English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46336882      Online Users : 1158
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30038


    Title: 台灣高科技廠商市場導向、技術機會主義與創新行為關係之研究
    Authors: 楊佩容
    Contributors: 陳建維
    楊佩容
    Keywords: 技術機會主義
    市場導向
    創新行為
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2009-09-11 17:06:41 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 台灣的高科技產業在全球供應鏈中擁有舉足輕重的地位,亦面臨全球化之下所帶來前所未有的激烈競爭。在此瞬息萬變的環境下,創新已成為支持企業生存,進一步帶來差異化優勢的原動力。而企業內部的策略導向主宰著企業的策略擬定,包括創新策略。其中市場導向被學者認為是現代行銷管理和策略的核心之一,它不僅對組織績效有正向影響,更被認為能透過創新來影響組織績效。技術機會主義是一個新興的概念,對企業採用新技術的能力有正向影響,與技術層面的創新息息相關。本研究創新行為分為製程創新、產品創新與管理創新,旨在探討技術機會主義與市場導向對於企業創新行為的影響,並加入技術變動性與市場變動性作為權變因素,檢視其對企業策略導向與創新行為之間關係的影響。

    本研究以新竹、南港以及內湖等三個科學園區的積體電路、電腦與周邊設備、通訊、光電、精密機械、生物技術等廠商作為實証研究的對象,有效分析樣本廠商共80家。資料蒐集後分別以信度、效度檢定、迴歸分析等方法來進行實證並驗證本研究所提出之各項假設。研究結果發現:(1)技術機會主義對於企業製程創新行為有正向影響,且環境中技術變動性提高會強化該影響效果;市場變動性提高則會減弱影響效果。(2)技術機會主義對於企業產品創新行為有正向影響,環境中技術變動性不會影響該效果,市場變動性提高則會減弱該效果。(3)市場導向對於企業的產品創新行為沒有正向影響,且環境中技術與市場變動性皆不會影響該效果。(4)市場導向對企業的管理創新行為有正向影響,而環境中的技術與市場變動性皆不會影響該效果。
    Reference: 中文部份
    吳明穎,「我國高科技產業經營績效之研究--以上市電子業為例」,1999。
    吳思華,「知識流通對產業創新的影響」,第七屆產業管理研討會,1998。
    吳貴民,「市場導向與學習導向對組織創新與組織績效影響之研究--以台灣生化 相關科技產業為例」,靜宜大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,2003。
    吳毓蘭,「台灣出口績優產業競爭優勢變動之研究」,國立台灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文,1994。
    林文寶,「技術知識整合、知識能量與組織學習對核心競爭力及創新績效關聯性之研究」,國立成功大學企業管理研究所博士論文,2001。
    林秋霞,「技術機會主義與公司績效之關係」,國立政治大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文,2003。
    林義屏,「市場導向、組織學習、組織創新與組織績效間關係之研究--以科學園區資訊電子產業為例」,國立中山大學企業管理學系博士論文,2001。
    洪基超,「創新類型與創新網絡配適對於創新績效影響之研究--以光電產業為例」,輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文,2003。
    胡嘉杰,「台灣高科技產業新產品上市之整合性行銷溝通--產品、品牌及產業影響因素之探討」,國立政治大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文,2003。
    莊博文,「技術能力、行銷能力與組織績效關係之研究」,政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,2004。
    Henard, David H. and David M. Szymanski (2001), "Why Some New Products are More
    Successful than Others", Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 38 No. 3, 362-75.
    Jaworski, Bernard J. and Ajay K. Kohli, (1993) , "Market Orientation: Antecedents and
    Consequences," Journal of Marketing, Vol.57, Iss.3, pp. 53-70.
    Kawaku Atuahene-Gima (1995), "An Exploratory Analysis of the Impact of Market
    Orientation on New Products Performance: A contingency Approach", Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 12 (4), 275-93.
    Kohli, A. K. & Jaworski, B. J. (1990),“Market Orientation: The Construct, Research
    Propositions, and Managerial Implications”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, pp.1-18.
    Kohli, Ajay K., Bernard J. Jaworski, and Ajith Kumar (1993), "MARKOR: A Measure of
    Market Orientation," Journal of Marketing Research, 30(November), 467-77.
    Rohit Deshpande, John.U. Farely, and Frederick. E. Webster (1993), "Corporate Culture, Customer Orientatoin, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57 No. 1, 23-37.
    Kotler, Philip (2000), Marketing Management, 10th ed., Prentice Hall Inc., p.13.
    Kuniyoshi Child and Tadao Kagono (1988), Innovation and the Japanese Management
    System, Berlin:Walter de Gruyter and Co.
    Mansfield, E. (1974), Technology and technological change, Economic Analysis and The
    Multinational Enterprise, George Allen & Unwin, 147-183.
    Mohr , Jakki J. (2001), Marketing of High-Technology Products and Innovations, Upper
    Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall
    Moriarty, Rowland and Thomas Kosnik (1989), "High-tech Marketing: Concepts, Continuity,
    and Change," Sloan Management Review, 7-17
    Naver, John C. and Stanley F. Slater (1990), “The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business
    Ruekert, Robert W. (1992), “Deveoloping a Market Orienation:An Organizational Strategy
    Profitability”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54 No. 4, 20-36.
    Nunnally, Jum. C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, 2nd Edition, NY: McGraw Hill Inc.
    Pierce, Jon L. and Andre L. Delbecq (1997), "Organization Structure, Individual Attitudes
    and Innovation," Academy of Management Review, 2(Jan), 27-37
    Pisano, Gary P (1990), "The R & D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis,"
    Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35 No.1, 153-76.
    Porter, Michael E. (1985), Competitive Advantage, New York:Free Press.
    Rice, Mark P., Gina Colarelli O`Connor, Lois S Peters, Joseph G Morone (1998), "Managing
    Discontinous Innovation", Research Technology Management Vol. 41 No.3, pp. 52-8
    Perspectives,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 9, pp.225-245.
    Schilling, Melissa A. (2002), "Technology Success and Failure in Winner-take-all Market:
    The Impact of Learning Orientation, Timing and Network Externalities," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45 No.2, 389-98.
    Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development. Boston:Harvard
    Business School Press.
    Sethi, Rajesh, Daniel C. Smith, and C. Whan Park.( 2001), "Cross-fuctional product
    development teams, creativity, and the innovativeness of new consumer products", Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 38 No. 1, 73-85.
    Shapiro, Benson P. (1998), "What the Hell Is `Market Orientation`?" Harvard Business
    陳建銘,「台灣高科技產業內部策略導向對新產品上市策略與績效影響之研究」,國立台灣政治大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文,2003。
    Review, Vol. 66 No.4, 119-25.
    Smith, B. L. R. and Claude E. Barfield (1996), Technology, R&D, and the Economy.
    Washington, DC:The Brookings Institution.
    Song, X. Michael and Montoya-Weiss, Mitzi M.(1998), " Critical Development Activities for
    Really New Versus Incremental Products", Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 15 No. 2, 124-35.
    Srinivasan, Raji, Gary L Lilien, and Arvind Rangaswamy (2002), "Technological
    Opportunism and RadicalTechnology Adoption: An Application to E-Business," Journal of Marketing, Vol.66 No. 3, 47-60.
    Trist, E. L.(1981), “The Evolution of Socio-Techniocal Systems as a Conceptual Framwork
    and as an Action Research Program in Perspectives,” Organization Design and Behavior, A.H. Van de Ven and W. F. Joyce, eds New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    Tushman, Michael L. and David A. Nadler (1986), “Organizing For Innovation,”California
    陳國源,「市場導向、製造策略、顧客滿意度對經營績效影響之研究--以台灣汽車零配件產業為例」,國立成功大學管理學院高階管理碩士在職專班 (EMBA)碩士論文,2004。
    Management Review, vol. 28, 74-92.
    Vrakking, Willem J (1990), "The Innovative Organization," Long Range Planning Vol. 23
    No. 2, 94-102.
    Wang, Catherine L. and Ahmed, Pervaiz K. (2004), "The development and Volidation of the
    Organizational Innovativeness Construct using Confirmatory Factor Analysis", European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 7 No.4, 303-13
    Zhou, Kevin Zheng, Chi Kin (Bennett) Yim, and David K. Tse (2005), "The Effects of
    Strategic Orientations on Technology- and Market-Based Breakthrough Innovation", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 69 No. 2, 42-60.
    Zirger, B.J. (1997), "The Influence of Development Experience and Product Innovativeness
    on Product Outcome", Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 9 No. 3, 287-97.
    黃亮樺,「市場導向、新產品開發策略與新產品創新程度之關係研究」,國立台北
    科技大學生產系統工程與管理研究所碩士學位論文,2003。
    蔡忠興,「技術創新活動對經營內涵影響之研究─以大陸台商為例」,大葉大學國際企業管理學系碩士班碩士論文,2004。
    賴鍾慶,「創新能力的來源及其本身技術商品化績效之影響」,國立中興大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文,2003。
    戴泰元,「公司策略、市場導向、推廣活動與績效之關係研究--以台灣電子業為例」,國立台灣政治大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文,1999。
    蘇立暐,「產品創新與市場競爭地位之關係--以台灣行動電話業為例」,逢甲大學企業管理學系碩士班論文,2003。
    蘇奕中,「創新策略之效益分析與評估--以資訊電子業為例」,國立中正大學會計學研究所碩士論文,2003。
    英文部分
    Abernathy W. J., Utterback J. M., 1975, "A Dynamic Model of Process and Product
    Innovation", Omega, 3(6): 639-56.
    Afuah Allen (1998), Innovation Management--Strategies, Implementation, and Profits:
    Oxford University Press
    Andrews, Jonlee. and Daniel C. Smith (1996), "In Search of Marketing Imagination: Factors
    Affecting the Creativity of Marketing Programs for Mature Products", Journal of
    Marketing Research, Vol. 33(2), 17-33.
    Avlonitis, Geroge J, Athanassios Kouremenos and Nicos Tzokas (1994), "Assessing the
    Innovativeness of Organizations and its antecedents: Products Innovstrat", European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 28 No. 11, 5-28.
    Betz, Frederick (1987), Managing Technology-competing Through New Ventures, Innovation,
    and Corporate Research. New York:Prentice Hall.
    Betz, Frederick (1993), Strategic Technology Management. NewYork:McGraw-Hill.
    Chandy, Rajesh K. and Gerard J. Tellis (1998), "Organizing fir Radical Innovation: The
    Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize," Journal of Research, 35 (November), 474-87.
    Chesbrough, Henry William (2003a), Open Innovation. Harvard University Press:
    Cambridge, M.A.
    Chesbrough, Henry William (2003b), “The era of open innovation,” Sloan Management Review, Summer: 35-41.
    Christensen, Clayton M. (1997), The Innovator`s Dilemma. Boston: Harvard Business School
    Press.
    Chuang, Li-Min (2005), "An Empirical Study of the Construction of Measuring Model for
    Organizational Innovation in Taiwanese High-tech Enterprises", Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, Mar, Vol. 6 No. 1 pp.299-304.
    Cooper, Robert G. and Ulricke de Brentani (1991), "New Industrial Financial Services:
    What Distinguishes the Winners", Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 8 No. 2, 75-90.
    Daft, Richard L. and Karl E. Weick (1984), "Toward a Model of Organizations as
    Interpretation Systems," Academy of Management Review," 9(2), 284-95.
    Daft, Richard L.(1978), “A Dual-core Model of Organizational Innovation,” Academy of
    Management Journal, Vol.21, No. 2, 193-210.
    Damanpour, Fariborz, Kathryn A. Szabat, and William M. Evan (1989), “The Relationship
    Between Types of Innovation and Organizational Performance’,” Journal of Management Studies, November, 587-601.
    Day, George S. (1994), “The capabilities of market-driven organizations,” Journal of
    Marketing, Vol. 58 No. 4 , 37-52.
    Drucker, Peter Ferdinand (1985), Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles.
    Heinemann, London.
    Edosomwan, Johnson A. (1989), Integrating Innovation and Technology Management, John
    Willy & Sons, Inc., New York, pp.105-121.
    Ettlie, John E. and William. P. Bridges (1982), "Environmental Uncertainty and
    Organizational Technology Policy,” IEEE Trans. Organizational Management, 29(1), 2-10.
    Frankle, E. G. (1990), Management of Technology Change. Kluwer Academic.
    Freeman, C. (1991). The nature of innovation and the evolution of the productive system. In
    OECD (eds.). Technology and Productivity-the Challenge for Economic Policy. Paris: OECD.
    Garcia, Rosanna and Roger Calantone(2002), "A critical look at technological innovation
    typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management" Vol. 19 No. 2, 110-132.
    Gatignon, Hubert and Jean-Marc Xuereb (1997), "Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New
    Product Performance," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 34 No.1, 77-90.
    Grupp, Hariolf (1998), Foundations of Economics of Innovatoin: Theory, Measurement, and
    Practice, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar PublishingLtd.
    Han, Jin ., Namwoon Kim, and Rajendra K. Srivastava (1998), "Market Orientation and
    Organizational Performance: Is Innovatoin a Missing Link?" Journal of Marketing, Vol. 62 No.4, 30-45.
    Heide, Jan B. and Allen M. Weiss (1995), "Vender Consideration and Swiching Behavior for
    Buyers in High-Technology Markets." Journal of Marketing, Vol. 59 No. 3, 30-43
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營與貿易研究所
    93351031
    94
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093351031
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2278View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback