English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109951/140892 (78%)
Visitors : 46209827      Online Users : 1123
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/132178


    Title: 陳寅恪典故考釋批評觀念及其實踐方法析論
    An Analysis of the Critical Ideas and Practice of Chen Yinke`s Studies of Allusion
    Authors: 李貴生
    Lee, Kwai-sang
    Contributors: 政大中文學報
    Keywords: 陳寅恪 ; 典故 ; 典故批評 ; 文學批評 ; 文學理論 
    Chen Yinke ; allusion ; allusive criticism ; literary criticism ; literary theory
    Date: 2019-06
    Issue Date: 2020-10-12 09:54:08 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 陳寅恪博涉古今中外學術,然而自1931年擔任清華大學中文系及歷史系「合聘教授」以來,詩文箋釋一直是他念茲在茲的研究課題,晚年更以今典、古典兩類考釋總結相關研究,發展出一套獨特的批評架構。他對典故的重視與新文化運動以來各種反對用典的聲音正是背道而馳,胡適的「八不主義」提倡不用典,並且屢以陳三立的作品為反面教材,錢玄同更把用典與白話文對立起來,主張全盤摒棄典故。然而典故在白話文中的消退,不等於它在文學理論層面上的失敗,出身外文系的錢鍾書在1930年代便仍多次強調典故的作用。在這種背景下,陳寅恪對典故的重視實有濃厚的翻案意味。本文正是循此思路著眼,考察陳寅恪如何通過對今典與古典的詮釋,重新確立典故在文學創作和實際批評中的價值。文章首先把陳寅恪的典故研究安置在文學批評的脈絡,全面整理和重構這種方法的形成過程、觀念義蘊和評鑑架構;繼而從文學理論及實際批評的角度闡明今典與古典考釋的共同學術預設,深化大家對典故批評的瞭解;最後會對這套方法的漏洞和詮釋局限作出客觀的評析,反思陳寅恪的論述是否足以回應五四以來有關用典的批評。
    Chen Yinke`s research focused on scholarship both ancient and modern, as well as both Chinese and foreign. Throughout his tenure as a professor in the Tsinghua University Departments of Chinese and History starting in 1931, he was constantly concerned with the exegesis of literary works. During his late years, he even categorized his related research exclusively into the studies of classical and contemporary allusion, and developed a unique critical framework. His emphasis on allusion directly opposed the voices against the use of allusion that arose at the outset of the New Culture Movement. In advocating his "Eight-Don`ts-ism" against allusion, Hu Shi frequently quoted Chen Sanli`s poems as negative examples. Qian Xuantong even placed allusion as the antithesis of vernacular Chinese and urged the complete repudiation of all allusions. Despite their diminishing use in vernacular Chinese, however, allusion still had its place in the field of literary theory. During the early 1930s, Qian Zhongshu, a gifted student in the Department of Foreign Languages of Tsinghua University, still emphasized the positive sides of allusion. Nevertheless, Chen Yinke`s emphasis on allusion in his research was still considered a revolt against the general trend at the time. In consideration of this particular background, this paper investigates how Chen Yinke reestablished the value of allusion in the fields of literary creation and practical criticism through the interpretation of classical and contemporary allusion. It starts with integrating Chen Yinke`s studies of allusion into the context of literary criticism, and reorganizes and reconstructs the formation process, conceptual significance and evaluation framework of his methods. Then the common theoretical assumptions underlying both classical and contemporary allusion are delineated from the perspective of literary and practical criticism, so as to deepen our understanding of the allusive criticism. In the last section, this paper provides an objective assessment of the shortcomings and limitations of Chen Yinke`s research methods. It also evaluates the validity of Chen Yinke`s arguments against the challenges and criticisms of allusion popularized by the May Fourth Movement.
    Relation: 政大中文學報, 31, 341-388
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.30407/BDCL.201906_(31).0010
    DOI: 10.30407/BDCL.201906_(31).0010
    Appears in Collections:[政大中文學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2204View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback