English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 87214/116105 (75%)
Visitors : 23266515      Online Users : 208
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/20874
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/20874


    Title: 中、美大學生在問題解決小團體中團體成績與工作分配策略之比較
    Other Titles: Chinese and American Differences in Group Performance and Strategies in Problem Solving Groups
    Authors: 陳彰儀
    Date: 1984-08
    Issue Date: 2008-12-31 10:58:06 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究之目的是探討美國學生與中國學生所組成之三人小團體,在實驗室進行團體作業(五個拼圖)時,(1)其工作分配策略是否不同;(2)其團體成績是否受不同之動機喚起指導語(運氣或技巧〉而有所差異。根據12個美國學生團體與12個中國學生團體的反應,本研究結果發現在進行團體作業前之問卷謂查中,中國團體認為理想之工作分配策略是較趨於團體取向〈例如三人合作),而美國團體則趨於個人取向〈三人分別做),這個發現支持本研究之假設。但在實際作業時,兩組所用的策略與團體成積在統計上都沒有達到顯著差異。在接受不同指導語時,團體成讀者顯著不間,接受「運氣」指導語之團體比接受「拉巧」指導語之團體在團體成積上較高。接受「運氣」指導語之情況中,美國學生的團體成績明顯優於中國學生的團體成績。上述發現之解釋,本文有詳細的討論。 Under one of two drive-arousing conditions (luck or skill) manipulated within a laboratory setting, 12 Americanand 12 Chinese 3-male-student groups were compared in terms of group strategies and group performan outcomes in solving five jigsaw puzzles. Chinese students were assumedto be more group oriented and cohesive than American students because of their different cultural structures. Results showed that support for the hypotheses was found on measures of anticipated strategies usedby Chinese vs. American groups (p < .05). Chinese' 'groups, as compared to American groups, intended to use more group as opposed to individual orienting strategies. The hypotheses were not confirmed on the actual strategies used and the task Outcome measures. Contrary to the hypo-thesis, groups performed better under the luck condition than the skill condition. Under the luck condition, American groups had better perfor-mance outputs than Chinese groups. Several factors that might accout for this outcome are discussed.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 7, 169-191
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[心理學系] 期刊論文
    [教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    p113.pdf1845KbAdobe PDF1159View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback