English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109948/140897 (78%)
Visitors : 46074580      Online Users : 731
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30046


    Title: 併購動機之實證研究—以美國上市上櫃公司為例
    Authors: 鄭帝允
    Contributors: 胡聯國
    鄭帝允
    Keywords: 國內併購動機
    跨國併購動機
    綜效假說
    代理假說
    傲慢假說
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2009-09-11 17:07:34 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   本研究的併購動機主要分為綜效假說、代理假說和傲慢假說。我們以目標公司報酬和總報酬的相關性,以及目標公司報酬和主併公司報酬的相關性來區分此三種假說。併購動機若支持綜效假說,則預期目標公司報酬和總報酬呈正相關,且目標公司報酬也和主併公司報酬呈正相關。併購動機若支持代理假說,則預期目標公司報酬和總報酬呈負相關,且目標公司報酬也和主併公司報酬呈負相關。併購動機若支持傲慢假說,則預期目標公司報酬和總報酬無關,且目標公司報酬和主併公司報酬呈負相關。

      本研究探討美國88件國內併購案以及79件跨國併購案,樣本期間為2000年1月1日到2006年12月31日。根據本研究的實證結果,做出以下結論:

    1、在國內併購案中,併購的動機主要來自綜效假說和傲慢假說。而在跨國併
    購案中,併購的動機主要來自代理假說和傲慢假說。

    2、沒有足夠的證據顯示以傲慢假說為併購的動機會減少公司的價值。

    3、匯率的變動並不影響企業從事跨國併購的動機。
      This paper develops tests to distinguish among the three major motives for M&A:synergy、agency and hubris. We distinguish three hypotheses by observing the correlation between target, acquirer and total gains. If the motive supports the synergy hypothesis, it expects positive correlation between target and total gains. The synergy hypothesis also expects positive correlation between target and acquirer gains. If the motive supports the agency hypothesis, it expects negative correlation between target and total gains. The agency hypothesis also expects negative correlation between target and acquirer gains. If the motive supports the hubris hypothesis, it expects zero correlation between target and total gains. The hubris hypothesis also expects negative correlation between target and acquirer gains.

      This paper treats 88 domestic and 79 cross-boarder cases of M&A over the period of 2000 to 2006 in America. According to the empirical result of the study, the conclusions are stated as follows:

    1. In the domestic cases of M&A, the synergy hypothesis and the hubris hypothesis are the primary motive of M&A. In the cross-boarder cases of M&A, the agency hypothesis and the hubris hypothesis are the primary motive of M&A.

    2. It has no adequate proof to show the motive of M&A flows from the hubris hypothesis may decrease the value of the company.

    3. The variation of the exchange rate has no effect on the motive of cross-boarder M&A.
    Reference: 一、英文部分
    1、Berkovitch, E. and M. P. Narayanan, 1993, Motives for Takeovers: An Empirical Investigation, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 28(3), 347-362.
    2、Bradley, M., A. Desai, and E. Kim, (1988), “Synergistic Gains From Corporate Acquisitions and Their Division Between the Stock-holders of Target and Acquiring Firm,” Journal of Financial Economics, May, pp.3-40.
    3、Firth, M., 1980, Takeovers, Shareholder Returns and the Theory of the Firms, Quarterly Journal of Economics 94, 235-260.
    4、Fama, E. F., 1980, Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm, Journal of Political Economy 88, 288-307.
    5、Jensen, Michael C., 1986, Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers, American Economic Review Proceedings 76, 323-329.
    6、Lewellen, W., C. Loderer, and A. Rosenfeld, 1985, Merger Decisions and Executive Stock Ownership in Acquiring Firms, Journal of Accounting and Economics 7, 209-231.
    7、Malatesta, P., 1983, The wealth effect of merger activity and the objective functions of merging firms, Journal of financial economics 11, 155-181.
    8、Morck, R.,A.Shleifer, and R.W.Vishny,1988, “Management ownership and market valuation: an empirical analysis,” Journal of Financial Economics 20,293-315.
    9、Roll, R. (1986), “The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers.” Journal of Business, 59, pp. 197-216.
    10、Palepu,Bernard,&Healy,2005,Business Analysis&Valuation.
    二、中文部分
    1、伍忠賢(民89年),「企業購併-理論與實務」,台北新陸書局。
    2、李淑芬(民95),「企業購併前後之經營績效研究」,成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班未出版碩士論文。
    3、余尚武及江玉柏(民87),「影響企業購併成敗之因素與策略探討」,經濟情勢暨評論,第四卷第二期,125-141。
    4、吳安妮 (民81),「台灣企業併購動機之實證研究」,管理評論 11卷,
    1-27。
    5、吳啟銘(民89),「企業評價-個案實證分析」,台北智勝文化出版公司。
    6、陳錦堂及沈仰斌(民87),「購併動機之理論與實證:以美國與亞洲之購併歷史為例」,經濟情勢暨評論,第四卷第二期,30-59。
    7、黃仁正(民91),「台灣上市公司併購動機,動機達成程度與經營績效之研究」,東海大學企業管理所未出版碩士論文。
    8、彭素貞(民95),「企業併購策略與併購綜效之實證研究」,台灣科技大學財務金融所未出版碩士論文。
    9、楊天龍(民85),「企業購併動機與績效之探討-以台灣1000大製造業為例」,靜宜大學管理科學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    10、魏郁華(民95),「併購動機:台灣實證研究分析」,元智大學財務金融所未出版碩士論文。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營與貿易研究所
    94351019
    95
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094351019
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2350View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback