English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110097/141043 (78%)
Visitors : 46424359      Online Users : 673
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/136329
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136329


    Title: 富櫃50指數之追蹤誤差成因探討
    Determinants of Tracking Error for TPEx 50 Index
    Authors: 徐家琪
    Hsu, Chia-Chi
    Contributors: 盧敬植
    Lu, Ching-Chih
    徐家琪
    Hsu, Chia-Chi
    Keywords: 富櫃50指數
    追蹤誤差
    臺灣50指數
    Smart Beta
    成分股
    特徵屬性
    風險溢酬
    TPEx 50 Index
    tracking error
    Taiwan 50 Index
    smart beta
    component stocks
    characteristics factors
    excess return
    Date: 2021
    Issue Date: 2021-08-04 14:44:14 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究首先探討富櫃50指數的追蹤誤差大小,並分析富櫃50指數對於櫃買市場績效表現的代表性。接著,本研究進一步以Smart Beta策略概念,運用特徵選擇模型(CS)、Grinblatt and Titman模型(GT)、Carhart四因素模型及Jensen單因素模型等方式檢驗造成富櫃50指數產生追蹤誤差之成因。實證結果發現,富櫃50指數對於上櫃市場的代表性,並未有臺灣50指數對於上市市場的代表性來得好。本研究亦發現,富櫃50對於上櫃市場之追蹤誤差主要是來自於成分股的特徵屬性與上櫃市場全體公司的差異,而並非來自於ETF的交易成本。綜合四種績效評估模型結果來看,富櫃50指數成分公司的市值規模以及帳面市值比等兩項特徵因子,使富櫃50 ETF相較於大盤市場存在風險溢酬。
    This study analyzes the tracking errors of TPEx 50 Index compared with Taiwan 50 Index to gauge how well TPEx 50 index is representing the performance of the over-the-counter market. Moreover, the study examines the determinant factors of tracking error with the concept of smart beta. We apply Characteristic Selectivity (CS) model, Grinblatt & Titman (GT) model, Carhart four-factor model, and Jensen one-factor model to evaluate the characteristics of the component stocks for Yuanta Taiwan TPEx 50 ETF.
    The results suggest that TPEx 50 Index is less representative than Taiwan 50 Index for the respective markets tracked. The tracking errors for TPEx 50 are mainly stemmed from the excess return offered by the stocks characteristic rather than the expenses deducted from the ETF. Furthermore, the four fund performance evaluation models show that the market capitalization and book-to-market ratio carry risk premiums to Yuanta Taiwan TPEx 50 ETF.
    Reference: Amenc, N., Deguest, R., Goltz, F., Lodh, A., Martellini, L., & Shirbini, E. (2014). Risk allocation, factor investing and smart beta: Reconciling innovations in equity portfolio construction. EDHEC-Risk Institute Publication (July).
    Blitz, D., & Huij, J. (2012). Evaluating the performance of global emerging markets equity exchange-traded funds. Emerging Markets Review, 13(2), 149-158. doi:10.1016/j.ememar.2012.01.004
    Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of finance, 52(1), 57-82.
    Chiang, W. (1998). Optimizing performance. Indexing for maximum investment results. In: GPCo Publishers, Chicago.
    Chu, P. K.-K. (2010). Study on the tracking errors and their determinants: evidence from Hong Kong exchange traded funds. Applied Financial Economics, 21(5), 309-315. doi:10.1080/09603107.2010.530215
    Daniel, K., Grinblatt, M., Titman, S., & Wermers, R. (1997). Measuring mutual fund performance with characteristic‐based benchmarks. The Journal of finance, 52(3), 1035-1058.
    Falk, R., & Tortoriello, R. (2015). Building Smart Beta Portfolios. S&P Capital IQ Quantamental research paper. Retrieved from www.spcapitaliq.com/documents/our-thinking/research/sp-capital-iq-quantamental-research-building-smart-beta-portfolios.pdf
    Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427-465.
    Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of financial economics, 33(1), 3-56.
    Frino, A., Gallagher, D. R., Neubert, A. S., & Oetomo, T. N. (2004). Index design and implications for index tracking. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 30(2), 89-95.
    Grinblatt, M., & Titman, S. (1989). Mutual fund performance: An analysis of quarterly portfolio holdings. Journal of business, 393-416.
    Grinblatt, M., & Titman, S. (1993). Performance measurement without benchmarks: An examination of mutual fund returns. Journal of business, 47-68.
    Haensly, P. J., Tripathy, N., & Peak, D. (2001). Tracking error in the Dow Jones Industrial Average versus alternative market indices: New evidence. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 101-116.
    Hsu, J. (2014). Value investing: Smart beta versus style indexes. The Journal of Index Investing, 5(1), 121-126.
    Jensen, M. C. (1968). The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945-1964. The Journal of finance, 23(2), 389-416.
    Johnson, B., Bioy, H., Kellett, A., & Davidson, L. (2013). On the right track: Measuring tracking efficiency in ETFs. The Journal of Index Investing, 4(3), 35-41.
    Larsen, G. A., & Resnick, B. G. (1998). Empirical insights on indexing: How capitalization, stratification and weighting can affect tracking error. Journalof Portfolio Management, 25(1), 51.
    Malkiel, B. G. (2014). Is smart beta really smart? The Journal of Portfolio Management, 40(5), 127-134.
    Pope, P. F., & Yadav, P. K. (1994). Discovering errors in tracking error. Journal of Portfolio Management, 20(2), 27.
    Roll, R. (1992). A mean/variance analysis of tracking error. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 18(4), 13-22.
    Vardharaj, R., Fabozzi, F. J., & Jones, F. J. (2004). Determinants of tracking error for equity portfolios. The Journal of Investing, 13(2), 37-47.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理學系
    108357013
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108357013
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202100767
    Appears in Collections:[財務管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    701301.pdf1337KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback