Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/149063
|
| Title: | 女性主義者的自我認同與親密關係協商策略
Feminist’s Identity and Intimate Relationship Negotiation Strategy |
| Authors: | 雷函霏
Lei, Han-Fei |
| Contributors: | 康庭瑜
Kang, Ting-Yu
雷函霏
Lei, Han-Fei |
| Keywords: | 女性主義
女性主義者
自我認同
親密關係
feminism
feminist
identity
Intimate relationship |
| Date: | 2023 |
| Issue Date: | 2024-01-02 15:35:31 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究從當代女性主義者的自我認同切入，以異性戀親密關係為範疇，探究女性主義者的意識形態、生命經驗及實踐的協商策略。目的有二，於理論方面，豐富女性主義者關於自我認同和親密關係實踐的質化研究；於實務方面，拓展當代的女性主義實踐典範。
採用質化研究的半結構式訪談，結合立意抽樣及滾雪球抽樣方法，共蒐集十五位研究對象的真實經驗及所思所想。前半部分，探析女性主義者建構、展演自我認同的歷程；後半部分，探析女性主義者的自我認同對親密關係實踐的影響及身處於其中的協商策略。
研究發現，女性主義者的自我認同建構過程，會經歷意識啟蒙、認同形塑及展演實踐三個階段。於意識啟蒙階段，個體因為生命經驗而有所體悟；於認同形塑階段，接觸女性主義後，得以解答舊識、打開新知；於展演實踐階段，分別受到自我監控和他人監控。
進入異性戀親密關係後，面對伴侶，研究對象會進行權衡式的協商，以共構認同及共存認同，處理倆人的觀念差異；面對父權結構，研究對象會進行反抗式的協商，藉由放棄傳統女性擁有的好處及爭取傳統女性沒有的好處，反抗潛藏於親密關係中的性別秩序。
This study focused on feminists’ identity and practice in heterosexual intimate relationships, aiming to explore feminist ideologies, life experiences, and their negotiation strategies in practice. The purpose is to enrich qualitative research about feminists’ identity as well as feminists’ practice in intimate relationships. Moreover, it could expand practice models of feminism.
The study results showed that feminists’ construction of identity mainly went through three stages: awareness raised, identity formed, and performance practiced. In the stage of awareness-raising, they were gradually enlightened due to their life experiences; in the stage of identity-forming, they cleared up their confusion and gained knowledge after learning feminism; in the stage of performance-practicing, they’re affected by self-monitoring and monitoring from others.
In heterosexual intimate relationships, when facing their partners, feminists would take two trade-off negotiation strategies to eliminate the differences in gender awareness between their partners and them: co-constructing or co-existing identity. Additionally, when facing patriarchy in heterosexual intimate relationships, feminists would take resistant negotiation strategies by means of splitting the bill, requiring equal domestic division of labor, and expressing consent about body or sex. |
| Reference: | 一、中文書目
王維邦、陳美華（2017）。 〈非常規性實踐的性別化態度：男「性」特權、性別分工和婚家體制的角色〉 。《女學學誌：婦女與性別研究》，40:53-105。
成令方譯（2008）。《性別打結：拆除父權違建》。臺北：群學。（原書：Allan G. Johnson [1997]. The Gender Knot: Unraveling Our Patriarchal Legacy.）
阮曉眉（2018）。 〈愛情的詭計：反思親密關係中的個體化議題〉 。《政治與社會哲學評論》，67:49-102。
余貞誼（2020）。 〈從盤根錯節到開枝散葉：女性主義社會學的扎根與實踐〉 。《台灣社會學》，40:143-153。
余貞誼（2011）。 〈我可能不夠女性主義：女性主義認同與實踐的敘事建構〉 。《台灣社會學》，21:101-156。
巫靜文譯（2021）。《厭女的資格》。臺北：麥田出版。（原書：Kate Manne [2020]. Feminist Media Studies.）
李佩雯（2019）。 〈大學生，性別平等了沒？：異性戀大學生愛情腳本之初探研究〉 。《中華傳播學刊》，35:89-123。
周素鳳譯（2001）。《親密關係的轉變：現代社會的性、愛、 慾》。臺北：巨流。（原書：Anthony Giddens [1992]. The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love & eroticism in modern societies.）。
林秀雲譯（2021）。《社會科學研究方法》。臺北：雙葉書廊。（原書：Earl Babbie [2020]. The Practice of Social Research, 15th ed.）
洪世民譯（2020）。《社會學的想像》。臺北：商業週刊。（原書：Mills, C. W. [2000]. The Sociological Imagination.）
徐江敏、李姚軍譯（1992）。《日常生活中的自我表演》。臺北：桂冠。（原書：Goffman. [1959]. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.）
秦琍琍、李佩雯、蔡鴻濱（2010）。《口語傳播》。新北：威仕曼文化。
陳雅馨譯（2017）。 〈壓迫的五張臉孔〉 。《正義與差異政治》。臺北：商周出版。（原書：Iris Marion Young [1990]. Justice and the Politics of Difference.）
婁美蓮譯（2017）。《不良女性主義者的告白》。新北：木馬文化。（原書：Roxane Gay [2014]. Bad Feminist.）
張娟芬（1999）。 〈人盯人式的父權〉 。《女性主義經典》。臺北：女書文化。
張秀蓉主編（1998）。《口語傳播概論》。臺北：正中。
張慈宜（2019）。 〈質性訪談中的權力關係〉 。《生命敘說與心理傳記學》，7:1-16。
張錦華、劉容玫譯（2001）。《女性主義媒介研究》。臺北：遠流。（原書：Liesbet van Zoonen [1994]. Feminist Media Studies.）
單德興（2020）。《訪談的技藝》。高雄：國立中山大學人文研究中心。
游美惠、蕭昭君（2018）。 〈當代大學生的浪漫愛想像與經驗：兼論情感教育的開展方向〉 。《性別平等教育季刊》，82:35-48。
游美惠（2001）。 〈性別政治〉 。《性別平等教育季刊》，16:93-95。
游美惠、林怡吟（2002）。〈浪漫愛的意識形態〉。《性別平等教育季刊》，20:112-115。
楊士堤譯（2015）。《厭女：日本的女性厭惡》。臺北市：聯合文學。（原書：上野千鶴子 [2010].《女ぎらい》。日本：紀伊國屋書店）
蔡宜文（2013）。《台灣異性戀男女青春羅曼史的性別分析》。國立清華大學社會學研究所碩士論文
蔡宜文（2018）。 〈女性主義者需要為性暴力「負責」嗎？〉 。《婦研縱橫》，108，54-65。
蔡敦浩、王慧蘭、劉育忠（2011）。《敘說探究的第一堂課》。臺北：鼎茂圖書。
潘淑滿（2022）。《質性研究：理論與應用（第二版）》。臺北：心理。
盧蓓恩譯（2000）。《人際溝通：目標本位取向》。臺北：五南。（原書：D. J. Canary & M. J. Cody. [1994] Interpersonal communication: A goals-based Approach.）
顧燕翎主編（2019）。《女性主義理論與流變》。臺北：貓頭鷹出版。
二、西文書目
Anna G. Jónasdóttir & Ann Ferguson (2013). Love: A Question for Feminism in the Twenty-First Century.
Aronson, P. (2003). Feminists or “postfeminists”? Young women’s attitudes toward feminism and gender relations. Gender & Society, 17(6), 903-922.
Baumeister, R. F., & Hutton, D. G. (1987). Self-presentation theory: Self-construction and audience pleasing. In Theories of group behavior (pp. 71-87). Springer, New York, NY.
Berlant, L. (1998). Intimacy: A special issue. Critical inquiry, 24(2), 281-288.
Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological methods & research, 10(2), 141-163.
Budgeon, S. (2001). Emergent feminist (?) identities: Young women and the practice of micropolitics. European Journal of Women's Studies, 8(1), 7-28.
Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. Transaction Publishers.
Downing, N. E., & Roush, K. L. (1985). From passive acceptance to active commitment: A model of feminist identity development for women. The Counseling Psychologist, 13(4), 695-709.
Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. W W Norton & Co.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
Fearon, J. D. (1999). What is identity (as we now use the word). Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
Fitz, C. C., Zucker, A. N., & Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2012). Not all nonlabelers are created equal: Distinguishing between quasi-feminists and neoliberals. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36(3), 274–285.
Frith, H. (2001). Young women, feminism and the future: Dialogues and discoveries. Feminism & Psychology, 11(2), 147-151.
Hooks, bell. 1981. Ain’t I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism. Boston: South End Press. Jaggar, Alison. 1983. Feminist Politics and Human Nature.
Jamieson, L. (1999). Intimacy transformed? A critical look at the ‘pure relationship’. Sociology, 33(3), 477-494.
Janice D. Yoder; Rachelle L. Perry; Ellen Irwin Saal (2007). What Good is a Feminist Identity?: Women’s Feminist Identification and Role Expectations for Intimate and Sexual Relationships. , 57(5-6), 365–372.
Jong, E. (1999) What Do Women Want? London: Bloomsbury.
Jung, E., & Hecht, M. L. (2004). Elaborating the communication theory of identity: Identity gaps and communication outcomes. Communication quarterly, 52(3), 265-283.
Knapp, M. L., Daly, J. A., Albada, K. F., & Miller, G. R. (2002). Background and current trends in the study of interpersonal communication. Handbook of interpersonal communication, 3-20.
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing.
Liss, M., & Erchull, M. J. (2010). Everyone Feels Empowered: Understanding Feminist Self-Labeling. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(1), 85–96.
Locke, K. (2000). Grounded theory in management research. Grounded Theory in Management Research, 1-160.
Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. Handbook of adolescent psychology, 9(11), 159-187.
Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage publications.
McRobbie, A. (2004). Post-feminism and popular culture. Feminist media studies, 4(3), 255-264.
McRobbie, A. (2009). The aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture and social change. Sage.
Michael L. Hecht (1993) 2002—a research odyssey: Toward the development of a communication theory of identity, Communication Monographs, 60:1, 76-82
Millett, K. (2016). Sexual politics. Columbia University Press.
Oksana Yakushko (2007). Do Feminist Women Feel Better About their Lives? Examining Patterns of Feminist Identity Development and Women’s Subjective Well-being. , 57(3-4), 223–234.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two Decades of Developments in Qualitative Inquiry. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice, 1(3), 261–283.
Rose, G. (1997). Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in human geography, 21(3), 305-320.
Rose, S. (2000). Heterosexism and the study of women's romantic and friend relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 56(2), 315-328.
Roy, R. E., Weibust, K. S., & Miller, C. T. (2007). Effects of Stereotypes About Feminists on Feminist Self-Identification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(2), 146–156.
Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. (2007). The F word: Is feminism incompatible with beauty and romance?. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(2), 125-136.
Rudman, L. A., & Phelan, J. E. (2007). The interpersonal power of feminism: Is feminism good for romantic relationships?. Sex Roles, 57(11), 787-799.
Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of sexual behavior, 15(2), 97-120.
Sorell, G. T., & Montgomery, M. J. (2001). Feminist perspectives on Erikson's theory: Their relevance for contemporary identity development research. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 1(2), 97-128.
Stacey, Judith. 1987. Sexism by a subtler name? Postindustrial conditions and postfeminist consciousness in the Silicon Valley. Socialist Review 17 (6): 7-28.
Swann, W. B., & Read, S. J. (1981). Self-verification processes: How we sustain our self-conceptions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17(4), 351–372.
Swann, W. B., Stein-Seroussi, A., & Giesler, R. B. (1992). Why People Self-Verify. Journal of personality and social psychology, 62(3), 392.
Ting-Toomey, S. (2015). Identity negotiation theory. In J. Bennett (Ed.), Sage Encyclopedia of Intercultural Competence, Volume 1 (pp. 418-422).
Twenge, J. M., & Zucker, A. N. (1999). What is a feminist? Evaluations and stereotypes in closed-and open-ended responses. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(3), 591-605.
Wadsworth, B. C., Hecht, M. L., & Jung, E. (2008). The role of identity gaps, discrimination, and acculturation in international students’ educational satisfaction in American classrooms. Communication Education, 57(1), 64-87.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & society, 1(2), 125-151.
三、網路資料
李姿穎（2021年11月）。〈男朋友夢工場〉。《 BIOS monthly 》。取自 https://www.biosmonthly.com/article/10923
康庭瑜（2021年11月）。〈康庭瑜：愛上女性主義者？我老公的三種生存策略〉。《世界走走》。取自 https://www.sehseh.world/article/4123797
康庭瑜（2021年10月）。〈康庭瑜：想去女生不能去的研究場域〉。《鏡好聽》。取自 https://www.mirrorvoice.com.tw/discover/47
黃星樺（2021年12月）。〈一個異男女性主義者的婚姻自白〉。《世界走走》。取自 https://www.sehseh.world/article/4123753
劉亦瓦（2022年10月）。〈成為女性主義者，有什麼用？〉。《世界走走》。取自 https://www.sehseh.world/article/4542172
Olivia（2023年2月）。〈北大女博主與上野千鶴子對談引爭議，結婚女性如何討論女性主義？〉。《端傳媒》。取自 https://theinitium.com/roundtable/20230226-roundtable-zh-Chizuko-Ueno-Beijing-University-blogger-debate |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
110464042 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110464042 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 404201.pdf | | 1666Kb | Adobe PDF | 2 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
