English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109960/140895 (78%)
Visitors : 46380186      Online Users : 1118
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/141666


    Title: 臺灣防制洗錢及打擊資恐之公私協力機制與展望—以資訊分享機制為核心
    Current Status and Future Prospects for Public-Private Partnerships in Taiwan in the Fight against Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing – Focusing on Information Sharing Mechanisms
    Authors: 許庭甄
    Hsu, Ting-Zhen
    Contributors: 臧正運
    Tsang, Cheng-Yun
    許庭甄
    Hsu, Ting-Zhen
    Keywords: 防制洗錢
    打擊資恐
    公私協力
    資訊分享
    Money Laundering
    Terrorist Financing
    Public-Private Partnership
    Information-Sharing
    Date: 2022
    Issue Date: 2022-09-02 15:10:48 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 全球防制洗錢及打擊資恐力道日益增強,為有效阻斷犯罪活動,許多國家已建立 戰略性公私協力夥伴關係,促使公、私部門有效且及時合作。國內政府機關長期 致力於對抗洗錢及資恐犯罪,但甚少觸及或探討如何利用公私協力夥伴關係獲取 更全面性的資源以打擊犯罪。本論文目標係就國內現有公私協力機制提出具體改 善方案,內容首先檢視臺灣現行防制洗錢及打擊資恐機制之架構、作法,並歸納 評鑑指列缺失,其次分析公私協力機制在德國、英國、加拿大、美國、澳洲、新 加坡及香港等國家之運作模式及成功關鍵因素,最後以半結構化方式訪談國內金 融機構和洗錢防制權責機關共七位重要成員以進行深入分析,就促進本國資訊分 享之提案,凝聚公私部門代表寶貴建議,為我國防制洗錢及打擊資恐公私協力機 制擘劃藍圖。
    The worldwide fight against money laundering and terrorist financing is gaining momentum. To effectively disrupt criminal activities, many countries have developed strategic public-private partnerships, an approach which enable the public and private sectors to cooperate in a synergistic and timely manner. In Taiwan, the government has devoted considerable efforts to strengthening the current mechanisms to tackle ML/TF problems and challenges but has rarely touched upon the issues of public-private collaboration in order to facilitate access to a broader range of information, a move which would elevate the effectiveness of combating crime. This thesis aims to provide suggestions for possible improvements in intensifying the partnerships between public and private sectors by firstly examining the strengths and vulnerabilities of Taiwan’s current mechanisms in combating money laundering and terrorist financing, then secondly, analyzing successful key factors of PPP operations executed in other countries including Germany, United Kingdom, Canada, United States, Australia, Singapore and Hong Kong, while finally, conducting semi-structured interviews with key personnel within financial institutions and relevant authorities to facilitate in-depth analysis to structure information-sharing PPP schemes for future development.
    Reference: Reference
    1. AMLD, MJIB, ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING ANNUAL REPORT (2020); AMLD, MJIB, ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING ANNUAL REPORT (2019); AMLD, MJIB, ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING ANNUAL REPORT (2018); AMLD, MJIB, ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING ANNUAL REPORT (2017); AMLD, MJIB, ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING ANNUAL REPORT (2016).
    2. AMLD, MJIB, AMLD PRESS (2021).
    3. AML/CTF Act, part 11, § 121-123 (2006).
    4. AML/CFT Industry Partnership (ACIP), MAS (2021), https://www.mas.gov.sg/regulation/anti-money-laundering/amlcft-industry-partnership-acip.
    5. AML/CFT and Public-Private Sector Partnership, FATF (May 20, 2016), https://www.fatf-gafi.org/publications/fatfgeneral/documents/public-private-sector-partnership.html.
    6. Anti-Financial Crime Alliance, BaFin (October 4, 2019) https://www.bafin.de/SharedDocs/Veroeffentlichungen/EN/Meldung/2019/meldung_190925_Anti_Financial_Crime_en.html.
    7. ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING OFFICE, EXECUTIVE YUAN, NATIONAL ML/TF RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT (2017).
    8. APG, ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING AND COUNTER-TERRORIST FINANCING MEASURES-CHINESE TAIPEI, THIRD MUTUAL EVALUATION REPORT (2019).
    9. Crime and Courts Act, section 7 (2013).
    10. Criminal Finances Act, section 11 (2017).
    11. Egnew, R.C. & Baler, S.G., Developing principles, goals, and models for public/private partnerships, 25 ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH 578, 571-580 (1998).
    12. Erik Hans Klijn & Geert Teisman, Institutional and Strategic Barriers to Public–Private Partnership: An Analysis of Dutch Cases, 23 PUBLIC MONEY MANAG. 137, 138-139 (2003).
    13. Ezezika, O.C. et al., To Trust or Not to Trust: A Model for Effectively Governing Public-Private Partnerships, 16 AGBIOFORUM, 27, 27 (2013).
    14. FATF, INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ON COMBATING MONEY LAUNDERING AND FINANCING TERRORISM & PROLIFERATION: THE FATF RECOMMENDATIONS (2021).
    15. FATF, PRIVATE SECTOR INFORMATION SHARING 5 (2017).
    16. FATF, PROCEDURE FOR THE FATF FORTH ROUND OF AML/CFT MUTUAL EVALUATIONS (2013).
    17. FinCEN Exchange in New York City Focuses on Virtual Currency, FinCEN (2019), https://www.fincen.gov/resources/financial-crime-enforcement-network-exchange.
    18. FinCEN, FinCEN’s 314(a) Fact Sheet (2022), https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/314afactsheet.pdf.
    19. FinCEN, Subject: Guidance on the Scope of Permissible Information Sharing Covered by Section 314(b) Safe Harbor of the USA PATRIOT Act (2009), https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/fin-2009-g002.pdf.
    20. FIU GERMANY, ANNUAL REPORT 2019 (2020).
    21. Fraud and Money Laundering Intelligence Taskforce launched, HKMA (May 26, 2017), https://www.hkma.gov.hk/eng/news-and-media/press-releases/2017/05/20170526-3/.
    22. FSC, Guideline for Information Sharing among Financial Institutions (2021), https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202112230006&dtable=News.
    23. Improving the UK’s Response to Economic Crime, NCA (Apr. 12, 2020), https://www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/what-we-do/national-economic-crime-centre.
    24. Greg Baldwin, Information Sharing Under Sections 314(a) and 314(b) of the USA Patriot Act 2 (Holland & Knight LLP, 2008).
    25. Industry Guidelines, ABS (2019) https://abs.org.sg/industry-guidelines/aml-cft-industry-partnership.
    26. Information Sharing Insight, FinCEN (2019), https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/314bparticipationinfo.pdf.
    27. JANE NELSON & SIMON
    28. ZADEK, PARTNERSHIP ALCHEMY: NEW SOCIAL PARTNERSHIPS IN EUROPE, COPENHAGEN: COPENHAGEN CENTRE (2000).
    29. JMLIT, PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFORMATION SHARING PARTNERSHIP TO TACKLE MONEY LAUNDERING IN THE FINANCE SECTOR (2020).
    30. Jomo, Kwame Sundaram ET AL., Public-Private Partnerships and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Fit for purpose? (United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs, Working Paper No.148, 2016), available at http://www.un.org/esa/desa/papers/2016/wp148_2016.pdf.
    31. Joseph J. Norton, A perceived trend in modern international financial regulation: Increasing reliance on a public-private partnership, 37 INT’L LAW. 43, 43 (2003).
    32. Joseph Mari, Project Protect: An In-Depth Review of the Public-Private Partnership to Combat Human Trafficking in Canada, ACAMSTODAY, (Dec. 2017), https://www.acamstoday.org/project-protect-combat-human-trafficking-in-canada.
    33. Judicial Reform Foundation, Statement of opinion in response to the draft amendment to the MLCA proposed by the Ministry of Justice in 2021(2022), https://www.jrf.org.tw/articles/2228.
    34. Julia Paschal Davis, Public-Private Partnerships, 44 PROCUREMENT LAW 9, 9-10 (2008).
    35. Kenneth Pemberton, ASP Regional Head of Complex Investigations, HSBC, Keynote Speech at the ACAMS, the 12th Annual Country Conference/Symposium Series (Jan. 21, 2021).
    36. Kochan Nick, Regulation: Anti-Money Laundering - UK - Banks Engage in AML Fight, THE BANKER (Jun. 10, 2016), https://www.thebanker.com/Banking-Regulation-Risk/Banks-engage-in-anti-money-laundering-fight/(language)/eng-GB?ct=true.
    37. Laws and Regulations, Banking Bureau, FSC (2019), https://www.rootlaw.com.tw/LawArticle.aspx?LawID=A040390041067000-1070709.
    38. Lisa M. Ellram, The supplier selection decision in strategic partnerships, JOURNAL OF PURCHASING AND MATERIAL MANAGEMENT, Sep. 1, 1990, at 8, 8-10.
    39. MARIO CERVANTES, OECD, STRATEGIC PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS FOR INNOVATION (2016).
    40. MARIO GARA ET AL., BANK OF RESEARCH PAPER, THE IMPACT OF ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING OVERSIGHT ON BANK’S SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTION REPORTING: EVIDENCE FROM ITALY (2019).
    41. MAS and Financial Industry to Use New Digital Platform to Fight Money Laundering, MAS (2021) https://www.mas.gov.sg/news/media-releases/2021/mas-and-financial-industry-to-use-new-digital-platform-to-fight-money-laundering.
    42. Miller Chris, Partner in Regeneration: Constructing a Local Regime for Urban Management, 27 POLICY AND POLITICS 343, 343-344 (1999).
    43. Ministry of Justice, Draft amendment on Articles of the MLCA (2021), https://www.moj.gov.tw/2204/2795/2799/125801/post.
    44. News Release: FINTRAC publishes indicators of money laundering through casino-related underground banking, FINTRAC, GOVERNMENT OF CANADA (Dec. 2019), https://www.fintrac-canafe.gc.ca/new-neuf/nr/2019-12-10-eng.
    45. NICK J MAXWELL, FFIS, FIVE YEARS OF GROWTH IN PUBLIC-PRIVATE FINANCIAL INFORMATION-SHARING PARTNERSHIPS TO TACKLE CRIME 19-22 (2020).
    46. NICK J MAXWELL & DAVID ARTINGSTALL, RUSI, THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION-SHARING PARTNERSHIPS IN THE DISRUPTION OF CRIME (2017).
    47. NICK J MAXWELL, RUSI, EXPANDING THE CAPABILITY OF FINANCIAL INFORMATIONAL-SHARING (2019).
    48. Nick Kochan, How Law Enforcement is Partnering up with Banks in AML Fight, WOLTERS KLUWER (Apr. 17, 2020), http://www.wolterskluwerfs.com/article/how-law-enforcement-is-partnering-up-with-banks-in-aml-fight.aspx.
    49. Nutavoot Pongsiri, Regulation and Public-Private Partnerships, 15 THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT 489, 495 (2002).
    50. PAMELA K. BUNDI, UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY-AFRICA, THE ROLE OF SYNERGY IN THE SUCCESS OF PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS: A CASE STUDY OF THE FINANCIAL INCLUSION IMPROVES SANITATION AND HEALTH IN KENYA (FINISH INK) PROJECT (2020).
    51. Paula Chadderton & Simon Norton, Public-Private Partnerships to Disrupt Financial Crime Exploratory Study of Australia’s Fintel Alliance (SWIFT Institute Working Paper, 2019).
    52. PAULINE VAILLANCOURT ROSENAU, MAPPING THE TERRAIN OF THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE POLICY PARTNERSHIP (2000).
    53. Public Private Partnership - Anti-Financial Crime Alliance, Zoll (2021) https://www.zoll.de/DE/FIU/Anti-Financial-Crime-Alliance/anti-financia-crime-alliance_node.html.
    54. RONALD W. MCQUAID, THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONAL: PARTNERSHIP ADVANTAGES, DISADVANTAGES AND SUCCESS FACTORS, THE NEW PUBLIC GOVERNANCE? 127, 130-134 (Stephen P. Osborne ed., 2010).
    55. Statistics of Justice, Ministry of Justice (2021), file:///Users/daisyhsu/Downloads/%E6%B3%95%E5%8B%99%E7%B5%B1%E8%A8%88%E6%91%98%E8%A6%81110%E5%B9%B41%E6%9C%88_%E6%A0%B8%E5%AE%9A(1100322%E6%8A%BD%E6%8F%9B).pdf.
    56. Statistics of Justice, Ministry of Justice (2022), https://www.rjsd.moj.gov.tw/rjsdweb/book/Book_Detail.aspx?book_id=525.
    57. Strengthening Information and Intelligence Sharing, HKMA (May 10, 2017), https://www.hkma.gov.hk/media/eng/doc/key-information/guidelines-and-circular/2018/20180510e2.pdf.
    58. Tactical Intelligence: Project Protect, FINTRAC (2019), https://www.theglobeandmail.com/files/editorial/News/0219-nw-na-trafficking/PROJECT- PROTECT.pdf.
    59. THE ASIA/PACIFIC GROUP ON MONEY LAUNDERING, ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING AND COUNTER-TERRORIST FINANCING MEASURES-HONG KONG, MUTUAL EVALUATION REPORT (2019).
    60. The Life Insurance Association of the Republic of China, Guideline for Information Sharing among Financial Institutions (2021), https://law.lia-roc.org.tw/Law/Content?lsid=FL097893.
    61. Ya-Mian Hsu, Financial Institutions are Uptight Preparing for the coming APG Mutual Evaluation, ANUE (Mar. 4, 2018), https://news.cnyes.com/news/id/4052090.
    62. YING-MING WU, RESEARCH ON PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS: JOINT PUBLIC-PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT AND URBAN DEVELOPMNET (1996).
    63. ZHANG TENG, ACAMS, DEFENSIVE SAR FILING: AN UNNECESSARILY HEAVY BURDEN ON THE AML FIELD (2018).
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    法學院碩士在職專班
    104961014
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104961014
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202201154
    Appears in Collections:[法學院碩士在職專班] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    101401.pdf1907KbAdobe PDF252View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback