English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46343132      Online Users : 1384
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/145783


    Title: ESG評分與財務績效關聯性之探討──以消費性產業分析
    A Study of the Relation of ESG Scores and Financial Performance- Take the Consumer Staples industry for Example
    Authors: 陳品瑜
    CHEN, PIN-YU
    Contributors: 徐政義
    Shiu, Cheng-Yi
    陳品瑜
    CHEN, PIN-YU
    Keywords: ESG
    財務績效
    SASB
    ESG
    Financial Performance
    SASB
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2023-07-06 16:30:50 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 企業的目標即為最大化股東權益,然隨著 ESG 概念的興起,企業漸漸重視 ESG 行動,許多國內外學者亦開始探討企業實行 ESG 與其績效的關聯性,現行 多篇報告提及企業實行 ESG 對其績效有正向作用,但亦有一說為實行 ESG 對 公司績效無顯著,甚至是負面影響。此外,現行相關期刊研究大多以國外 ESG 評分機構之評分作為變數,但本研究欲以台灣市場為例,探討 SASB 分類中消 費性產業(Consumer Staples industry)上市企業實行 ESG 是否對其財務績效有正 面影響,故在 ESG 分數方面選用台灣經濟新報(TEJ)於 2015 至 2021 年間計算 之 ESG 評分(TESG)計算;財務績效方面同樣使用台灣經濟新報(TEJ)提供之 ROA、Tobin’s Q 等作為企業財務績效指標代表。

    除整體 ESG 分數之外,本研究更深入分別探討 E(環境)、S(社會)、G(治理)三項 構面對企業財務績效的影響,以此建議未來企業可著重之企業社會責任項目。
    The goal of enterprises is to maximize shareholders` equity. However, with the rise of the concept of ESG, enterprises gradually pay attention to the importance of ESG actions. Many scholars at home and abroad have begun to discuss the correlation between the implementation of ESG in enterprises and their financial performance.

    Many current reports mention that the implementation of ESG in enterprises has a positive effect on their performance, but some say that the implementation of ESG has no significant effect on corporate performance, or even, a negative impact. In addition, most current studies take the scores of foreign ESG scoring agencies as variables. However, this study will take the Taiwan market as an example to explore whether the implementation of ESG in listed companies in the Consumer Staples industry in SASB classification has a positive impact on their financial performance. In this thesis, the ESG score (TESG) calculated by Taiwan Economic New Newspaper (TEJ) from 2015 to 2021 was used to proxy ESG performance. In terms of financial performance, ROA and Tobin`s Q provided by Taiwan Economic News (TEJ) are used as representatives of corporate financial performance indicators.

    In addition to the overall ESG score, this study further explored the impact of E (environmental), S (social), and G (governance) on corporate financial performance, and suggested CSR projects that enterprises could focus on in the future.
    Reference: 1. Amir, B. Amir, R. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict Between Shareholders. Journal of business ethics, Vol.97 (1), 71-86.

    2. Almazora, L. (2022). Why consumer staples are a focal point for ESG risk. Wealth Professional. https://www.wealthprofessional.ca/investments/socially-responsible- investing/why-consumer-staples-are-a-focal-point-for-esg-risk/367872

    3. Aydoğmuş, M., Gülay, G., Ergun, K. (2022). Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22, 119-127.

    4. Cornell, B., and Shapiro, A. C. (1987). Corporate Stakeholders and Corporate Finance. Financial Management, 16, 5-14.

    5. Calantone, R., and Cavusgil, S. T. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515- 524

    6. Cheung, Y. L., Jiang, K., Mak, B. S. C., & Tan, W. Q. (2013), Corporate Social Performance, Firm Valuation, and Industrial Difference: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(4), 625-631.

    7. Churet, C., & Eccles, R. G. (2014). Integrated Reporting, Quality of Management, and Financial Performance. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 26 (1), p.56- 64

    8. Christensen, A., & Russell, T. (2015). Consumer Staples Sector. Retrieved from
    https://s3.wp.wsu.edu/uploads/sites/606/2015/02/SectorOverview_CNS_Spring2014.pdf

    9. Chen, J. (2020). Consumer Staples. Retrieved from
    https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/consumerstaples.asp

    10. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2007). Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: the role of competitive positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24, 224-241.

    11. Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social-Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 1, 1- 13.

    12. Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100.

    13. Eccles, R, G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2011). The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance. Harvard Business School Working Paper Series, 12-035.

    14. Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Brand Trust in 2020 (2020). Retrieved from https://www.edelman.com/sites/g/files/aatuss191/files/2020- 06/2020%20Edelman%20Trust%20Barometer%20Specl%20Rept%20Brand%20 Trust%20in%202020.pdf (May. 07, 2023)

    15. Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits. New York Times Magazine.

    16. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Massachusetts: Pitman Publishing Inc., Boston.

    17. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and Financial Performance: Aggregated Evidence From More Than 2000 Empirical Studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210- 233.

    18. Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG Performance and Firm Value: The Moderating Role of Disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45-64.

    19. FTSE Russel Industry Classification Benchmark, from
    https://www.ftserussell.com/data/industry-classification-benchmark-icb

    20. FourKites (2023).The Great Reset: Ocean Shipping in a Post-Pandemic World, from https://www.fourkites.com/wp-content/uploads/FourKites-Global- Ocean-Report-2023.pdf(May. 15, 2023)

    21. Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997), The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research. Business and Social, 36, 5-31.

    22. Hillman. A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What’s the Bottom Line?, Strategic Management Journal, 22 (2), 125-139.

    23. Hamdi, K., Guenich, H. & Saada, M. B. (2022) Does Corporate Financial Performance Promote ESG: Evidence from US Firms, Cogent Business & Management, 9( 1).

    24. Jenter, D., Lewellen, K., & Warner, J.B. (2011). Security Issue Timing: What Do Managers Know, and When Do They Know It? The Journal of Finance, 66(2):413-443.

    25. Jody, G., Clarissa, H., & George, S. (2021). Material Sustainability Information and Stock Price Informativeness. Journal of Business Ethics, 171 (3), 513-544.

    26. Krüger, P. (2014). Corporate Goodness and Shareholder Wealth, Journal of Financial Economics, 115(2), 304- 329

    27. KPMG Survey of Sustainability Reporting (2022). Retrieved from
    https://www.kpmguniversityconnection.com/University/view/curriculum/?module_id=164 (Feb. 15, 2023)

    28. KPMG Key Global Trends in Sustainability Reporting (2022). Retrieved from
    https://kpmg.com/xx/en/home/insights/2022/09/survey-of-sustainability-reporting-2022/global-trends.html (Feb. 15, 2023)

    29. Lin, K., Kabel, A., Parker, S., & Joye, C. (2019). Are ESG Alpha and Beta Benefits in Corporate Bonds a Mirage? From https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3352950

    30. MSCI (2023), Global Industry Classification Sector. From
    https://www.msci.com/documents/1296102/11185224/GICS+Sector+Definitions+2023.pdf/822305c6-f821-3d65-1984-6615ded81473?t=1679088764288

    31. Preston, L. E., & O’Bannon, D. P. (1997). The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship: A Typology and Analysis. Business & Society, 36(4), 419–429.

    32. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and Society: The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84, 78-92.

    33. Peters, R., and Mullen, M. R. (2009). Some Evidence of the Cumulative Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance. The Journal of Global Business Issue, 3, 1-14.

    34. PWC Global Consumer Insights Pulse Survey: Consumers respond to waves of disruption (2022), from https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/consumer-markets/consumers-respond-to-waves-of- disruption/gcis-report-june-2022.pdf (May. 07, 2023)

    35. PWC: Preparing for tomorrow’s consumers today: The future of consumer markets. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/consumer-markets/future-of-consumer- markets/future-of-consumer-markets-report-2021.pdf (May. 7, 2023)

    36. Principles for Responsible Investment: What are the Principles for Responsible
    Investment?. Retrieved from https://www.unpri.org/about-us/what-are-the-principles-for-responsible-investment (Mar. 15, 2023)

    37. Qureshi, M. A., Kirkerud, S., Theresa, K., & Ahsan, T. (2019). The Impact of Sustainability (Environmental, Social, and Governance) Disclosure and Board Diversity on Firm Value: The Moderating Role of Industry Sensitivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1199- 1214.

    38. Schuler, D. A. & Cording, M. (2006). A Corporate Social Performance-Corporate Financial Performance Behavioral Model for Consumers. Academy of Management Review, 31, 540-558.

    39. Sandner, P. G., & Block, J. (2011), The Market Value of R&D, Patents, and Trademarks. Research Policy, 40 (7), 969-985.

    40. Stellner, C. Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility and Eurozone Corporate Bonds: The Moderating Role of Country Sustainability, Journal of Banking & Finance, 59, 538-549.

    41. Shirasu, Y., & Kawakita, H. (2021), Long-term Financial Performance of Corporate Social Responsibility. Global Finance Journal, 50.

    42. Whelan, T., Atz, U., Holt, T, V., & Clark, C. (2021), ESG and Financial Performance: Uncovering the Relationship by Aggregating Evidence from 1,000 Plus Studies Published between 2015 – 2020. Rockefeller Asset Management& NYU Stern Center.

    1. 王嘉宏(2012)。企業社會績效與企業價值的關連性。﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/476w5f。

    2. 沈中華與張元 (2008),企業社會責任行為可以改善財務績效嗎?-以英國
    FTSE 社會責任指數為例,經濟論文,第 36 卷第 3 期,339-385。
    3. 李秀英、劉俊儒、楊筱翎 (2011),企業社會責任與公司績效之關聯性,
    東海管理評論,13 ( 1),77-112。

    4. 施凱珍(2021)。採SASB準則下ESG重大性議題與財務績效之探討。(碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9zzc87。

    5. 楊雅智 (2015)。淺談企業社會責任之國際發展趨勢與國內推動現況。證券暨期貨月刊,33 (1),5-15。

    6. 勤業眾信:2020零售力量與趨勢展望-數位零售的供應鏈網絡,檢自https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/tw/Documents/consumer-business/rp200428-2020-retail-industry-trend-rp.pdf (May. 13, 2023)。

    7. 證券櫃檯買賣中心永續報告書企業負面案例 (2011),檢自https://dsp.tpex.org.tw/web/csr/cpexample4.php (Feb. 13, 2023)。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營與貿易學系
    110351021
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110351021
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    102101.pdf1877KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback