English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140891 (78%)
Visitors : 46238629      Online Users : 1249
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/133593


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/133593


    Title: 新修正刑法之「獨立宣告沒收」（上）
    Authors: 楊雲驊
    Yang, Yun-Hua
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 獨立宣告沒收;民事沒收;從刑;反貪腐公約;事實上或法律上原因
    Non-conviction-based Asset Confiscation;Civil Confiscation,Accessory Punishments;United Nations Convention againstCorruption;Factual or Legal Cause
    Date: 2016-06
    Issue Date: 2021-01-18 15:32:18 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 我國刑法舊法之沒收屬於從刑，一般情況下，必須在被告已經獲判有罪確定，同時也科予主刑時，才能夠一併科處沒收的從刑，但緊扣著「有罪判決才能沒收」的原則規定，在實務上勢必出現許多無法解決的問題，如何建構一套合理且具有實務效用的非定罪犯罪所得沒收制度，甚至解決透過刑事司法互助而追討被告留置外國的犯罪所得，成為我國現行刑事司法的重要課題。新刑法沒收制度特別於第四十條第三項明定犯罪物及犯罪所得，因事實上或法律上原因未能追訴犯罪行為人之犯罪或判決有罪者，得單獨宣告沒收。本文將從比較法以及新規定之構成要件等，詳細分析此一新法之意義。
    Confiscation was an accessory punishment before amendments. Generally speaking, itcan only accompany principal punishment after the conviction of defendant. Thisrequirement will result in many unsolvable problems in practice. Therefore, how toestablish a reasonable and practical non-conviction confiscation system and even to claimcrime proceeds by mutual assistance in criminal justice have become critical issues. Underthe newly-amended Article 40, Paragraph 3 of Criminal Code, confiscation for crimeproceeds or things used in the commission can be pronounced independently if theconviction is failed due to factual or legal causes. This article will conduct in-depthanalysis of the essence of new regulations from its criteria and the perspective ofcomparative law.
    Relation: 月旦法學雜誌, No.第 254 期, pp.62-71 頁
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.3966/102559312016070254004
    DOI: 10.3966/102559312016070254004
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2186View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback