earth County, Minnesota, as a Basis for Farm Land Appraisal”, Masters Thesis, The University of Minnesota.
    23.Huang, Y., 2017, “A study of sub-divided units (SDUs) in Hong Kong rental market”, Habitat International, 62: 43-50.
    24.Lancaster, K. L., 1966, “A New Approach to Consumer Theory", Journal of Political Economy, 74(2): 132-157.
    25.Leung, K. M. and Yiu, C.Y., 2019, “Rent determinants of sub-divided units in Hong Kong”, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 34(1): 133-151
    26.Lichtenstein, D. R. and Burton, S., 1989, “The relationship between perceived and objective price-quality”, Journal of Marketing Research, 26(4): 429–443.
    27.Lin,T. C. and Evans, A.W. ,1978 , “Area, Time, Centrality and the Value of Urban Land.”, Land Economics , 76(3): 386-394.
    28.Malpezzi, S., Ozanne, L. and Thibodeau, T., 1980, Characteristic Prices of Housing in Fifty Nine Metropolitan Areas ,Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.
    29.Malpezzi, S., 2003, “Hedonic Pricing Models: A Selective and Applied Review”, in Housing Economics and Public Policy, pp.67-89
    30.Mulder, C. H. ,2007, “The family context and residential choice: A challenge for new research”, Population Space and Place, 13(4): 265-278.
    31.Ridker, R.G. and Henning, J.A., 1967, “The determinants of residential property value with special reference to air pollution”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 49(2): 246-257
    32.Rosen, S., 1974, “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets Product Differentiation in Pure Competition”, Journal of Political Economy, 82(1): 34-55.
    33.Sirmans, G.S., Macpherson, A.D. and Zietz, N.E., 2005, “The Composition of Hedonic Pricing Models”, Journal of Real Estate Literature, 13(1): 1-44.
    34.Sirmans, G.S., C.F. Sirmans and J.D. Benjamin, 1989, “Determining apartment rent: the value of amenities, services, and external factors”, Journal of Real Estate Research, 4(2): 33-44.
    35.Söderberg, B., 2002, “A note on the hedonic model specification for income properties”, pp.157-180. In Real Estate Valuation Theory, edited by Wang, K. and Wolverton, M.L., Boston: Springer.
    36.Tabuchi, T., 1996, “Quantity Premia in Real Property Markets”, Land Economic, 72(2): 206-217.
    37.Tobler, W. R., 1970, “A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region”, Economic Geography, 46(supplement: Proceedings), 234-240.
    38.Wallace, H. A., 1926, “Comparative Farmland Values in Iowa”, Journal of Land and Public Utility Economics, 2(4): 385-392.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政學系
    106257023
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1062570231
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202000465
    Appears in Collections:[地政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    023101.pdf2393KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback