Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/147055
|
| Title: | 藝術表演或社會行動？──以《陰道獨白》及其展演為例
Art Performance or Social Action? ─ Taking The Vagina Monologues and Its Performance as an Example |
| Authors: | 沈宜臻
Shen, Yi-Jen |
| Contributors: | 高國魁
洪儀真
沈宜臻
Shen, Yi-Jen |
| Keywords: | 《陰道獨白》
女性主義戲劇
社會行動劇場
勵馨基金會
On Stage表演藝術工作坊
The Vagina Monologues
Feminist theater
Theatre of social action
Garden of Hope Foundation
On Stage Workshop |
| Date: | 2023 |
| Issue Date: | 2023-09-01 15:30:00 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 在女性主義劇場中，性別暴力和性愉悅是敘事的永恆主題。這些關乎性別議題的劇碼不僅是單純的藝術表演，同時代表著社會倡議。劇團多半希望其演出能發揮行動的力量，翻轉不平等的情境。然而，劇作究竟是做為一個藝術品、還是做為一場社會行動製作而成，關乎於劇團的策略選擇。劇團究竟採取什麼樣的手法，讓性別議題顯現到大眾面前，就成了研究劇場的社會效應需要進一步釐清的問題。
本文以伊芙‧恩斯勒的劇本《陰道獨白》在台灣的演出狀況為研究對象，分析勵馨基金會和On Stage表演藝術工作坊上演這齣戲的過程，挖掘不同劇團如何採取不同路徑將性別議題轉化為公共討論。本研究從兩大劇團對《陰道獨白》文本分析出發，看劇場如何展現社會的不平等議題。再來，則是從兩個劇團製作《陰道獨白》的背景，描繪出它們倡議的社會角色與性別價值。最後研究將以觀者的角度作結，評估劇場表演帶來的社會效應。
本研究主要發現，作為婦女團體的勵馨基金會，與作為表演團體的On Stage工作坊，雖然演出性質有所不同，卻殊途同歸地將女性議題透過美學素材的轉化，達成社會的同情共感。當隱晦、不可言說的性議題得到藝術式顯化，相關的性別敘事也將獲得政治效用，結果產生社會上的觀念革命。與此同時，《陰道獨白》劇本的在地化改編也反向受到社會運動啟發，不斷創新鮮活經驗。
In the feminist theater, narratives of gender violence or sexual pleasure are eternal themes. These dramas are not only artistic performances, but also stand for social advocacy. People usually expect that their performances can exert strength of action to overturn gender inequality. However, the production of theater as an artwork or a social action pertains to a troupe`s choice of strategies. The different ways in which troupes utilize techniques to manifest gender issues before the public is a question that requires further clarification for studying the social effects of theaters.
This thesis takes various performances of Eve Ensler’s The Vagina Monologues in Taiwan as a research object. It analyzes the production processes of the Garden of Hope Foundation and On Stage, and explore different paths chosen by distinct theater companies to transform gender issues into public discussions. This research starts with the textual analysis of The Vagina Monologues, examining how feminist theaters represent the issues of gender inequality. Furthermore, it will depict social roles and gender values they advocate from the vantage point of these two troupes’ production backgrounds. Finally, it ends with the audiences’ perspective, assessing the social effects brought about by theater performances.
One major research finding is that although the Garden of Hope Foundation as a women`s group and On Stage Workshop as a performance group produce two different types of performance, they both transform women`s issues with aesthetic materials in order to achieve social empathy. When implicit and unspeakable sexual issues are manifested artistically, relevant gender narratives will also acquire political efficacy, resulting in a conceptual revolution within society. In the meantime, localized adaptations of The Vagina Monologues have also been conversely inspired by social movements, constantly innovating fresh life experiences. |
| Reference: | 王中，2014，《公共藝術概論》。北京：北京大學。
汪彥成，2017，《重探公共性：臺灣當代藝術的公共性問題》。臺北：臺北藝術大學藝術跨域研究所碩士論文。
林殷齊，2016，〈臺灣女性藝術家創作中自我概念之探究（1895-2013）〉。《藝術研究學報》，9（1），67-92。
段馨君，2010，《凝視臺灣當代劇場 ：女性劇場、跨文化劇場與表演工作坊》。台北：Airiti Press華藝學術出版社。
段馨君，2012，〈《暴風雨》的身體展演與殖民創傷〉。《英美文學評論》，（20），35-69。
陳芳英，2011，〈深雪初融：論新世紀新編京劇的女性書寫〉。《戲劇學刊》，（13），35-64。
曾鈺涓，2005，〈女性身體與藝術創作──從「美的象徵」到「主體意義」的呈現〉。《婦研縱橫》，（74），31-42。
楊婉怡，1998，《後現代性別政治：當代英美女性主義劇場理論初探》。臺北：國立藝術學院戲劇研究所碩士論文。
周泓儒，2018，〈【性別劇場】從政治角力到女性主體！女性主義劇場極簡史〉。女人迷，https://womany.net/read/article/15537?type=author，取用日期2022年3月25日。
黃斐新，2020，〈看妳不爽，然後？當性別遇見受壓迫者劇場〉。臺灣被壓迫者劇場推廣中心，http://www.ctotw.tw/2011/10/blog-post.html，取用日期2022年3月25日。
Boal, Augusto著、賴淑雅譯，2000，《被壓迫者劇場》。臺北：揚智出版。
Boal, Augusto著、馬利文譯，2019，《慾望的彩虹》。北京：北京師範大學出版。
Biro, David著、彭榮邦譯，2014，《聆聽疼痛 ：為痛苦尋找話語、慈悲與寬慰》。新北：木馬文化。
Bishop, Claire著、林宏濤譯，2015，《人造地獄 ：參與式藝術與觀看者政治學》。臺北：典藏藝術家庭出版。
Ensler, Eve著、丁凡、喬色分譯，2014，《陰道獨白》。臺北：心靈工坊文化。
Hauser, Arnold著、居延安編譯，1990，《藝術社會學》。臺北：雅典出版。
Jones, Phil著、洪素真等譯，2002。《戲劇治療》。臺北：五南出版。
Landy, Robert著、王秋絨等譯，2016，《人格面具與表演 ：角色在戲劇、治療與日常生活的意義》。臺北：心理出版社。
Rancière, Jacques著、楊成瀚、關秀惠譯 ，戴遠雄審訂、修譯、導讀，2021，《感性配享 ：美學與政治》。臺北：商周出版。
Sontag, Susan著、陳耀成譯，2017，《旁觀他人之痛苦》。臺北：麥田出版。
Adorno, Theodor, 1981, Prisms. Translated by Samuel and Shierry Weber. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Baker, Rachel B., Marilyn Sawyer Sommers, 2008, “Relationship of Genital Injuries and Age in Adolescent and Young Adult Rape Survivors.” Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, JOGNN 37(3): 282-289.
Benjamin, Walter, 1969, “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” Pp. 217-252 in Illuminations, edited by Harcourt Brace. New York: Schocken Books.
Beuys, Joseph, 2007, What is Art? Conversation with Joseph Beuys. London: Clairview Books.
Bell, Susan, Susan Reverby, 2005, “Vaginal Politics: Tensions and Possibilities in The Vagina Monologues.” Women`s Studies International Forum, 28(5): 430-444.
Brecht, Bertolt, 1964, Brecht on Theatre: The Development of an Aesthetic, edited by John Willett. New York: Macmillan.
Brodsky, Annette, 1973, “The Consciousness-raising Group as a Model for Therapy with Women.” Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice 10(1): 24-29.
Caprioli, Mary, Mark A. Boyer, 2001, “Gender, Violence, and International Crisis.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 45(4): 503-518.
Chemaly, Soraya, 2018, Rage Becomes Her: The Power of Women`s Anger. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Diderot, Denis, 1957, The paradox of acting. New York: Hill & Wang.
Ettinger, Bracha L, 2006, “Wit(h)nessing Trauma and the Matrixial Gaze.” Pp. 123-156 in The Matrixial Borderspace, edited by Brian Massumi. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Eriksson, Birgit, Carsten Stage and Bjarki Valtysson, ed., 2019, Cultures of Participation: Arts, Digital Media and Cultural Institutions. London: Routledge.
Freeman, Barbara, 1995, The Feminine Sublime: Gender and Excess in Women’s Fiction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Goffman, Erving, 1959, “The Moral Career of the Mental Patient.” Psychiatry 22(2): 123-142.
Goodman, Lizbeth, 2003, Contemporary Feminist Theatres: To Each her Own. London: Routledge.
Groys, Boris, 2010, Going Public. Berlin: Sternberg Press.
Groys, Boris, 2016, In the Flow. London & New York: Verso Books.
Habermas, Jürgen, 1991, Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. New York: Polity Press.
Hobfoll, Stevan E., et al., 2007, “Five Essential Elements of Immediate and Mid–term Mass Trauma Intervention: Empirical Evidence.” Psychiatry 70(4): 283-315.
Kast, Verena, 2014, “Complexes and Imagination.” Journal of Analytical Psychology 59(5): 680-694.
Lev-wiesel, Rachel, 1998, “Use of Drawing Technique to Encourage Verbalization in Adult Survivor of Sexual Abuse.” The Arts in Psychotherapy 25(4): 257-261.
Merry, Sally E., 2011, Gender Violence: A Cultural Perspective (Vol. 3). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, 2012, Phenomenology of Perception. Translated by Donald Landes. New York: Routledge.
Murphy, Jenny, ed., 2001, Art Therapy with Young Survivors of Sexual Abuse. East Sussex: Brunner-Routledge.
Hall, Kim Q., 2005, “Queerness, Disability, and the Vagina Monologues.” Hypatia 20(1): 99-119.
Pollock, Griselda, 2010, “Aesthetic Wit(h)nessing in the Era of Trauma.” EurAmerica: A Journal of European and American Studies 40(4): 829-886.
Powell, Leslie, and Sandra L. Faherty, 1990). “Treating Sexually Abused Latency Age Girls – A 20 Aession Treatment Plan Utilizing Group Process and the Creative Arts Therapies.” The Arts in Psychotherapy 17: 35-47.
Rae, Megan, 2012, Theatre of the Oppressed: Transitioning Feminist Pedagogy from Theory to Praxis. Minnesota State University, Mankato.
Rancière, Jacques, 2004, The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible. London & New York: Continuum.
Rancière, Jacques, 2009, “The Method of Equality: An Answer to Some Questions.” Pp. 273-288 in Jacques rancière: History, Politics, Aesthetics. Edit by Edited by Gabriel Rockhill and Philip Watts, Durham: Duke University Press.
Rancière, Jacques, 2010, Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. Trans by Steven Corcoran. London & New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Ridgeway, Cecilia L, Shelley Correll, 2004, “Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations.” Gender & Society 18(4): 510-531.
Schroeder, Ralph, 1996, The Feminist Possibilities of Dramatic Realism. New Jersey: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
Tal, Kalí, 1996, Worlds of Hurt: Reading the Literatures of Trauma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Turner, Victor, 1988, The Anthropology of Performance. New York: P AJ Publications.
Walton, Kendall, 2015, “Fictionality and Imagination—Mind the Gap.” Pp. 17-35, in In Other Shoes: Music, Metaphor, Empathy, Existence. London: Oxford University Press.
Žižek, Slavoj, 1996, “Fantasy as Political Category: A Lacanian Approach,” Journal for the Psychoanalysis of Culture & Society 1: 77-85. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
社會學系
108254013 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108254013 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [社會學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 401301.pdf | | 5846Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
