English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 93954/124402 (76%)
Visitors : 29049492      Online Users : 400
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/20866
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/20866

    Title: 應用模糊統計於A型量表分類之研究
    Other Titles: Application of Fuzzy Statistical Analysis in the Investigation of Classification of Type A
    Authors: 胡悅倫;陳皎眉;吳柏林
    Keywords: 模糊集合 ; 隸屬度函數 ; 模糊分類 ; A型行為傾向;Fuzzy logic ; Membership function ; Fuzzy clustering ; Type A behavior pattern
    Date: 2006-03
    Issue Date: 2008-12-31 10:57:32 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 自陳法乃是評量 A 型行為傾向最普遍的方式。該評量方式通常以總分為基礎,把人分為 A 型與 B 型兩種類別,但是,A 型行為傾向並不是一個整體性的建構,因此,過度簡化地把人分成 A、B 兩類,將造成 A 型行為傾向在預測心血管疾病上不一致的情況。有人建議必須在連續性量尺上,針對某些特定指標作分類,可以解決此一問題,而模糊集合量尺可以是解決此一議題的新方向。 因為模糊集合基本概念,在於人經常處於多元思維狀態。簡單二分法,實在無法精確描述人類多元行為,因此我們考慮將模糊分類應用於 A 型量表分析,以解決過度簡化分類問題。就複雜多變的人類行為或思維體系,以 A 型行為傾向的分類為例,提供一套更精確合理的分析方法與更多的訊息,做出明確細緻的決策。 The most common way to assess type A behavior pattern (TABP) is self-report measure. People were placed in two categories (A and B) based on total score. However, the type A is not a global construct. Therefore, the oversimplified categorical method (A and B) have emerged inconsistency in type A findings which predict coronary endpoints. Some suggests that accessing specific indicators on continuous scale can solve this problem. But, the current alternatives proposed by other researchers are inconvenient in research and practice. Fuzzy logic based on a continuous scale can be a brand new solution for this issue. In this paper we propose a new analytical method for the type A research. The advantages of eveluation with fuzzy statistical analysis include: (i) Evaluation process becomes robust and consistent by reducing the degree of subjectivity of the evaluator. (ii) Self-potentiality is highlighted by indicating individual distinctions. (iii) Provide the evaluators with an encouraging, stimulating, self-reliant guide that emphasizes on individual characteristics. Empirical results demonstrate that our new approach is efficient and more realistic than the traditional clustering did. To demonstrate the effectiveness and advantages of the new method, the results were presented in comparison with those by the traditional method using dualistic and mutually exclusive categorical analyses.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 29(1), 151-181
    Journal of Education & Psychology
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[心理學系] 期刊論文
    [教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    p33.pdf5040KbAdobe PDF9101View/Open

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback