English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109951/140892 (78%)
Visitors : 46214696      Online Users : 756
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 資訊管理學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/27041
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/27041


    Title: 建構資訊系統整合廠商評量模式-以核心銀行系統為例
    Other Titles: Building IT Vendor Evaluation Model-A Core Banking System Experience
    Authors: 曾淑峰;黃彥穎
    Tseng,Shu-Feng;Huang,Yan-Yin
    Keywords: 核心銀行系統;系統轉型評估;分析層級程序法;Systems Evaluation;Core Banking Systems;Analytical Hierarchy Process
    Date: 2003-07
    Issue Date: 2009-01-17 16:04:54 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究主要目地是建立一個資訊系統整合廠商評量模式,用以進行評估及選擇適當的系統整合廠商。以核心銀行系統轉換為例,經由文獻探討及針對國內某商業銀行的個案研究,我們定義出考量因素分析層級及涵蓋因素。配合分析層級法(Analytical Hierarchy Process)設計問卷,收集銀行資訊管理人員及業務管理人員對於各考量因素兩兩比較的認知,經AHP運算建立層級因素問的權重分派,之後再依受測者樣本分類進行統計分析,作為評估廠商時參考的對象。決策者可根據各自銀行狀況再作權重調整,以此標準評量廠商資料,計算最後評比結果。本研究進一步根據所發展的資訊系統整合廠商評量模式的需求發展一個評量模式建構支援系統,以網頁技術支援評量者分析層級建構及網路問春調查。在應用於各類資訊系統廠商評選時,可依照本研究建議的評量模式,修改分析層級架構,在參考產業認知及層級分析的運算作業下,評選出優良的合作廠商。 Using a core banking system as the example, this study aims to establish an evaluation model and the associated model construction support system to facilitate the vendor evaluation process. We review the literature and identify a group of consideration categories and their included factors. These factors are conformed to real world situations through a case study on a commercial bank at Taiwan. In the following survey, the weight allocation for these consideration factors is investigated from the banking community at Taiwan. A questionnaire based on the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to collect the comparative perceptions for the importance of these consideration factors. Through the AHP, the aggregated evaluation weights are calculated. Statistical analysis is conducted based on the perception differences among different groups of sample. Based on the evaluation model, the decision-makers may adjust the evaluation weights of the consideration factors based on the ad-hoc needs for their banks. The comparative scores of the evaluated vendors are then calculated for the participating vendors. The study contributes to establish an AHP-based evaluation process and the associated model construction support system using the web technologies for the AHP levels construction and questionnaire survey. The similar approach can be applied to other kinds of information systems.
    Relation: 資訊管理學報, 10(1), 23-46
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[資訊管理學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    16085752-200307-10-1-23-46-a[1].pdf1684KbAdobe PDF22596View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback