English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88987/118697 (75%)
Visitors : 23575401      Online Users : 146
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/24723
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/24723


    Title: 我國會計師受懲戒原因與種類之關聯性分析
    Other Titles: The Association between Professional Deficiencies and Auditor Sanction Types-An Analysis of Auditor's Sanction Cases in Taiwan
    Authors: 俞洪昭;李承易;戚務君
    Yu, Hung-Chao;Chi, Wu-Chun;Lee, Cheng-I
    Keywords: 會計師懲戒;查核證據;財務報表簽證;查核意見;Auditor sanction;Audit evidence;Attestation of financial statements;Audit opinion
    Date: 2000-11
    Issue Date: 2009-01-13 15:48:21 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文的主要目在瞭解懲戒原因與懲戒結果的關聯性,以供主管機關與會計師瞭解哪些懲戒原因是影響懲戒結果的重要因素。本研究發現四項重要結論:第一,從查核疏失而言,無會計師綜合性結論、缺乏足夠之查核證據、未取得客戶聲明書或日期有誤以及未確實參與現金盤點為影響懲戒種類之最常見原因。第二,就事務所提供之服務種類而言,會計師懲戒委員會在決定懲處之輕重時,對於會計師報告使用者為一般大眾之財務報表簽證所作之處罰較其他專業服務為重。第三,從事務所型態而言,會計師懲戒委員會並不會因為事務所型態為獨資或合夥而有懲處程度上的差異。最後,會計師懲戒委員會並不會因為會計師出具之意見不同而有懲處程度上的差異。
    The main purpose of this paper is to examine the association between auditor's professional deficiencies and types of sanction received. A sample of 254 auditor sanction cases during 1988 and 1998 were analyzed using an ordered probit model. The empirical results show several important results. First, the most common deficiencies committed by auditors include a lack of (1) sufficient and competent evidence, (2) physical cash count, (3) management representation letter, and (4) an overall conclusion in auditor's working papers. Second, the service provided by the auditor significantly affects the types of sanction. In particular, the sanction tends to be more severe when the auditor conducts a financial statement audit. Finally, CPA firm type and audit opinion do not significantly affect the types of sanction. Policy implications of these results were also discussed.
    Relation: 風險管理學報,2(2),37-56
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    blank.pdf19KbAdobe PDF822View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback