English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 92429/122733 (75%)
Visitors : 26454037      Online Users : 92
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 新聞學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/29796
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/29796


    Title: 報紙政治新聞小報化傾向初探─《蘋果日報》在台發行前後之比較
    Tabloidization of Political News in Newspapers - Before and After the Publication of Apple Daily in Taiwan
    Authors: 尹俊傑
    Yi,Chun Jeh
    Contributors: 蘇蘅
    Su,Herng
    尹俊傑
    Yi,Chun Jeh
    Keywords: 政治新聞
    小報
    小報化
    客觀報導
    political news
    tabloid
    tabloidization
    objective reporting
    Date: 2007
    Issue Date: 2009-09-11 16:19:48 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 國內報業在開放報禁後逐漸邁入競爭激烈的市場型態,各報先後朝以讀者需求與利潤為依歸的市場導向模式發展,而《蘋果日報》於2003年在台灣發行之後,再度對台灣報業市場產生一次極大衝擊。本研究聚焦在報紙政治新聞,觀察以往以硬性資訊為主的政治新聞在此脈絡下是否也受其影響開始出現或加劇原有的「小報化」傾向。

    本研究以《自由時報》、《中國時報》、《聯合報》三大報的前三版政治新聞做為「非小報」的政治新聞樣本,並以《蘋果日報》在台發行當年、以及前後三年(2000年、2003年與2006年)做為分析期間,採用量化內容分析法,比較這三階段政治新聞的報導形式、內容與風格等面向。

    在形式面,國內報紙政治新聞的報導內文篇幅並沒有顯著的減少跡象,其標題與搭配的照片面積也沒有明顯增大,改變最大之處在於報紙政治新聞搭配刊登照片的新聞比例逐漸提高,使得整體版面呈現出更加視覺圖像導向的「小報化」形式特色。

    在內容面,本研究發現在報導主題的轉變上,關乎政府政策與國會等較具公共性質的新聞量明顯減少、針對政治醜聞的報導明顯增加;然而,聚焦單一政治人物的個人化報導,多年來卻維持一定比例沒有明顯增加,這部分並不吻合「小報化」的新聞主題發展。

    在風格面,政治人物的個人報導朝軟性化發展,含納更多私領域動態或是人情趣味元素;而記者在撰寫特稿與評論時,更容易以明顯字句對特定政治人物或黨派進行負面批評;聚焦政治衝突的新聞量雖然沒有顯著增加,但衝突事件的主角卻也逐漸轉移到政治人物彼此的個人恩怨上。

    最後,本研究以四個客觀性報導處理手法做為觀察指標,檢視國內政治新聞報導是否受「小報化」負面影響而在新聞專業與報導素質上做出讓步。在純淨新聞裡不摻記者個人意見、和明確提供消息來源等基本處理方式上,《蘋果日報》登台前後的政治新聞差異並不大;然而,國內報紙政治新聞的解釋與評論性質報導卻帶有了更多的黨派色彩,且平衡陳述對立意見的報導比例也逐漸減少。
    Apple Daily has made an impact on the strongly competitive newspaper market in Taiwan since its publication in 2003, spilling over tabloid news values into other media outlets. This study focuses solely on traditionally serious and hard political news and sets out to examine whether it has been influenced, or tabloidized, over time.

    Quantitative content analysis on political news items from three largest non-tabloid newspapers - Liberty Times, United Daily and China Times - was carried out and measured at three different levels: form, main topic and style. News samples were randomly selected in 2000, 2003 and 2006.

    In terms of form, more and more political news incorporated visual elements, such as photographs, as means for presenting information, while the page space devoted to text remained relatively stable. As for main topic, the overall decrease of coverage on government, parliament and policies was evident, and the focus has been shifted toward political scandal. With regard to style, the personalized coverage on political figures was done with a more softer approach by focusing more on human interest stories. And personal conflicts of politicians were highlighted in coverage on political conflict.

    Finally, measurement of objective reporting was adopted to gauge whether there was an overall decrease in journalistic standards of political reporting. The results were mixed. While the basic practices of not presenting subjective opinion and anonymous news source were maintained over the period, the news comments have become more partisan and the balanced presentation of conflicting political views has decreased.
    Reference:  中文部分
    于衡(1970)。《新聞採訪》。台北市新聞記者公會。
    方怡文、周慶祥(1999)。《新聞採訪理論與實務》。台北:正中。
    牛隆光(2005)。《電視新聞「小報化」及其守門過程研究》。政治大學新聞研究所博士論文。
    李祖舜(2004)。《擺盪在政治與專業之間:報紙政治記者對新聞實務與專業角色的認知》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
    李貞怡、李秀珠(2006)。〈台灣媒體競爭市場之報紙內容多樣性研究〉,《新聞學研究》,88:135-172。
    何琦瑜(2003)。〈台灣報業大戰開打〉,《天下雜誌知識庫》。上網日期:2003年4月15日,取自http://www.cwk.com.tw/。
    林麗雲(2000)。〈台灣威權政體下「侍從報業」的矛盾與轉型:1949-1999〉,《台灣產業研究》,3:89-148。
    林修卉(2007年8月30日)。〈胡:與妻多結幾次婚 樂趣多〉,《中國時報》,第A6版。
    林政忠、鄭任汶(2007年10月9日)。〈蒸發10天 長仔錄影帶現身〉,《聯合報》,第A1版。
    殷祺譯(2005)。《政治傳播學引論》,北京:新華。(原書McNair, B. [1999]. An introduction to political communication. New York: Routledge.)
    張卉穎(2004)。《蘋果日報對聯合報、中國時報的影響》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
    陳順孝(2004)。〈國內報業經營之道探索-善用「小報」創意、開展「大報」新局〉,《行政院新聞局2003出版年鑑》。取自http://info.gio.gov.tw/Yearbook/92/list-2-p20.htm。
    馮建三(2004)。〈渴望「正常資本主義國家」的八天:分析五家日報2004年總統大選後的新聞〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》,54:277-290。
    黃振家譯(2002)。《大眾媒體研究》。台北:學富。(原書Wimmer, R. D. & Dominick, J. R. (2000). Mass media research: An introduction (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.)
    楊瑪利(2002)。〈弱智媒體〉,《天下雜誌知識庫》。上網日期:2002年4月1日,取自http://www.cwk.com.tw/。
    楊擊譯(2006)。《大眾媒介與社會》,北京:華夏。(原書Curran J. & Gurevitch M. (eds.). [2000]. Mass media and society (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.)
    潘家慶、卜正珉(1990)。〈解嚴前後報紙政治新聞報導的轉變〉,《新聞學研究》,43:85-116。
    鄧麗萍(2005)。《從爭議性政治新聞探討客觀報導與事實建構》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
    劉昌德(2007)。〈媒體倫理的政治經濟學:國家、資本與新聞專業規範的流變〉,《中華傳播學刊》,11:111-154。
    羅世宏、魏玓、馮建三、唐士哲、林麗雲、王菲菲、王賀白譯(2005)。《問題媒體:二十一世紀美國傳播政治》。台北:巨流。(原書McChesney, R. (2004). The problem of the media: U.S. communication politics in 21st century. New York: Monthly Review Press.)
    蘇蘅(2001)。《報紙新聞「小報化」的趨勢分析》。(行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告,NSC 89-2412-H-004-031)。台北:政治大學新聞系。
    蘇蘅(2002)。《競爭時代的報紙:理論與實務》。台北:時英。
    蘇蘅、牛隆光、黃美燕、趙曉男(2000)。〈台灣報紙轉型的問題與挑戰──提供讀者更好的選擇?〉,《新聞學研究》,64:1-32。
     英文部分
    Babbie, E. (2003). The practice of social research (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
    Baum, M. A. (2002). Sex, lies, and war: How soft news brings foreign policy to the inattentive public. American Political Science Review, 96, 91–110.
    Becker, K. (1992). Photojournalism and the tabloid press. In P. Dahlgren & C. Sparks (Eds.), Journalism and popular culture (pp. 130-153). London: Sage.
    Bek, M.G. (2004). Research note: Tabloidization of news media: An analysis of television news in Turkey. European Journal of Communication, 19(3), 371–386.
    Benson, R. & Hallin D.C. (2005). How states, markets and globalization shape the news: The French and American National Press, 1965-1997. Paper presented at the 55th annual conference of the International Communication Association, New York, USA.
    Bird, S. E. (1990). Storytelling on the far side: Journalism and the weekly tabloid. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7, 377-389.
    Bird, S. E. (2002). The audience in everyday life. London: Routlege.
    Brants, K. & Neijens, P. (1998). The infotainment of politics. Political Communication, 15, 149-164.
    Brookes, R. (2000). Tabloidization, media panics, and mad cow disease. In C. Sparks & J. Tulloch (Eds.), Tabloid tales: Global debates over media standards (pp. 195-209). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
    Conboy, M. (2006). Popular politics in a national context. In M. Conboy, Tabloid Britain: Constructing a community through language (pp. 152-184). New York: Routledge.
    Connell, I. (1998). Mistaken identities: Tabloid and broadsheet news. The Public, 5(3), 11-31.
    Corner, J. & Pels, D. (2003). Introduction: The re-styling of politics. In J. Corner & D. Pels (Eds.), Media and the restyling of politics: Consumerism, celebrity, cynicism (pp. 1-18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Delli Carpini, M. & Williams, B. (2001). Let us entertain you: Politics in the new media environment. In L. Bennett & R. Entman (Eds.), Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy (pp. 160-191). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Entman, R.M. & Bennett, W.L. (2001). Communication in the future of democracy: A conclusion. In L. Bennett & R. Entman (Eds.), Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy (pp. 468-480). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Esser, F. (1999). 'Tabloidization' of news: A comparative analysis of Anglo-American and German press journalism. European Journal of Communication, 14(3), 291–324.
    Franklin, B. (1997). Newszak and new media. London: Arnold.
    Graber, D., McQuail, D. & Norris, P. (1998). Introduction: Political communication in a democracy. In D. Graber, D. McQuail & P. Norris (Eds.), The politics of news (pp. 1-16). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
    Gripsund, J. (1992). The aesthetics and the politics of melodrama. In P. Dahlgren & C. Sparks (Eds.), Journalism and popular culture. (pp. 84-95) London: Sage.
    Gripsrud, J. (2000). Tabloidization, popular journalism, and democracy. In C. Sparks & J. Tulloch (Eds.), Tabloid tales: Global debates over media standards (pp. 285-300). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
    Hauttekeete, L., Peersman, W. & Debackere, J. (2002). 'Politics in newspapers: Did you notice anything?' An analysis of the tabloidization of political news in four Flemish newspapers. Tijdschrift voor Sociologie, 23(3-4), 343-369.
    Klein, U. (2000). Tabloidized political coverage in the German Bild-Zeitung. In C. Sparks & J. Tulloch (Eds.), Tabloid tales: Global debates over media standards (pp. 177-194). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
    Macdonald, M. (2000). Rethinking personalization in current affairs journalism. In C. Sparks & J. Tulloch (Eds.), Tabloid tales: Global debates over media standards (pp. 251-266). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
    McLachlan, S. & Golding, P. (2000). Tabloidization in the British press: A quantitative investigation into changes in British newspapers,1952-1997. In C. Sparks & J. Tulloch (Eds.), Tabloid tales: Global debates over media standards (pp. 75-89). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
    McManus, J. (1994). Market-driven journalism: Let the citizen beware? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    McQuail, D. (1992). Media performance: Mass communication and the public interest. London: Sage.
    McQuail, D., Graber, D. & Norris, P. (1998). Conclusion: Challenges for public policy. In D. Graber, D. McQuail & P. Norris (Eds.), The politics of news (pp. 251-257). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
    Mindich, D. T. Z.(1998). Just the facts: How "objectivity" came to define American journalism. New York: New York University Press.
    Moy, P. & Pfau, M. (2000). With malice toward all?: The media and public confidence in democratic institutions. Westport, CT: Praeger.
    Nisbet, M. (2001). That’s infotainment! How soft journalism -- that offers sensationalism, celebrity, crime & the paranormal as news -- undermines the credibility of major media organizations, drives away their core audiences, and hurts democracy. Retrieved March 20, 2007, from Generation sXeptic web site: http://www.csicop.org/genx/infotainment/
    Norris, P. (1997). A virtuous circle: Political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Ornerbring, H. & Jonsson, A. (2004). Tabloid journalism and the public sphere: A historical perspective on tabloid journalism. Journalism Studies, 5(3), 283-295.
    Patterson, T. (2000). Doing well and doing good: How soft news and critical journalism are shrinking the news audience and weakening democracy -- and what news outlets can do about it. The Joan Shorenstein Center for Press, Politics, & Public Policy at Harvard University.
    Plasser, F. (2005). From hard to soft news standards?: How political journalists in different media systems evaluate the shifting quality of news. Press/Politics, 10(2), 47-68.
    Popkin, S. (2006). Changing media, changing politics. Perspectives on Politics, 4(2), 327-341.
    Rooney, D. (2000). Thirty years of competition in the British tabloid press: The Mirror and the Sun 1968-1998. In C. Sparks & J. Tulloch (Eds.), Tabloid tales: Global debates over media standards (pp. 91-109). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
    Schonbach, K. (2000). Does tabloidization make German local newspapers successful? In C. Sparks & J. Tulloch (Eds.), Tabloid tales: Global debates over media standards (pp. 63-74). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
    Sparks, C. (1992). Popular journalism: Theories and practice. In P. Dahlgren & C. Sparks (Eds.), Journalism and popular culture (pp. 24-44). London: Sage.
    Sparks, C. (2000). Introduction: The panic over tabloid news. In C. Sparks & J. Tulloch (Eds.), Tabloid tales: Global debates over media standards (pp. 1-40). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
    Tuchman, G. (1999). Objectivity as strategic ritual: An examination of newsmen’s notion of objectivity. In H. Tumber (Eds.), News: A reader (pp. 297-307). New York: Oxford University Press.
    Tulloch, J. (2000). The eternal recurrence of new journalism. In C. Sparks & J. Tulloch (Eds.), Tabloid tales: Global debates over media standards (pp. 131-146). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
    Underwood, D. & Stamm, K. (1992). Balancing business with journalism: Newsroom policies at 12 West Coast newspapers. Journalism Quarterly, 69(2): 301-317.
    Underwood, D. (1998). Market research and the audience for political news. In D. Graber, D. McQuail & P. Norris (Eds.), The politics of news (pp. 171-192). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
    Uribe, R. & Gunter, B. (2004). The tabloidization of British tabloids. European Journal of Communication, 19(3), 387-402.
    van Zoonen, L., Hermes, J. & Brants, K. (1998). Introduction: of public and popular interests. In K. Brants, J. Hermes & L. van Zoonen (Eds.), The media in question: popular cultures and public interests (pp. 1-6). London: Sage.
    van Zoonen, L. (2003). After Dallas and Dynasty, we have … Democracy: Articulating soap, politics and gender. In J. Corner & D. Pels (Eds.), Media and the restyling of politics: Consumerism, celebrity, cynicism (pp. 99-116). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Vettehen, P.H., Nuijten, C.M., & Peeters, A. (2006). Sensationalism in television news: toward optimal arousal – and beyond. Paper presented at the 56th annual conference of the International Communication Association, Dresden, Germany.
    Vettehen, P.H., Nuijten, K. & Beentjes, H. (2006). Research note: Sensationalism in Dutch current affairs programmes 1992–2001. European Journal of Communication, 21(2), 227–237.
    Westerstahl, J. (1983). Objective news reporting. Communication Research, 10, 403-424.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    新聞研究所
    94451014
    96
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094451014
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[新聞學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML179View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback