English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46284464      Online Users : 982
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 金融學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/136854
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136854


    Title: 整合ESG之價值、成長投資策略 - 台灣市場之探討
    ESG Integration : Value and Growth Strategies in Taiwan Market
    Authors: 葉承哲
    Yeh, Cheng-Che
    Contributors: 楊曉文
    Yang, Sheau-Wen
    葉承哲
    Yeh, Cheng-Che
    Keywords: ESG投資組合
    因子投資策略
    ESG權重調整
    ESG分數調整
    ESG Integration
    Factor Investment
    ESG Tilt
    Adjusted ESG Score
    Date: 2021
    Issue Date: 2021-09-02 15:59:56 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究主要探討不同代理變數建構之價值和成長策略結合ESG權重調整於台灣市場之成效。本研究使用MSCI ESG資料庫,並將投資策略分成前1/3(Good)、中間1/3(Neutral)與後1/3(Bad)三種投資組合。首先,本研究發現台灣MSCI ESG資料庫存在規模偏誤和產業偏誤,因此使用調整後評分進行後續分析。同時本研究發現評分偏誤將高估高評分投資組合之風險調整後報酬同時低估其投資組合Beta值。第二,Good投資組合之P/E和P/B皆高於Bad投資組合,支持過往文獻中ESG帶來高評價之論述。第三,本研究發現Good投資組合中多數情況ESG權重調整將提升策略報酬,僅少數情況會降低波動率和Beta。E/P和B/P代理變數建構之價值策略加入ESG權重調整後績效反而衰退。第四,本研究發現無論是Good投資組合亦或者Bad投資組合,ESG與S加權有較佳的績效改善幅度和穿透性,其中又以Bad投資組合結合ESG市值加權效果最佳。最後,本研究透過CAPM模型、FF三因子模型和FF五因子模型檢定投資組合是否具有顯著Alpha。結果顯示多數的ESG權重調整並未創造顯著Alpha仍屬於Beta策略之範疇。
    This Thesis focuses on integrating ESG into Value and Growth investment strategies constructed by different proxy in Taiwan Market. This Thesis uses MSCI ESG datasbase and devides every investment strategies into three portfolios: top third(Good), middle third(Neutral) and bottom third(Bad). First of all, we find that MSCI ESG Score is biased against firm size and industry.Therefore, we construct adjusted scores instead of using original scores.The score bias will overestimate the risk-adjusted returns of ESG Good portfolio and underestimate their portfolio Beta. Second, the P/E Ratio and and P/B ratio of ESG Good portfolio are higher than those of Bad portfolio, supporting the argument that ESG brings high valuation in past literatures. Third, we find that in most cases in Good portfolios, ESG integration increases portfolio returns, and only a few cases will reduce volatility and Beta. Also, the portfolio performance of value strategies constructed by E/P and B/P has declined after applying ESG integration. Fourth, we find that ESG and S weight adjustment have better performance improvement and penetration. Bad portfolio combined with ESG weighting has the best effect. Finally, this thesis uses the CAPM model, FF three-factor model and the FF five-factor model to test whether ESG integration brings statistically significant portfolio Alpha. The result indicates that most ESG weight adjustments did not create significant portfolio Alpha and still belong to the category of Beta strategies.
    Reference: 一、學術文章
    1.Angel, J. J., & Rivoli, P. (1997). Does ethical investing impose a cost upon the firm? A theoretical perspective. The Journal of Investing, 6(4), 57-61.
    2.Asness, C. S., Moskowitz, T. J., & Pedersen, L. H. (2013). Value and momentum everywhere. The Journal of Finance, 68(3), 929-985.
    3.Asness, C. S., Frazzini, A., & Pedersen, L. H. (2019). Quality minus junk. Review of Accounting Studies, 24(1), 34-112.
    4.Auer, B. R. (2016). Do Socially Responsible Investment Policies Add or Destroy European Stock Portfolio Value? Journal of Business Ethics, 135(2), 381-397.
    5.Black, F., Jensen, M. & Scholes, M. (1972). The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical Tests. In: M. Jensen, ed., studies in the Theory of Capital Markets, 1st ed. New York: Praeger.
    6.Basu, S. (1977). Investment performance of common stocks in relation to their price‐earnings ratios: A test of the efficient market hypothesis. The journal of Finance, 32(3), 663-682.
    7.Banz, R. W. (1981). The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. Journal of financial economics, 9(1), 3-18.
    8.Bauer, R., Koedijk, K., & Otten, R. (2005). International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1751-1767.
    9.Baker, M., Bergstresser, D., Serafeim, G., & Wurgler, J. (2018). Financing the response to climate change: The pricing and ownership of US green bonds (No. w25194). National Bureau of Economic Research.
    10.Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2010). Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica, 77(305), 1-19.
    11.Bender, J., Briand, R., Melas, D., & Subramanian, R. A. (2013). Foundations of factor investing. Available at SSRN 2543990.
    12.Berg, F., Koelbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2019). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. MIT Sloan School of Management.
    13.Breedt, A., Ciliberti, S., Gualdi, S., & Seager, P. (2019). Is ESG an Equity Factor or Just an Investment Guide?. The Journal of Investing, 28(2), 32-42.
    14.Barber, B. M., Morse, A., & Yasuda, A. (2021). Impact investing. Journal of Financial Economics, 139(1), 162-185.
    15.Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of finance, 52(1), 57-82.
    16.Cheng, H., Hong, H., & Shue, K. (2013). Do managers do good with other people`s money? (No. w19432). National Bureau of Economic Research.
    17.Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic management journal, 35(1), 1-23.
    18.Chatterji, A. K., Durand, R., Levine, D. I., & Touboul, S. (2016). Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers. Strategic Management Journal, 37(8), 1597-1614.
    19.Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value?. Management science, 46(8), 1059-1074.
    20.Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The accounting review, 86(1), 59-100.
    21.Dimson, E., Karakaş, O., & Li, X. (2015). Active ownership. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(12), 3225-3268.
    22.Edmans, A. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial economics, 101(3), 621-640.
    23.El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388-2406.
    24.Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857.
    25.Edmans, A., Li, L., & Zhang, C. (2014). Employee satisfaction, labor market flexibility, and stock returns around the world (No. w20300). National Bureau of Economic Research.
    26.Friedman, M. (1970). A theoretical framework for monetary analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 193-238.
    27.Fama, E., French, K. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33, 3–56.
    28.Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1998). Value versus growth: The international evidence. The journal of finance, 53(6), 1975-1999.
    29.Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2012). Size, value, and momentum in international stock returns. Journal of financial economics, 105(3), 457-472.
    30.Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2015). A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of financial economics, 116(1), 1-22.
    31.Frazzini, A., & Pedersen, L. H. (2014). Betting against beta. Journal of Financial Economics, 111(1), 1-25.
    32.Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233.
    33.Ferrell, A., Liang, H., & Renneboog, L. (2016). Socially responsible firms. Journal of financial economics, 122(3), 585-606.
    34.Friedman, H. L., & Heinle, M. S. (2016). Taste, information, and asset prices: Implications for the valuation of CSR. Review of Accounting Studies, 21(3), 740-767.
    35.Galema, R., Plantinga, A., & Scholtens, B. (2008). The stocks at stake: Return and risk in socially responsible investment. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(12), 2646-2654.
    36.Geczy, C., Stambaugh, R. F., & Levin, D. (2005). Investing in socially responsible mutual funds. Available at SSRN 416380.
    37.Giese, G., Lee, L. E., Melas, D., Nagy, Z., & Nishikawa, L. (2017). Foundations of ESG investing. MSCI ESG Research LLC. MSCI inc. PDF Retrieved April, 27, 2020.
    38.Giese, G., Lee, L. E., Melas, D., Nagy, Z., & Nishikawa, L. (2019). Foundations of ESG investing: How ESG affects equity valuation, risk, and performance. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 45(5), 69-83.
    39.Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic management journal, 30(4), 425-445.
    40.Goss, A., & Roberts, G. S. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(7), 1794-1810.
    41.Gregory, A., Tharyan, R., & Whittaker, J. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and firm value: Disaggregating the effects on cash flow, risk and growth. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(4), 633-657.
    42.Guenster, N., Bauer, R., Derwall, J., & Koedijk, K. (2011). The economic value of corporate eco‐efficiency. European financial management, 17(4), 679-704.
    43.Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of financial economics, 93(1), 15-36.
    44.Hong, H., Kubik, J. D., & Scheinkman, J. A. (2012). Financial constraints on corporate goodness (No. w18476). National Bureau of Economic Research.
    45.Hsu, J., Kalesnik, V., & Kose, E. (2019). What is quality?. Financial Analysts Journal, 75(2), 44-61.
    46.Hong, H. G., Kubik, J. D., Liskovich, I., & Scheinkman, J. (2019). Crime, punishment and the value of corporate social responsibility. Available at SSRN 2492202.
    47.Jiao, Y. (2010). Stakeholder welfare and firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(10), 2549-2561.
    48.Kurtz, L. (1997). No effect, or no net effect? Studies on socially responsible investing. The Journal of Investing, 6(4), 37-49.
    49.Konar, S., & Cohen, M. A. (2001). Does the market value environmental performance?. Review of economics and statistics, 83(2), 281-289.
    50.Kempf, A., & Osthoff, P. (2007). The effect of socially responsible investing on portfolio performance. European Financial Management, 13(5), 908-922.
    51.Krüger, P. (2015). Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of financial economics, 115(2), 304-329.
    52.Kaiser, L. (2020). ESG integration: Value, growth and momentum. Journal of Asset Management, 21(1), 32-51.
    53.Lintner, J. (1965). The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Review of Economics and Statistics 47, 13–37
    54.Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1994). Contrarian investment, extrapolation, and risk. The journal of finance, 49(5), 1541-1578.
    55.Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of marketing, 70(4), 1-18.
    56.Lev, B., Petrovits, C., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2010). Is doing good good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strategic management journal, 31(2), 182-200.
    57.Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. The Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785-1824.
    58.Liang, H., & Renneboog, L. (2017). On the foundations of corporate social responsibility. The Journal of Finance, 72(2), 853-910.
    59.Luo, H. A., & Balvers, R. J. (2017). Social screens and systematic investor boycott risk. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(1), 365-399.
    60.Merton, R. C. (1973). An intertemporal capital asset pricing model. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 867-887.
    61.Merton, R. C. (1987). A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information.
    62.Masulis, R. W., & Reza, S. W. (2015). Agency problems of corporate philanthropy. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(2), 592-636.
    63.Madhavan, A., Sobczyk, A., & Ang, A. (2021). Toward ESG alpha: Analyzing ESG exposures through a factor lens. Financial Analysts Journal, 77(1), 69-88.
    64.Ng, A. C., & Rezaee, Z. (2015). Business sustainability performance and cost of equity capital. Journal of Corporate Finance, 34, 128-149.
    65.Nagy, Z., Kassam, A., & Lee, L. E. (2016). Can ESG add alpha? An analysis of ESG tilt and momentum strategies. The Journal of Investing, 25(2), 113-124.
    66.Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization studies, 24(3), 403-441.
    67.Kramer, M. R., & Porter, M. (2011). Creating shared value (Vol. 17). FSG.
    68.Plumlee, M., Brown, D., Hayes, R. M., & Marshall, R. S. (2015). Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence. Journal of accounting and public policy, 34(4), 336-361.
    69.Pástor, Ľ., Stambaugh, R. F., & Taylor, L. A. (2020). Sustainable investing in equilibrium. Journal of Financial Economics.
    70.Seretis, P., Nagy, Z., Marshall, R. (2020). ESG investing in emerging markets. Available at : https://www.msci.com/documents/10199/239004/Research-Insight-ESG-investing-in-emerging-markets.pdf/1b53d40c-2caf-b30c-37e5-cf881376cdc4
    71.Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008). The price of ethics and stakeholder governance: The performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Journal of corporate finance, 14(3), 302-322.
    72.Ross, S. A. (2013). The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. Journal of Economic Theory 13, 341-360.
    73.Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The journal of finance, 19(3), 425-442.
    74.Sloan, R. G. (1996). Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings?. Accounting review, 289-315.
    75.Seifert, B., Morris, S. A., & Bartkus, B. R. (2004). Having, giving, and getting: Slack resources, corporate philanthropy, and firm financial performance. Business & society, 43(2), 135-161.
    76.Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management science, 59(5), 1045-1061.
    77.Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77-91.
    78.Masulis, R. W., & Reza, S. W. (2015). Agency problems of corporate philanthropy. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(2), 592-636.
    79.Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008). Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior. Journal of banking & finance, 32(9), 1723-1742.
    80.Wu, S. W., Lin, F., & Wu, C. M. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and cost of capital: An empirical study of the Taiwan stock market. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 50(sup1), 107-120.
    81.Zerbib, O. D. (2019). The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds. Journal of Banking & Finance, 98, 39-60.
    82.蕭向有. (2020). ESG 結合因子投資法之低貝他, 價值與小型股策略. 政治大學風險管理與保險學系學位論文, 1-55.

    二、調查報告

    1.Aberdeen Standard Investments (2019). Smart beta and ESG Global research study.Available at https://www.aberdeenstandard.com/docs?editionId=662f3bdd-62a0-4fbc-a266-793fdf5eea36.
    2.FTSE Russell (2020). Smart Sustainability: 2020 global survey findings from asset owners.Available at https://radius-global.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/P4_200030_Smart-Sustainability_2020_v03.8.pdf.
    3.Global Sustainable Investment Alliance (2018). Global Sustainable Investment Review. Available at http://www.gsi-alliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/GSIR_Review2018F.pdf.
    4.Morningstar Stylebox Methodology (2018). Available at https://www.morningstar.com/content/dam/marketing/shared/research/methodology/678263-StyleBoxMethodolgy.pdf.
    5.臺灣永續投資調查 (2020). Available at http://www.aacsb.ntpu.edu.tw/twsvi/uploads/file/cus2_scmbiebay1.pdf.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    金融學系
    108352007
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108352007
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202101162
    Appears in Collections:[金融學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    200701.pdf2771KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback