English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 93218/123590 (75%)
Visitors : 27701370      Online Users : 535
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131393


    Title: 美國與臺灣醫學圖書館學會專業人員認證制度比較研究
    Comparative Study on the Certification for Medical Library Association Professionals between the United States and Taiwan
    Authors: 高維平
    Kao, Wei-Ping
    Contributors: 王梅玲
    Wang, Mei-Ling
    高維平
    Kao, Wei-Ping
    Keywords: 醫學圖書館
    圖書館專業人員
    認證制度
    Medical libraries
    Library professionals
    Certification
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2020-08-03 18:50:35 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在瞭解美國與臺灣醫學圖書館學會專業人員認證制度,比較兩國醫學圖書館學會專業人員認證之發展歷史、專業能力標準與現況,包括:認證制度種類與功能、認證資格與級別、認證機構、認證方式與範圍、認證更新辦法、認證程序,以及認證制度價值,做為我國發展醫學圖書館學會專業人員認證制度之參考依據。研究採用比較研究法與深度訪談法進行分析。
    研究結果經分析得到以下結論:一、美國與臺灣皆針對健康資訊專業人員建立認證制度,顯示兩國對於健康資訊從業人員專業能力的重視程度;二、美國具有詳盡之專業人員能力標準,臺灣則無相關規範;三、美國認證兼顧健康資訊專業人員之學位、繼續教育與個人成就,以及領域相關工作經驗,臺灣側重於健康資訊領域之知識與著作成就;四、美國認證制度在職業發展、專業地位與薪資頗具價值,而臺灣目前較無實質增益。
    根據研究結果,本研究分別針對該領域組織或個人提出建議,以提升健康資訊管理的專業品質:一、對醫學圖書館學會之建議:(一)建立醫學圖書館專業人員之能力標準、(二)促使臺灣醫學圖書館專業人員認證邁向法制化發展,以確立健康資訊專業人員的專業地位;二、對健康資訊機構之建議:(一)聘僱具備健康資訊專業人員認證者、(二)提升具有認證者之薪資與專業地位,以確保健康資訊服務之品質;三、對健康資訊工作人員之建議:健康資訊領域之從業人員必須自行尋求各種專業成長之管道,持續性的維持繼續教育與職業發展,同時積極參與專業學會之認證,以提升個人專業形象。
    This research mainly focuses on the certification for Medical Library Association professionals of the United States and Taiwan, and compares the developmental history, professional competence standards, including types and functions of certification systems, certification qualifications and levels, certificate authority, certification methods and scope, certification renewal, certification procedures, and certification system value beteew the two countries. Using comparative method and in-depth interview as the research tools, the present study aimed at providing a useful reference for the Taiwan Medical Library Association which is responsible for the certification for Medical Library Association professionals.
    The results lead to the following conclusion: 1. Both the United States and Taiwan have established a certification system for health information professionals, showing the emphasis of the two countries on the professional competence of health information professionals; 2. The United States has established detailed professional competence standards, while Taiwan has no relevant regulations; 3. In the United States, certification takes into account the degree, professional accomplishments of health information professionals, as well as related work experience in the field, while Taiwan focuses on the knowledge of health information and academic publications; 4. In the United States, certification system is valuable in career development, professional status and salary; however, certification is not associated with benefits in terms of professional recognition or career development in Taiwan .
    The results of the current study may highlight some recommendations for relevant organizations and personal to improve the professional quality of healthcare information management. For the Medical Library Association to establish the professional status of healthcare information professional, it would be important to (1) establish assessment standards for competence, and (2) incorporate the requirement for qualified personnel into the Hospital accreditation system. For health information organizations to ensure with-quality since, it is suggested that they could (1) hire certified health information professionals, and (2) improve the salary and professional status of certified professional. For the continual education and career development of health information staff, they should seek various professional growth channels and actively participate in on-the-job training to update their knowledge and skill in the field.
    Reference: 鈕文英(2017)。質性研究方法與論文寫作。臺北市:雙葉書廊。
    馮佳(2015)。國外圖書館職業資格認證推行方式研究。圖書館雜誌,34(2),68-73。
    楊美華、劉欣蓓(2003)。知識經濟時代專門圖書館員知能探究。中國圖書館學會會報,70,4-17。
    葉宗顯等(譯) (2013)。社會研究方法指南。新北市:韋伯文化國際。(Alasuutari, P., Bickman, L. & Brannen, J., 2008)
    臺灣醫學圖書館學會(2016)。臺灣醫學圖書館學會章程。取自https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Xb69cO-J6KeTQwNTs_yxOfGwhWQuKGV_/view
    臺灣醫學圖書館學會(2017a)。國內首次圖書館員認證考試 37名獲頒高級醫學圖書館管理師證書。取自https://www.taiwanmla.org/?p=7239&lang=zh
    臺灣醫學圖書館學會(2017b)。醫學圖書館專業人員認證方式說明。取自https://www.taiwanmla.org/?p=7031&lang=zh
    臺灣醫學圖書館學會(2018)。第2屆 學會各委員會與工作計劃。取自https://www.taiwanmla.org/?page_id=7363&lang=zh
    臺灣醫學圖書館學會(2019a)。醫學圖書館專業人員接受繼續教育積分認定及證書更新辦法。取自https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LgaADsFVxQ1P0XP7AWRbYkOoV7NXTmfD/view
    臺灣醫學圖書館學會(2019b)。醫學圖書館專業人員認證辦法。取自https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fPFSTjU7LLcSwLcFD-sJMG-Mdx4M6bvt/view
    臺灣醫學圖書館學會(2019c)。醫學圖書館專業人員認證辦法與施行細則。取自https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VO9FL6TQ2Siniqmydftfd7wLofDaxVTx/view
    臺灣醫學圖書館學會(2019d)。醫學圖書館管理師考試考題範例。取自http://www.taiwanmla.org/?uamfiletype=attachment&uamgetfile=http://www.taiwanmla.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/%E9%86%AB%E5%AD%B8%E5%9C%96%E6%9B%B8%E9%A4%A8%E7%AE%A1%E7%90%86%E5%B8%AB%E8%80%83%E8%A9%A6%E8%80%83%E9%A1%8C%E7%AF%84%E4%BE%8B.doc
    臺灣醫學圖書館學會(2020a)。[TMLA] 109年醫學圖書館管理師認證–以著作申請。取自https://www.taiwanmla.org/?page_id=8371&lang=zh
    臺灣醫學圖書館學會(2020b)。109年醫學圖書館專業人員認證方式說明。取自https://www.taiwanmla.org/?page_id=8365&lang=zh
    劉一德(2019)。問題出在「大政府」。取自https://talk.ltn.com.tw/article/paper/1277812
    錢昆、崔麗媛(2011)。我國圖書館員職業資格認證制度探究。長春師範學院學報,30(4),168-171。
    薛理桂(1994)。比較圖書館學導論。臺北市:臺灣學生書局。
    蘇諼(1999)。臺灣地區醫學圖書館員繼續教育需求之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:NSC87-2415-H-030-007)。臺北縣新莊市:輔仁大學圖書資訊學系。
    蘇諼(2003)。數位時代醫學圖書館之內部空間規劃。圖書與資訊學刊,47,1-14。
    蘇諼(2006)。醫療專業人員的資訊行為。圖書館學與資訊科學,32(2),32-41。
    American Library Association(ALA). (2009). ALA’s Core Competences of Librarianship. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/educationcareers/sites/ala.org.educationcareers/files/content/careers/corecomp/corecompetences/finalcorecompstat09.pdf
    American Library Association(ALA). (2016). Become a Librarian. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/educationcareers/libcareers/become
    Arnold, P. A., Braddock Communications., & U.S. Department of State's Bureau of International Information Programs(IIP). (2004). About America : how the United States is governed. Retrieved from https://web-archive-2017.ait.org.tw/infousa/zhtw/PUBS/AmGov/governed.pdf
    Baker, L. M., Kars, M., & Petty, J. (2004). Health sciences librarians' attitudes toward the Academy of Health Information Professionals. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 92(3), 323–333.
    Bell, J. A. (1996). History of the Medical Library Association's credentialing program. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 84(3), 320-333.
    Bereday, G. Z. F. (1964). Comparative Method in Education. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    Bramble, J., Steidinger, S., Hamasu, C., & Austin, M. (2018). Clinical Medical Librarian Licensure: Pros versus Cons. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 37(3), 306-311. doi:10.1080/02763869.2018.1477719
    Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor(BLS). (2019). Occupational Outlook Handbook, Librarians. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/ooh/education-training-and-library/librarians.htm
    Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals(CILIP). (2018). Professional Registration. Retrieved from https://www.cilip.org.uk/page/ProfessionalRegistration
    Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals(CILIP). (2019). PKSB (Professional Knowledge & Skills Base) for Knowledge Management. Retrieved from https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.cilip.org.uk/resource/group/d8c83290-f520-4c10-83fe-998144595612/cilip-kmpksb-january2019v3.pdf
    Drake, M. A. (2005). Encyclopedia of library and information science. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
    Gartland, H. J. (1968). The Veterans Administration library program. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 56(1), 21-23.
    Medical Library Association(MLA). (1985). Proceedings, Eighty-fourth Annual Meeting Medical Library Association, Inc. Denver, Colorado May 25-31, 1984. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 73(1), 94-119.
    Medical Library Association(MLA). (2007). Professional Competencies. Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/education/policy/
    Medical Library Association(MLA). (2010). Code of Ethics for Health Sciences Librarianship. Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/page/code-of-ethics
    Medical Library Association(MLA). (2015). Health Information Profession. Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=53
    Medical Library Association(MLA). (2016). How the Academy credential benefits your career. Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=1265
    Medical Library Association(MLA). (2017). Professional Competencies. Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/page/test-competencies
    Medical Library Association(MLA). (2018). Academy of Health Information Professionals (AHIP). Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/academy/
    Medical Library Association(MLA). (2019a). Determine Your Eligibility for Academy Membership. Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=323
    Medical Library Association(MLA). (2019b). Explore a Career in Health Sciences Information. Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=352
    Medical Library Association(MLA). (2020a). Academy Roster. Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=350
    Medical Library Association(MLA). (2020b). MLA Committees. Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=440
    Medical Library Association(MLA). (n.d.a). About MLA. Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=21
    Medical Library Association(MLA). (n.d.b). Academy of Health Information Professionals (AHIP). Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=41
    Medical Library Association(MLA). (n.d.c). Application Instructions for AHIP Member, Senior or Distinguished Level. Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=1268
    Medical Library Association(MLA). (n.d.d). Instructions for Renewing Your AHIP Membership at Your Current Level. Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=1270
    Medical Library Association(MLA). (n.d.e). Professional Accomplishments Points Index. Retrieved from https://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=438#teaching
    Myers, B. A., & Rodriguez, B. (2016). How do early career health sciences information professionals gain competencies?. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 104(3), 215–220. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.104.3.006
    Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    Roper, F. W. (2006). The medical library association's professional development program: A look back at the way ahead. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 94(1), 8-18.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班
    107913014
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107913014
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202001105
    Appears in Collections:[圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    301401.pdf6815KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback