English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110097/141043 (78%)
Visitors : 46423429      Online Users : 619
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/138956


    Title: 影響法官量刑因素之研究 —以槍砲彈藥刀械管制條例為例
    The Determinants of Judges` Sentencing Decisions: A Study of Controlling Guns, Ammunition and Knives Act in Taiwan
    Authors: 曾怡鳳
    Tseng, Yi-Feng
    Contributors: 陳鎮洲
    Chen, Jenn-Jou
    曾怡鳳
    Tseng, Yi-Feng
    Keywords: 量刑因子
    法官性別
    槍砲彈藥刀械管制條例
    Sentencing factor
    Judge gender
    Date: 2021
    Issue Date: 2022-02-10 13:10:49 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 司法院於107年12月21日啟用「量刑趨勢建議系統」,本研究參考量刑趨勢建議系統內的量刑因子並使用民國108年度全台灣各地方法院關於槍砲彈藥刀械管制條例的所有一審判決資料,估計除了案件事實外,法官性別、性別比例及地區對於量刑的影響。實證結果顯示法官的性別及地區對於量刑有顯著的影響,平均來說男性法官宣判的有期徒刑長度比女性法官多1.3個月,而管轄權位於直轄市的地方法院宣判的有期徒刑長度比不在直轄市的地方法院少1.4個月。
    The Judicial Yuan developed the "Sentencing Trend Recommendation System" on December 21, 2018. This paper refers to the sentencing factors in the system and uses all the district court judgments regarding the violation of Controlling Guns, Ammunition and Knives Act in 2019 in order to evaluate whether sentencing is influenced by, other than the facts of the case, the judge gender, gender ratio and region. The results show that judge gender and region have a significant impact on sentencing. On average, the length of sentence of imprisonment made by male judges is 1.3 months longer than that made by female judges. The length of sentence of imprisonment made by district courts whose jurisdiction is in a municipality is 1.4 months shorter than those not in a municipality.
    Reference: Anderson, J. M., & Heaton, P. (2012). How much difference does the lawyer make: The effect of defense counsel on murder case outcomes. Yale Law Journal, 122(1), 154-217
    Ashenfelter, O., Eisenberg, T., & Schwab, S. J. (1995). Politics and the judiciary: The influence of judicial background on case outcomes. Journal of Legal Studies, 24(2), 257-282
    Bickle, G. S., & Peterson, R. D. (1991). The Impact of Gender-Based Family Roles on Criminal Sentencing. Social Problems, 38(3), 372-394
    Boyd, C. L., Epstein, L., & Martin, A. D. (2010). Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 389-411
    Butcher, K. F., Park, K. H., & Piehl, A. M. (2017). Comparing Apples to Oranges: Differences in Women’s and Men’s Incarceration and Sentencing Outcomes. Journal of Labor Economics, 35(S1), S201-S234
    Champion, D. J. (1987). Elderly Felons and Sentencing Severity: Interregional Variations in Leniency and Sentencing Trends. Criminal Justice Review, 12(2), 7-14
    Crew, B. K. (1991). Sex differences in criminal sentencing: Chivalry or patriarchy. Justice Quarterly, 8(1), 59-84
    Curry, T. R., Lee, G., & Rodriguez, S. F. (2004). Does victim gender increase sentence severity? further explorations of gender dynamics and sentencing outcomes. Crime and Delinquency, 50(3), 319-343
    Cutshall, C. R., & Adams, K. (1983). Responding to Older Offenders: Age Selectivity in the Processing of Shoplifters. Criminal Justice Review, 8(2), 1-8
    Eren, O., & Mocan, N. H. (2020). Judge Peer Effects in the Courthouse. Working Paper.
    Friedl, J., & Honoree, A. (2007). Is justice blind examining the relationship between presidential appointments of judges and outcomes in employment discrimination cases. Cumberland Law Review, 38(1), 89-100
    Gazal-Ayal, O., & Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R. (2010). Let My People Go: Ethnic In-Group Bias in Judicial Decisions—Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 7(3), 403-428
    Glynn, A. N., & Sen, M. (2015). Identifying Judicial Empathy: Does Having Daughters Cause Judges to Rule for Women’s Issues?. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 37-54
    Kim, P. T., Schlanger, M., Boyd, C. L., & Martin, A. D. (2009). How Should We Study District Judge Decision-Making? Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 29, 83-112
    Knepper, M. (2018). When the Shadow Is the Substance: Judge Gender and the Outcomes of Workplace Sex Discrimination Cases. Journal of Labor Economics, 36(3), 623-664
    Kramer, J., & Steffensmeier, D. (1993). Race and Imprisonment Decisions. The Sociological Quarterly, 34(2), 357-376
    Lim, C. S. H., Silveira, B., & Snyder, J. M. (2016). Do Judges’ Characteristics Matter? Ethnicity, Gender, and Partisanship in Texas State Trial Courts. American Law and Economics Review, 18(2), 302-357
    Lizotte, A. J. (1978). Extra-Legal Factors in Chicago`s Criminal Courts: Testing the Conflict Model of Criminal Justice. Social Problems, 25(5), 564-580
    Peresie, J. L. (2005). Female judges matter: Gender and collegial decisionmaking in the federal appellate courts. Yale Law Journal, 114(7), 1759-1790
    Rachlinski, J. J., Johnson, S., Wistrich, A. J., & Guthrie, C. (2009). Does unconscious racial bias affect trial judges. Notre Dame Law Review, 84(3), 1195-1246
    Rodriguez, S. F., Curry, T. R., & Lee, G. (2006). Gender Differences in Criminal Sentencing: Do Effects Vary Across Violent, Property, and Drug Offenses? Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 318-339
    Songer, D., & Crews-Meyer, K. (2000). Does Judge Gender Matter? Decision Making in State Supreme Courts. Social Science Quarterly, 81(3), 750-762
    Songer, D. R., Davis, S., & Haire, S. (1994). A Reappraisal of Diversification in the Federal Courts: Gender Effects in the Courts of Appeals. The Journal of Politics, 56(2), 425-439
    Steffensmeier, D., & Britt, C. L. (2001). Judges’ Race and Judicial Decision Making: Do Black Judges Sentence Differently?. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 749-764
    Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2006). Does Gender Modify the Effects of Race–ethnicity on Criminal Sanctioning? Sentences for Male and Female White, Black, and Hispanic Defendants. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 241-261
    Steffensmeier, D., Kramer, J., & Streifel, C. (1993). Gender and Imprisonment Decisions, 31(3), 411-446
    Steffensmeier, D., Kramer, J., & Ulmer, J. (1995). Age differences in sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 12(3), 583-602
    Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1998). The Interaction of Race, Gender, and Age in Criminal Sentencing: The Punishment Cost of Being Young, Black, and Male. Criminology, 36(4), 763-798
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    經濟學系
    108258029
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108258029
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202200142
    Appears in Collections:[經濟學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    802901.pdf913KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback