English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46378985      Online Users : 681
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/142134


    Title: 從排放權交易機制之訴訟論如何精進排放權交易機制之設計要素
    How to Improve the Design Elements of an Emissions Trading Scheme from the Experiences of Lawsuits Relating to Emissions Trading Schemes
    Authors: 李昀蓁
    Li, Yun-Chen
    Contributors: 施文真
    Shih, Wen Chen
    李昀蓁
    Li, Yun-Chen
    Keywords: 京都議定書
    巴黎協定
    排放權交易機制
    排放權交易機制設計要素
    核配量
    氣候訴訟
    抵換
    Kyoto Protocol
    Paris Agreement
    Emissions Trading Scheme
    Design Features of Emissions Trading Scheme
    Allowance
    Climate Litigation
    Offset
    Date: 2022
    Issue Date: 2022-10-05 09:17:29 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 自1997年通過「京都議定書」以來,附錄一締約國為了達成其於議定書下之減排承諾,皆致力透過推行國內環境政策以達減排目標,而排放權交易機制便是其中一有力政策工具,其中又以「排放上限與交易」之類型為最常被使用。根據世界銀行發布之《碳排放交易機制設計手冊與指南》,在「排放上限與交易」類型下之設計要素主要有適用範圍與排放上限、分配核配量、遵循制度、彈性制度、連結制度等。每個設計要素都因不同國家、區域之排放權交易機制而產生不同的特性與問題。
    本文透過與排放權交易機制設計要素有關之訴訟,整理各個不同設計要素在不同國家、區域下之排放權交易機制被控訴的原因與法院見解,發覺目前難以用一個完美框架去適用各國之排放權交易機制,原因在於排放權交易機制設計本身須配合國家與區域的獨特性,故難以用統一形式做設計。不過藉由過往訴訟經驗,仍能提供未來欲建立排放權交易機制之政策制定者相關想法與建議,避免再次發生同類型之訴訟。
    Since the adoption of the "Kyoto Protocol" in 1997, the contracting parties have committed to achieving emission reduction targets through the implementation of domestic environmental policies for their nationally determined contributions. Emissions trading mechanism is one of the powerful policy tools, especially "cap and trade" type is the most commonly used. According to《Emissions Trading in Practice:A Handbook on Design and Implementation》issued by the World Bank, the design features under the " cap and trade" type mainly include scope and cap, allocation allowance, compliance, flexibility and linking etc. Each design feature has different characteristics and problems due to ETS in different countries and regions.
    Through the litigation related to the design elements of the emission trading mechanism, this paper sorted out the reasons why ETSs with different design elements were sued in different countries and regions and the opinions of the courts, and found that it was difficult to use a perfect framework to apply ETS of various countries. The reason is that design ETS must match the uniqueness of the country and region, so it is difficult to design with a unified form. However, based on litigation experiences, they can still provide relevant ideas and suggestions for policy makers who want to establish ETS in the future, so as to avoid the recurrence of similar lawsuits.
    Reference: 中文文獻
    法規、修正草案、行政函釋
    《溫室氣體減量及管理法》
    《第一批應盤查登錄溫室氣體排放量之排放源》,https://ghgrule.epa.gov.tw/admin/resource/files/06_第一批應盤查登錄溫室氣體排放量之排放源總說明及逐條說明(1050117).pdf。
    「溫室氣體減量及管理法修正草案(氣候變遷因應法草案)」,https://enews.epa.gov.tw/DisplayFile.aspx?FileID=26E59EF644F21D93。
    行政院環保署,環署毒字第1070010241號函。
    行政院環保署,環署毒字第1060090521號函。
    專書
    葉至誠、葉立誠(2011年),研究方法與論文寫作,3版,鼎商出版社。
    期刊論文
    林春元(2022年),全球淨零排放趨勢下,企業的因應與法律佈局,當代法律,5期,頁14-20。
    施文真(2008年),由交易單位之法律性質重新檢視排放權交易制度與WTO之關係,政大法學評論,第105期,頁121-215。
    施文真(2019年),巴黎協定對排放權交易制度之連結所可能帶來之影響:由下而上或由上而下的管制工具?,月旦法學雜誌:環境法特刊,頁39-72。
    施文真(2009年),溫室氣體減量法草案簡評──以排放權交易為主要分析對象,月旦法學雜誌,174期,頁47-68。
    葉俊榮等(2015年),溫減法,然後呢?──法律學者評新通過溫減法,月旦法學雜誌,245期,頁52-73。
    劉哲良(2015年),台灣碳交易:現況與展望,經濟前瞻,159期,頁17-21。
    碩博士論文
    鐘苡甄(2021年),碳排放權交易制度下之登錄處立法研究——以歐盟登錄處及其碳市場犯罪為例,國立政治大學國際經營與貿易學系碩士論文。
    網際網路
    王敏旭,修法拚減碳!《氣候變遷法》有隱憂,今日新聞,2022年7月28日,https://tw.sports.yahoo.com/news/修法拚減碳-氣候變遷法-有隱憂-040017711.html(最後瀏覽日:2022年8月28日)。
    李昀蓁,歐洲人權法院出現首起氣候訴訟,政治大學國際經貿組織暨法律研究中心經貿法訊,第 275 期 ,http://www.tradelaw.nccu.edu.tw/epaper/no275/4.pdf(最後瀏覽日:2022年7月14日)。
    李佳穎,應有共識的氣候法仍搞不定四大爭議讓朝野在議場外續角力,風傳媒,2022年5月26日,https://new7.storm.mg/article/4347502(最後瀏覽日:2022年8月28日)。
    孫文臨,【研商氣候法】環署擬請金融機構主責「碳交易」 金管會反對,環境資訊中心,2021年1月12日,https://e-info.org.tw/node/228994。
    郭家宏,台積電也大聲呼籲,碳交易有多重要?李堅明:它攸關台灣供應鏈成本競爭力,風傳媒,2022年4月15日,https://www.storm.mg/article/4288232?page=2。
    國家發展委員會,臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明,2022 年 3 月 30 日, https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzEwL3JlbGZpbGUvMC8xNDc2Mi8yZGM3MWIwMC1iMWQxLTRhZWQtYWYwYS0wMjhmYzVjMjlmNjYucGRm&n=6Ie654GjMjA1MOa3qOmbtuaOkuaUvui3r%2bW%2bkeWPiuetlueVpee4veiqquaYji5wZGY%3d&icon=..pdf。(最後瀏覽日:2022年7月14日)
    環保署說明碳費徵收規劃,行政院環境保護署,2021年11月20日,https://enews.epa.gov.tw/Page/3B3C62C78849F32F/eda88f0a-b3d0-4b10-a25b-1b2eddfd935d(最後瀏覽日:2022年3月25日)
    英文文獻
    國際協定
    Agreement Between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on the Linking of Their Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Systems, 2017 O.J. (L 322) 3.
    Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, annex A, Dec. 11, 1997, 2303 U.N.T.S. 162.
    Paris Agreement, Dec. 12, 2015.
    法律條文
    Commission Decision of 27 April 2011 Determining Transitional Union-wide Rules for Harmonised Free Allocation of Emission Allowances Pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Annex I, 2011 O.J. (L130).
    Commission Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council, Amending Directive 2003/87/EC Establishing a System for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading Within the Union, Decision (EU) 2015/1814 Concerning the Establishment and Operation of a Market Stability Reserve for the Union Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading Scheme and Regulation (EU) 2015/757, COM (2021) 551 final (July 14, 2021).
    Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 Establishing a Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading Within the Community and Amending Council Directive 96/61/EC, art. 9, 2003 O.J. (L 275) 32.
    Directive 2008/101/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 Amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to Include Aviation Activities in the Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading Within the Community, 2009 O.J. (L 8) 3.
    Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on Markets in Financial Instruments and Amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU, Annex Ⅰ, 2014 O.J. (L 173) 349.
    HEALTH & SAF. CODE, § 38500 et seq.
    Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 of 21 June 2012 on the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, 2012 O.J. (L 181) 30.
    U.S. CONST. art. II, § 2, cl. [2].
    法律案件
    Ass`n of Irritated Residents v. Cal. Air Res. Bd., 206 Cal. App. 4th 1487 (2012).
    Armstrong v. Winnington, [2012] EWHC 10 (Ch.).
    California Chamber of Commerce v. California Air Resources Board, U.S. Cal. Super. Ct. (2013).
    Case C-127/07, Arcelor Atlantique et Lorraine and Others v. Premier minister (Dec. 16, 2008)
    Case C 148/14, Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Nordzucker AG (Apr. 29, 2015).
    Case C-158/15, Elektriciteits Produktiemaatschappij Zuid-Nederland EPZ NV v Bestuur van de Nederlandse Emissieautoriteit (June 9, 2016)
    Case C 180/15, Borealis AB and Others v Naturvårdsverket (Sept. 8, 2016).
    Case C‐203/12, Billerud Karlsborg AB and Billerud Skärblacka AB v Naturvårdsverket (Oct. 17, 2013).
    Case C-302/17, PPC Power a.s. v Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky, Daňový úrad pre vybrané daňové subjekty (May 25, 2018).
    Case C 366/10, Air Transport Association of America et al. v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change (Dec. 21,2011).
    Case C‐460/15, Schaefer Kalk GmbH & Co. KG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Jan. 19, 2017)
    Case C-504/04, Agrarproduktion Staebelow GmbH v Landrat des Landkreises Bad Doberan (Jan. 12, 2006).
    Case C-580/14, Sandra Bitter v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Dec. 17, 2015)
    Greenpeace Canada v. Minister of the Environment (Ontario), 2019 ONSC 5629 (Can.).
    Case T-178/05, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v. Commission of the European Communities (Nov. 23, 2005).
    Case T-183/07, Republic of Poland v. European Commission (Sept. 23, 2009).
    Case T-263/07, Republic of Estonia v Commission of the European Communities (Sept. 23, 2009).
    Case T-330/18, Carvalho and Others v Parliament and Council (May 8, 2019).
    Case T-369/07, Republic of Latvia v Commission (July 5, 2011).
    Case T-374/04, Federal Republic of Germany v. Commission of the European Communities (Nov. 7, 2007).
    Elliott-Smith v. Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy et al., [2021] EWHC 1633 (Admin).
    Greenpeace Canada v. Minister of the Environment (Ontario), 2019 ONSC 5629 (Can.).
    La Paloma Generating Co. v. California Air Resources Board, 588 B.R. 695, 725 (Bkrtcy.D.Del. 2018).
    Our Children’s Earth Foundation v. California Air Resources Board, 527 F.3d 842, 844 (9th Cir., D.C Cir. 2015).
    United States v. California, 444 F. Supp. 3d 1181 (E.D. Cal. 2020).
    書籍
    FREESTONE, D. & STRECK, C, LEGAL ASPECT OF CARBON TRADING (2009).
    專書論文
    Denny Ellerman, The EU emission trading scheme: a prototype global system?, in POST-KYOTO INTERNATIONAL CLIMATE POLICY: IMPLEMENTING ARCHITECTURES FOR AGREEMENT 88-118 ( Joseph E. Aldy & Robert N. Stavins eds., 2009).
    期刊論文
    Stine Aakre & Jon Hovi, Emission Trading: Participation Enforcement Determines the Need for Compliance Enforcement, 11(3) EUROPEAN UNION POLITICS 427-445 (2010).
    İzzet Ari, Voluntary emission trading potential of Turkey, 62 ENERGY POLICY 910-919 (2013).
    Christian Flachsland et al., Global trading versus linking: Architectures for international emissions trading, 37 ENERGY POLICY 1637-1647 (2009).
    R. H. Coase, The Problem of Social Cost, 3 JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS 1-44 (1960).
    Jacqueline Peel&Hari M. Osofsky, Climate Change Litigation, 16 ANNUAL REVIEW OF LAW AND SOCIAL SCIENCE 21-38 (2020).
    Brian J. Preston, Climate Change Litigation (Part 1), 5(1) CARBON & CLIMATE L. REV. 3-12 (2011).
    Hugh S. Gorman & Barry D. Solomon, The Origins and Practice of Emissions Trading, 14(3) JOURNAL OF POLICY HISTORY 293-320 (2002).
    Joana Setzer & Lisa C. Vanhala, Climate Change Litigation: A Review of Research on Courts and Litigants in Climate Governance, 10(3) WIRES CLIMATE CHANGE 1-19 (2019).
    資料庫
    Climate Change Litigation Databases, SABIN CENTER FOR CLIMATE CHANGE LAW, http://climatecasechart.com/climate-change-litigation/.
    Climate Change Laws of the World database, GRANTHAM RESEARCH INSTITUTE ON CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE ENVIRONMENT & SABIN CENTER FOR CLIMATE CHANGE LAW, https://climate-laws.org/.
    國際組織出版品
    LARA DAHAN ET AL., NORWAY: AN EMISSIONS TRADING CASE STUDY (2015), https://www.edf.org/sites/default/files/norway-case-study-may2015.pdf
    MARISSA SANTIKARN ET AL., A GUIDE TO LINKING EMISSIONS TRADING SYSTEMS (2018).
    JOANA SETZER AND CATHERINE HIGHAM, GLOBAL TRENDS IN CLIMATE CHANGE LITIGATION:2022 SNAPSHOT (2022), https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Global-trends-in-climate-change-litigation-2022-snapshot.pdf.
    PARTNERSHIP FOR MARKET READINESS & INTERNATIONAL CARBON ACTION PARTNERSHIP, EMISSIONS TRADING IN PRACTICE: A HANDBOOK ON DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION (1 ed. 2016).
    PARTNERSHIP FOR MARKET READINESS & INTERNATIONAL CARBON ACTION PARTNERSHIP, EMISSIONS TRADING IN PRACTICE, SECOND EDITION: A HANDBOOK ON DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION (2nd ed. 2021).
    UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME, GLOBAL CLIMATE LITIGATION REPORT:2020 STATUS REVIEW (2020), https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/34818/GCLR.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
    UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME, THE STATUS OF CLIMATE CHANGE LITIGATION – A GLOBAL REVIEW (2017), https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/20767/climate-change-litigation.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
    政府文件
    Hearing on the Nomination of Dr. Janet Yellen Before the Comm. on Fin., 117th Cong. 109 (2021) (statement of Janet Yellen, Treasury Sec’y of the U.S.).
    Press release, US. Department of Justice, United States Files Lawsuit Against State of California for Unlawful Cap and Trade Agreement with the Canadian Province of Quebec (Oct. 23, 2019), https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/united-states-files-lawsuit-against-state-california-unlawful-cap-and-trade-agreement.
    網際網路
    Canada - Québec Cap-and-Trade System, ICAP, https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/ets-pdf-download/73 (last visited Apr. 18, 2022).
    Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), EUROPEAN UNION, https://european-union.europa.eu/institutions-law-budget/institutions-and-bodies/institutions-and-bodies-profiles/court-justice-european-union-cjeu_en (last visited July 17, 2022).
    Emissions Cap and Allowances, EUROPE COMMISSION, https://ec.europa.eu/clima/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets/emissions-cap-and-allowances_en (last visited June 13, 2022).
    Emission trading systems, OECD, https://www.oecd.org/env/tools-evaluation/emissiontradingsystems.htm (last visited Apr. 18, 2022).
    ETS Map, ICAP, https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/ets (last visited May 8, 2022).
    EU Carbon Permits, TRADING ECONOMICS, https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/carbon (last visited July 14, 2022).
    Flexibility Provisions, ICAP, https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/flexibility-provisions (last visited May 6, 2022).
    Guidance on Cooperative Approaches Referred to in Article 6, Paragraph 2, of the Paris Agreement. Proposal by the President, UNFCCC (Nov. 13, 2021), https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/cma2021_L18E.pdf.
    Linking, ICAP, https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/linking (last visited Apr. 18, 2022).
    Monitoring, reporting and verification of EU ETS emissions, EU COMMISSION, https://ec.europa.eu/clima/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets/monitoring-reporting-and-verification-eu-ets-emissions_en.
    MRV & Enforcement, ICAP, https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/mrv-enforcement (last visited May 7, 2022).
    Policy Brief: Climate Change Policies, ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT, https://www.oecd.org/env/cc/39111309.pdf (last visited July 17, 2022).
    Structure of the Courts Chart, COURTS AND TRIBUNALS JUDICIARY, https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/courts-structure-0715.pdf (last visited Aug. 23, 2022).
    Stranded Assets, CARBON TRACKER (Aug. 23, 2017), https://carbontracker.org/terms/stranded-assets/.
    Stian Reklev, Yundai Steel Loses First Lawsuit over Korea ETS Allocation -Paper, CARBON PULSE (Dec. 17, 2015), https://carbon-pulse.com/13483/.
    The Principle of Subsidiarity, EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (Feb. 2, 2020), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/7/the-principle-of-subsidiarity
    UK emissions trading scheme, SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT, https://www.gov.scot/policies/climate-change/emissions-trading-scheme/ (last visited July 17, 2022).
    Use of International Credits, EUROPEAN COMMISSION, https://ec.europa.eu/clima/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets/use-international-credits_en (last visited July 13, 2022).
    What is the Kyoto Protocol?, UNITED NATIONS CLIMATE CHANGE, https://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol (last visited Mar. 26, 2022).
    What is a Carbon Offset?, CARBON OFFSET GUIDE, https://www.offsetguide.org/understanding-carbon-offsets/what-is-a-carbon-offset/ (last visited May 7, 2022).
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營與貿易學系
    109351044
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109351044
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202201523
    Appears in Collections:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    104401.pdf2183KbAdobe PDF282View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback