English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46366510      Online Users : 1068
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/149358


    Title: 房價實坪制後公設價格不同計價方式之實證研究
    An empirical study of pricing methods on public space after "actual-use" unit price system
    Authors: 江穎慧;王怡文;張金鶚
    Chiang, Ying-Hui;Wang, Yi-Wen;Chang, Chin-Oh
    Contributors: 地政系
    Keywords: 效用理論;住宅價格;公共設施;公設比
    Utility theory;Housing price;Neighborhood facilities
    Date: 2023-05
    Issue Date: 2024-01-29
    Abstract: 隨著當前住宅價格攀升,大眾對於住宅公設計價方式的討論愈加熱烈,也產生許多說法。目前臺灣對集合住宅價格的計價方式是採虛坪計價(將建物專有與公設面積合併計算住宅價格),反觀香港與日本皆採實坪計價(僅以建物專有面積計算住宅價格)。以特徵價格效用理論觀之,住宅公設帶來的效益也會影響住宅價格,Tse & Love(2000)研究顯示住宅公設為影響房價的因素之一,但實務上該如何採計公共設施的價格才能真正反映其效用?另一方面,內政部則欲提升住宅價格資訊透明度,於不動產交易實價登錄網站中分離專有面積與公設面積價格,惟分離計價方式尚未定論。有鑑於此,本研究欲以不同計價方式釐清住宅公設的價格。本研究資料為臺北大學特定區內19棟集合住宅大樓,於2012年到2017年間的交易資料共1,154筆,並採特徵價格效用理論進行分析。結果顯示,住宅公設對住宅價格有正向影響,然而虛坪計價會高估住宅公設價格;實坪計價會低估住宅公設價格;將專有及公設面積分離計價發現,公設單價約占專有部分單價三成,以此價格比重分別訂定專有、公設面積價格,能夠反映住宅各部分面積的效用價值,解決過去虛坪計價造成的紛爭。此外,該價格比重亦可作為未來不動產實價登錄網站分離住宅專有與公設面積價格之參考,改善住宅價格組成資訊不透明的問題。
    Recently, the pricing method of condominium housing in Taiwan is based on the price includes private part combined shared area(the area of neighborhood facilities) of the building. In contrast, both Hong Kong and Japan are priced only private part of the building. In terms of utility theory, neighborhood facilities also bring benefits, however, it is commonly believed that the private part of the building is much more effective, consequently, the argument of pricing only private part of building has appeared. On the other hand, Taiwan's government is looking for a method to separate the price of private area and the area of neighborhood facilities in order to improve the information of housing price, although the technique has not yet been determined. Tse & Love (2000) showed that neighborhood facilities are the factors affecting housing prices, but how can the pricing of neighborhood facilities reflects utility practically? To answer the question, this study wants to analyze different pricing methods in order to clarify the true value of neighborhood facilities. This study used WLS as model, and selected the sale price of real estate in 19th condominium housing in a specific area of Taipei University, from 2012 to 2017, totally 1,159 data. The study found that neighborhood facilities have positive impact on housing prices, while recent pricing method overestimates neighborhood facilities prices, the pricing methods which priced only private part of the building will underestimate neighborhood facilities prices. On the contrary, the pricing method separating the private area and the area of neighborhood facilities found that neighborhood facilities only account for nearly 30% of the price of the private area. Supposed that housing price will decline when the price is based on the ratio, moreover, the ratio can be used not only as a reference for government to separate the price of private area and the area of neighborhood facilities in the future, improve the information of housing price, but also solve the dispute under recent pricing method.
    Relation: 公共事務評論, Vol.20, No.1, pp.106-128
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[地政學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML38View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback