English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110116/141062 (78%)
Visitors : 46445552      Online Users : 964
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/146383


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146383


    Title: 主管對於指派業務目標的說服方法與員工對業務目標的接受程度:實驗研究證據
    Supervisors` Persuasion Tactics in Assigning Target and Subordinates` Acceptance of the Target: Experimental Evidence
    Authors: 林雀華
    Lin, Chueh-Hua
    Contributors: 吳安妮
    殷華祥
    Wu, Anne
    Yin, Huaxiang
    林雀華
    Lin, Chueh-Hua
    Keywords: 說服方法
    目標難易度
    目標接受程度
    目標設定
    主管與員工關係
    Persuasion Tactics
    Target Difficulty
    Target Acceptance
    Target Setting
    Supervisor–Subordinate Relationship
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2023-08-02 13:22:14 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究採用情境式實驗設計，探討主管對於員工指派業務目標的說服方法如何影響員 工之目標接受程度。本研究預期並發現，主管的說服方法是可以提高員工的目標接受 程度。且本研究更進一步發現，相較於邊緣途徑 (Peripheral Route)的說服方法的影響, 中央途徑(Central Route)的說服方法才能有效提高員工的目標接受程度。再者，在目標難度極高的組別下，主管採用中央途徑的說服方法，使員工有較高的意願於工作上的付出及達標的企圖心。除此之外，本研究亦發現主管採用中央途徑的說服方法 下，亦可提升員工的正面情緒且同時降低負面情緒。綜上所述，本研究的實驗結果，對於目標設定的理論提出更進一步的貢獻以及對於主管與員工的關係有實務上的貢獻。
    This study uses a scenario experiment to investigate how supervisors’ persuasion tactics affects subordinates’ target acceptance in the target setting process. I predict and find that employing persuasion routes in convincing target to subordinates improves subordinates’ target acceptance. Specifically, relative to no persuasion, using the central-route persuasion tactics improves subordinates’ target acceptance, whereas using the peripheral-route persuasion tactics does not improve subordinates’ target acceptance. Noteworthily, subordinates in the extremely challenging target group have higher intentions to exert their effort and to attain the target when their supervisor employs the central-route persuasion. I further find that, in comparison with no persuasion, as well as the peripheral-route persuasion, using the central-route persuasion can increase subordinates’ positive emotions and reduce their negative emotions. Taken together, this study contributes to target setting theory and has important practical implications for the supervisor–subordinate relationship.
    Reference: Arnold, M. C. (2015). The effect of superiors` exogenous constraints on budget negotiations. The Accounting Review, 90(1), 31-57. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50864

    Arnold, M. C., & Artz, M. (2015). Target difficulty, target flexibility, and firm performance: Evidence from business units’ targets. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 40, 61- 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.12.002

    Arnold, M. C., Artz, M., & Tafkov, I. (2019). The effect of target transparency on managers’ target setting decisions. Available at SSRN 3431071. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3431071

    Arnold, M. C., Hannan, R. L., & Tafkov, I. D. (2018). Team member subjective communication in homogeneous and heterogeneous teams. The Accounting Review, 93(5), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52002

    Arnold, M. C., Hannan, R. L., & Tafkov, I. D. (2020). Mutual monitoring and team member communication in teams. The Accounting Review, 95(5), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52659

    Arnold, M. C., & Tafkov, I. D. (2019). Managerial discretion and task interdependence in teams. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(4), 2467-2493. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12504

    Atkinson, J. W. (1958). Towards experimental analysis of human motivation in terms of motives, expectancies, and incentives. In J. W. Atkinson (Ed.), Motives in fantasy, action and society: A method of assessment and study (pp. 288-305). Van Nostrand.

    Austin, J. T. (1989). Effects of shifts in goal origin on goal acceptance and attainment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44(3), 415-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(89)90017-4

    Beehr, T. A., & Love, K. G. (1983). A meta-model of the effects of goal characteristics, feedback, and role characteristics in human organizations. Human Relations, 36(2), 151-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678303600205

    Bhattacharjee, S., & Brown, J. O. (2018). The impact of management alumni affiliation and persuasion tactics on auditors` internal control judgments. The Accounting Review, 93(2), 97-115. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51816

    Bol, J. C., & Lill, J. B. (2015). Performance target revisions in incentive contracts: Do information and trust reduce ratcheting and the ratchet effect? The Accounting Review, 90(5), 1755-1778. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51050

    Brown, T., & Fanning, K. (2019). The joint effects of internal auditors` approach and persuasion tactics on managers` responses to internal audit advice. The Accounting Review, 94(4), 173-188. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52295

    Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1984). The elaboration likelihood model of Persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research, 11(1), 673–675.

    Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Kao, C. F., & Rodriguez, R. (1986). Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(5), 1032. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.5.1032

    Chow, C. W. (1983). 1983 Competitive Manuscript Award: The Effects of Job Standard Tightness and Compensation Scheme on Performance: An Exploration of Linkages. Accounting Review, 667-685.

    Christ, M. H. (2013). An experimental investigation of the interactions among intentions, reciprocity, and control. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 25(1), 169- 197. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-50443

    Earley, P. C. (1985). Influence of information, choice and task complexity upon goal acceptance, performance, and personal goals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(3), 481- 491. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.70.3.481

    Earley, P. C., & Kanfer, R. (1985). The influence of component participation and role models on goal acceptance, goal satisfaction, and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36(3), 378-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(85)90006-8

    Erez, M., Earley, P. C., & Hulin, C. L. (1985). The impact of participation on goal acceptance and performance: A two-step model. Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 50-66.

    Erez, M., & Kanfer, F. H. (1983). The role of goal acceptance in goal setting and task performance. Academy of Management Review, 8(3), 454-463. https://doi.org/10.2307/257834

    Erez, M., & Zidon, I. (1984). Effect of goal acceptance on the relationship of goal difficulty to performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.69

    Falk, A., & Kosfeld, M. (2006). The hidden costs of control. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1611-1630. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.5.1611

    Fisher, J. G., Frederickson, J. R., & Peffer, S. A. (2000). Budgeting: An experimental investigation of the effects of negotiation. The Accounting Review, 75(1), 93-114. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2000.75.1.93

    Gibbins, M., & Trotman, K. T. (2002). Audit review: Managers` interpersonal expectations and conduct of the review. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(3), 411-444. https://doi.org/10.1506/J519-5LVU-JTMQ-YYJ7

    Gunning, Robert, 1952, The Technique of Clear Writing (McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Hansen, S. C., & Van der Stede, W. A. (2004). Multiple facets of budgeting: An exploratory analysis. Management Accounting Research, 15(4), 415-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2004.08.001

    Haugtvedt, C. P., & Petty, R. E. (1992). Personality and persuasion: Need for cognition moderates the persistence and resistance of attitude changes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 308. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.2.308

    Heaven, P. C. (1990). Attitudinal and personality correlates of achievement motivation among high school students. Personality and Individual Differences, 11(7), 705-710. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(90)90255-P

    Hirst, M. K., & Lowy, S. M. (1990). The linear additive and interactive effects of budgetary goal difficulty and feedback on performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(5), 425-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(90)90026-Q

    Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.

    Kadous, K., Koonce, L., & Towry, K. L. (2005). Quantification and persuasion in managerial judgement. Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(3), 643-686.

    Kelly, K. O., Webb, R. A., & Vance, T. (2014). The interactive effects of ex post goal adjustment and goal difficulty on performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 27(1), 1-25. doi:10.2308/jmar-50729

    Kelly, K. O., Webb, R. A., & Vance, T. (2015). The interactive effects of ex post goal adjustment and goal difficulty on performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 27(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-50729

    Lau, C. M., & Roopnarain, K. (2014). The effects of nonfinancial and financial measures on employee motivation to participate in target setting. The British Accounting Review, 46(3), 228-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.02.006

    Lee, T. W., Locke, E. A., & Phan, S. H. (1997). Explaining the assigned goal-incentive interaction: The role of self-efficacy and personal goals. Journal of Management, 23(4), 541-559. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300403

    Li, F. (2008). Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence. Journal of Accounting and economics, 45(2-3), 221-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.02.003

    Locke, E. A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3(2), 157-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(68)90004-4

    Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Prentice- Hall, Inc.

    Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M., & Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90(1), 125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.90.1.125

    Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2014). Measuring readability in financial disclosures. The Journal of Finance, 69(4), 1643-1671. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12162

    Merchant, K. A., & Manzoni, J.-F. (1989). The Achievability of Budget Targets in Profit Centers: A Field Study. The Accounting Review, 64(3), 539–558.

    Merchant, K. A., Stringer, C., & Shantapriyan, P. (2018). Setting financial performance thresholds, targets, and maximums in bonus plans. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 30(3), 55-73.

    Oldham, G. R. (1975). The impact of supervisory characteristics on goal acceptance. Academy of Management Journal, 18(3), 461-475.

    Palan, S., & Schitter, C. (2018). Prolific. ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004

    Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. Dubuque. IA: William C. Brown.

    Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer.

    Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135-146. https://doi.org/10.1086/208954

    Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Ahearne, M. (1997). Moderating effects of goal acceptance on the relationship between group cohesiveness and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 974. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.374

    Rich, J. S., Solomon, I., & Trotman, K. T. (1997). The audit review process: A characterization from the persuasion perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(5), 481-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(97)80165-1

    Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4(3), 219. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.4.3.219

    Schulman, P. (1999). Applying learned optimism to increase sales productivity. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 19(1), 31-37.

    Sengupta, J., Goodstein, R. C., & Boninger, D. S. (1997). All cues are not created equal: Obtaining attitude persistence under low-involvement conditions. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(4), 351-361. https://doi.org/10.1086/209488

    Smith, R. (2021). Daily communication from managers directly correlates with less anxiety and stress. Wall Street Journal. https://partners.wsj.com/sap/experience-management- in-action/daily-communication-from-managers-directly-correlates-with-less-anxiety- and-stress/

    Stedry, A. C., & Kay, E. (1966). The effects of goal difficulty on performance: A field experiment. Behavioral Science, 11(6), 459-470. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830110605

    Vance, R. J., & Colella, A. (1990). Effects of two types of feedback on goal acceptance and personal goals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.1.68

    Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation.

    Wang, L. W., & Yin, H. (2022). The effects of emotion-understanding ability and tournament incentives on supervisors’ propensity to acquire subordinate-type information to use in control decisions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 101425.

    Webb, A., Jeffrey, S. A., & Schulz, A. (2010). Factors affecting goal difficulty and
    performance when employees select their own performance goals: Evidence from the field. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 22(1), 209-232. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar.2010.22.1.209

    Webb, R. A., Williamson, M. G., & Zhang, Y. (2013). Productivity-target difficulty, target- based pay, and outside-the-box thinking. The Accounting Review, 88(4), 1433-1457. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50436

    Wolfe, C. J., Mauldin, E. G., & Diaz, M. C. (2009). Concede or deny: Do management persuasion tactics affect auditor evaluation of internal control deviations? The Accounting Review, 84(6), 2013-2037. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.6.2013

    Yalch, R. F., & Elmore-Yalch, R. (1984). The effect of numbers on the route to persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(1), 522-527. https://doi.org/10.1086/208988

    Yin, H. (2021). Can employees exercise control over managers? The role of the employees` knowledge of manager behavior and manager discretion. The Accounting Review, 96(5), 365-388. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2015-0219

    Yukl, G. A., & Latham, G. P. (1978). Interrelationships among employee participation, individual differences, goal difficulty, goal acceptance, goal instrumentality, and performance. Personnel Psychology, 31(2), 305-323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1978.tb00449.x
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    105353503
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105353503
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    350301.pdf1348KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback