English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 93218/123590 (75%)
Visitors : 27662622      Online Users : 227
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131159


    Title: 辦公大樓健康室內設計與裝修評估指標之研究
    The study on healthy interior design and construction assessment indicator of office building
    Authors: 朱宏文
    Chu, Hung-Wen
    Contributors: 孫振義
    朱宏文
    Chu, Hung-Wen
    Keywords: 綠建築
    智慧建築
    健康建築
    幸福健築
    裝修
    工程
    翻新
    整修
    改造
    Green Building
    Intelligence Building
    Health
    Wellbeing
    Decoration
    Construction
    Refurbish
    Fit-Out
    Retrofit
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2020-08-03 18:07:24 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 綠建築發展已成為世界性熱門的話題,室內設計與施工是建築物不可或缺的過程,然而頻繁的翻新與改造對環境與健康造成直接和間接的危害,空間規劃時除考量裝修量體多寡,設備系統節約、建材選用、循環經濟、機能使用完善、室內環境品質、營運安全管理精進,智慧便捷設施、感知、辨識、處理制動、自預警自修復功能設備,更應該關注人員舒適、生理、心理及精神方面等健康問題。
    新建及舊有商辦大樓建設不斷消耗地球資源,造成二氧化碳排放過量和環境污染,基於綠建築生態、節能、減廢、健康及永續發展的目標,本研究運用文獻回顧、專家訪談、李克特度量表、模糊德爾菲問卷調查,歸納統計得分與共識值分析,篩選出四個主要面向及十八個關鍵指標評估項目,並採用層級分析程序法得出影響辦公大樓健康合理指標與權重值排序,透過產業界之綠色協會、建築師及機電技師、室內設計師及工程師、物業管理專案、能源顧問等各類群專家的訪談紀錄及問卷結果,建立出辦公大樓健康室內設計與裝修指標評估體系。
    研究結果評估第一層權重排序依次是環境品質面39.2%、安全管理面23.0%、機能使用面21.1%、節約循環面16.7%。第二層前五項排序依次是空氣品質管理、空調設備系統節能、空間友善佈局、前期評估與分析、熱健康舒適性…等。
    商辦大樓室內裝修涉及廣泛且複雜的專業技能,必須整合管理工程的綜合介面,除結構空間造型、美術、色彩學等基本建築元素外,節能生態環保、機電空調消防、建材及設備規格、功能測試調整與平衡、各種標章認證都要涉略,本研究以業務執行角度觀察彙集了綠建築、智慧建築、健康、幸福建築、綠裝修、綠建材協會、室內設計公會等專業人士對此議題進行訪談評論,釐清室內影響健康關鍵因素,建立綠裝修認證的基本架構。
    建築物是否具有永續環保與健康之功能,應以完工後營運使用期間的持續監測調整與性能驗證,來評斷原始設計是否符合實際人員的健康功能表現,上述研究成果與資訊僅供建築相關從業人員參考應用,當建築物進行改造與室內裝修時,給予正確設計引導與施工方向,期待以營運使用觀點思考綠色健康建築本質,由內而外關注自然生態與健康的環境。本研究結論與建議可供商辦大樓室內設計與裝修工程綠色認證之政策、學術研究評估與專業人士業務推廣執行之參考依據。
    The development of green buildings has become a popular topic globally. Interior design and construction are indispensable processes in creating an office building. Nevertheless, frequent renovation and refurbishing projects will cause direct or indirect harm to the environment and human health. In addition to considering the amount of decoration space planning, energy saving of equipment and systems, green building material selection, circular economy, perfect functional use, indoor environment quality, advancement in operation, safety, and management, intelligent and convenient facilities, perception, identification, processing braking, self-warning and self-repairing functional equipment, more attention should be paid to personnel comfort, physiology, psychology, and mental health issues.
    The construction of new or existing commercial office buildings continuously consumes the earth’s resources, causing excessive carbon dioxide emissions and environmental pollution. Based on the goals of green building ecology, energy saving, waste reduction, healthy, and sustainable development, this study uses literature reviews, expert interviews, Likert metrics special scales, Fuzzy Delphi Method questionnaire survey, summed up statistical scores and consensus value analysis, to screen out four main aspects and eighteen key index evaluation items, and used the Analytic Hierarchy Process method to obtain the reasonable indexes and weighted values that affect the health of office buildings. Through the interview records and questionnaire results of various groups of experts such as green associations, architects, electrical & mechanical technicians, interior designers and engineers, property project management, energy consultants, etc., an evaluation system for healthy interior design and decoration indicators for office buildings is established.
    Based on the study, the resulting evaluation suggests that for the first level, the weighted values by rank are 39.2% for environmental quality, 23.0% for safety management, 21.1% for functional use, and 16.7% for recycling. The top five items in order for the second level are indoor air quality management, energy-saving of the air-conditioning system, space-friendly layout, preliminary assessment and analysis, thermal health and comfort, etc.
    The interior decoration of commercial buildings involves a wide range of complex professional skills. It is often necessary to integrate a comprehensive interface of project management. In addition to basic building elements such as structural space modeling, fine arts, and color science, others such as energy-saving, ecological and environmental protection, electrical & mechanical air conditioning and fire protection, green building materials and equipment specifications, functional testing with adjustments and Balances, and various certifications are required. From the perspective of business execution, this study brings together observations from Accredited Professionals in green buildings, intelligent buildings, health, wellbeing buildings, green decoration, green building materials, interior design & construction associations, etc. Interviews were conducted and comments are referenced to clarify the key factors affecting indoor health and establish a basic framework for Green ID+C certification.
    Whether a building is sustainable in terms of environmental protection and health, continuous monitoring, adjustments, and performance verification during the operation period after completion should be implemented to determine if the original design meets the health performance criteria of the actual personnel. The above research results and information are available to construction-related practitioners. During the interior design decoration and building renovation phases, the study gives correct design guidance and construction directions. From the perspective of building operations, the goal is to think about the inherent characteristics of green buildings and their health and pay attention to the ecology and environmental health of the natural world using an inside-out approach. The conclusions and recommendations of this study can be used as a reference basis for the green certification policy, academic research evaluation, and accredited professional business in promoting the implementation of interior design and construction and decoration of commercial office buildings.
    Reference: 一、中文參考文獻
    (一)專書
    何明錦,2015,「EEWH-BC綠建築評估手冊」,台灣:內政部建築研究所。
    何明錦,2016,「IB智慧建築評估手冊」,台灣:內政部建築研究所。
    林憲德,2016,「綠建築91技術」:生態、節能、減廢、健康』,台北:詹氏書局。
    林憲德,2018,「建築產業碳足跡」,台北:詹氏書局。
    黃育徵,2017,「循環經濟」,台灣:天下雜誌股份有限公司。
    蔡耀賢、林芳銘、陳振誠,2015,「綠建材評估與解說手冊」,台灣:內政部建築研究所綠領建築師培訓工作坊專業講師群,2013,「綠領建築師教你設計好房子修訂版』新北市:野人文化股份有限公司。
    經濟部能源局,2017,「辦公室節能應用技術手冊」,台灣:財團法人台灣綠色生產力基金會。
    薩瓦爾NIKIL SAVAL,2016,「隔間:我們如何從19世紀陰暗帳房走到21世界Google人性化辦公空間 - CUBED:A Secret history of the Workplace」,台北:貓頭鷹出版。
    William McDonough, Michael Braungart, 2008, Cradle to Cradle -『從搖籃到搖籃:綠色經濟的設計提案』,台灣:野人出版社。

    (二)國內期刊
    王英賢,2009,「小型住宅綠建築設計之應用研究」,樹德科技大學建築與環境設計研究所碩士學位論文:高雄市。
    江哲銘、賴光邦、謝婷婷,2000,「辦公空間室內環境指標之研究」,第二屆中華民國室內設計學術研討會論文集:p257-262。
    江哲銘、賴光邦、謝婷婷,2012,「氣候變遷下綠建材環境效率初探」,台灣建築學會會刊雜誌:p41-48。
    胡佩青、卓秀蓉,2013,「以企業社會責任觀點推展高科技物業的室內空氣品質管理」,『物業管理學報』,第四卷,第二期。
    莊璦嘉、林惠彥,2005,「個人與環境適配對工作態度與行為之影響」,台灣管理學刊,第5卷,第1期:p123-148。
    許興華、朱啟銘、郭瑋克,2018,「室內裝修施工流程之探究-以住宅設計為例」,德霖學報,第31期:p1-10。
    葉保強,2007,「企業社會責任的發展與國家角色」,應用倫理研究通訊,第41期:p35-47。
    景军、薛伟玲,2014,「醫學人類學與四種社會理論之互動」,思想战线,第40卷,第2期:№ 2,2014 Vol.40。
    陳奉瑤,2014,「綠建築價值供需雙方之認知分析,土地經濟年刊,第28期:p106-132。
    黃靖文、李勇輝、潘姵如,2017,「環境連結對於綠建築技術與組織績效之中介效果探討」,『中原企管評論』,第15卷,第二期:p55-74。
    謝惠元、江倩儀、黃琳、文家豪、葉思柔,2018,「綠建築與建築績效之關聯探討」,『第20屆科際整合管理研討會』。
    財團法人資源循環台灣基金會,2018,「邁向台灣2030永續發展專刊」。
    Hong-Jhong Cheng & Shih-Yeh Wang,2019,「The Willingness of Private Sectors to Apply for Green Building Certification in Taiwan」,『第十七屆土地研究學術研討會』。

    (三)碩博士學位論文
    吳建煌,2019,「辦公大樓分級標準化之研究」,國立政治大學地政系在職專班碩士論文,台北。
    林欣怡,2017,「國內室內裝修業落實綠色裝修之策略研究」,中國科技大學建築研究所碩士論文,台北。
    施文玫,2012,「綠建築室內環境指標促進使用者滿意度之影響」,國立聯合大學建築研究所碩士論文,苗栗。
    徐憶如,2012,「綠色裝修評估指標之建構」,國立臺灣師範大學碩士論文,台北。
    陳秀卿,2000,「從契合理論來探討工作壓力身心健康職業倦怠之關係」,國立政治大學心理學系碩士論文,台北。
    陳惠玲,2005,「住宅內部健康評估指標體系之研究」,朝陽科技大學建築及都市設計研究所碩士論文,台北。
    莊碩瑜,2009,「建構台灣辦公類綠建築使用管理階段評估指標之研究」,樹德科技大學經營管理研究所碩士論文,台北。
    莊燦年,2006,「從室內裝修設計觀點探討健康綠建材使用率適宜性之研究」,國立成功大學建築研究所碩士論文,台南。
    張從怡,2015,「舊建築更新節能改善效益之研究-以綠建築更新改造計畫為例」,國立成功大學建築研究所博士論文,台南。
    馮心蕾,2003,「室內設計專案管理系統之研究」,中原大學室內設計研究所碩士論文,中壢。
    黃永泰,2012,「研究型公有建築使用後評估之研究 - 以經濟效益導入環境健康因子為例」,國立成功大學建築研究所博士論文,台南。
    黃琳琳,2004,「以健康觀點探討室內空氣品質改善可行性之研究」,國立成功大學建築研究所碩士論文,台南。
    黃雅鈴,2005,「實體辦公環境對工作之影響」,國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文,台北。
    黃善群,2016,「室內裝修工程碳足跡評估系統之研究」,國立成功大學建築研究所碩士論文,台南。
    黃慧,2018,「外商銀行對物業管理公司績效評估因素之探討」,國立台北大學企業管理學系碩士論文,台北。
    游能君,2008,「健康住宅評估指標之研究」,臺北科技大學土木與防災研究所碩士論文,台北。
    楊謙柔,2000,「綠建築設計評估工具之研究(以辦公建築為例) 」,中國文化大學建築及都市計畫研究所碩士論文,台北。
    楊韻儒,2013,「綠色室內設計評估系統研究」,中原大學室內設計研究所碩士論文,桃園。
    楊世駿,2018,「公司總務業務委託物業管理公司統包處理可行性之研究」,華夏科技大學資產與物業管理碩士論文,台北。
    楊坤潔,2019,「建構綠裝修認證制度之研究」,國立台北科技大學建築系建築與都市設計碩士論文,台北。
    鄧運鴻,2012,「B2B室內設計產業兩岸發展策略」,國立政治大學商學院經營管理碩士論文,台北。
    蔡典均,2017,「探討WELL Building Standard在台灣集合住宅之適用性」,國立台灣科技大學建築研究所碩士論文,台北。
    蘇家豪,2015,「室內裝修從業人員對綠建材認知及使用之研究」,國立高雄大學創意設計與建築學系研究所碩士論文,高雄。

    (四)其他(內政部建築研究所)
    林子平、蔡耀賢、林奉怡、羅子雯、陳思元,2019,「綠建築維護管理與費用合理性之研究」,內政部建研所,台灣。
    室內環境品質管理協會,2019,「室內空氣品質治理人員培訓教材」,台灣:台灣室內環境品質管理協會。
    孫振義等,2019,「綠建築之造價成本分析比較研究」,內政部建研所,台灣。
    財團法人台灣建築中心,2011,「綠建築標章申請審核認可及使用作業要點」,台灣。
    財團法人智慧建築協會,2016,「智慧綠建築高階訓練課程」,台灣。
    溫琇玲等,1992,「智慧型建築自動化現況調查及分析研究」,內政部建研所,台灣。

    二、外文參考文獻
    (一)專書論文
    Delos Living LLC, 2015, WELL Building Standard, U.S.A: International WELL Building Institute.
    Delos Living LLC, 2018, WELL Commissioning Measurement and Verification, U.S.A:International WELL Building Institute.
    HARVARD T.H.CHAN, 2017, 9 Foundations of a health Building, U.S.A:School of public health center for health and the global environment.
    HARVARD T.H.CHAN, 2018, Active Design, U.S.A:School of public health center for health and the global environment.
    Peerati Upatising, 2016, Development model for commercial office real estate in Thailand's green market, USA: MIT Press.

    (二)期刊論文
    Alan Hedge, 2017, “Ergonomic workplace design for health wellness and productivity”, Ergonomics, 60(11): 1598–1599.
    Anna Puig-Ribera, Judit Bort-Roig, Maria Giné-Garriga, Angel M. González-Suárez, Iván Martínez-Lemos, Jesús Fortuño, Joan C. Martori, Laura Muñoz-Ortiz, Raimon Milà, Nicholas D. Gilson and Jim McKenna, 2017, “Impact of a workplace sit less, move more’ program on efficiency-related outcomes of office employees”, BMC Public Health, 17: 455.
    Bianca C. Dreyer, Simon Coulombe, Stephanie Whitney, Manuel Riemer and Delphine Labbé, 2018, “A framework for green remodeling enabling energy efficiency and healthy living for the elderly”, Energies, 11: 2031.
    Carmen Díaz López, Manuel Carpiob, Maria Martín-Moralesc, Montserrat Zamorano, 2019, “A comparative analysis of sustainable building assessment methods”, Sustainable Cities and Society, 49: 101611.
    C.O. Ryan, W.D. Browning, J.O. Clancy, S.L. Andrews, N.B. Kallianpurkar,2014, “Emerging nature-based parameters for health and wellbeing in the built environment”, Archnet-IJAR, 8(2): 62-76.
    C.R. Subhash Varmaa, Sivakumar Palaniappan,2019, “Comparision of green building rating schemes used in north america, europe and asia”, Habitat International, 89: 01-13.
    Dat Tien Doan,Ali Ghaffarianhoseini,Nicola Naismith,Tongrui Zhang,2017,“A critical comparison of green building rating systems”, Building and Environment, 123: 243-260.
    Edwin H.W. Chan, Queena K. Qian, Patrick T.I. Lam,2009, “The market for green building in developed Asian cities the perspectives of building designers”, Energy Policy, 37: 3061–3070.
    Grzegorz Majewski, Łukasz J. Orman, Marek Telejko, Norbert Radek, Jacek Pietraszek and Agata Dudek, 2020, “Assessment of Thermal Comfort in the Intelligent Buildings in View of Providing High Quality Indoor Environment”, Energies,13: 01-20.
    Hadi Daneshmandi, Alireza Choobineh, Haleh Ghaem, Mehran Karimi, 2015, “Adverse Effects of Prolonged Sitting Behavior on the general health of office workers”, Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 7(2): 69-75.
    HanShin Jo, Yang-Yen Ou, Chun-Chia Kung, 2019, “The neural substrate of self- and otherconcerned wellbeing: An fMRI study”, PLOS ONE, 14(10): e0203974.
    Hao-Cheng Huang,Yeng-Horng Perng, 2018, “Multi-Criteria Decision support system for Green Commercial space Design”, Open house international, 43(4): 05-15.
    Hong-Jhong Cheng and Shih-Yeh Wang, 2019, “The willingness of private sectors to apply for green building certification in Taiwan– Comparison of EEWH and LEED system in its promotional strategy”, International Review of Business Research Papers, 3(2): 54-68.
    Julie Dorseya and Alan Hedge, 2017, “Re-evaluation of a LEED platinum building: Occupant experiences of health and comfort”, Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 8(8): 4235-4241.
    Karen Clay, Joshua Lewis, and Edson Severnini, 2018, ”Pollution Infectious Disease, and Mortality: Evidence from the 1918 Spanish Influenza Pandemic”, The Journal of Economic History, 78(4): 1179–1209.
    Kerstin Sailer, Ian McCulloh, 2012, “Social networks and spatial configuration - How office layouts drive social interaction”, Social Networks, 34: 47–58.
    Kwok Wai Tham, Pawel Wargocki, Yan Fen Tan, 2015, “Indoor environmental quality occupant perception prevalence of sick building syndrome symptoms and sick leave in a Green Mark Platinum-rated versus a non-Green Mark-rated building: A case study”, Science and Technology for the Built Environment, 21: 35-44.
    Lin-Han Chiang Hsieh,Douglas Noonan, 2017, “Strategic Behavior in Certifying Green Buildings: An Inquiry of the Non-building Performance Value”, Building research and information, 28(5): 353-367.
    Lindsay J. McCunn & Robert Gifford, 2012, “Do green offices affect employee engagement and environmental attitudes”, Architectural Science Review, 55(2): 128-134.
    Lu Chen; Peggy A. Hannon; Sharon S. Laing; Mariana J. Kohn; Kathleen Clark; Scott Pritchard; Jeffrey R. Harris, 2015, “Perceived Workplace Health Support Is Associated With Employee Productivity”, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 29(3): 139-145.
    Malgorzata W. Kozusznik, Laurentiu Paul Maricutoiu, José M. Peiró, Delia Mihaela Vîrgaˇ, Aida Soriano and Carolina Mateo-Cecilia, 2018, “Decoupling Office Energy Efficiency From Employees’ Well-Being and Performance: A Systematic Review”, Front. Psychol. 10: 293.
    Meltem Ö. Gürel and Joy K. Potthoff, 2006, “Interior Design in Architectural Education”, JADE, 25(2): 217-230.
    Minyoung Kwon,Hilde Remoy, Andy van den Dobbelsteen,Ulrich Knaack, 2019, “Personal control and environmental user satisfaction in office buildings: Results of case studies in the Netherlands”, Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 7(2): 69-75.
    John W. Murry, Jr., James O. Hammons, 1995, “Delphi:A versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research”, The review of higher education, 18(4): 423-436.
    Nicole van den Bogerd, S. Coosje Dijkstra, Jacob C. Seidell, Jolanda Maas, 2017, “Greenery in the university environment students' preferences and perceived restoration likelihood”, PLOS ONE, 13(2): e0192429.
    Perry Forsythe and Sara Jane Wilkinson, 2015, “Measuring office fit-out changes to determine recurring embodied energy in building life cycle assessment”, Facilities, 33(3/4):262-274.
    Piers MacNaughton,Usha Satish,Jose Guillermo Cedeno Laurent,Skye Flanigan,Jose Vallarino,Brent Coull,John D.Spengler,Joseph G. Allen, 2017, “The impact of working in a green certified building on cognitive function and health”, Building and Environment:178-186.
    Robert A. Simons, Spenser Robinson, Eunkyu Lee, 2014, “Green office buildings a qualitative exploration of green office building attributes”, JOSRE, 6(1): 211-231.
    Sergio Altomonte, Stefano Schiavon, Michael G. Kent & Gail Brager, 2019, “Indoor environmental quality and occupant satisfaction in green certified buildings”, Building research and information, 47(3): 255-274.
    Stephanie Timm,Whitney Austin Gray,Trey Curtis,Susan Sung Eun Chung, 2018, “Designing for Health: How the Physical Environment Plays a Role in Workplace Wellness”, American Journal of Health Promotion, 32(6): 1468-1473.
    Ying Hua, Vivian Loftness, Judith H. Heerwagen, and Kevin M. Powell, 2011, “Relationship between Workplace Spatial Settings and Occupant Perceived Support for Collaboration”, Environment and Behavior, 43(6): 807–826.
    Yousef Al Horr, Mohammed Arif, Amit Kaushik,Ahmed Mazroei, Martha Katafygiotou, Esam Elsarrag, 2016, “Occupant productivity and office indoor environment quality: A review of the literature”, Building and Environment, 105: 369-389.
    Yousef Al Horr,Mohammed Arif,Martha Katafygiotou,Ahmed Mazroei,Amit Kaushik,Esam Elsarrag, 2016, “Impact of indoor environmental quality on occupant well-being and comfort: A review of the literature”, International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 5: 1–11.
    Zezhou Wu, Heng Lib, Yong Feng, Xiaochun Luob, Qiaohui Chen, 2019, “Developing a green building evaluation standard for interior decoration: A case study of China”, Building and Environment, 152: 50-58.
    Zhikun Ding, Ze Fan, Vivian W.Y. Tam, Yu Bian, Shenghan Li,I.M.Chethana S. Illankoon, Sungkon Moon, 2018, “Green building evaluation system implementation”, Energy Policy, 37: 3061–3070.
    Zhonghua Gou, 2016, “Green building for office interiors: challenges and opportunities”, Facilities, 34(11/12): 614-629.

    三、網頁參考文獻
    大學報第1653期; 處心積「綠」台灣綠建築制度待完善。
    城設‧誌,2017,「國際 WELL 健康建築認證標準的特色剖析」。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政學系碩士在職專班
    106923011
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106923011
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202000797
    Appears in Collections:[地政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    301101.pdf3521KbAdobe PDF71View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback