English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109953/140889 (78%)
Visitors : 46264063      Online Users : 858
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/17460
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/17460


    Title: Toward a Discursive Basis of Public Reason in the Internet World
    論網路時代以論述為基礎的公共理性
    Authors: 陳起行
    Chen, Chi-Shing
    Keywords: 典範移轉;哈伯瑪斯;論述理論;互生性;公共領域;羅斯;公共理性;德沃金,裁判理論;訴訟外爭議解決;線上爭議解決;Paradigm Shift;Juergen Habermas;Discourse Theory;Co-originality;Public Sphere;John Rawls;Public Reason;Ronald Dworkin;Theory of Adjudication;Alternate Dispute Resolution ADR;Online Dispute Resolution
    Date: 2008-04
    Issue Date: 2008-12-18 12:25:33 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 隨資訊科技的發展,法律的改變可以用典範移轉形容之。本文嘗試為未來法律進入下一個典範勾勒出一個可能的路徑。哈伯瑪斯(Juergen Habermas)持續以其互生(co-originality)理論批判羅斯(John Rawls)的公共理性以及德沃金(Ronald Dworkin)的裁判理論。由這個領域的理論對話出發,本文期望能導出未來法院裁判與訴訟外爭議解決機制之間相互辯證的重要性。而如何建構以論述為基礎的網路爭議解決機制便是未來法律邁向新典範的關鍵。A paradigm shift is how the legal change after the advancement of information technology has been described. Looking for the next paradigm, this article suggests an approach to initiate the change. Rawls`s concept of public reason and Dworkin`s theory of adjudication form a consistent chain of thought and are consistently critiqued by the cooriginality thesis of Habermas. The discussions of their theoretical exchanges lead to an idea of public conflict resolution emphasizing the dialectic relationship between the court and alternate dispute resolution. The latter can be a discursive public sphere on the internet which is critical for leading us to the next legal paradigm.
    Relation: 東吳法律學報 , 19(4), 1-30
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    1-30-a.pdf987KbAdobe PDF2266View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback