English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 92429/122733 (75%)
Visitors : 26279641      Online Users : 273
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131072

    Title: 智慧型學術文章推播服務代理人對促進學術傳播之影響研究
    The Effects of an Intelligence Academic Article Push-Service Agent on Scholarly Communication
    Authors: 簡丞擔
    Chien, Cheng-Tan
    Contributors: 陳志銘
    Chen, Chih-Ming
    Keywords: 學術傳播
    Scholarly communication
    Academic community
    Automatic push system,
    Recommend accuracy
    Online advertising effectiveness
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2020-08-03 17:50:38 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 學術傳播對於學術成果的推廣一直以來都扮演著重要角色,將學術論文、資料分享給更多從事相關研究的學者或是研究人員,有助於讓他們獲得更多的資訊偶遇(Information Encountering)機會。其中,社群網路是一個有效的資訊散播媒介,透過社群網站進行學術傳播可以將具有相同研究興趣的人聚合起來,並組建成學術社群,並在社群內互相傳遞學術相關資訊、針對特定議題進行討論,以及互相交流研究結果。由於目前在中文環境的學術社群較少,因此本研究希望能透過創建學術社群來拉近中文環境中具有相同學術研究領域之學者與研究人員,並透過本研究設計之「智慧型學術文章推播服務代理人(Itelligence Academic Article Push-Service Agent, IAAPSA)」來促進學術論文的傳播,透過擷取社群中的留言資料,並與學術論文資料庫之論文進行比對,將最相關的論文推播至討論社群中,希望藉此增加學術論文與研究人員之資訊偶遇機會,進而提升學術傳播效益。
    最後基於本研究之研究結果,提出IAAPSA發布貼文策略之改善建議,以及未來可以繼續進一步探索的研究方向。整體而言,本研究以內容為基礎之推薦(Content-based Recommendation)方法所發展之IAAPSA,可提升學術社群之經營成效,對於促進學術論文之傳播具有創新與貢獻。
    Scholarly communication has played a primary role in the promotion of academic outcome, by sharing academic theses and data with more scholars or researchers for more information encountering opportunities. Social network is an effective information dissemination medium. With scholarly communication through social network sites, people with same research interests are gathered and construct the academic community to mutually deliver academic information, discuss specific issues, and exchange research results. There are comparatively few academic communities with Chinese environment. This study therefore expects to bring scholars and researchers with the same academic research fields closer in the Chinese environment through the establishment of academic community. Moreover, the “Intelligent Academic Article Push-Service Agent (IAAPSA)” designed in this study is used for enhancing the communication of academic theses. By capturing messages in the social community and comparing with theses in academic thesis database, the most relevant theses are pushed to the social network. It is expected to enhance the information encountering opportunity of academic theses and researchers to further promote scholarly communication benefit.
    With one-shot pre-experimental design, the academic community, “Journal of InfoLib & Archives”, is established on Facebook and library, information and archival studies related scholars and researchers are invited to join in the community as the research objects. Through IAAPSA, messages left in the community are compared with the thesis database in “NCCU Academic Hub” and pushed to the community. The downloads of the pushed theses are recorded for calculating whether the downloads significantly increase with recommendations. What is more, the questionnaire is used for understanding whether the pushed theses meet the needs of the community and the online advertising effectiveness of such posts to the community. It aims to evaluate the academic article recommend accuracy of with IAAPSA and the online advertising effectiveness of recommended posts. The effect of thesis recommendation on the enhancement of scholarly communication is comprehensively discussed.
    The research findings show that the downloads of academic theses pushed to the academic community through the recommendation of IAAPSA are remarkably enhanced and the recommend accuracy is favorable. Besides, the online advertising effectiveness of posts also present good benefits, revealing that IAAPSA could push theses meeting the community discussion to the academic community, and the community members are willing to click and download full-text data for reading. From the qualitative interview data, the community members affirm that the theses pushed by IAAPSA meet their needs and using Facebook as the academic community exchange and community platform is suitable.
    Based on the research result, improvement for posts with IAAPSA and future research direction are suggested. Overall speaking, IAAPSA developed with Content-based Recommendation in this study could promote the management effect of academic community and present innovation and contribution to enhance the communication of academic theses.
    Reference: 曾曉彤(2018)。臉書社群廣告效果研究: Chatbot 與貼文廣告效果之比較。政治大學傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程學位論文 ,1–133。
    戴軒廷、馬恆、張紹勳 (2004)。 影響網路廣告效果之相關因素。中華管理評論國際學報。

    Achakulvisut, T., Acuna, D. E., Ruangrong, T., & Kording, K. (2016). Science Concierge: A Fast Content-Based Recommendation System for Scientific Publications. PLOS ONE, 11(7), e0158423. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158423
    Al-Rawi, Ahmed. “News Values on Social Media: News Organizations’ Facebook Use.” Journalism 18, no. 7 (2017): 871–889.
    Ainin, S., Naqshbandi, M. M., Moghavvemi, S., & Jaafar, N. I. (2015). Facebook usage, socialization and academic performance. Computers & Education, 83, 64–73.
    Asabere, N. Y., Xia, F., Meng, Q., Li, F., & Liu, H. (2015). Scholarly paper recommendation based on social awareness and folksonomy. International Journal of Parallel, Emergent and Distributed Systems, 30(3), 211–232.
    Batmaz, Z., Yurekli, A., Bilge, A., & Kaleli, C. (2019). A review on deep learning for recommender systems: Challenges and remedies. Artificial Intelligence Review, 52(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-018-9654-y
    Beel, J., & Dinesh, S. (2017). Real-World Recommender Systems for Academia: The Pain and Gain in Building, Operating, and Researching them. BIR@ ECIR, 6–17.
    Beel, J., & Langer, S. (2015). A comparison of offline evaluations, online evaluations, and user studies in the context of research-paper recommender systems. International conference on theory and practice of digital libraries, 153–168. Springer.
    Booker, L., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2013). How academic libraries can leverage social networking to popularize their services: An empirical study. Journal of the Indiana Academy of the Social Sciences, 16(2), 12.
    Callaghan, G., & Fribbance, I. (2016). The use of Facebook to build a community for distance learning students: A case study from the Open University. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 31(3), 260–272.
    Chu, Hui-Chun, Gwo-Jen Hwang, Chin-Chung Tsai, and Nian-Shing Chen. “An Innovative Approach for Promoting Information Exchanges and Sharing in a Web 2.0-Based Learning Environment.” Interactive Learning Environments 17, no. 4 (December 2009): 311–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820903195173.
    Dantonio, L., Makri, S., & Blandford, A. (2012). Coming across academic social media content serendipitously. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(1), 1–10.
    David, O. N., Helou, A. M., & Rahim, N. Z. A. (2012). Model of perceived influence of academic performance using social networking. International Journal of Computers & Technology, 2(2a), 24–29.
    De Gemmis, M., Lops, P., Musto, C., Narducci, F., & Semeraro, G. (2015). Semantics-aware content-based recommender systems. 收入 Recommender Systems Handbook (页 119–159). Springer.
    Erdelez, S., Beheshti, J., Heinström, J., Toms, E., Makri, S., Agarwal, N. K., & Björneborn, L. (2016). Research perspectives on serendipity and information encountering. Proceedings of the 79th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Creating Knowledge, Enhancing Lives through Information & Technology, 11. American Society for Information Science.
    Han, J., & Yamana, H. (2017). A survey on recommendation methods beyond accuracy. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, 100(12), 2931–2944.
    Jordan, K. (2016). Digital scholarship and the social networking site: How academics conceptualise their networks on academic social networking sites and Twitter.
    Khoo, C. S. (2014). Issues in information behaviour on social media. LIBRES: Library and Information Science Research Electronic Journal, 24(2), 75.
    Kim, S.-W., & Gil, J.-M. (2019). Research paper classification systems based on TF-IDF and LDA schemes. Human-Centric Computing and Information Sciences, 9(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13673-019-0192-7
    Kirkup, G. (2010). Academic blogging: Academic practice and academic identity. London Review of Education, 8(1), 75–84.
    Knight, C. G., & Kaye, L. K. (2016). ‘To tweet or not to tweet?’A comparison of academics’ and students’ usage of Twitter in academic contexts. Innovations in education and teaching international, 53(2), 145–155.
    Knight, G. (2015). Building a research data management service for the London school of hygiene & tropical medicine. Program-Electronic Library and Information Systems, 49(4), 424–439. https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-01-2015-0011
    Lee, J., Lee, K., & Kim, J. G. (2013). Personalized academic research paper recommendation system. arXiv preprint arXiv:1304.5457.
    Lee, M. K., Yoon, H. Y., Smith, M., Park, H. J., & Park, H. W. (2017). Mapping a Twitter scholarly communication network: A case of the association of internet researchers’ conference. Scientometrics, 112(2), 767–797.
    Lee, S., Ha, T., Lee, D., & Kim, J. H. (2018). Understanding the majority opinion formation process in online environments: An exploratory approach to Facebook. Information Processing & Management, 54(6), 1115–1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2018.08.002
    Lin, Chin-Feng, and Chen-Su Fu. “Evaluating Online Advertising Effect: An Approach Integrating Means–End Conceptualization and Similarity Analysis.” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 32 (2018): 1–12.

    Liu, Yang, Chen Yang, Jian Ma, Wei Xu, and Zhongsheng Hua. “A Social Recommendation System for Academic Collaboration in Undergraduate Research.” Expert Systems 36, no. 2 (2019): e12365.
    Lops, P., de Gemmis, M., & Semeraro, G. (2011). Content-based Recommender Systems: State of the Art and Trends. 收入 F. Ricci, L. Rokach, B. Shapira, & P. B. Kantor (编), Recommender Systems Handbook (页 73–105). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_3
    Lou, L., & Koh, J. (2017). Enhancing Fan Participation in Social Media Based Virtual Brand Communities: The Case of Like, Comment, and Share Activities. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 27(1), 54–76.
    Menon, S., & Soman, D. (2002). Managing the power of curiosity for effective web advertising strategies. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 1–14.
    Ortega, J. L. (2016). To be or not to be on Twitter, and its relationship with the tweeting and citation of research papers. Scientometrics, 109(2), 1353–1364.
    Ovadia, S. (2013). When social media meets scholarly publishing. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 32(3), 194–198.
    Ovadia, S. (2014). ResearchGate and Academia. edu: Academic social networks. Behavioral & social sciences librarian, 33(3), 165–169.
    Panahi, S., Watson, J., & Partridge, H. (2016). Information encountering on social media and tacit knowledge sharing. Journal of Information Science, 42(4), 539–550.
    Pontis, S., Kefalidou, G., Blandford, A., Forth, J., Makri, S., Sharples, S., … Woods, M. (2016). Academics’ responses to encountered information: Context matters. Journal of the association for information science and technology, 67(8), 1883–1903.
    Pursel, B., Liang, C., Wang, S., Wu, Z., Williams, K., Brautigam, B., … Giles, C. L. (2016). BBookX: Design of an Automated Web-based Recommender System for the Creation of Open Learning Content. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, 929–933. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.
    Roudposhti, V. M., Nilashi, M., Mardani, A., Streimikiene, D., Samad, S., & Ibrahim, O. (2018). A new model for customer purchase intention in e-commerce recommendation agents. Journal of International Studies Vol, 11(4).
    Suciu, G., Boscher, C., Prioux, L., Pasat, A., & Dobre, C. (2017). Insights into Collaborative Platforms for Social Media Use Cases. Studies in Informatics and Control, 26(4), 435–440.
    Toreini, P., Chatti, M. A., Thüs, H., & Schroeder, U. (2016). Interest-based recommendation in academic networks using social network analysis. DeLFI 2016–Die 14. E-Learning Fachtagung Informatik.
    Wu, S.-I., Wei, P.-L., & Chen, J.-H. (2008). Influential factors and relational structure of Internet banner advertising in the tourism industry. Tourism Management, 29(2), 221–236.
    Xu, Heng, Lih-Bin Oh, and Hock-Hai Teo. “Perceived Effectiveness of Text vs. Multimedia Location-Based Advertising Messaging.” International Journal of Mobile Communications 7, no. 2 (2009): 154–177.
    Zakrevskaya, N. G., Utisheva, E. V., Bordovskiy, P. G., & Komeva, E. Y. (2018). Electronic information and education environment as academic communication tool. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture, (2), 3–3.
    Description: 碩士
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107155017
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202001168
    Appears in Collections:[圖書資訊與檔案學研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    501701.pdf2846KbAdobe PDF0View/Open

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback