English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112721/143689 (78%)
Visitors : 49576169      Online Users : 310
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/140766


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140766


    Title: CEDAW與我國憲法之性別平等保障內涵的比較
    CEDAW`s Concept of Equality in Comparison to Gender Equality under the Taiwan`s Constitution
    Authors: 陳靜慧
    Chen, Ching-hui
    Contributors: 法學院
    Keywords: 消除對婦女一切形式歧視公約;性別平等;形式平等;實質平等;結果平等;非對稱取徑;間接歧視;暫行特別措施;性別刻板印象
    CEDAW;Sex equality;Gender equality;Formal equality;Substantive equality;Equality of result;Asymmetrical approach;Indirect discrimination;Temporary special measures;Gender stereotype
    Date: 2019-12
    Issue Date: 2022-07-04 13:00:09 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 2007年我國批准了消除對婦女一切形式歧視公約（The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women，以下簡稱CEDAW），2011年制定施行法，以在我國法體系推動CEDAW保障與促進性別平等之規定。歷次的國家報告審議均關注的一個問題是，我國憲法與法律規定迄今尚無包含如CEDAW所載之歧視定義者，國際審查委員會敦促我國以法律或憲法層次規範對性與性別歧視加以定義，以落實CEDAW之目的與保障內涵。無論將來欲採取何種立法模式，都有必要對於CEDAW的平等概念內涵予以釐清，尤其CEDAW採非對稱取徑、關注婦女群體地位、以結果平等為目標，而大法官主要採取對稱取徑解釋平等權，因此，CEDAW與我國憲法設有之性別平等規定是否相容，值得深入探究。本文首先爬梳CEDAW之平等概念，再探討我國憲法上之性別平等概念與CEDAW是否一致，之後對於我國未來落實CEDAW之策略提出建議。
    Taiwan ratified CEDAW in 2007. CEDAW is commonly understood as a women`s only Convention. The aim of CEDAW is not only put an end to unjustified classifications of individuals on the basis of sex, but also to improve de facto position of women (individuals as well as groups) by means of temporary special measures and to focus on the structural causes of discrimination. Compared to the asymmetrical approach of CEDAW, Constitutional Court interpreted sex and gender equality as a right to comparatively equal treatment, which is symmetrical. This raises the question to what extent the Constitution reflects the requirements of CEDAW and whether and in how far it might be possible to align Taiwan`s law to CEDAW. Against this background, this paper aims to show the scope and purpose of CEDAW firstly. The following provides a comparative assessment of the basic features of concept of sex and gender equality in Taiwan`s Constitution. Finally, some suggestions are made for preventing or resolving conflicts between CEDAW and Constitution.
    Relation: 臺北大學法學論叢, 112, 1-61
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法學院] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2229View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback