English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 92429/122733 (75%)
Visitors : 26279669      Online Users : 247
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131071


    Title: 開放取用教材對臺灣之大學教師教學與大學機構推廣之調查研究
    A Survey on the Open Access Textbooks for University Teachers' Teaching and Universities Promotion in Taiwan
    Authors: 呂星儀
    Lu, Sing-Yi
    Contributors: 邱炯友
    Chiu, Jeong-Yeou
    呂星儀
    Lu, Sing-Yi
    Keywords: 開放取用
    開放取用教材
    開放教育資源
    數位教材
    電子資源
    Open access
    Open access textbook
    Open educational resources
    Digital textbook
    Electronic resources
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2020-08-03 17:50:26 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在數位時代的影響下,對於高等教育環境而言數位教材的需求日益增加,加上大學生受到教科書價格過高的困擾,因此Open Access Textbooks(以下簡稱OAT)的發展需求成為了大學致力發展的教學資源之一。
    此篇論文期望分享臺灣的大學教師對於OAT的使用情形,初步了解教師使用OAT的原因、使用方式、影響因素等面向,並彙整臺灣之大學OA發展機構對於OAT的發展意願、成本考量以及OAT的預期成效。
    此篇論文藉由訪談調查法了解台灣之大學教師在OAT的使用原因主要呈現在減少學生購買教科書的花費上,除此之外目前台灣之大學生對於學術資源之著作權概念仍不完整,教師期望藉由OAT來教導學生利用數位資源的正確方式。教師在OAT使用上將先以課程輔助教材為主,藉由數位資源的優勢提供學生豐富的多媒體教材,並配合現今數位原民的資訊使用習慣,期望可以藉由OAT的特性來提升大學生的學習成效。
    同時本研究藉由問卷調查形式初步了解數間臺灣之大學OA發展機構對於OAT的看法,目前多數機構有發展OAT的意願,但仍無完整的發展策略,而目前OA發展機構會面臨到人力資源缺乏、主管機關與教師對OAT的認知不足等問題,將影響到未來OAT推廣的成效,OA發展機構應提升校內師生對OAT的認知,並考量與其他相關機構的合作需求,進而建立完整的OAT的永續發展策略。
    本研究最後提出以下OAT未來發展上的建議:(1)進行大學教師OAT需求分析;(2)建立大學教師與校內主管機關對OAT的完整觀念;(3)培養大學生對數位資源之著作權觀念;(4)建立OAT資源與OAT使用回饋之整合平台;(5)確認與其他機構之合作需求及業務分配;(6)確保OAT發展策略之永續性。
    During the digital age, the increasing demand for digital textbooks for the higher education environment, coupled with the high price of textbooks for college students, Open Access Textbooks (OAT) has become one of the teaching resources that the university is committed to developing it. This research expects to share the use of OAT by university teachers in Taiwan, to initially understand the reasons why teachers use OAT, how to use them, and the effect of using OAT. On the other hand, this research summarized the viewpoint, attitude, consideration of cost, and anticipated benefits of OA development agencies in Taiwan’s university about OAT.
    The results of this study infer that the reasons for the use of OAT by university teachers in Taiwan are mainly to reduce the cost of textbooks. In addition, considering the concept of copyright for scholarly resources in Taiwan’s university students is still weak, teachers expect teach students the right way to use digital resources by OAT. University teachers will use OAT for supplementary materials in order to provide students with multimedia resources, take advantage of digital resources, and cooperate with the information behavior of Digital Natives. It is expected that the characteristics of OAT can be used to promote the learning outcomes of students. The study applied a questionnaire to understand the viewpoint of OAT for OA development agencies in Taiwan’s university. As of now, most agency have the desire to develop support services for OAT, but there is still no complete strategic planning. OA development agency will face due to the lack of human resources, the lack of awareness of OAT by the competent authorities and teachers will affect the outcome of the promotion of OAT in the future. OA development agency should improve the teachers’ and students’ awareness of OAT in university, consider to build the cooperative relationship with other OA agencies, and establish a complete strategic plan for future development of OAT.
    Finally, this study proposed the following suggestion:(1) Analyze the needs of university teachers for OAT; (2) Establish a complete concept of OAT for university teachers and internal authorities; (3) Establish a complete concept of copyright of digital information resources for university students; (4) Establish the platform for OAT resources and OAT use feedback; (5) Confirm cooperation requirements and business distribution with other OA organizations; (6) Ensure the sustainability of OAT development strategy.
    Reference: 外文參考書目
    Association of Research Libraries. “Framing the Issue Open Access.” 2014, accessed September 14,2019, http://www.arl.org/scomm/open_access/framing.html.
    Avila, Sandra, and Christina C. Wray. “To Infinity and Beyond: Reducing Textbook Costs Through Librarian/Faculty Collaborations.” Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning 12, no. 3/4 (July 2018): 90–100, https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2018.1498618.
    BioMed Central. “About BMC.” 2018, Accessed September 14,2019, https://www.biomedcentral.com/about.
    Bohhannon John. “Who’s Afraid of Peer Review?” Science 342, no. 6154 (October 4, 2013): 60–65, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.342.6154.60.
    Braddlee, and Amy VanScoy. “Bridging the Chasm: Faculty Support Roles for Academic Librarians in the Adoption of Open Educational Resources.” College & Research Libraries 80, no. 4 (May 2019): 426–49, accessed January 04,2020, https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.80.4.426.
    “Budapest Open Access Initiative.” 2002. Accessed October 10, 2019, https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org.
    Bueno-de-la-Fuente, Gema, John Robertson and Stuart Boon. “The roles of libraries and information professionals in Open Educational Resources (OER) initiatives.” (2012), accessed January 04,2020, https://minds.wisconsin.edu/handle/1793/63306.
    Catherine Mitchell. “Does the UC open access policy miss the mark? Depends on which mark. Retrieved from Office of Scholarly Communication.” 2016, accessed October 21,2019, https://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/2016/10/does-the-uc-open-access-policy-miss-the-mark-depends-on-which-mark/.
    Cengage. “OER: Making Education Affordable.” accessed October 19,2019, https://www.cengage.com/oer/.
    Chris Jones, Ruslan Ramanau, Simon Cross, Graham Healing. “Net Generation or Digital Natives: Is There a Distinct New Generation Entering University?” Computers & Education 54, no. 3 (April 2010): 722–32, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.022.
    College Board. “Average Estimated Undergraduate Budgets.” 2018, accessed September 14,2019, https://trends.collegeboard.org/college-pricing/figures-tables/average-estimated-undergraduate-budgets-2018-19#Key%20Points.
    Crozier Heather. “Promoting Open Access and Open Educational Resources to Faculty.” Serials Librarian 74, no. 1–4 (January 2018): 145–50, https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2018.1428470.
    David C. Prosser. “From Here to There: A Proposed Mechanism for Transforming Journals from Close to Open Access.” Learned Publishing 16, no.3(2003), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1087/095315103322110923.
    Diane Harley, Shannon Lawrence, Sophia Krzys Acord,and Jason Dixson. “AFFORDABLE AND OPEN TEXTBOOKS: An Exploratory Study of Faculty Attitudes.” Research & Occasional Paper Series 1.10 (January 2010), https://cshe.berkeley.edu/publications/affordable-and-open-textbooks-exploratory-study-faculty-attitudes.
    Directory of Open Access Journal. accessed October 16,2019, https://doaj.org/.
    Elaine Allen and Jeff Seaman. “Opening the Textbook: Open Educational Resources in U.S. Higher Education, 2015-16.” Babson Survey Research Group, (accessed March 3, 2020).
    Elsevier. accessed October 15,2019, https://www.elsevier.com/zh-tw.
    Enis, Matt. “Open Access Finds Ally in UC--San Francisco.” Library Journal 137, no. 11 (June 15, 2012): 17, http://search.ebscohost.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=76630525&lang=zh-tw&site=ehost-live.
    Florida Virtual Campus. “An action plan for building a statewide infrastructure to support OER in Florida's public institutions of higher education: The final report of the open access textbook and educational resources task force.”2016. Accessed October 17,2019, https://oerknowledgecloud.org/content/2016-florida-student-textbook-course-materials-survey.
    Elizabeth Gadd, Charles Oppenheim, Steve Probets. “Steve RoMEO Studies 4: An analysis of Journal publishers' Copyright Agreements.” 2003, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1087/095315103322422053.
    Gerald Beasley. “Article processing charges: A new route to open access?” Information Services & Use, 36(2015), 163-170, https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-160815.
    Guy Marieke and Holl András. “Article Processing Charges.” Pasteur 4OA Briefing Paper, (2015), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.44318.
    Hacker, Andrea, and Elizabeth Corrao. “Laying Tracks as the Train Approaches: Innovative Open Access Book Publishing at Heidelberg University from the Editors' Point of View.” Journal of Scholarly Publishing 48, no. 2 (January 2017): 76–89, https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.48.2.76.
    Hilton III, John, and Carol Laman. “One College’s Use of an Open Psychology Textbook.” Open Learning 27, no. 3 (November 2012): 265–72, https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2012.716657.
    Hwang Gwo-Jen, and Wu Po-Han. “Advancements and Trends in Digital Game-Based Learning Research: A Review of Publications in Selected Journals from 2001 to 2010.” British Journal of Educational Technology 43, no. 1 (January 2012):E6–10, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01242.x.
    Kekkonen, Moneta, S., and G.B. Moneta. “E–Learning in Hong Kong: Comparing Learning Outcomes in Online Multimedia and Lecture Versions of an Introductory Computing Course.” British Journal of Educational Technology 33, no. 4 (September 2002): 423–33, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00279.
    Kenneth C. Green. “GOING DIGITAL: Faculty Pespectives on Digital and OER Course Materials.” February 19, 2016. Accessed October 19, 2019, https://www.campuscomputing.net/content/2016/2/19/going-digital-2016.
    Danny A. Kingsley. “Paying for Publication: Issues and Challenges for Research Support Services.” Australian Academic & Research Libraries 45, no. 4 (December 2014): 262–81, https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2014.945135.
    Michael Robinson. “Digital nature and digital nurture: libraries, learning and the digital native.” Library Management, 29(1/2,2008),67-76.
    Mirela Roncevic. “Open Educational Resources: The Story of Change and Evolving Perceptions.” No Shelf Required, December 3, 2019, accessed January 05,2020, http://www.noshelfrequired.com/open-educational-resources/?utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook_tw&utm_campaign=acad_news-sharing-oer_20191213&fbclid=IwAR2a_94fHmePsnz2_bsbfAuUw3ZZgdAHOTe08I1EZ6d-tzc72D1s2-oNdm0.
    Nature Research. “Nature Partner Journals.” accessed October 17,2019, https://www.nature.com/nature-research/open-access/nature-partner-journals.
    Nature Research. “Open access at Nature Research.” accessed October 15,2019, https://www.nature.com/nature-research/open-access.
    OCLC. Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc, 2005.
    Open Access Textbook Task Force. “Final report. Retrieved.” 2010, accessed October 17,2019, https://oerknowledgecloud.org/content/open-access-textbook-task-force-final-report.
    Open Access Textbook Task Force. “Open access textbook task force final report.”2010, accessed September 21,2019, https://oerknowledgecloud.org/content/open-access-textbook-task-force-final-report.
    Openstax. “Improving access, learning, and our world.” accessed October 17,2019, https://openstax.org/impact.
    Patrick O. Brown, Diane Cabell, Aravinda Chakravarti, Barbara Cohen, Tony Delamothe, Michael Eisen et al. “Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing.” accessed October 15, https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4725199.
    Peter Harrison. “What are mirror journals, and can they offer a new world of open access?” Accessed October 17, 2019, https://www.elsevier.com/connect/what-are-mirror-journals-and-can-they-offer-a-new-world-of-open-access.
    Peter Suber. “The taxpayer argument for open access.” SPARC Open Access Newsletter, September 4, 2003, Accessed October 10, 2019, https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4725013.
    Lisa Petrides, Cynthia Jimes, Clare Middleton‐Detzner, Julie Walling, and Shenandoah Weiss. “Open Textbook Adoption and Use: Implications for Teachers and Learners.” Open Learning 26, no. 1 (February 2011): 39–49. doi:10.1080/02680513.2011.538563.
    Piccoli, Ahmad, and Lves, B. “Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training.” MIS Quarterly 25, 4(2001), 401-425.
    QUT Manual of Policies and Procedures. “Open access for QUT research outputs.” Manual of policies and procedures(2018), accessed September 14,2019, http://www.mopp.qut.edu.au/F/F_01_03.jsp.
    Reed, Jason , and Benjamin Jahre. “Reviewing the Current State of Library Support for Open Educational Resources.” Collection Management 44, no. 2–4 (April 2019): 232–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2019.1588181.
    Saeed Rezaei Sharifabadi. “How digital libraries can support e-learning.” The Electronic Library Vol. 24 No. 3(2006):389-401, https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470610671231.
    SHERPA/RoMEO. “RoMEO Statistics.” Accessed October 15, 2019, http://sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/statistics.php?la=en&fIDnum=|&mode=simple.
    The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC) Europe. “Setting the Default to Open: Open Access Citation Advantage (OACA) List.”accessed October 15,2019, http://sparceurope.org/what-we-do/open-access/sparceurope-open-access-resources/open-access-citation-advantage-service-oaca/oaca-list/.
    Todorinova, Lily, and Zara T. Wilkinson. “Closing the Loop: Students, Academic Libraries, and Textbook Affordability.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 45, no. 3 (May 2019): 268–77, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.03.010.
    UNESCO. “Open Educational Resources,” accessed October 17,2019, https://en.unesco.org/themes/building-knowledge-societies/oer.
    United States Government Accountability Office. “College textbooks: Students have greater access to textbook information,”2013, accessed September 14,2019, https://oerknowledgecloud.org/content/college-textbooks-students-have-greater-access-textbook-information.
    Richard E. West. “Developing an Open Textbook for Learning and Instructional Design Technology.” TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning 63, no. 2 (March 2019): 226–35, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0263-z.
    Wicherts Jelte M. “Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals.” PLoS ONE 11, no. 1 (January 29, 2016): 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147913.

    中文參考書目
    Earl Babbie。社會科學研究方法。林秀雲譯。台北:雙葉書廊,2018。
    中華開放教育聯盟。「OERs」。檢索於2019年10月31日,https://copeneduc.org/oers/。
    臺灣開放式課程暨教育聯盟。「2019-2021推動臺灣開放教育適性Open textbook徵集計畫」。檢索於2019年12月26日,http://220.130.196.92:86/TOCEC/web/news_sample.jsp?news_id=15。
    臺灣開放式課程暨教育聯盟。「開放式課程新旅程-Open Textbooks」。檢索於2019年11月1日,http://tocwc.blogspot.com/2019/10/tocec121081009.html。
    臺灣開放式課程聯盟(舊址)。檢索於2019年11月1日,http://www.tocwc.org.tw/。
    臺灣開放式課程聯盟。檢索於2019年10月31日,http://220.130.196.92:86/TOCEC/web/index.jsp。
    臺灣電子書供給合作社。檢索於2019年11月2日,http://www.tebsco.org.tw/wordpress/。
    吳紹群。「Google Book Search對圖書館發展之影響」。圖書資訊學刊3卷,第1&2期(2005):83-105,https://doi.org/10.6182/jlis.2005.3(1.2).083。
    吳紹群、吳明德。「開放資訊取用期刊對學術傳播系統之影響」。圖書資訊學研究2卷,1期(2007):21-54。
    李治安、林懿萱。「從傳統到開放的學術期刊出版:開放近用出版相關問題初探」。圖書館學與資訊科學33卷,1期(2007):39-52。
    李海碩、周倩。「臺灣開放式課程發展歷程、特色與影響之初探:以交通大學開放式課程為例」。大學圖書館第17卷第1期(2013):22-42,https://doi.org/10.6146/univj.17-1.02。
    林懿萱、王珮儀、鍾詩敏。「談創用CC授權(基礎篇)-介紹臺灣創用CC授權推廣現況與授權條款之演進」。律師雜誌328期(2007):22-33。https://doi.org/10.7030/tbj.200701.0022。
    邱炯友。學術傳播與期刊出版。台北市:遠流,2006。
    邱炯友、蔣欣樺。「學術出版傳播之 Open Access 模式」。中華民國圖書館學會會報74期(2005):165-183。
    侯雅雯。「MOOCs對高等教育教學之挑戰與問題」。高等教育出版12卷,1期(2017):69-88。
    徐新逸、彭康鈞。「大學生與大學教師在資訊行為考量因素之比較研究」。教育資料與圖書館學50卷,第3期(2013):393-423,https://doi.org/10.6120/JoEMLS.2013.503/0494.RS.CM。
    徐嘉伶。「初探“Google圖書”對數位出版產業之影響」。中華印刷科技年報(2010):520-527。https://doi.org/10.30153/JCAGST.201003.0037。
    國家圖書館。「臺灣華文電子書庫」。檢索於2019年10月31日,http://taiwanebook.ncl.edu.tw/zh-tw。
    國家圖書館。「學術知識服務網」。檢索於2019年10月31日,https://ref.ncl.edu.tw/。
    國家圖書館。中華民國一O六年圖書館年鑑(2018):159-162。
    康軒出版社。「康軒雲」。檢索於2019年11月15日,https://945cloud.knsh.com.tw/。
    翰林出版社。「翰林雲端學院」。檢索於2019年11月15日,https://www.ehanlin.com.tw/index.html。
    張子超。「立意取樣」。教育大辭書(2000),檢索於2019年11月9日,https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1304283/?index=18。
    教育部。「教育大市集」。檢索於2019年11月15日,https://market.cloud.edu.tw/。
    陳亞寧。「開放式資訊取用對館藏發展與服務的衝擊」。圖書與資訊學刊57期(2006):61-73。
    陳亞寧。「開放取用教科書現況發展分析」。圖書館學與資訊科學43卷,2期(2017):53-79,https://doi.org/10.6245/JLIS.2017.432/711。
    項潔、洪筱盈。「臺灣機構典藏發展芻議」。教育資料與圖書館學43卷,2期(2005):173-189。
    黃明居、黃瑞娟、賴姿伶。「大學圖書館期刊館藏之開放性資源比例與引用優勢之研究」。大學圖書館16卷第1期(2012):36-52,https://doi.org/10.6146/univj.2012.16-1.03。
    遊一龍、程千芳。細說研究:一條尋奇探秘的臨淵小徑。台北市:雙葉書廊,2014。
    臺灣大學圖書館。「公開取用電子書」。檢索於2019年11月2日,http://ebooks.lib.ntu.edu.tw/Home/ListBooks。
    劉靜怡。「數位時代的知識生產模式與學術資源開放近用運動-以美國法學期刊為例」。政大法學評論123期(2011):193-252。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    圖書資訊與檔案學研究所
    107155015
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107155015
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202001169
    Appears in Collections:[圖書資訊與檔案學研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    501501.pdf4336KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback