English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 92776/123147 (75%)
Visitors : 26983972      Online Users : 580
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131845


    Title: 國民小學校長社會正義領導指標建構之研究:模糊德菲法之應用
    A Study on the Indicators Construction of Social Justice Leadership for Elementary School Principals: An Application of Fuzzy Delphi Method
    Authors: 張成緯
    Chang, Cheng-Wei
    Contributors: 張奕華
    Chang, I-Hua
    張成緯
    Chang, Cheng-Wei
    Keywords: 社會正義
    社會正義領導
    指標建構
    模糊德菲法
    層級分析法
    Social justice
    Social justice leadership
    Indicator construction
    Fuzzy delphi method
    analytic hierarchical process
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2020-09-02 12:57:18 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在建構國民小學校長社會正義領導指標,研究者先以文獻探討之方法初擬國民小學校長社會正義領導之指標內容,後組成模糊德菲法專家小組,進行專家問卷調查,並完成指標之建構。而後使用層級分析法求得各層面及各細項指標之權重,以完成國民小學校長社會正義領導指標之權重體系。根據研究之結果進行分析,得出以下結論與建議:
    一、結論
    (一)本研究所建構之國民小學校長社會正義領導指標,共分為六層面,層面下共計26項指標。
    (二)本研究所建構之國民小學校長社會正義領導指標之層面,依其權重排序為:「層面一 具備核心領導特質」(36.8%)、「層面二 促進平等獲取機會」(23.8%)、「層面五 提高學生學習成就」(15.6%)、「層面六 增進專業溝通能力」(10.85%)、「層面三 改善學習環境」(7.2%)以及「層面四 營造歸屬感」(5.9%)。
    二、建議
    本研究依研究結果對教育行政機關、國民小學校長以及後續研究者提出之建議建議如下:
    (一)對教育行政機關之建議:參考本指標架構發展國民小學校長社會正義領導之實踐依據,並據以設計校長專業培訓課程。
    (二)對國民小學校長之建議:參考本指標架構作為檢視自身社會正義領導之依據、並可作為發展社會正義校園的方向。
    (三)對後續研究者之建議:擴大研究範圍以及研究對象,並可使運用多元之研究方法。
    The purpose of this study is to construct the indicators of social justice leadership for principals in elementary schools. As for research methods, through literature review, the researcher has organized 26 indicators within 6 main dimensions as a raw model of indicators of social justice leadership for principals in elementary schools. Based on the raw model, the Fuzzy Delphi questionnaire was developed and the survey was conducted with the sample size of 12 experts. Then, through the Analysis of Hierarchical Process, the weight of each dimension, and each indicator is obtained to complete the weight system of the social justice leadership indicators of the principals of the elementary schools. Based on the analysis of the results of the study, the following conclusions and recommendations are provided:
    1. Conclusion
    (1) The indicators of social justice leadership for elementary school principals constructed by this research are divided into six main dimensions and a total of 26 indicators under the dimension.
    (2) The indicator dimensions of social justice leadership for elementary school principals constructed by this research institute is ranked according to their weights: "Dimension 1: Possesses core leadership qualities" (36.8%), "Dimension 2: Promotes equal access to opportunities" (23.8%), "Dimension 5: Improves student learning achievements" (15.6%), and Dimension 6: Improves professional communication skills" ( 10.85%), "Dimension 3: Improves the learning environment" (7.2%) and "Dimension 4: Creates a sense of belonging" (5.9%).
    2. Recommendations
    According to the results of this study, the recommendations were provided to the education administration institutions, the principals of elementary schools, and the follow-up researchers are as follows:
    (1) Recommendations for educational administrations: Refer to this indicator framework to develop the practical basis for the development of social justice leadership of national elementary school principals, and design professional training courses for principals accordingly.
    (2) Recommendations to the principals of elementary schools: Refer to this indicator structure as a basis for reviewing their social justice leadership, and as a direction for the development of a social justice campus.
    (3) Suggestions for follow-up researchers: Expand the research scope and research objects, and enable the use of multiple research methods.
    Reference: 壹、中文部分
    王俊斌(2016)。 教育制度中的社會正義理論分析-多元觀點與比較基礎建構。臺灣教育社會學研究,16(2),29-63。
    阮亨中、吳柏林(2000)。模糊數學與統計應用。臺北市:俊傑書局。
    吳政達(2008)。教育政策分析——概念、方法與應用。臺北市:高等教育。
    林甦、任澤平(2009)。模糊德爾菲法及其應用。中國科技論壇,5,102-122。
    蔡金田(2012)。從社會正義領導理論探究「攜手計畫—課後扶助」政策之實施。教育行政論壇,4(2),35-66。
    蔡金田(2014)。國民小學校長領導實現社會正義的現況與策略探就—來自八位校長的經驗。新竹教育大學教育學報,31(1),47-76。
    簡良平(2009)。偏遠國小學校課程實踐脈絡分析:教育促成社會正義之觀點。初等教育學刊,34,1-24。doi:10.7036/JEE.200912.0001
    楊深坑(2008)。社會公義、差異政治與教育機會均等的新視野。當代教育研究,16(4),1-37。doi:10.6151/CERQ.2008.1604.01
    施又瑀(2018)。校長社會正義領導的理論與實踐:以臺灣中部一所小學為例。臺灣教育社會學研究,18(2),89-134。
    周美慧(2014)。校長多元文化領導策略、教育正義實踐與學校效能之研究。
    國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政學系博士論文(未出版),南投縣。
    陳信智(2009)。評論十二年國教追求促進教育機會均等,社會公平「正義」目的之理論適當性。學校行政,62,31-43。
    陳奕筑(2017)。校長社會正義領導之個案研究。國立臺北教育大學教育經營與管理學系碩士論文 (未出版),臺北市。

    張鈿富、張曉琪(2010)。社會公義領導: 促動教育界的革命。當代教育研究季刊,18(1),147-156。
    張奕華、劉文章(2012)。教育正義的實踐觀點與個案分析。教育資料與研究,106,1-22。
    張紹勳(2012)。模糊多準則評估法及統計。臺北市:五南。
    張倫耀(2012)。國民中學校長正義領導指標建構之研究。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政學系碩士論文(未出版),南投縣。
    張文權、張臺隆(2018)。弱勢關懷的新焦點:偏遠地區中小學校長社會正義領導之研究。中等教育,69(3),27-43。
    黃建翔、吳清山(2016)。國民中小學校長永續領導指標及權重體系之建構。當代教育研究季刊, 24(1),1-32。
    貳、英文部分
    Albritton, S., Huffman, S., & McClellan, R. (2017). A study of rural high school principals’ perceptions as social justice leaders. Administrative Issues
    Journal, 7(1), 19-38.
    Bogotch, I. E. (2000). Educational leadership and social justice: Theory into practice. Journal of School Leadership, 12, 138-156.
    Blackmore, J. (2002). Leadership for socially just schooling: More substance and less style in high-risk, low-trust times? Journal of School Leadership, 12(2), 198-
    222.
    Berkovich, I. (2014). A socio-ecological framework of social justice leadership in education. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(3), 282-309.
    Chen, S. J., & Hwang, C. L. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods and application. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
    Cochran-Smith, M. (2008). Toward a theory of teacher education for social justice. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
    DeMatthews, D. (2015). Making sense of social justice leadership: A case study of a principal’s experiences to create a more inclusive school. Leadership and Policy
    in Schools, 14(2), 139-166.
    DeMatthews, D., Izquierdo, E., & Knight, D. S. (2017). Righting past wrongs: A superintendent’s social justice leadership for dual language education along the US-Mexico border. Education Policy Analysis Archives/Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 25, 1-32.
    Furman, G. (2012). Social justice leadership as praxis: Developing capacities through preparation programs. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(2), 191-229.
    Gewirtz, S. (1998). Conceptualizing social justice in education: Mapping the territory. Journal of Education Policy, 13(4), 469-484.
    Gewirtz, S., & Cribb, A. (2002). Plural conceptions of social justice: Implications for policy sociology. Journal of Education Policy, 17(5), 499-509.
    Jayavant, S. (2016). Mapping the complexities of effective leadership for social justice praxis in urban Auckland primary schools. Education Sciences, 6(11), 1-25.
    Lewis, K. (2016). Social justice leadership and inclusion: A genealogy. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 48(4), 324-341.
    Laura, C. T. (2018). Enacting social justice leadership through teacher hiring. The Urban Review, 50(1), 123-139.
    Chiu, M. M., & Walker, A. (2007). Leadership for social justice in Hong Kong schools: Addressing mechanisms of inequality. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(6), 724-739.
    McKenzie, K. B., Christman, D. E., Hernandez, F., Fierro, E., Capper, C. A., Dantley, M., ... & Scheurich, J. J. (2008). From the field: A proposal for educating leaders
    for social justice. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(1), 111-138.
    Nadrozny, T. (2017). Response to intervention through a social justice leadership framework: An inquiry of principal's beliefs and effect on classroom practice. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois.
    Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    Rasinski, K. A. (1987). What's fair is fair—Or is it? Value differences underlying public views about social justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(1), 201-211.
    Rivera-McCutchen, R. L. (2014). The moral imperative of social justice leadership: A critical component of effective practice. The Urban Review, 46(4), 747-763..
    Shields, C. M. (2004). Dialogic leadership for social justice: Overcoming pathologies of silence. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 109-132.
    Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98.
    Theoharis, G. (2007). Social justice educational leaders and resistance: Toward a theory of social justice leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(2),
    221-258.
    Theoharis, G. (2008). Woven in deeply: Identity and leadership of urban social justice principals. Education and Urban Society, 41(1), 3-25.
    Theoharis, G. (2009). The school leaders our children deserve: Seven keys to equity, social justice, and school reform. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
    Turhan, M. (2010). Social justice leadership: Implications for roles and responsibilities of school administrators. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1357-1361.
    Whang, N. Y. (2019). School leadership for social justice and its linkage with perilous politics. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(1), 117-133.
    Zhang, Y., Goddard, J. T., & Jakubiec, B. A. (2018). Social justice leadership in education: A suggested questionnaire. Research in Educational Administration &
    Leadership (REAL), 3(1), 53-86.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    教育行政與政策研究所
    107171014
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107171014
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202001456
    Appears in Collections:[教育行政與政策研究所 ] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    101401.pdf4808KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback