Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131956
|
| Title: | 莫比烏斯環上的媒介：後真相時代與矛盾雙重性
Media on the Möbius strip: the post-truth era and ambivalence |
| Authors: | 王悅
Wang, Yue |
| Contributors: | 黃厚銘
Huang, Hou-Ming
王悅
Wang, Yue |
| Keywords: | 後真相時代
假新聞
現實原則
擬仿
矛盾雙重性
宿命策略
Post-truth era
Fake news
Reality principle
Simulation
Ambivalence
Fatal strategy |
| Date: | 2020 |
| Issue Date: | 2020-09-02 13:18:25 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 從2016年的美國總統大選和英國「脫歐」公投開始，「假新聞」的氾濫就引發了人們的擔憂。2018年與「燕子」颱風有關的「假新聞」事件，因為關聯到一位台灣外交官的自殺，也讓台灣社會意識到「假新聞」的危害。美國哲學家Lee McIntyre使用「後真相」的概念描述如今真相所受到的威脅，擔憂人們的情感與個人信念已經比客觀現實更能影響輿論。相關的實證研究將「假新聞」的問題歸結為逃避現實的固有人性和社群媒介的推波助瀾。這些研究給出的解方自然也從兩方面著手。一方面提升個體辨別新聞真假的能力，另一方面干預社群媒介，重視優質內容的生產。但是，這些討論都只涉及「假新聞」的流通層面，而沒有觸及更為深層的問題，即現實是否還是現代人行為的參照，現實的價值是否發生了動搖。本研究依循法國學者Jean Baudrillard的基進理論，探究現實及其價值在現代社會的變遷，並希望提出因應「後真相時代」的解方。
現實是現代人給自己的行為提供意義和價值的合理性原則。Baudrillard的擬仿（simulation）概念從廣義上來說是現代人用現實祛除幻象的過程。但是同樣的擬仿過程也導致了現實的消失。按照Baudrillard的擬象系譜學，擬仿不僅摧毀了傳統社會的象徵秩序，建立起以現實為參照物的現代符號體系，而且在現代的擬象秩序遞嬗中，不斷摧毀既有的現實，以便將實現比現實更加完滿的現實。我們則處在從狹義的擬仿階段向碎形階段過渡的時期。媒介發揮的作用不只是讓事件得到關注，而且是以符號模型（model）重新詮釋事件。即使原本強烈對立的真與假的區分也在傳播系統中被操作化為模型。任何一項事實都能夠用多種模型加以詮釋，每一種詮釋都是真的，模型與事實之間發生了短路。擬仿的結果不只是新聞真假難以判定，而且新聞的意義也不再能夠確定。
「後真相」的問題不再能描述為「假新聞」的氾濫，而是資訊的過量所造成的不確定性。本研究引入Baudrillard的矛盾雙重性（ambivalence）概念以尋求應對的策略。矛盾雙重性既是Baudrillard提出擬仿假說的基礎，也是提供了回應「後真相」的可能。現代符號系統通過排斥與化約矛盾雙重性得以建立，但是矛盾雙重性又不可避免地以系統自身的死亡形式糾纏著現代符號。因此，行之有效的策略既是致命性的（fatal），也是宿命性的（fatal）。按照矛盾雙重性的相互性規則，我們可以用不確定性回應系統強加的資訊不確定性。這種宿命策略在大眾（mass）中體現為，對任何資訊都報之以假裝相信的態度，並讓他人以為他們相信，而在媒介中則體現為後果與原因不成比例的命定事件（fated event）。
The proliferation of "fake news" has been a cause for concern since the 2016 US presidential election and the Brexit vote. The "fake news" incident related to Super Typhoon Jebi in 2018, which was linked to the suicide of a Taiwanese diplomat, also made Taiwan society aware of the dangers of "fake news". Lee McIntyre, an American philosopher, uses the concept of "post-truth" to describe the threats to truth today, worrying that people`s emotions and personal beliefs have more influence on public opinion than objective reality. Related empirical studies attribute the problem of "fake news" to the inherent human nature of escaping from reality and the promotion of social media. The solutions given by these studies also work in two ways. On the one hand, to enhance the ability of individuals to distinguish between true and false news; on the other hand, to intervene in social media and emphasizes the production of high-quality content. But these discussions are only about the circulation level of "fake news", rather than the deeper question of whether reality is still a reference for modern people`s actions and whether its value has been shaken. This research follows the radical theory of Jean Baudrillard, a French scholar, explores the changes of reality and its value in modern society, and hopes to propose solutions to the "post-truth era".
Reality is the rationality principle that modern people provide meaning and value to their own actions. Baudrillard`s concept of simulation, in a broad sense, is the process by which modern people use reality to dispel illusions. But the same simulation process also leads to the disappearance of reality. According to Baudrillard`s genealogy of simulacra, simulation not only destroyed the symbolic order of the traditional society and established a modern sign system with reality as a reference, but also destroyed the existing reality continuously in the transformation of modern simulacra orders, so as to realize a reality that was more perfect than reality. We are in the transition period from the narrow sense of simulation stage to fractal stage. The role of media is not just to bring attention to events, but to reinterpret them in sign models. Even the originally strongly opposed distinction between true and false is manipulated as a model in the communication system. Any fact can be interpreted by multiple models, each of which is true, and there is a short circuit between models and facts. Not only is it hard to tell whether the news is true or false, but the meaning of news can no longer be determined.
The problem of "post-truth" can no longer be described as the proliferation of "fake news", but rather the uncertainty created by the excess of information. This study introduces Baudrillard`s concept of ambivalence to find a response strategy. Ambivalence is not only the basis of Baudrillard`s simulation hypothesis, but also provides the possibility of responding to the "post-truth". The modern sign system is established by excluding and reducing ambivalence, but ambivalence as a non-value principle inevitably haunts modern signs in the form of the system`s own death. Therefore, the strategy must be fatal in both two senses. According to the reciprocal rule of ambivalence we can respond to the uncertainty of information imposed by the system with uncertainty. This kind of fatal strategy manifests itself in masses as an attitude of pretending to believe in any information and making others believe that they believe it, and in media as fated events of maximum consequence. |
| Reference: | 今周刊. (2018.12.21). 一個外交官之死... 蘇啟誠遺孀發聲明：輕生非受到假新聞壓力. from https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/161153/post/201812210003/一個外交官之死...%20蘇啟誠遺孀發聲明：輕生非受到假新聞壓力
中時電子報. (2018.09.16). 台灣媒體操縱仇中情緒 假新聞害死蘇啟誠. from https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20180916000682-260407?chdtv
中時電子報. (2019.12.02). 外交官蘇啟誠之死 「卡神」楊蕙如涉案遭起訴. from https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20191202001295-260402?chdtv
自由時報. (2018.09.08). 日本救災中國製造假新聞 華航人士點出關鍵原因... from https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/2545014
自由時報. (2018.12.15). 逮到造謠男大生！他聲稱受困關西機場靠中國脫困... from https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/2643080
自由時報. (2019.02.25). 英國「國家連線安全」警告：抖音 淪戀童癖狩獵場. from https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/paper/1269869
自由時報. (2019.06.03). 抗議臉書審查機制 示威者在FB總部前脫光光... from https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/2810307
自由時報. (2019.12.02). 關西機場事件 沈伯洋：造謠者中國翹著二郎腿看戲. from https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/2996402
卡洛·羅韋利（C. Rovelli）（2019）。《時間的秩序》（The Order of Time）（楊光譯）。 長沙：湖南科學技術出版社。
阿萊特·法爾熱（A. Farge）（2017）。《法國大革命前夕的輿論與謠言》（Dire et mal dire, l’opinion publique au xviiie siècle）（陳旻樂譯）。 上海：文匯出版社。
風傳媒. (2018.09.26). 中國製造「假新聞」操弄台灣對立？國台辦嗆聲：民進黨抹黑大陸，台灣同胞心裡有數. from https://www.storm.mg/article/513270
紐約時報中文網. (2016.12.07). 「後真相」的真相. from https://cn.nytimes.com/culture/20161207/tc07wod-post-truth/zh-hant/
壹周刊. (2019.12.13). 法院認證是「他」冷血造謠害死外交官！網怒還要這些帶風向爛官名嘴出來面對. from https://tw.nextmgz.com/realtimenews/news/456120
韓炳哲（2019）。《倦怠社會》（Müdigkeitsgesellschaft）（王一力譯）。 北京：中信出版社。（原作2013年出版）
羅世宏. (2018). 關於「假新聞」的批判思考：老問題、新挑戰與可能的多重解方. 〈資訊社會研究〉(35), pp. 51-85.
Baudrillard, J. (1975[1973]). The Mirror of Production (M. Poster, Trans.). St. Louis: MO: Telos.
Baudrillard, J. (1981[1972]). For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign (C. Levin., Trans.). St Louis: MS: Telos.
Baudrillard, J. (1983). In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities... Or the End of the Social And Other Essays (P. Foss, P. Patton, & J. Johnston, Trans.). New York, NY: Semiotext(e).
Baudrillard, J. (1988[1987]). The Ecstasy of Communication (B. Schutze & C. Schutze, Trans.). New York, NY: Semiotext(e).
Baudrillard, J. (1989[1986]). America (C. Turner, Trans.). London: UK: Verso.
Baudrillard, J. (1990[1983]). Fatal Strategies. New York: NY: Semiotext(e).
Baudrillard, J. (1990[1979]). Seduction (B. Singer, Trans.). London, UK: Macmillan.
Baudrillard, J. (1993). Baudrillard Live: Selected Interviews (1982–1993). London, UK: Routledge.
Baudrillard, J. (1993[1976]). Symbolic Exchange and Death (I. H. Grant, Trans.). London, UK: SAGE.
Baudrillard, J. (1993[1990]). The Transparency of Evil: Essays on Extreme Phenomena (J. Benedict, Trans.). London: UK: Verso.
Baudrillard, J. (1994[1981]). Simulacra and Simulation (S. F. Glaser & A. Arbor, Trans.). MI: University of Michigan Press.
Baudrillard, J. (1995[1991]). The Gulf War did not take place (P. Patton, Trans.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Baudrillard, J. (1996[1995]). The Perfect Crime (C. Turner, Trans.). London, UK: Verso.
Baudrillard, J. (1998[1970]). The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures (C. Turner, Trans.). London: UK: SAGE.
Baudrillard, J. (2000). The Vital Illusion (J. Witwer Ed.). New York: NY: Columbia University Press.
Baudrillard, J. (2001[1999]). Impossible Exchange (C. Turner, Trans.). London, UK: Verso.
Baudrillard, J. (2003[2000]). Passwords (C. Turner, Trans.). London, UK: Verso.
Baudrillard, J. (2004[2001]). Fragments: Converstions with François L`Yvonnet (, Trans.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Baudrillard, J. (2007[1977]). Forget Foucault (N. Dufresne, Trans. 2nd edn ed.). New York: NY: Semiotext(e).
Baudrillard, J. (2009). The Vanishing Point of Communication. In D. B. Clarke, M. A. Doel, W. Merrin, & R. G. Smith (Eds.), Jean Baudrillard: Fatal theories (pp. 15-23). Oxon, UK Routledge.
Baudrillard, J. (2009[2007]). Why Hasn’t Everything Already Disappeared? (C. Turner, Trans.). London: UK: Seagull.
Baudrillard, J. (2010[2008]). Carnival and Cannibal, or the play of Global Antagonism (C. Turner, Trans.). Chicago: IL: Chicago University Press.
Baudrillard, J., & Noailles, E. V. (2007[2005]). Exiles from Dialogue (C. Turner, Trans.). Cambridge: UK: Polity.
Benjamin, W. (1968). The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction (H. Zohn, Trans.). In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations (pp. 217-251). New York, NY: Schocken Books.
Butler, R. (1999). Jean Baudrillard: The Defence of the Real. UK: London: SAGE.
Cormack, P. (2002). Sociology and Mass Culture: Durkheim, Mills, and Baudrillard. Toronto: CAN: University of Toronto Press.
Derrida, J. (1992). Given Time: I. Counterfeit Money (P. Kamuf, Trans.). Chicago. IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Gane, M. (1991). Baudrillard: Critical and Fatal Theory. London: UK: Routledge.
Gane, M. (2003). French Social Theory. London: UK: SAGE.
Hölderlin, F. (1988). Friedrich Hölderlin: Essays and Letters on Theory (T. Pfau, Trans.). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2002[1987]). Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments (E. Jephcott, Trans. G. S. Noerr Ed.). Stanford: CA: Stanford University Press.
Huizinga, J. H. (1980[1944]). Homo Ludens: Study of the Play Element in Culture. London, UK: Routledge.
Kakutani, M. (2018). The Death of Truth: Notes on falsehood in the age of Trump. New York, NY: Tim Duggan.
Kellner, D. M. (1989). Jean Baudrillard: From Marxism to Postmodernism and Beyond. Cambridge: UK: Polity.
Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., . . . Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The Science of Fake News: Addressing fake news requires a multidisciplinary effort. Science, 359(6380), pp. 1094-1096.
McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-Truth. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Mcquail, D., & Windahl, S. (1993). Communication Models for the Study of Mass Communications. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Merrin, W. (2005). Baudrillard and the Media: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: UK: Polity.
Nietzsche, F. (2001a). Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future (J. Norman, Trans. R.-P. Horstmann & J. Norman Eds.). Cambridge: UK: Cambridge University Press.
Nietzsche, F. (2001b). The Gay Science: With a Prelude in German Rhymes and an Appendix of Songs (J. Nauckhoff & A. D. Caro, Trans. B. Williams Ed.). Cambridge: UK: Cambridge University Press.
Nietzsche, F. (2003). Writings from the Late Notebooks (K. Sturge, Trans. R. Bittner Ed.). Camhridge: UK: Camhridge University Press.
Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32, pp. 303-330.
Pascal, B. (2008). Pensées and Other Writings (H. Levi, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Pawlett, W. (2013). Violence, Society and Radical Theory: Bataille, Baudrillard and Contemporary Society. Surrey: UK: Ashgate.
Poovey, M. (1998). A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1963). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Tackett, T. (2015). The Coming of the Terror in the French Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “Fake News”: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), pp. 137-153.
Trump, D. (2017.11.27). We should have a contest as to which of the Networks, plus CNN and not including Fox, is the most dishonest, corrupt and/or distorted in its political coverage of your favorite President (me). They are all bad. Winner to receive the FAKE NEWS TROPHY! , from https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/935147410472480769
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), pp. 1146-1151.
Wang, G. (2018). Media Communication Research in the Digital Era Moving Beyond Ontological Dualism. Communication Theory, 28, 235–253.
Žižek, S. (2002). Welcome to the Desert of the Real: Five Essays on September 11 and Related Dates. UK, London: Verso.
Žižek, S. (2008[1989]). The Sublime Object of Ideology. UK: London: Verso.
Žižek, S. (2018.07.29). Three Variations on Trump: Chaos, Europe, and Fake News. from https://thephilosophicalsalon.com/three-variations-on-trump-chaos-europe-and-fake-news/ |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
104464068 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104464068 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202001658 |
| Appears in Collections: | [傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 406801.pdf | | 1188Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 154 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
