English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112721/143689 (78%)
Visitors : 49536625      Online Users : 970
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/135916
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/135916


    Title: 自願性揭露智慧財產管理計畫之決定因素 ─以電子業為例
    Factors Associated with the Voluntary Disclosures of IP Management Plans: Evidences from Electronics Firms
    Authors: 蕭為中
    Hsiao, Wei-Chung
    Contributors: 戚務君
    Chi, Wu-Chun
    蕭為中
    Hsiao, Wei-Chung
    Keywords: 自願性揭露
    公司治理
    智慧財產權
    智慧財產管理計畫
    Voluntary disclosure
    Corporate governance
    Intellectual property rights
    Intellectual property management plans
    Date: 2021
    Issue Date: 2021-07-01 17:00:29 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 我國於 2020 年正式將智財管理加入到公司治理架構,並鼓勵企業能夠制訂並揭露與營運目標連結之智慧財產管理計畫,藉此成為利害關係人評估企業創新管理能力的重要管道。本研究旨在觀察影響企業於公司網站自願性揭露智慧財產管理計畫之因素,並以 2020 年度台灣上市電子業公司作為研究對象進行分析。
    實證結果顯示,公司財務績效與企業自願性揭露智慧財產管理計畫之意願呈現顯著正相關。此外,在公司治理因素方面,當董事會規模愈小、獨立董事比例愈低、董事持股比例愈低以及於過往公司治理評鑑中表現較好時,企業自願性揭露智慧財產管理計畫的可能性愈高。
    The competent authority in Taiwan formally added intellectual property management to the corporate governance structure in 2020, and encourages companies to formulate and disclose intellectual property management plans that are linked to operational goals, thereby becoming important resources for stakeholders to evaluate their innovative management capabilities. Using a sample of Taiwanese listed electronics firms in 2020, this article observes what incentivizes the companies voluntarily disclose intellectual property management plans. The empirical results show a positive association between intellectual property management plan disclosure and profitability. In terms of corporate governance structure, the company is more likely to voluntarily disclose intellectual property management plan when the size of board is smaller, the proportion of independent directors is lower, the proportion of directors` shareholding is lower, and the company performs better in corporate governance evaluation.
    Reference: 中文部分
    王瑄與杜榮瑞,2005,企業資訊揭露之決定因素與效應(上)-資訊透明六種假說 一探自願揭露六大動機,會計研究月刊,第237期:64-67。
    王文英與李佳玲,2008,我國資訊電子業之企業重要智慧資本-外部資訊使用者與內部人士之觀點,當代會計,第9卷,第1期:33-68。
    李潤之與李少華,2008,如何透過資訊風險管理確保企業智慧財產,會計研究月刊,第266期:92-99。
    吳幸蓁與廖蕙儀,2017,自願性揭露企業社會責任資訊之決定因素與其資訊後果,中山管理評論,第25卷,第1期:13-62。
    林文玲與傅鍾仁,2011, 企業社會責任之揭露對會計資訊價值攸關性-以台灣資訊電子業上市公司為例.,商管科技季刊,第12卷,第2期:209-229。
    林秀鳳、鄭雅如、林秉孝與陳政彥,2013,自願性環保資訊揭露對公司價值之影響,東海管理評論,第15卷,第1期:37-67。
    林俊傑、劉梧柏與黃華瑋,2018,公司治理評鑑與財務績效及公司價值之關聯性探討:以台灣上市櫃企業公司治理評鑑為例,商略學報,第10卷,第1期:23-46。
    袁建中,2017,智慧財產權管理導論與實務。台北:經濟部智慧財產局。
    財團法人資訊工業策進會科技法律研究所創意智財中心,2019年國內企業智財現況調查報告
    陳則銘,2003,企業併購之相關智慧財產管理策略與法律規劃研究-以併購美國高科技公司時之專利查核評估探微,國立政治大學智慧財產研究所碩士論文。
    陳冠宙、陳育成與陳雪如,2005,影響上市公司網站資訊透明度因子之實證,會計與公司治理,第2卷,第1期:33-59。
    陳瑞斌與許崇源,2007,公司治理結構與資訊揭露之關聯性研究,交大管理學報,第27卷,第2期:55-109。
    陳奕之,2018,《智財策略管理與企業經營整合》首部曲—簡析資訊、態度、策略至企業智財策略管理及其重要性,專利師,第32期:69-84。
    陳奕之,2018,《智財策略管理與企業經營整合》三部曲—採行智財策略管理的趨勢與優勢及成功企業之楷模,專利師,第34期: 83-115。
    陳煒朋與徐淑芳,2019,資訊揭露與投資人保護:市場風險、股票流動性與企業價值分析,證券市場發展季刊,第31卷,第1期: 87-140。
    張瑞當與方俊儒,2006,資訊揭露評鑑系統對企業盈餘管理行為之影響,會計評論,第42期:1-22。
    張瑞當、方俊儒與朱正雄,2007,代理成本對自願性盈餘預測揭露之影響,交大管理學報,第27卷,第2期:29-53。
    郭年雄,2006,智慧財產權評價發展趨勢,國家菁英季刊,第2卷,第2期:41-62。
    郭雨嵐與汪家倩,2016,智慧財產與人才的管理策略,會計研究月刊,第364期:68-73。
    黃劭彥、吳東憲與紀怡如,2009,企業網站環境會計資訊揭露影響因素之研究, 會計與公司治理,第6卷,第1期:1-29。
    程心瑤,2011, 公司治理與企業責任報告之揭露,會計評論,第52期:35-76。
    廖益興、陳彥綺與王貞靜,2011,年報資訊揭露與資訊不對稱:來自私有資訊交易之證據,經濟研究,第47卷,第1期:45-96。
    廖芝嫻與連晨帆,2015,前瞻性研究發展費用揭露的影響因素與市場反應,臺大管理論叢,第26卷,第1期:209-254。
    薛敏正、邱彥毅與邱詩婷,2017,公司治理評鑑與盈餘品質,會計審計論叢,第7卷,第2期:57-83。
    蔡維哲、翁培師與陳婉甄,2017,台灣股票市場三大法人持股與公司資本結構的關聯性,管理學報,第34卷,第2卷:307-329。
    鄭淑芳,2020,從新修正公司治理評鑑指標看智財管理實務,台灣半導體產業簡訊,第93期:2-4。

    英文部分
    Akbaş, H. E., and S. Canikli. 2019. Determinants of Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Emission Disclosure: An Empirical Investigation on Turkish Firms. Sustainability 11 (1):1-24.
    Alnabsha, A., H. A. Abdou, C. G. Ntim, and A. A. Elamer. 2018. Corporate Boards, Ownership Structures and Corporate Disclosures. Journal of Applied Accounting Research 19 (1):20-41.
    Baek, H. Y., D. R. Johnson, and J. W. Kim. 2009. Managerial Ownership, Corporate Governance, and Voluntary Disclosure. The Journal of Business and Economic Studies 15 (2):44-61.
    Ben-Amar, W., M. Chang, and P. McIlkenny. 2017. Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Response to Sustainability Initiatives: Evidence from the Carbon Disclosure Project. Journal of Business Ethics 142 (2):369-383.
    Blank, R. M., and D. J. Kappos. 2012. Intellectual Property and the U.S. Economy: Industries in Focus, edited by E. a. S. Administration and U. S. P. a. T. Office.
    Brick, I. E., and N. K. Chidambaran. 2010. Board Meetings, Committee Structure, and Firm Value. Journal of Corporate Finance 16 (4):533-553.
    Brown-Liburd, H., and V. Zamora. 2015. The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Assurance in Investors` Judgments When Managerial Pay is Explicitly Tied to CSR Performance. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 34:75-96.
    Chen, S., X. I. A. Chen, and Q. Cheng. 2008. Do Family Firms Provide More or Less Voluntary Disclosure? Journal of Accounting Research 46 (3):499-536.
    Depoers, F., T. Jeanjean, and T. Jérôme. 2016. Voluntary Disclosure of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Contrasting the Carbon Disclosure Project and Corporate Reports: JBE. Journal of Business Ethics 134 (3):445-461.
    Dhaliwal, D., O. Z. Li, A. Tsang, and Y. G. Yang. 2014. Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and The Cost of Equity Capital: The Roles of Stakeholder Orientation and Financial Transparency. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 33 (4):328-355.
    Gamerschlag, R., K. Möller, and F. Verbeeten. 2011. Determinants of Voluntary CSR Disclosure: Empirical Evidence from Germany. Review of Managerial Science 5 (2):233-262.
    Haniffa, R. M., and T. E. Cooke. 2002. Culture, Corporate Governance and Disclosure in Malaysian Corporations. Abacus 38 (3):317-349.
    Healy, P. M., and K. G. Palepu. 2001. Information Asymmetry, Corporate Disclosure, and The Capital Markets: A Review of The Empirical Disclosure Literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31 (1):405-440.
    Hossain, M., and H. Hammami. 2009. Voluntary Disclosure in The Annual Reports of An Emerging Country: The Case of Qatar. Advances in Accounting 25 (2):255-265.
    Hussainey, K., and B. Al‐Najjar. 2011. Future‐oriented Narrative Reporting: Determinants and Use. Journal of Applied Accounting Research 32 (3):26-49.
    Jones, D. A. 2007. Voluntary Disclosure in R&D-Intensive Industries. Contemporary Accounting Research 24 (2):489-522.
    Laksmana, I. 2008. Corporate Board Governance and Voluntary Disclosure of Executive Compensation Practices*. Contemporary Accounting Research 25 (4):1147-1182.
    Lang, M. H., and R. J. Lundholm. 1996. Corporate Disclosure Policy and Analyst Behavior. The Accounting Review 71 (4):467-492.
    Li, J., R. Pike, and R. Haniffa. 2008. Intellectual Capital and Corporate Governance Structure in UK Firms. Accounting and Business Research 38 (2):137-159.
    Lin, I. 2019. The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in High-Tech Mergers and Acquisitions. NTUT Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Management 8 (1):31-51.
    Mallin, C., and K. Ow-Yong. 2012. Factors Influencing Corporate Governance Disclosures: Evidence from Alternative Investment Market (AIM) Companies in The UK. The European Journal of Finance 18 (6):515-533.
    Prado-Lorenzo, J.-M., and I.-M. Garcia-Sanchez. 2010. The Role of the Board of Directors in Disseminating Relevant Information on Greenhouse Gases. Journal of Business Ethics 97 (3):391-424.
    Premuroso, R. F. 2008. An Analysis of Voluntary Annual Report Disclosures of Outsourcing: Determinants and Firm Performance. Ph.D., Florida Atlantic University, Ann Arbor.
    Sharma, N. 2014. Extent of Corporate Governance Disclosure by Banks and Finance Companies Listed on Nepal Stock Exchange. Advances in Accounting 30 (2):425-439.
    Tagesson, T., V. Blank, P. Broberg, and S.-O. Collin. 2009. What Explains The Extent and Content of Social and Environmental Disclosures on Corporate Websites: A Study of Social and Environmental Reporting in Swedish Listed Corporations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16 (6):352-364.
    van Greunen, L., and I. Gobac. 2021. Building Respect for Intellectual Property—The Journey Toward Balanced Intellectual Property Enforcement. The Journal of World Intellectual Property 24 (1-2):167-185.
    Wang, K., S. O, and M. C. Claiborne. 2008. Determinants and Consequences of Voluntary Disclosure in An Emerging Market: Evidence from China. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 17 (1):14-30.
    Wang, M., and K. Hussainey. 2013. Voluntary Forward-looking Statements Driven by Corporate Governance and Their Value Relevance. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 32 (3):26-49.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    108353023
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108353023
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202100483
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    302301.pdf2242KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback