English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110182/141115 (78%)
Visitors : 46694670      Online Users : 669
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/146278
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146278


    Title: ESG因子對於企業債務風險的影響
    The Impact of ESG Factors on Corporate Debt Risk
    Authors: 陳揚捷
    Chen, Yang-Jie
    Contributors: 李志宏
    Lee, Jie-Haun
    陳揚捷
    Chen, Yang-Jie
    Keywords: ESG
    債務風險
    債務成本
    信用評級
    ESG
    Debt risk
    Debt cost
    Credit rating
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2023-08-02 12:57:39 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: ESG代表企業在環境、社會、治理層面的各種作為,近年來ESG相關風險的重要度逐漸提高,議題關注度隨之提升,過去企業進行ESG投資可能會拖累財務績效,而不受投資人親睞,但在另一方面,企業亦可能享受到這些投資的效益,降低企業風險的同時還可能有收益,如提早投資減碳的公司便可以避免碳費的成本,甚至享受到出售碳權的收入。ESG相關範疇的投資可以增強未來企業在面臨相關風險的能力。而當企業風險降低,資金成本也會降低,本研究主要探討議題即為企業ESG的表現是否能夠降低債務面的風險以及成本。

    為了研究此一議題,本研究使用2011年至2017年於紐約證交所(NYSE)、那斯達克交易所(NASDAQ)以及美國交易所(AMEX)上市的企業做為樣本,並以路孚特(Refinitiv)ESG評分作為企業ESG表現的衡量依據,再以標普全球評級(S&P Global Rating)做為企業長期之信用品質,觀察ESG表現與信用評級降級之間的關係。實證結果顯示ESG表現好的公司的確能夠顯著降低信用評級被降級的機率,代表能夠降低債務風險,且本研究進一步發現ESG因子也可以降低債務成本。唯每提高一分之ESG評分,降低之信用評級被降級的機率不超過0.25%,並且降低之債務成本也不超過0.0085%;若是財務體質較好的公司,降低之債務成本可提高至0.02%,但影響仍相當有限。
    ESG represents the various actions taken by companies in the areas of environment, social, and governance. In recent years, the importance of ESG-related risks has been gradually increasing, leading to an increased focus on these issues. In the past, companies engaging in ESG investments may have suffered from a drag on financial performance and lack of investor’s favor. However, in the other hand, companies may enjoy the benefits of these investments. For example, companies that invest early in carbon reduction can avoid the costs of carbon fees and even generate income from selling carbon credits. Investing in ESG-related areas can enhance a company`s ability to face related risks in the future. When a company`s risk decreases, its cost of capital also decreases. This study mainly explores whether a company`s ESG performance can reduce debt-related risks and costs.

    To investigate this issue, this study uses a sample of companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), Nasdaq, and American Stock Exchange (AMEX) from 2011 to 2017. Refinitiv`s ESG ratings are used as a measure of corporate ESG performance, and S&P credit ratings are used to assess long-term credit quality. The relationship between ESG performance and credit rating downgrades is observed. The empirical results show that companies with good ESG performance can truly reduce the probability of credit rating downgrades, indicating a reduction in debt risk. Furthermore, this study finds that ESG factors can also lower debt costs. Each one-point increase in ESG score leads to a decrease in the probability of credit rating downgrades by no more than 0.25%, and a decrease in debt costs by no more than 0.0085%. However, it should be noted that for companies with stronger financial profiles, the reduction in debt costs may be enhanced to 0.02%; nonetheless, the overall impact remains relatively modest.
    Reference: Altman, E.I., “Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy,” Journal of Finance 23 (1968), pp. 589–609.

    Alp, Aysun. "Structural shifts in credit rating standards." The Journal of Finance 68.6 (2013): 2435-2470.

    Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of management Journal, 28(2), 446-463.

    Attig, N., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., & Suh, J. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and credit ratings. Journal of business ethics, 117, 679-694.

    Amato, J. D., & Furfine, C. H. (2004). Are credit ratings procyclical?. Journal of Banking & Finance, 28(11), 2641-2677.

    Altman, E. I., Iwanicz‐Drozdowska, M., Laitinen, E. K., & Suvas, A. (2017). Financial distress prediction in an international context: A review and empirical analysis of Altman`s Z‐score model. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 28(2), 131-171.

    Bhagat, S., & Bolton, B. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of corporate finance, 14(3), 257-273.

    Brammer, S., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures. Financial management, 35(3), 97-116.

    Becker, B., & Gerhart, B. (1996). The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospects. Academy of management journal, 39(4), 779-801.
    Brav, A., Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Michaely, R. (2005). Payout policy in the 21st century. Journal of financial economics, 77(3), 483-527.

    Berg, F., Koelbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315-1344.

    Barth, F., Hübel, B., & Scholz, H. (2022). ESG and corporate credit spreads. The Journal of Risk Finance.

    Cuñat, V., Gine, M., & Guadalupe, M. (2012). The vote is cast: The effect of corporate governance on shareholder value. The journal of finance, 67(5), 1943-1977.

    Dyck, A., Lins, K. V., Roth, L., & Wagner, H. F. (2019). Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. Journal of financial economics, 131(3), 693-714.

    Eliwa, Y., Aboud, A., & Saleh, A. (2021). ESG practices and the cost of debt: Evidence from EU countries. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 79, 102097.

    El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?. Journal of banking & finance, 35(9), 2388-2406.

    Flammer, C. (2021). Corporate green bonds. Journal of financial economics, 142(2), 499-516.

    Faulkender, Michael, & Mitchell A. Petersen, 2006, Does the source of capital affect capital structure? Review of Financial Studies 19, 45– 79.

    Graham, J. R. (2000). How big are the tax benefits of debt?. The journal of finance, 55(5), 1901-1941.

    Gibson Brandon, R., Krueger, P., & Schmidt, P. S. (2021). ESG rating disagreement and stock returns. Financial Analysts Journal, 77(4), 104-127.

    James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2013). An introduction to statistical learning (Vol. 112, p. 18). New York: springer.

    Kurshev, Alexander, & Ilya A. Strebulaev, (2006), Firm size and capital structure, Working paper, Stanford GSB.

    Karpf, A., & Mandel, A. (2017). Does it pay to be green?. Available at SSRN 2923484.


    KIM, T., & KIM, I. (2020). The Influence of Credit Scores on Dividend Policy: Evidence from the Korean Market. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(2), 33–42

    Kim, Y., Li, H., & Li, S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 43, 1-13.

    Kiesel, F., & Lücke, F. (2019). ESG in credit ratings and the impact on financial markets. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 28(3), 263-290.

    Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The accounting review, 91(6), 1697-1724.

    Lee, K. H., Min, B., & Yook, K. H. (2015). The impacts of carbon (CO2) emissions and environmental research and development (R&D) investment on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 167, 1-11.

    Myers, S. C. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of financial economics, 5(2), 147-175.

    Menard, S. (2002). Applied logistic regression analysis (No. 106). Sage.

    Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative science quarterly, 48(2), 268-305.


    Ng, A. C., & Rezaee, Z. (2015). Business sustainability performance and cost of equity capital. Journal of Corporate Finance, 34, 128-149.

    Ohlson, J. A. (1980). Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy. Journal of accounting research, 109-131.

    Orlitzky Marc, Frank L Schmidt, Sara L Rynes, (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization studies, 24(3), 403-441

    Pedersen, L. H., Fitzgibbons, S., & Pomorski, L. (2021). Responsible investing: The ESG-efficient frontier. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 572-597.

    Pástor, Ľ., Stambaugh, R. F., & Taylor, L. A. (2022). Dissecting green returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 146(2), 403-424.

    Raimo, N., Caragnano, A., Zito, M., Vitolla, F., & Mariani, M. (2021). Extending the benefits of ESG disclosure: The effect on the cost of debt financing. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4), 1412-1421.

    Ramstein, C., Dominioni, G., Ettehad, S., Lam, L., Quant, M., Zhang, J., ... & Trim, I. (2019). State and trends of carbon pricing 2019. The World Bank.

    Saeidi, S. P., Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S. P., & Saaeidi, S. A. (2015). How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction. Journal of business research, 68(2), 341-350.
    Trinks, A., Mulder, M., & Scholtens, B. (2020). An efficiency perspective on carbon emissions and financial performance. Ecological Economics, 175, 106632.

    Van Binsbergen, J. H., Graham, J. R., & Yang, J. (2010). The cost of debt. The Journal of Finance, 65(6), 2089-2136.

    Wang, Y., & Zhi, Q. (2016). The role of green finance in environmental protection: Two aspects of market mechanism and policies. Energy Procedia, 104, 311-316.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理學系
    110357006
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110357006
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[財務管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    700601.pdf2599KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback