Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131290
|
| Title: | 幼兒園創新經營之研究 －以臺北市一所私立小學附設幼兒園為例
A Case Study of Preschool Innovation Management of One Private Elementary Preschool in Taipei County |
| Authors: | 吳佩瑛
Wu, Pei-Ying |
| Contributors: | 郭昭佑
Kuo, Chao-Yu
吳佩瑛
Wu, Pei-Ying |
| Keywords: | 私立幼兒園
學校創新
創新經營
Rivate kindergartens
School Innovation
PInnovative Management |
| Date: | 2020 |
| Issue Date: | 2020-08-03 18:31:07 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究旨在探討臺北市一所私立幼兒園創新經營之歷程，了解經營過程中面臨的困境與因應之策略。本研究採用個案研究法、訪談法、資料蒐集，輔以實地參與來分析推論，研究對象為臺北市一所私立幼兒園，受訪者包括輔導主任、三教師。最後發現個案小學附設幼兒園面臨的困境有：
(一)行政管理方面:師資異動與行政動盪影響士氣，而後有危機是由於內部有行政人事的動盪調整，也是老師無法干預。以前人事異動很大，連小學都異動很動盪，這對學校的經營影響很大，所以對於升小學的訊息、狀況，師資不穩造成流失率高，整個環境和生態都在變化，福利制度隨學校經營績效有所變動與調整，造成老師疑慮，老師無所適從。
(二)課程教學方面:近年來家長們迷思雙語教學，我們學校的重點因為是蒙特梭利教育，英文這塊的學習面向並非是我們的課程重點，加上現今教育環境趨勢與潮流，家長仍會選擇標榜以美語幼兒園為主軸的學校，且當時的校長不重視蒙式，資深老師無法堅持發揮自己的教育理念。
(三)資源運用方面:未完全符合經濟效益，空間、環境、設備適度規畫與執行。 1、學生嚴重流失，學校因歷經少子化的緣故，歷經經營上的困境，很多家長會直接選擇直接一貫升到高中，同時也傾向將小朋友送到住家附近的托兒園所，省去讓孩子因坐交通車而需要早起及睡不飽的擔憂，造成學生數減少與流失，也沒有完全中學的優勢。2、面臨招生困境: 約90幾年到100年後期間人數遞減，經營方式是相對是保守且限制重重，學校內部受到衝擊，因師資過剩必須裁員及資遣老師，造成老師的無助與恐慌，生源減少影響招生，班級數不斷下降，影響園所經營與生存。
(四)能活動方面:過去在活動及學生的展能活動方面，較無顯著的作法，因此缺少提供孩子表演的舞台，在孩子活動空間的安排無考慮到可與小學端資源共享如:圖書館、操場…等等。沒有著重園所活動等行銷宣傳，顯得較為保守與傳統。
(五)校園環境規劃營造方面:學校建築及社區老化，學習環境與設備未與時俱進，應即時因應時代符合潮流趨勢。
面臨上述困境中，研究者歸納以下結論，幼兒園創新經營之面項如:
一、領導者面對組織內部不合時宜之制度，應具備變革的勇氣與決心，建立與調整有效的制度。園內組織行事準則與制度，待管理及整合凝聚內部共識。行政組織架構及工作內容分工明確；積極面對困境，進行有效協調溝通，處理及因應。
二、課程教學：運用社區資源發展在地文化特色，在理論與實務中相互實踐與驗證，學習並提升教師專業知能；藉由各項活動課程落實與安排，提供孩子完整學習，積極落實推展孩子運動。
三、注入引進、整合相關人力、社區、物力、環境等資源，與小學部資源共享，有效規劃經費運用，塑造學校優質形象、環境空間彈性開放，有效規劃各項教學活動。薪水、福利對師資穩定幫助很大，另有規劃教師可放寒暑假，是吸引繼續留任的原因，園長的帶領有影響，能看得更寬廣，老師更進步。
四、增加對內與對外的影響力，提升對內家長及老師對學校的認同，積極營造學校環境及對外提升校譽，為學校引進資源，打造良好夥伴關係，有益於學校幼兒園的經營與發展。緊密增加親師生互動，發揮展能的意義並努力嘗試創新統整各項活動，培養孩子多元能力與發展，奠定良好的學習態度。
五、校舍改建源設備運用、綠美化營造，重視校園空間的安全、整潔及效率、適切性，校園應重視定期環境消毒與整潔，避免病媒蚊孳生或群聚感染，營造安全舒適之環境並有效積極防疫措施，落實乾淨整潔之校園環境。
最後，根據研究結果，提出幾點建議，俾供該個案幼兒園及未來研究者作為參考。
關鍵詞：私立幼兒園、學校創新、創新經營
This research aims to explore the innovative management process of a private kindergarten in Taipei City, and to understand the difficulties faced in the management process and the corresponding strategies. This research adopts case study method, interview method, data collection, supplemented by field participation to analyze inferences. The research object is a private kindergarten in Taipei City. The interviewees include counseling director, three
Teachers. Finally, it was found that the difficulties faced by the kindergarten attached to the primary school were as follows:
(1) Administrative management: Teacher changes and administrative turmoil affect morale, and then there is a crisis due to internal administrative personnel turbulence adjustments, and teachers cannot interfere. In the past, there was a lot of personnel changes, even elementary schools were very turbulent, which had a great impact on the school’s operation. Therefore, for the information and conditions of entering primary schools, the instability of teachers caused a high rate of loss. The entire environment and ecology are changing, and the welfare system is changing. The school`s operating performance has changed and adjusted, causing teachers` doubts and teachers at a loss.
(2) Curriculum teaching: In recent years, parents have been thinking about bilingual teaching. The focus of our school is Montessori education. The learning aspect of English is not the focus of our curriculum. In addition to the current educational environment trends and trends, parents They would still choose schools that advertised American-language kindergartens as the main axis, and the principal at that time didn`t pay much attention to Mongolian style, and senior teachers could not insist on exerting their educational philosophy.
(3) In terms of resource utilization: it is not fully in line with economic benefits, and space, environment, and equipment are properly planned and executed. 1. There is a serious loss of students. Due to the fact that the school has experienced declining birthrates and operating difficulties, many parents will directly choose to go directly to high school, and they also tend to send their children to nurseries near their homes to save their children. The worry of getting up early and not getting enough sleep due to transportation has caused the decrease and loss of students, and it does not have the advantages of middle school. 2. Facing the difficulty of enrollment: The number of students is decreasing during the period from 90 to 100 years later. The operation method is relatively conservative and restrictive. The school
is affected. Due to the surplus of teachers, it is necessary to lay off staff and send teachers, causing teachers to be helpless and panic. , The reduction of the source of students affects enrollment, and the number of classes continues to decline, affecting the operation and survival of the park.
(4) In terms of disability activities: In the past, there were relatively no obvious practices in activities and students` disability activities, so there was no stage for children to perform. The arrangement of children`s activity space did not take into account the sharing of resources with elementary schools, such as: Library, playground... etc. There is no emphasis on marketing and publicity such as garden activities, which is more conservative and traditional.
(5) Campus environment planning and construction: school buildings and communities are aging, and the learning environment and equipment have not kept pace with the times. It should be in line with the trend of the times. Facing the above-mentioned dilemma, the researchers summarized the following conclusions. The aspects of innovative operation of kindergartens include:
1. Leaders should have the courage and determination to change and establish and adjust effective systems when faced with untimely systems within the organization. The rules and systems of organization and conduct in the park are to be managed and integrated to build internal consensus. The administrative organization structure and work content are clearly divided; actively face difficulties, conduct effective coordination and communication, deal with and respond.
2. Curriculum teaching: use community resources to develop local cultural characteristics, practice and verify each other in theory and practice, learn and improve teachers` professional knowledge; through the implementation and arrangement of various activities and courses, provide children with complete learning, and actively implement and promote children movement. 3. Inject and integrate relevant human, community, material, and environmental resources, share resources with the elementary school, effectively plan the use of funds, shape the school`s high-quality image, open the environment and space, and effectively plan various teaching activities. Salary and benefits are very helpful to the stability of teachers. In addition, planning teachers can take winter and summer vacations, which is the reason for attracting continued retention. The head of the kindergarten has an impact and can be seen more broadly and teachers are more advanced.
4. Increase internal and external influence, increase the recognition of parents and teachers of
the school, actively create a school environment and promote school reputation externally, introduce resources for the school, create a good partnership, and benefit the operation and development of the school’s kindergarten . Closely increase the interaction between teachers and students, give full play to the meaning of performance, and try to innovate and integrate various activities, cultivate children`s diverse abilities and development, and establish a good learning attitude.
5. The use of equipment and green landscaping for school building reconstruction, pay attention to the safety, cleanliness, efficiency, and appropriateness of campus space. Schools should pay attention to regular environmental disinfection and cleanliness to avoid breeding of vector mosquitoes or group infections, create a safe and comfortable environment and be effective and active Epidemic prevention measures are implemented to implement a clean and tidy campus environment.
Finally, based on the results of the research, several suggestions are put forward for reference by the kindergarten and future researchers of this case.
Keywords: Rivate kindergartens, School Innovation, PInnovative Management |
| Reference: | 中文部分
2019年1月8日美國之音。台灣少子化更趨嚴重2018年出生率創8年新低。https://www.voacantonese.com/a/taiwan-birth-rate-2018-population-marriage-rate-01072019/4732622.html
Annabelle Godwin and Lorraine Schrag 著葉佳青譯( 2000)。幼托機構經營與管理。華騰文化股份有限公司，台北市10(3)，75-102。
Jillian Rodd原著。李文正、張幼珠譯（1999）。成功的幼托行政管理:園所領導之鑰。教育叢書深耕叢書。光佑出版社，台北縣。
John B.Thomson、廖鳳瑞等著（1996）。幼兒教育的實踐與展望-世界幼教趨勢與台灣本土經驗。教育深耕叢書1。光佑文化事業股份有限公司出版，(36)，33-86。
Panjit Kumar著潘中道、胡龍騰、蘇文賢譯者（2014)第二版新。研究方法步驟化學習指南。學富文化事業有限公司出版。143。
PHYLLIS CLICK原著吳百祿譯者（2003）。幼托機構經營與管理。華騰文化股份有限公司出版。32(1)。
Sue Bredekamp Carol Copple編者洪毓英譯（2000）。Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs 幼教綠皮書-符合孩子身心發展的專業幼教。父母心理學全集3，和英出版社，14、27。
中華民國內政部戶政司。全球資訊網。人口統計資料。https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346
中華民國內政部統計處(2018)。https://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/chart.aspx
中華醫事學院幼兒保育系主編。洪明全、陳彥廷校閱（2006）。幼兒保育專業發展:理論與實務。華藤文化股份有限公司出版，(89)，142-163。
王立杰、田育芬、段慧瑩、張碧如編著（2006）。幼教機構行政管理第二版幼稚園與托兒所實務四版Administration of Early Childhood。永大書局，台北。
甘獻基(2019)2月14日。搶救生育率（一）：找出低生育率的原因。https://opinion.udn.com/opinion/story/12638/3641852
行政院（2000）。發二五放幼兒教育券實施方案。行政院臺八十九教字第二六0二五號函。
行政院（2000）。發放幼兒教育券實施方案。行政院臺八十 九教字第二六0二五號函。
何金針、唐璽惠，2003年。少子化趨勢對幼稚園經營之衝擊及因應策略。學校行政雙月刊，43，242－252
吳昆壅(2007)。少子化對國民小學教育影響與因應之研究。國立臺東大學社會科教學碩士班碩士論文，臺東縣。
吳思華(2005)。競爭力背後的創造力。教育研究月刊，133，5-10。
吳清山（2004）。學校創新經營理念與策略。教師天地，128，30-44。
吳清山（2004）。學校創新經營理念與策略。教師天地，128，30-44。
吳清山、林天祐（2003）。創新經營。教育資料與研究，53，134-135
李于梅（2007）。幼稚園運藍海策略與創新經營之研究。國立政治大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文。
李裕光、沈繻淯、陳素珍、魏麗卿、謝惠娟編著（2009）。蒙特梭利教學。華都文化事業有限公司，臺北市。
林新富(2001)。轉換成本在顧客滿意度與顧客忠誠度關係之干涉效果－以台北市私立幼教產業為例。實踐大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。臺北。
段慧瑩研究主持（2006）。托育機構因應幼托整合政策之現況研究。國立教育資料館。，52（3），141-172。
洪福財（2000）。教師專業學習社群之調查研究：「關注學生學習成效」為焦點。課程與教學，17(1)，209-232。幼兒教育史-臺灣觀點。五南圖書出版公司。
洪福財（2013）。臺北市的幼稚園發展:沿革與挑戰。幼兒教育，309，8-17。
洪福財（2018）。台灣幼教史。五南出版社，臺北市。
翁麗芳（1998）。幼兒教育史。心理出版社，臺北市，244。
翁麗芳(2012）。從臺灣史觀點論臺灣幼兒教育的發展。教育資料與研究104期。國家教育研究院，6(6)，73-77。
能力雜誌編著(2003)。價值創新實例。臺北市：中國生產力中心
陳鈺馥、林惠琴(2019，1月7日)。自由時報電子報。不婚不生！去年新生兒18.1萬8年新低 結婚對數也創9年新低。https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/2663966
高義展（2003）。學前教育行政管理與實務。台北:啟英文化。
高義展編著（2006）。學前教育行政管理與制度。鼎茂圖書出版股份有限公司
國立臺中師範學院幼教學術研討會(2000)。二千年代新幼兒教育的展望論文集。國立臺中師範學院，臺中市。
國教署 (2019年5月24日)更新https://www.ece.moe.edu.tw/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/1080524定稿QA我國少子女化對策2至5歲篇.pdf
張弘弦主編（1992）。第一冊校園規劃。福爾曼幼教管理資訊出版社，台北市，244。
張弘弦主編（1992）。第二冊園務行政。福爾曼幼教管理資訊出版社，台北市，244。
張弘勳（2008）。幼托園所行政與管理。五南圖書出版股份有限公司，(37)，1-25。
張孝筠(2006)。我國少子化效應對幼保生態之影響。幼教資訊，187，21-27
張明輝(2002)。學校經營與管理研究。台北:學富。
教育部全球資訊網（2000）。我國少子化對策計畫(107年-111)。行政院臺八十九教字第二六0二五號函。
教育部全球資訊網(2018，10月23日)。當前教育重大政策我國少子女化對策計畫（107年至111年）。重要政策。https://www.edu.tw/News_Plan_Content.aspx?n=D33B55D537402BAA&sms=954974C68391B710&s=1F066099DDDA393B。
陳星貝(2012)。不可小覷少子化對台灣教育的衝擊。財團法人國家政策研究基金會，2014年3月 29日，取自http://www.npf.org.tw/post/2/11696?
陳義明著（2005）。學校經營管理與領導。一般教育，(86)，9-10。心理出版社。臺北市。
曾坤暘（1990）。幼兒教育行政。教育叢書23。水牛出版社，台北。
湯志民(2006)。政大附中創新經營的理念與政策。教育研究月刊，145，59－81。
華視(2019，6月12日)。托育準公共化缺失多 監委批:上路倉促。華視。取自https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E6%89%98%E8%82%B2%E6%BA%96%E5%85%AC%E5%85%B1%E5%8C%96%E7%BC%BA%E5%A4%B1%E5%A4%9A-%E7%9B%A3%E5%A7%94%E6%89%B9-%E4%B8%8A%E8%B7%AF%E5%80%89%E4%BF%83-045800852.html
黃義良(2005)。幼教機構的行銷策略初探。幼兒教育年刊，17，35-55
黃義良(2006)。藍海策略對幼教機構經營的啟示。幼教資訊，192，17－24。
新版全國教保資訊網(2019)https://www.ece.moe.edu.tw/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/1080604修正核定本-我國少子女化對策計畫107年至111年核對ok.pdf教育部、衛生福利部、勞動部、內政部、 財政部、經濟部、科技部、交通部、人事行政總處、 國家發展委員會。中華民國108年6月修正
新聞與活動。總統府新聞。中華民國108年10月31日。https://www.president.gov.tw/NEWS/24971。
葉興華（2002）。從課程領導者的角色期望談我國國小課程領導之困境與展望。初等教育學刊，12。
詹麗玲（2007）。幼稚園經營面臨少子化因應策略之調查研究-以彰化縣為例。國立嘉義大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文。
臺北市政府教育局108年度臺北市私立幼兒園園長會議手冊（2019，8月7日）。LOVE IS FUN傳遞用心 超越價值。37。臺北市政府教育局。https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yvM92XtxBjXuJokutVwItIKWzyMv0oPl/view
歐姿秀（2002）。台灣近十五年幼兒園園長領導研究派典轉移之探究。幼兒教育年刊， 14，177-202。
蔡春美、敖韻玲、張翠娥（1992）。幼稚園與托兒所行政。心理出版社，(37)，1-25。
鄭博真著(2009)。 幼兒於課程與教學創新-多元智能取向。新文京開發出版有限公司，19 (2)。臺北縣中和市。
顏士程（2012）。臺灣幼兒園發展史。華騰全球數位文化股份有限公司出版，4(11)，221-237。
顏秀如、張明輝(2005)。學校創新經營的意涵與實施計畫。中等教育，56，28-53。
魏美惠(2005)。剖析臺灣幼兒教育的生態環境。幼兒教育年刊，14，113-124
魏美惠著（1995）。近代幼兒教育思潮。心理出版社有限公司，臺北市，244。
魏惠貞(2008)。各國幼兒教育。幼兒教育116。心理出版社，5。
洪福財(2002)。幼兒教育史-台灣觀點。台北市:五南。
蔡春美、敖韻玲、張翠娥（1992）。幼稚園與托兒所行政。心理出版社，(37)，1-
25。
曾坤暘（1990）。幼兒教育行政。教育叢書23。水牛出版社，台北。
蔡春美、張翠娥、陳素珍（2007）。幼教機構行政管理:幼稚園與托兒所實務。幼兒教育49。心理出版社，臺北市。
王立杰、田育芬、段慧瑩、張碧如編著（2006）。幼教機構行政管理第二版幼稚園與托兒所實務四版Administration of Early Childhood。永大書局，台北。
張弘勳（2008）。幼托園所行政與管理。五南圖書出版股份有限公司，(37)
，1-25。
中華醫事學院幼兒保育系主編。張孝筠(2006)。我國少子化效應對幼保生態之影響。幼教資訊，187，21-27
林新富(2001)。轉換成本在顧客滿意度與顧客忠誠度關係之干涉效果－以台北市私立幼教產業為例。實踐大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。臺北。
中華民國內政部戶政司。全球資訊網。人口統計資料。https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346
蔡春美、張翠娥、陳素珍（2007）。幼教機構行政管理:幼稚園與托兒所實務。幼兒教育49。心理出版社，臺北市。
張弘勳（2008）。幼托園所行政與管理。五南圖書出版股份有限公司，(37)，1-25。
顏士程（2012）。臺灣幼兒園發展史。華騰全球數位文化股份有限公司出版，4(11)，221-237。
吳清山、林天佑（2003）。教育小辭書。臺北:五南。
黃瑞琴(2001)。質的教育研究方法。台北:心理。
潘淑滿(2003)。質的研究-理論與應用。台北:心理。
張孝筠(2007)。我國「扶持五歲弱勢幼兒及早教育計畫」往下延伸之必要性。教育 研究月刊，161，頁5-14
魏惠娟(2004)。焦點團體。載於謝臥龍主編，質性研究(272-316)。台北市:心理。
西文部分
Acaray, A. (2007). Kucuk ve orta boy isletmelerde yenilik yonetimi: yenilik yonetiminde etkili olan orgutsel yapi ve faktorlere iliskin bir arastirma. Innovation management in small and medium-sized enterprises: a survey related to innovation management and organizational structure and factors activating innovation management. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Kocaeli: Kocaeli University.
Acikalin, A. (1998). Uc rakamli yildonumlerine dogru. Towards three digits’ anniversaries. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yonetimi, 16(2), 387-393.
Altrichter, H. & Schratz, M. (Hrsg.) (1992). Studien zur Bildungsforschung und Bildungspolitik, Band 5. Bildung in Österreich. Analysen und Entwicklungsperspektiven, S. 81. Österreichischer Studienverlag: Innsbruck.
Andersson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. (2000). Individual envii-onmental initiative:
Championing natural enviionmental issues in U.S. business organizations.
Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 548-570."
Aygen, S. (2006). İsletmelerde yenilik yonetimi surecinde orgut yapilarinda ve hizmet tasarımlarinda yasanan donusumler: Antalya ili bes yildizli konaklama isletmelerinde ampirik bir arastirma ve hizmet tasarimi onerisi. The Changes occurred in service design and in their organization structures in innovation management process of the businesses: An emprical research in five-star-hotels in Antalya province and a service design proposal. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Konya: Selcuk University.
Argon, T. & Ozcelik, N. (2007). Ilkogretim okulu yoneticilerinin degisikligi yonetme yeterlilikleri. The primary school administrators’ competencies within the framework of administrating change. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 16, 70-89.
Avci, M. (2009). Ogrenme yonelimliligin yenilik performansı uzerine etkisi: Mugla mermer sektorunde bir inceleme. [The effect of learning orientation on firm innovativeness: An investigation in the marble industry in Mugla Zonguldak Karaelmas Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(10), 121-138.
Balay, R. (2004). Kuresellesme, bilgi toplumu ve egitim. Globalisation, information society and education. Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Dergisi,37(2), 61-82.
Beycioglu, K. & Aslan, M. (2010). Okul gelisiminde temel dinamik olarak degisim veyenilesme: Okul yoneticileri ve ogretmenlerin rolleri. Change and innovation as main dynamics in school development: administrators and teachers’ roles.Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 7(1), 153-173.
Blackmore, J., Bateman, D., Loughlin, J., O’Mara, J., & Aranda, G. (2011). Research into
the connection between built learning spaces and student outcomes. Melbourne, Vic,
Australia:State Government Victoria.
Bormann, I. (2011). Zwischenräume der Veränderung: Innovationen und ihr Transfer im Feld von Bildung und Erziehung, S. 9. Springer:Wiesbaden.
Banoglu, K. & Peker, S. (2012). Ogrenen orgut olma yolunda ilkogretim okul
yoneticilerinin okullarina ve kendilerine iliskin algi durumlari. Primary school
principals’ perception on their schools and themselves on the way of being a learning
organization. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 43, 71-82.
Calik, T. (2003). Ogrenen orgutler olarak egitim kurumlari. Educational instutions as learning organizations. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(8), 115-130.
Cavusgil, S. T., Calantone, R. J. & Zhao, Y. (2003). Tacit knowledge transfer and firm innovation cabability. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 18(1), 6-21.
Chou, C., Shen, C., Hsiao, H. & Chen, S. (2010). The influence of innovative organizational management of technological and vocational schools on innovative performance–using organizational innovative climate as the mediator variable. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 8(2), 237-242.
Chou, C., Shen, C., Hsiao, H. & Chen, S. (2010). The influence of innovative organizational management of technological and vocational schools on innovative performance–using organizational innovative climate as the mediator variable. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 8(2), 237-242.
Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a
global organization. Management Science, 50(3), 352–364.
M Osborne - Teachers and Curriculum, 2016
ERIC"http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.66.14
Drucker, P. F. (2003). Yenilik disiplini icinde yenilik (Cev: A. Kardan). Istanbul: Mess.
Duplesis, M. (2007). The role of knowledge management in innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(4), 20-29.
Durna, U. (2002). Yenilik yonetimi. Ankara: Nobel.
Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Issue 66, (2016).Teacher Opinions on the
Innovation Management Skills of School Administrators and Organizational Learning
Mechanisms1,243-262
Ellison, S. (2009). Hard-Wired for innovation? Comparing two policy paths toward innovative Schooling. International Education, 39(1), 30-48.
Eveleens, C. (2010). Innovation management: A literature review of innovation process models and their implications. Nijmegen, NL, 1-16.
Fussangel, K. & Gräsel, C. (2009). Lerngemeinschaften von Lehrerinnen und Lehrern und ihre Bedeutung für die Schulentwicklung. In: Berkemeyer, N., Bonsen, M. & Harazd, B. (Hrsg.): Perspektiven der Schulentwicklungsforschung. Festschrift für Hans-Günter Rolff, S. 118-130. Beltz:Weinheim.
Garcia, V. J., Ruiz, A. & Llorens, F. J. (2007). Effects of technology absorptive capacity and technology proactivity on Organizational learning,innovation and performance:An empirical examination.Technology Analysis &Strategic Management, 19, 527-558.
Gol, E. & Bulbul, T. (2012). Ilkogretim okulu yoneticilerinin yenilik yonetimi yeterliklerine iliskin ogretmen algilari. The perceptions of the teachers regarding the innovation management efficacies of the primary school administrators. Mersin Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 8(2), 97-109.
Gräsel, C., Bormann, I., Schütte, K., Trempler, K., Fischbach, R. & Asseburg, R. (2012). Perspektiven der Forschung im Bereich Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung. In: BMBF (Hrsg.): Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung – Beiträge zur Bildungsforschung. Bildungsforschung Band 39, S. 7-25. Berlin.
http://www.ph-noe.ac.at/forschung/projekte/innovationscheck-schule.html
Hofman, R. H. & Dijkstra, B. J. (2010). Effective teacher professionalization in networks? Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1031-1040.
Hofman, R. H., Boom, J., Meeuwisse, M. & Hofman, W. H. A. (2012). Educational innovation, quality and effects: An exploration of innovations and their effects in secondary education. Educational Policy, 27(6), 843-866.
Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Issue 66, 2016, 243-262 Teacher Opinions on the Innovation Management Skills of School Administrators and Organizational Learning Mechanisms1 http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.66.14
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Kathrins, R. (2007). The relationship of leadership style and types of organizational culture to the effectiveness and employee satisfaction in acute care hospital. Unpublished Dissertation, Touro University International.
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Leadership for Primary Schools: An Examination of Innovation within an Austrian Educational Context Heißenberger, Petra Global Education Review, v3 n1 p148-163 2016"
Lemon, M. & Sahota, P. S. (2004). Organizational culture as knowledge repository for increased innovative capacity. Technovation, 24, 483-498.
Lieberman, A, Saxl, E. R., & Miles, M. B. (1988). Teacher leadership: Ideology and
practice. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools
(pp. 148-166). New York: Teachers College Press.
Little, J. W. (1984). Seductive images and organizational realities in professional
development. Teachers College Record, 86(1), 84-102"
M Osborne - Teachers and Curriculum, 2016 - ERIC"Managing Educational Champions: Entrepreneurship in Schools Ori Eyal PhD, Doron Yosef-Hassidim First Published January 1, 2012
Markham, S. K. (1998). A longitudinal examination of how champions influence
others to support their projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management,
15(6), 490-504.
Managing Educational Champions: Entrepreneurship in Schools Ori Eyal PhD, Doron
Yosef-Hassidim First Published January 1, 2012
McCharen, B., Song, J. & Martens, J. (2011). School innovation: The mutual impacts of organizational learning and creativity. Educational Management Administration & Leaderhip, 39(6), 676-694.
Mohanty, K. & Kar, S. (2012). Achieving innovation and success: Organizational learning. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 9(1), 36-42.
Murphy, J. (2007). Teacher leadership: Barriers and support. In T. Towsend (Ed.),
International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement (pp. 681-706). Dordrecht: Springer.
Muys, D., & Harris, A. (2007). Teacher leadership in (in)action: Three case studies
of contrasting schools. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 35(1), U1-134.
Nickolaus, R. & Gräsel, C. (Hrsg.) (2006). Innovation und Transfer. Expertisen zur Transferforschung. Schneider: Baltmannsweiler.
Ozdemir, S. (2013). Egitimde orgutsel yenilesme. Organizational innovation in education. Ankara: Pegem
Ozdevecioglu, M. & Bickes, D. M. (2012). Orgutsel ogrenme ve inovasyon iliskisi: Buyuk olcekli isletmelerde bir arastirma. The relationship between organizational learning and innovation: A study at the large-sized businesses. Erciyes Universitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakultesi Dergisi, 39, 19-45.
Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Roserúiolz, S. (1989). Teachers` workplace: The social organization of schools.
New York: Teachers College Press.
Saphier, J., & King, M. (1985). Good seeds grow in strong cultures. Educational
Leadership, 42(6), 67-74.
Simsek, Y. & Yildirim, C.M. (2004). Ogrenen okullarin kulturel yapilari. Cultural structures of learning schools. XIII. Ulusal Egitim Bilimleri Kurultayi, İnonu Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi, Malatya, 6-9 Temmuz.
Suarez-Orozco, M. & Sattin, C. (2007).Wanted: Global citizens. Educational Leadership,
64(7), 58-62.
Therin, F. (2002). Organizational learning and innovation in high tech small firms. Proceedings of 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii, IEEE Computer Society, 6-9 January.
Trott, P. (2005). Innovation management and new product development (3rd Edition).
London: Prentice Hall.
Yunus Emre OMUR&Argon,Turkan ARGON.（2016）.Eurasian Journal of Educational
Research, Teacher Opinions on the Innovation Management Skills of School
Administrators and Organizational Learning Mechanisms1, Issue 66, 243-262
http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.66.14" |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
學校行政碩士在職專班
105911017 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105911017 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202001068 |
| Appears in Collections: | [學校行政碩士在職專班] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
